This paper develops the theoretical underpinnings of conservation "supply " curves (CSCs), and in doing so uncovers several problems with current procedures for their construction. The CSC is shown to be derivable from a production isoquant, and not to be a true supply curve. The traditional algorithm for constructing a CSC from discrete measures is shown to be suboptimal, contrary to prior claims. Omitting conservation measuresfrom consideration can lead to systematic, excessive conservation. The CSC concept is extended from constant-service to constant-utility measures, and an improved approximation is suggested for the cost of conserved energy (CCE) of measures that cause rebound. The appendix provides a formula for CCE that is simple yet more general than the one currently in use, but shows that even with this generalization, CSCs cannot be constructed for a world with fluctuating energy prices.
BlumsteinCarlStoftS. E. (1995). Technical Efficiency, Production Functions and Conservation Supply Curves, POWER Working Paper, FWP-029, University of California Energy Institute, April. Forthcoming in Energy—The International Journal.
2.
BraithwaitSteven D.CavesD.HanserP. (1993). “The Complete and Unabridged Measure of DSM Net Benefits: What We've Been Missing.” Presented at 6th National Demand-Side Management Conference, published by the Electric Power Research Institute.
3.
BrownRichard (1990). Estimates of the Achievable Potential for Electricity Efficiency Improvements in U.S. Residences, masters project for the Energy and Resources Group, University of California, Berkeley, May18.
4.
ChamberlainJohn N.HermanP. (1993). “Why Al. “Good" Economists Reject the RIM Test.” Presented at the 6th National Demand-Side Management Conference, published by the Electric Power Research Institute.
5.
Electric Power Research Institute (1990). Efficient Electricity Use: Estimates of Maximum Energy Savings, EPRI CU-6746, prepared by Barakat &Chamberlin, Inc. Palo Alto, CA. March.
6.
GoldsteinD.MowrisR.DavisB.DolanK. (1990). Initiating Least-Cost Planning in California: Preliminary Methodology and Analysis, Natural Resources Defense Council and the Sierra Club, prepared for the California Energy Commission, Docket No. 88-ER-8, Revised May 10.
7.
HuntingtonHillard G. (1994). “Been top down so long it looks like bottom up to me,” Energy Policy22(10): 833-838.
8.
JoskowPaul L.MarronD. B. (1992). “What Does a Negawatt Really Cost? Evidence from Utility Conservation Programs,” The Energy Journal13(4): 41-74.
9.
KoomeyJ. G.AtkinsonC.MeierA.McMahonJ.BoghosianS.AtkinsonB.TurielI.LevineM.NordmanBruceChanP. (1991). The Potential for Electricity Efficiency Improvements in the U.S. Residential Sector. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. LBD30477, July.
10.
LovinsAmory (1985). “Saving Gigabucks withNegawatts,” Public Utilities Fortnightly, March21.
11.
LovinsA. B.SardinskyR.KiernanP.FlaniganT.BancroftB.ShepardM. M. (1986) Competitek, Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass, Colo..
12.
LovinsAmory B.Hunter LovinsL. (1991). “Least-Cost Climatic Stabilization,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment16:433-531.
13.
MeierAlan K. (1982). Supply Curves of Conserved Energy. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. LBL-14686, May.
14.
MeierA.WrightJ.RosenfeldA. H. (1983). Supplying Energy Through Greater Efficiency, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
15.
New England Energy Policy Council (1987) Power to Spare: A Plan for Increasing New England's Competitiveness Through Energy Efficiency, July.
Northwest Power Planning Council (1991). 1991 Northwest Conservation and Electric Power Plan Volume I, 91-04, April.
18.
Panel on Policy Implications of Greenhouse Wanning (1992). Policy Implications of Greenhouse Warming, pp 171-200, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
RosenfeldA. H. (1993). “Conserved Energy Supply Curves for US Buildings,” Contemporary Policy Issues (11): 45-68.
21.
RubinE. S. (1992). “Realistic Mitigation Options for Global Wanning,” Science, (257):148-149,261-266.
22.
RuffLarry E. (1988). “Least-cost Planning and Demand-side Management: Six Common Fallacies and One Simple Truth,” Public Utilities Fortnightly, 19, April28.
23.
UsibelliA.GardinerB.LuhrsenW.MeierA. (1983). A Residential Conservation Data Base for the Pacific Northwest. Submitted to: Bonneville Power Administration, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. LBL-17055, November.
24.
VarianHal R. (1978). Microeconormc Analysis, New York: W. W. Norton &Company.
