Network governance, social capital, and virtue-based forms of corporate social responsibility justify sectoral arrangements organized around reciprocated forms of entrepreneurial accountability to promote best practices of corporate social responsibility benchmarked in near and long terms. Standards of corporate social responsibility require precise elaboration within the contexts of contemporary theories of the firm that specify the normative limits of voluntary business obligations. This article argues that such ethical constraints remain too narrow and suggests how corporate social responsibility might be extended in accordance with eudaimonic principles of social capital and aretaic principles of executive excellence manifested by managerial learning.
Adler, P.S., & Kwon, S.W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17-40.
2.
Beesley, M., & Evans, T. (1978). Corporate social responsibility-A reassessment . London: Croom Helm.
3.
Berle, A.A., & Means, G.C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Macmillan.
4.
Brenner, S.N. & Cochran P.L. (1991). The stakeholder theory of the firm: Implications for business and society theory and research. Second Annual Meeting of the International Association for Business and Society . Utah, Sundance.
5.
Brenner, S.N. (1993). The stakeholder theory of the firm and organizational decision-making: Some propositions and a model. Paper presented at the fourth annual meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, San Diego, CA.
6.
Brenner, S.N., & Cochran, P.L. (1991). The stakeholder theory of the firm: Implications for business and society theory and research. Paper presented at the second annual meeting of the International Association for Business and Society, Sundance, UT.
7.
Brown, C.C. (1979). Beyond the bottom line. New York: Macmillan.
8.
Buber, M. (1980). Good and evil. New York: Prentice Hall.
9.
Calton, J.M., & Payne, S.L. (2003). Coping with paradox: Multistakeholder learning dialogue as a pluralist sensernaking process for addressing messy problems . Business & Society, 42(1), 7-42.
10.
Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
11.
Dahl, R.A. (1972). A prelude to corporate reform. Business and Society Review, 1, 17-21.
12.
Davis, K. (1977). Five propositions for social responsibility. In A. B. Carroll (Ed.), Managing corporate social responsibility (pp.46-51). BostonLittle, Brown.
13.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65-91.
14.
Drucker, P. (1946). The concept of the corporation. New York: The New American Library.
15.
Drucker, P. (1984). The new meaning of corporate social responsibility . California Management Review, 26, 53-63.
16.
Drucker, P. (1993). Post capitalist society. New York: Harper.
17.
Dunfee, T. (1998). The marketplace of morality: First steps toward a theory of moral agency. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(1), 127-145.
18.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of twentieth century business. Oxford, UK: Capstone.
19.
Foster, D., & Jonker, J. (2006). Stakeholder engagement in and beyond the organization . In J. Jonker & M. D. Witte (Eds.), The challenge of organizing and implementing corporate social responsibility (pp. 115-130). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
Galbraith, J.K. (1968). The new industrial estate. London: Penguin.
21.
Galbraith, J.K. (1972). The emerging public corporation. Business and Society Review, 1, 54-56.
22.
Habisch, A. & Moon, J. (2006). Social capital and corporate social responsibility . In J. Jonker and M. d. Witte (Eds.). The challenge of organizing and implementing corporate social responsibility. New York, Palgrave. Macmillan.
23.
Handy, C. (1997). The citizen corporation. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 26-27.
24.
Henderson, D. (2001). Misguided virtue: False notions of corporate social responsibility. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
25.
Jones, R. (2004). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. Personnel Psychology, 57, 1068-1071.
26.
Marsden, C. (2006). In defence of corporate social responsibility . In A. Kakabadse & M. Morsing (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: Reconciling aspiration with application. (pp. 22-39). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
27.
Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping: Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
Nijhof, A., Bruijn, T.D., Fisscher, O., Jonker, J., Karssing, E., & Schoemaker, M. (2006). Learning to be responsible: Developing competences for organization-wide CSR. In J. Jonker & M. D. Witte (Eds.), The challenge of organizing and implementing corporate social responsibility (pp. 148-172). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
29.
Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
30.
Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T.K. (2001). A social science perspective on social capital: social capital and collective action. BlomingtonIndiana University.
31.
Polyani, K. (1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.
32.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, Simon and Schuster .
33.
Roome, N., &. Jonker, J. (2006). The enterprise strategies of european leaders in corporate social responsibility. In Jonker & M. d. Witte.The challenge of organizing and implementing corporate social responsibility (pp. 223-236). New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
Schwartz, P. & Gibb, B. (1999). When good companies do bad things: Responsibility and risk in an age of globalization New York, John Wiley & Sons.
35.
Stocker, M., & Hegeman, E. (1996). Valuing emotions. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue ethics: A pluralistic view. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
37.
Svendsen, A. & Laberge, M. (2006). A new direction for CSR: Engaging networks for whole system change. In J. Jonker and M. d. Witte.The challenge of organizing and implementing corporate social responsibility (pp.131-147). New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
38.
Thurow, L. (1997). The future of capitalism: How today's economic forces shape tomorrow's world (reprint ed.). New York: Penguin.
39.
Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
