Abstract
Prostacyclin [prostaglandin I2 (PGI2)] activates and sensitizes meningeal sensory afferents. In healthy subjects PGI2 triggers headache in healthy subjects. However, the migraine-eliciting effect of PGI2 has not been systematically studied in patients with migraine. We hypothesized that intravenous infusion of the stable prostacyclin analogue epoprostenol would trigger migraine-like attacks in migraineurs. We infused 10 ng kg−1 min−1 PGI2 or placebo over 25 min in 12 migraineurs without aura in a controlled, double-blind, cross-over study and recorded headache intensity and associated symptons, velocity in the middle cerebral artery (VMCA) and diameter in the superficial temporal artery. In the period 0–14 h, 12 subjects reported headache on PGI2 day compared with three subjects on placebo day (P = 0.004), and six subjects fulfilled the criteria for an experimentally induced migraine-like attack compared with two subjects on placebo (P = 0.219). During infusion and post-infusion phases the AUC under the headache curve on PGI2 was significantly larger than on placebo (P < 0.05). There was a significant VMCA decrease (P = 0.015) and superficial temporal artery diameter increase (P < 0.001) on PGI2 compared with placebo. In conclusion, PGI2 may trigger a migraine-like attack in migraine sufferers. We suggest sensitization of perivascular nociceptors and arterial dilation as the mode of action of PGI2-induced headache and migraine-like attacks.
Introduction
The headache- or migraine-provoking properties of naturally occurring signalling molecules have provided new insights into the pathophysiology of migraine (1). Human models of migraine (2,3) have predicted efficacy of nitric oxide synthase inhibition (4) and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor blockade (5) and subsequently there has been proof of efficacy in Phase II trials of these compounds (6).
Although non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used in the treatment of migraine (7,8), the role of prostanoids in the pathogenesis of migraine and their possible migraine-eliciting effect are not fully clarified. Prostanoids are important inflammatory mediators involved in pain transmission (9). Prostaglandin I2 (PGI2 or prostacyclin) is a member of the prostaglandin family of lipid mediators produced by endothelial cells (10), mast cells (11) and astrocytes (12–15). PGI2 is a potent vasodilator and an important mediator of oedema and inflammatory pain (10). Of particular relevance for headache is the release of PGI2 upon mast cell degranulation (11) causing activation and sensitization of meningeal sensory afferents (16,17). Recently, we examined the headache-eliciting effect of PGI2 in healthy subjects (18). PGI2 induced a mild to moderate headache associated with dilation of cranial arteries (18). Given that headache-inducing substances in healthy volunteers have the potential to induce migraine in migraine sufferers (19), we hypothesized that PGI2 may trigger migraine attacks in migraineurs. PGI2 is a chemically unstable molecule, but a stable analogue is available as a freeze-dried preparation (epoprostenol) for intravenous administration in man (20). Therefore, we studied the migraine-eliciting effect of epoprostenol in patients with migraine without aura in a double-blind crossover study. In addition, we aimed to study the vascular effect of epoprostenol in relation to possible migraine induction.
Design and methods
Main experiment
We recruited 12 patients with migraine without aura (MoA) (four male and eight female) but otherwise healthy, mean age 35.3 years (range 20–53 years). Exclusion criteria were: any other type of headache (except episodic tension-type headache less than three times a month); any daily medication apart from oral contraceptives; serious somatic or psychiatric diseases. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the County of Copenhagen (KA-20060086), Danish Medicines Agency and the Danish Data Protection Agency, and was undertaken in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in Edinburgh in 2000. The study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov and monitored by the Good Clinical Practice unit at Copenhagen University Hospital. All subjects gave informed consent to participate.
Experimental design
In a double blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design, the subjects were randomly allocated to receive PGI2 10 ng kg−1 min−1 or placebo (isotonic saline) over 25 min on 2 days, separated by at least a week. The central pharmacy performed the randomization and prepared the study drug. The randomization code remained in the hospital during the study and was not available to the investigators until the study was complete.
All subjects reported to the laboratory at 08.30 h headache free. The subjects had to be without migraine or tension-type headache 5 days before start of each study day to avoid any sensitization of neurons. Coffee, tea, cocoa, alcohol or other methylxanthine-containing foods or beverages were not allowed for at least 8 h before start of the study. All procedures were performed in a quiet room, and room temperature was noted at the beginning and at the end of each experiment. The subjects were placed in the supine position and a venous catheter (Venflon®) was inserted into the right antecubital vein for infusion. The subjects then rested for 30 min before baseline recordings. After baseline measurements, infusion started using a time and volume controlled infusion pump (Braun Perfusor, Melsungen, Germany). Headache intensity, accompanying symptoms, velocity in the middle cerebral artery (VMCA), diameter of the superficial temporal artery and radial artery, end-tidal partial pressure of pCO2 (PetCO2), adverse events and vital signs were recorded at baseline and then every 10 min until 90 min after start of infusion.
After 90 min the subject was offered bread and lemonade/water to prevent headache caused by hunger or dehydration. The subjects were carefully instructed to complete a headache diary with accompanying symptoms according to the International Headache Society (21), including questions concerning premonitory symptoms (tired, yawning, stiff neck, blurred vision, thirst, intolerant/irritable, emotional, difficulty with concentration, any other symptoms) (22) and allodynia (combing, shaving, shower, cold, earrings, eyeglasses, heat, contact lenses, tight clothes, pillow, ponytail, necklace) (23) and any rescue medication every hour until 12 h after discharge from the hospital. In addition, the subjects were asked if the reported headache mimicked and was located as during a spontaneous migraine attack. Subjects were allowed to take rescue medication of their own choice at any time.
Headache intensity and migraine definition
Headache intensity was repeatedly recorded on a verbal rating scale (VRS) from 0 to 10 [0, no headache; 1, a very mild headache (including a feeling of pressing or throbbing—pre-pain); 10, worst imaginable headache] (24). Headache characteristics and associated symptoms were also recorded to determine the quality, localization (uni- or bilateral) and type of headache.
Headache induced experimentally by infusion of a neurotransmitter can not fulfil strict criteria for MoA (21). First, the migraine-like attacks reported are induced by pharmacological substances and can therefore not be spontaneous, although they often phenotypically mimic spontaneous migraine attacks in the majority of patients (2,3). Second, most spontaneous migraine attacks develop in a matter of hours and often go through a phase where they phenomenologically fulfil the criteria for tension-type headache before the headache gets worse, becomes unilateral and has the associated symptoms required for migraine. For this reason, attacks aborted by migraine-specific treatment were accepted in the new criteria for chronic migraine (25). Patients in experimental provocation studies cannot be denied treatment of the induced attacks and often treat before all migraine criteria are fulfilled. Based on these circumstances, we have used the following two criteria for a migraine-like attack induced 0–14 h after infusion of an experimental drug:
Headache attacks fulfilling either 1 or 2: headache attack fulfilling criteria C (moderate to severe pain intensity is considered ≥ 4 on VRS scale) and D for MoA (21).
Headache attack described as mimicking usual migraine attack and treated with a triptan.
Middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity
VMCA was recorded bilaterally by transcranial Doppler (TCD) with hand-held 2-MHz probes (Multidop X; DWL, Sipplingen, Germany), as previously described (26,27). All recordings were done by the same skilled examiner (T.W.). PetCO2 (end-tidal CO2) was recorded simultaneously to the TCD measurements using an open mask that caused no respiratory resistance (ProPac Encore®; Welch Allyn Protocol, Beaverton, OR, USA). VMCA was corrected for PetCO2 changes by e0.034 per mmHg change in PetCO2 (28).
Diameter of the superficial temporal artery and radial artery
Diameter of the frontal branch of the left superficial temporal artery (STA) and left radial artery was measured by a high-resolution ultrasonography unit (20 MHz, bandwidth 15 MHz; Dermascan C; Cortex Technology, Hadsund, Denmark) as previously described (29,30).
Vital signs
Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure were measured by an auto-inflatable cuff (ProPac Encore®; Welch Allyn Protocol). ECG (Cardiofax V; Nihon-Kohden, Tokyo, Japan) was monitored on an LCD screen and recorded on paper.
Data analysis and statistics
Headache scores are presented as median and quartiles. Vascular baseline values are presented as mean ± S.D. and vascular peak responses as mean including 95% confidence interval, unless otherwise stated. Baseline was beforehand defined as an average of T-10 and T0 before the start of infusion.
We defined an in-hospital phase, consisting of an infusion phase as a period from 0 to 30 min (0–30 min) because of a short half-life (2–4 min) of PGI2 in plasma (31–33), and a postinfusion phase as a period from 30 to 90 min (30–90 min). Furthermore, a post-hospital phase was defined as the period of 1.5–14 h after start of the infusion. Primary end-points were incidence of any headache or reported migraine-like headache (confer criteria for an experimentally induced migraine attack above), and differences in response calculated as area under the curve (AUC) according to the trapezium rule (34) for headache score (AUCheadache), VMCA (AUCVMCA), diameter of STA (AUCSTA) between PGI2 and placebo. Secondary end-points were differences in response in AUCPetCO2, AUCRA, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) (AUCMAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (AUCSBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (AUCDBP), and HR (AUCHR) between PGI2 and placebo. Baseline was subtracted before calculating the AUC to reduce variation between sessions within subject.
To test the differences between incidences we used McNemar's test. To test differences between variables the Wilcoxon signed rank test for headache score and a paired, two-way t-test for vascular data were used. We tested for period and carry-over effects for all baseline variables with Mann–Whitney test and independent t-test. All analyses were performed with
Results
Mean baseline values (±
P-value: paired t-test.
There were no serious adverse events and patients cooperated well. Due to technical problems PetCO2 was missing on subject 1 on the PGI2 day. There was no difference in the VMCA between the left and right sides at baseline on PGI2 (P = 0.522) or placebo (P = 0.268). There was no difference between pain side and non-pain side on PGI2 (P = 0.764) or placebo (P = 0.630) at baseline in subjects reporting unilateral headache. We therefore used an average of the left and the right side. There was no carry-over or period effect for baseline values of headache, VMCA, STA, RA, MAP, SBP, DBP or HR (P > 0.05).
Headache
Details on the PGI2-induced headache or migraine during in- and post-hospital phases are given in Table 2 and Figure 1.
Median (□) and individual active Clinical characteristics of prostaglandin I2-induced headache (localization, intensity/verbal rating scale, quality, aggravation by physical activity) and associated symptoms (nausea, photophobia, phonophobia) in 12 migraineurs without aura Peak headache including onset and cessation of headache, and associated symptoms during in-hospital (min) and out-hospital (hours) phases are shown. Time of onset for headache mimicking a usual migraine attack and time for fulfilling the criteria for migraine are given. In row b and c recorded as migraine if fulfilling the following criteria for a migraine attack; fulfilling criteria C and D for migraine without aura or headache described as mimicking a usual migraine attack and treated with a triptan (see text). The participants were allowed to take medication of their own choice at any time in the out-hospital phase. NS, not stated. a. Spontaneous migraine attack without aura according to the International Headache Society criteria (21). b. In-hospital phase (0–90 min). c. Post-hospital phase (1.5–14 h).
(a) and placebo (x) (b) headache scores on a verbal rating scale (VRS) in migraineurs without aura during and after 25 min infusion of PGI2 (epoprostenol) 10 ng kg−1 min−1 or placebo. There was a significantly higher headache response in the infusion (AUCheadache 0–30 min, P = 0.003) and post-infusion (AUCheadache 30–90 min, P = 0.006) phases on PGI2 day compared with placebo day. There was no difference in delayed headache (AUCDelayed headache, P = 0.866).
In the period 0–14 h, 12 (100%) subjects reported headache on PGI2 day compared with three (25%) subjects on placebo day (P = 0.004, McNemar), and six (50%) subjects fulfilled the criteria for an experimentally induced migraine-like attack compared with two (17%) subjects on placebo (P = 0.219). During the in-hospital phase (0–90 min), 11 (92%) subjects reported headache on the PGI2 compared with two (17%) on placebo (P = 0.004, McNemar), and three subjects (25%) reported migraine-like attacks compared with no subjects on placebo (P = 0.250). During the post-hospital phase (1.5–14 h), seven (58%) subjects reported delayed headache on PGI2 day compared with three (25%) subjects on placebo day (P = 0.125, McNemar), and three (25%) subjects reported migraine-like attacks compared with two (17%) subjects on placebo (P = 1.000). Mean time and range for migraine-like attacks were 30 min in-hospital and 6 h (5–7 h) post-hospital phase. One subject had a headache that started during the in-hospital phase and lasted throughout the post-hospital phase.
During the infusion phase, the AUC0–30 min on PGI2, 25 (15–47.5), was significantly larger than on placebo, 0 (0–0) (P = 0.003) (Fig. 1). During the post-infusion phase, the AUC30–90 min on the PGI2, 35 (6.25–57.5), was significantly larger than on the placebo, 0 (0–0) (P = 0.006) (Figs 1 and 2). The median peak headache, 1 (1–2.75), occurred 20 min after start of PGI2 infusion (Fig. 1a). During the post-hospital phase, there was no difference in AUC1.5–14h between the PGI2, 2.25 (0–6.25), and the placebo days, 0 (0–1.88) (P = 0.866).
We asked patients whether headache reported during and after experiments mimicked their spontaneous migraine attacks. In the period 0–14 h, 10 (83%) subjects reported the headache to mimic a spontaneous attack on the PGI2 day and three (25%) on the placebo day. Furthermore, 11 (92%) subjects reported that headache was located as during a spontaneous attack after PGI2 and two (17%) subjects after placebo.
Individual and mean flow velocities (cm/s) in the middle cerebral arteries (VMCA) during and after 25 min infusion of PGI2 (epoprostenol) 10 ng kg−1 min−1 or placebo in 12 migraineurs without aura. There was a significant difference in the infusion (AUCVMCA 0–30 min, P = 0.015) phase and no difference in the post-infusion (AUCVMCA 30–90 min, P = 0.291) phase after correction for changes in PetCO2.
Middle cerebral artery velocity and diameter
We found a significant decrease in the AUCVMCA on PGI2 compared with placebo during the infusion phase (P < 0.001) and no difference in the post-infusion phase (P = 0.275) (Fig. 3).
Individual and mean diameter (mm) of the superficial temporal artery (STA) during and after 25 min infusion of PGI2 (epoprostenol) 10 ng kg−1 min−1 or placebo in 12 migraineurs without aura. There was a significant difference in the infusion phase (AUCSTA 0–30 min, P < 0.001) and post-infusion (AUCSTA 30–90 min, P = 0.005) phases.
There was a significant difference in the AUCPetCO2 recordings during TCD scans between PGI2 and placebo days during the immediate phase (P = 0.001), but no difference in the post-infusion phase (P = 0.055).
After correction for PetCO2 changes, there was a significant decrease in the AUCVMCA on PGI2 day compared with placebo day during the infusion phase (P = 0.015) and no difference in the post-infusion phase (P = 0.291).
Superficial temporal artery and radial artery
During the infusion phase, the AUCSTA 0–30 min on the PGI2 day was significantly larger than on the placebo day (P < 0.001) (Fig. 4). In the post-infusion phase, the AUCSTA 30–90 min on the PGI2 day was significantly larger than on the placebo day (P = 0.005). There was no difference in AUCRA 0–30 min (P = 0.052) or AUCRA 30–90 min (P = 0.783) between the PGI2 day and the placebo day. See Table 3 for peak responses.
Median headache Maximal responses to PGI2 compared with baseline during the in-hospital phase (0–90 min) for headache (median and quartiles) and vascular responses (mean per cent and 95% CI) Mean blood flow in the middle cerebral artery (VMCA), diameter of the superficial temporal artery (STA), radial artery (RA), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are given.
and mean per cent changes from baseline in the middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity after correction for changes in PetCO2 (VMCA) (□), diameter of the superficial temporal artery (STA) (▴) and radial artery (RA) (○) from baseline during and after 25 min infusion of PGI2 (epoprostenol) 10 ng kg−1 min−1 in 12 migraineurs without aura. Compared with baseline, peak responses occurred at 20 min for headache [1 (1–2.75) (median and quartiles)], 10 min for VMCA [−10.5% (−14.9, 6.0, 95 CI)], 20 min for STA [32.9% (26.4, 39.4, 95% CI)], and 20 min for RA (9.0% (3.7, 14.3, 95% CI)] after infusion start.
Premonitory symptoms and allodynia
During spontaneous migraine attacks 11 subjects usually experienced premonitory symptoms. Five subjects (42%) reported some of their usual premonitory symptoms in the in-hospital phase on the PGI2 day with onset 10–40 min after start of the infusion compared with one subject (8%) reporting usual premonitory symptoms with onset 50 min after start of the infusion on the placebo day (P = 0.125, McNemar). Ten subjects (83%) reported some of their premonitory symptoms in the post-hospital phase on the PGI2 day compared with five subjects (42%) on the placebo day (P = 0.125, McNemar).
Seven out of 12 subjects reported allodynia during their spontaneous migraine attacks. During the in-hospital phase two subjects (17%) reported allodynia on the PGI2 day compared with none on the placebo day (P = 0.500, McNemar). In the post-hospital phase two subjects (17%) reported allodynia on the PGI2 day compared with two subjects (17%) on the placebo day (P = 1.000, McNemar).
Arterial blood pressure and heart rate
We found no difference in MAP between PGI2 and placebo days during either the infusion (AUCMAP 0–30 min, P = 0.351) or the post-infusion phase (AUCMAP 30–90, P = 0.344). There was no difference in SBP in the infusion phase (AUCSBP 0–30 min, P = 0.080), but a significant difference in the post-infusion phase (AUCSBP 30–90 min, P = 0.003). There was a significant difference in DBP in the infusion phase (AUCDBP 0–30 min, P = 0.046) and no difference in the post-infusion phase (AUCDBP 30–90 min, P = 0.701). We found that AUCHR 0–30 min was significantly larger on PGI2 than on placebo during the infusion phase (P < 0.001), but there was no difference in the post-infusion phase (AUCHR 30–90 min, P = 0.980).
Adverse events
Adverse events were recorded every 10 min during the in-hospital phase (0–90 min) during and after 25 min infusion of PGI2 (epoprostenol) 10 ng kg- 1 min- 1 or placebo in 12 migraineurs without aura
Symptoms in italics are usual premonitory symptoms and symptoms assumed to represent allodynia during spontaneous migraine attacks in subjects reporting this adverse event during the in-hospital phase.
McNemar.
Discussion
The major finding of the present study is that PGI2 triggered more headaches than placebo in migraine sufferers and 50% of the patients reported experimentally induced migraine attacks.
PGI2-induced head pain or migraine
In 1981, Peatfield (35) reported that 8 ng kg−1 min−1 of PGI2 induced a migraine-like headache in seven out of eight migraineurs. There was no detailed reporting of headache features in that study, but some of the migraineurs reported a short-lasting headache that stopped after the infusion and mimicked a spontaneous migraine attack. Interestingly, one of the subjects had treated a mild migraine attack before the infusion and reported aggravation of migraine pain and associated symptoms during infusion that returned to pre-infusion intensity after the infusion.
In the present study with a larger dose and detailed reporting, we observed that PGI2 infusion induced a migraine-like headache in half of patients (50%). Interestingly, 75% (n = 9) of the subjects reported headache to mimic a spontaneous attack during the in-hospital phase. Furthermore, 83% of patients reported the headache to be located as during a spontaneous attack and 42% reported their usual premonitory symptoms in the in-hospital phase with onset during or shortly after PGI2. Three of these subjects fulfilled the criteria for an experimentally induced migraine attack without aura. However, we found no statistical difference in pre- or postmonitory symptoms between two experimental days. Therefore, we can not exclude that reported symptoms were unspecific or related to adverse events after infusion. It is possible that a full-blown migraine attack might have occurred if a higher dose or a longer infusion time had been used. In support, we have previously shown a clear dose–response relationship between headache and PGI2 in healthy subjects (18), and we did not observe a plateau in headache intensity within the 25-min infusion. It would be tempting to increase dose or prolong the PGI2 infusion. However, considering the marked side-effects of the present regime, neither a higher dose nor a longer infusion time would be ethically acceptable. Adverse events of PGI2 may to some extent have compromised blindness of the present study, but adverse events were caused by the physiological response to PGI2 and could not have been avoided. The present double-blind approach was the best possible way, although not ideal, of coping with methodological error.
During the post-hospital phase, three patients (25%) treated the migraine-like attacks with a triptan, and all subjects reported pain-free response (Table 2). Four other subjects (33%) reported that sleep successfully terminated headache in the post-hospital phase. Interestingly, three of these subjects reported that headache preceded sleep and mimicked a spontaneous migraine attack. Given that sleep is often a natural abortive of migraine attacks, it could be speculated that these patients aborted the development of a migraine attack by sleeping. Tiredness and sleep may, however, be unspecific in this context, but it is noteworthy that tiredness is the most common non-headache feature during the premonitory, headache and postmonitory phases of a migraine attack (22). Thus, sleeping might affect incidence of reported migraine attacks in the present study.
Experimental mechanical dilation of the internal carotid artery, MCA or STA induces focal head pain in non-migraineurs (36,37), but there has been contradicting report of vasodilation during both spontaneous (30,38) and experimentally induced (2,3,39–41) migraine attacks. Vasodilating substances often induce headache or migraine-like attacks (2,41) and we therefore measure vasoactive responses even though vasodilation in a modern context is considered as an epiphenomenon (17,39,42,43). We have previously examined headache and vascular responses after PGI2 in healthy subjects (18). The incidence of headache (n = 11), median maximal headache intensity [1 on VRS (1–2.75, quartiles)] and STA dilation (38.8%) in healthy subjects are similar to the present data. This may suggest that the physiological effect of PGI2 in humans is not restricted to migraineurs. It appears, however, that patients and healthy subjects may differ in the number of reported unilateral (67% vs. 9%) and throbbing (75% vs. 58%) headaches and decrease in VMCA (−10.5% vs. −4.6%) and incidence of headache in the post-hospital phase (seven vs. four). We have previously seen enhanced arterial responses in migraineurs compared with healthy controls (19,44). One could speculate that hypersensitivity to PGI2 is explained by a small difference in vasodilation or decreased interictal pain thresholds of perivascular nociceptors in migraine sufferers. The post
Possible mechanisms of a PGI2-induced migraine-like attacks
In the last 12 years there has been increased focus on the role of meningeal sensory afferents and mast cells in the generation of migraine pain. The question is, where and how can intravenously administrated PGI2 activate and sensitize sensory afferents relevant for migraine pain? PGI2 acts via a subtype of prostanoid receptors (IP) predominantly coupled to a Gs-type G-protein causing an increase in cAMP (45–47). The cAMP–PKA pathway has been implicated in the generation of headache and migraine-like headache (3,48) and mechanical sensitization of dural nociceptors (49). The trigeminovascular system is considered to be crucial in all aspects of cranial pain and haemodynamics (50) and IP-receptors are expressed in both trigeminal neurons (51) and cerebral arteries (52). It has been shown that pain can be triggered in humans by stimulating the dura mater close to meningeal arteries (36). Mediators like PGI2 released upon mast cell degranulation cause sensitization of dural afferents in animals (16). Moreover, infusion of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1/COX-2 inhibitors blocks sensitization in both meningeal nociceptors (53) and trigeminal ganglion cells (54). PGI2 dose-dependently sensitizes dural afferents directly in both Aδ and C units for at least 30 min after topical application (16). Interestingly, the timing corresponds to the reported headache (median range 10–50 min) in the present study. It should be noticed that PGI2 also dilates cranial arteries via IP-receptors in vascular smooth muscle cells via potassium channels and cAMP–PKA pathway (55–58). It could therefore be speculated that cephalic dilation or changes in vascular tone may contribute to PGI2-induced head pain. We observed a throbbing quality of head pain in most of the migraineurs. Sensitization of dural afferents in the present study may contribute to intracranial mechanical hypersensitivity and contribute to the throbbing quality of pain, as suggested during spontaneous migraine attacks (17). Allodynia was reported by two subjects during the in-hospital phase. This could be due to unspecific side-effects or activation of skin nociceptors, and not, as in spontaneous migraine, to a central sensitization phenomenon, because this would require 2–4 h to develop (59–62). We did not use Quantitative Sensory Testing and the presence of allodynia can not be verified. Interestingly, intravenous infusion of PGI2 in both healthy subjects (18) and migraineurs does not induce general or focal pain in other parts of the body, except a few cases of abdominal pain. It is therefore plausible to suggest that intravenous PGI2 in the dose given is more selective in activating trigeminal perivascular nociceptors and thereby head pain and migraine.
Collectively, these data suggest that PGI2 may cause sensitization of perivascular dural nociceptors via IP-receptors located in peripheral terminals of trigeminal ganglia (51,63). This, together with arterial dilation, may cause migraine-like attacks. Furthermore, it appears that incidence of migraine-like attacks after PGI2 (50%) is quite similar to other models of migraine such as glyceryl trinitrate (50–80%) (2,64–66), calcitonin gene-related peptide (∼33%) (3), histamine (∼70%) (67) and sildenafil (∼80%) (39). Future human and animal research should consider PGI2 as a biomarker to study neurovascular mechanisms relevant to migraine.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
The authors thank laboratory technicians Lene Elkjær and Winnie Grønning for their dedicated and excellent assistance. The study was supported by grants from the Lundbeck Centre of Neurovascular Signaling (LUCENS).
