An indicator can be defined as a statistic used as part of an assessment exercise. There have been three relatively distinct waves of interest in indicators at the national level. Indicator work creates both opportunities and hazards for federal statistical agencies. Indicators not only increase the accessibility of federal statistics but also expose statistical agencies to charges of partisanship that can jeopardize both the credibility of their products and the agencies’ abilities to accomplish their core mission of collecting data from an increasingly wary public. Managing the tension between the scientific and political dimensions of indicator work involves acknowledging the value-laden nature of indicator development and establishing a clear division of labor, with political entities assuming responsibility for grappling with the most obviously normative issues and statistical agencies limiting their involvement in such work to the provision of statistical scientific expertise.
Alonso, William, and Paul Starr.1982. The political economy of national statistics . Items: The Newsletter of the Social Science Research Council36 (3): 29-35.
Biderman, Albert D.1966. Social indicators and goals. In Social indicators, ed. Raymond A. Bauer, 68-153. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Boston Indicators Project.2009. Transportation: Indicators at-a-glance. The Boston Foundation . Available from www.bostonindicators.org/IndicatorsProject/Transportation/AtAGlance.aspx?id=3552 (accessed July 30, 2009).
5.
Citro, Constance F. 6 October 2006. Functionality and usability of information from the American Community Survey-A CNSTAT Panel Study. Presentation made to the Association of Public Data Users, Washington, DC.
6.
Duncan, Joseph W., and William C. Shelton .1978. Revolution in United States government statistics, 1926-1976. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce and Office of Federal Statistical Policy and Standards .
7.
Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics.2009. America’s Children: Key national indicators of well-being, 2009. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
8.
Fugua, Carolyn J. E.2010. The most intimate collaboration: Business interests and the development of U.S. official statistics. PhD. diss., University of Chicago.
9.
Government Accountability Office (GAO).2004 . Informing our nation: Improving how to understand and assess the USA’s position and progress. GAO-05-1. Washington, DC: GAO.
10.
Gross, Bertram M.1966. Preface: A historical note on social indicators. In Social indicators, ed. Raymond A. Bauer, ix-xviii. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
Henriot, Peter.1970. Political questions about social indicators. Western Political Quarterly23 (2): 235-55.
12.
Institute of Medicine.2009. State of the USA health indicators: Letter report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
13.
Jencks, Christopher.1987. The politics of income measurement. In The politics of numbers, ed. William Alonso and Paul Starr, 83-132. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
14.
Jones, Lyle V., and Ingram Olkin.2004. The nation’s report card: Evolution and perspectives. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation in cooperation with the American Educational Research Association.
15.
Land, Kenneth C.1983. Social indicators. Annual Review of Sociology9:1-26.
16.
McLanahan, S.1995. The consequences of nonmarital childrearing for women, children, and society. In National Center for Health Statistics, Report to Congress on out-of-wedlock childbearing. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
17.
Mitchell, Wesley Clair.1933. Recent social trends in the United States: Report of the President’s Research Committee on Social Trends. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
18.
National Research Council.1999. Grading the nation’s report card: Evaluating NAEP and transforming the assessment of educational progress, ed. James W. Pellegrino, Lee R. Jones, and Karen J. Mitchell.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
19.
National Research Council.2009. Principles and practices for a federal statistical agency, 4th ed., ed. Constance F. Citro, Margaret E. Martin, and Miron L. Straf.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
20.
Patriarca, Silvana.1996. Numbers and nationhood: Writing statistics in nineteenth century Italy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Pira International.2000. Commercial exploitation of Europe’s public sector information. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for the Information Society.
22.
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.1969. Toward a social report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
23.
Van Dusen, Roxann A., ed. 1974. Social indicators, 1973: A review symposium. Washington, DC: Social Science Research Council.
24.
Weiss, Peter.2002. Borders in cyberspace: Conflicting public sector information policies and their economic impact. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
25.
Weitzman, Murray S.1979. An emerging Census Bureau program of social indicator development and application. Public Data Use7 (3/4): 2-7.
