This paper presents an econometric estimation of the "rebound effect" for household vehicle travel in the United States based on analysis of survey data collected by the Energy Information Administration (ELA) at approximately threeyear intervals over a 15-year period. The rebound effect measures the tendency to "take back" potential energy savings from fuel economy improvements as increased travel. Vehicle use models were estimated for one-, two-, three-, four-, and five-vehicle households. The results confirm recent estimates based on national or state-level data: a long-run "take back" of about 20 percent of potential energy savings. Consumer responses to changes in fuel economy or fuel price per gallon appear to be equal and opposite in sign. Recognizing the interdependencies among miles of travel, fuel economy and price is key to obtaining meaningful results.
ArchibaldArchibaldGillinghamRobert (1980). “An Analysis of the Short-Run Consumer Demand for Gasoline Using Household Survey Data.” Review of Economics and Statistics62 (November): 622-628.
2.
ArchibaldArchibaldGillinghamRobert (1981a). “The Distributional Impact of Alternative Gasoline Conservation Policies.” Bell Journal of Economics12(2): 426-444.
3.
ArchibaldArchibaldGillinghamRobert (1981b). “A Decomposition of the Price and Income Elasticities of the Consumer Demand for Gasoline.” Southern Economic Journal47(4): 1021-1031.
4.
BeckerG.S. (1965). “A Theory of the Allocation of Time.” The Economic Journal75(299): 493-517.
5.
BlairR.D.KasermanD.L.TepelR.C. (1984). “The Impact of Improved Mileage on Gasoline Consumption.” Economic Inquiry22: 209-217.
6.
BockstaelBockstaelMcConnellKenneth E. (1981). “Theory and Estimation of Household Production Function for Wildlife Recreation.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management8 (September): 199-214.
7.
BrookesL. (1990). “The Greenhouse Effect: The Fallacies in the Energy Efficiency Solution.” Energy Policy18(2): 199-201.
8.
DahlC.A. (1994). Demand for Transportation Fuels: A Survey of Demand Elasticities and Their Components. Manuscript, Division of Economics and Business, Colorado School of Mines.
9.
DahlC.A. (1986). “Gasoline Demand Survey.” The Energy Journal7(1): 67-82.
10.
DahlC.A.SternerT. (1991). “Analyzing Gasoline Demand Elasticities: A Survey.” Energy Economics13(3): 203-210.
11.
DavisS.C. (1998). Transportation Energy Data Book Edition 18. ORNL-6941, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
12.
GatelyD. (1990). “The U.S. Demand for Highway Travel and Motor Fuel.” The Energy Journal11(3): 59-73.
13.
GoldbergP.K. (1996). Die Effects of the Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency Standards. Working Paper 5673, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
14.
GolobT.F.KimS.RenW. (1996). “How Households Use Different Types of Vehicles: A Structural Driver Allocation and Usage Model.” Transportation Research A30(2): 103-118.
15.
GreeneW.H. (1993). Econometric Analysis: Second Edition. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
16.
GreeneW.H. (1995). LIMDEP Version 7.0. Econometric Software, Inc., Plainview, NY.
17.
GreeneD.L. (1992). “Vehicle Use and Fuel-Economy: How Big Is the ‘Rebound’ Effect?” Die Energy Journal13(1): 117-143.
18.
GreeneD.L. (1990). “CAFE or PRICE: An Analysis of the Effects of Federal Fuel Economy Regulations and Gasoline Price on New Car MPG, 1978-89.” The Energy Journal11(3): 37-57.
19.
GreeneD.L.HuP.S. (1984). “The Influence of the Price of Gasoline on Vehicle Use in Multivehicle Households.” Transportation Research Record 988, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 19-23.
20.
GreeneD.L.KahnJ.GibsonR. (1999). An Econometric Analysis of the Elasticity of Vehicle Travel With Respect to Fuel Cost per Mile Using RTEC Survey Data. ORNL-6950, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
21.
GreeningL.A.GreeneD.L. (1997). Energy Use, Technical Efficiency, and the Rebound Effect: A Review of the Literature. Report to the Office of Policy Analysis and International Affairs, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, December.
22.
GreeningL.A.JengH.T.FormbyJ.ChengD.C. (1995). Use of Region, Life-Cycle, and Role Variables in the Short-Run Estimation of the Demand for Gasoline and Miles Traveled. Working Paper WP-94001, Division of Research and Service, College of Commerce and Business Administration, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
23.
GrubbM.J. (1990). “Energy Efficiency and Economic Fallacies.” Energy Policy18(8): 783-785.
24.
HaughtonJ.SarkerS. (1996). “Gasoline Tax as a Corrective Tax: Estimates for the United States, 1970-1991.” The Energy Journal17(2): 103-126.
25.
HensherD.A.SmithN.C. (1986). “A Structural Model of the Use of Automobiles by Households: A Case Study of Urban Australia.” Transport Reviews6(1): 87-111.
26.
HensherD.A.MilthorpeF.W.SmithN.C. (1990). “The Demand for Vehicle Use in the Urban Household Sector.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy24(2): 119-137.
27.
JonesC.T. (1993). “Another Look at U.S. Passenger Vehicle Use and the ‘Rebound’ Effect from Improved Fuel Efficiency.” The Energy Journal14(4): 99-110.
28.
KhazzoomJ. D. (1980). “Economic Implications of Mandated Efficiency in Standards for Household Appliances.” The Energy Journal1(4): 21-40.
29.
KhazzoomJ.D.ShelbyM.WolcottR. (1990). “The Conflict Between Energy Conservation and Environmental Policy in the U.S. Transportation Sector.” Energy Policy5: 456-458.
30.
ManneringF. (1986). “A Note on Endogenous Variables in Household Vehicle Utilization Equations.” Transportation Research B20(1): 1-6.
31.
ManneringF. (1983). “An Econometric Analysis of Vehicle Use in Multivehicle Households.” Transportation Research A17A(3): 183-189.
32.
ManneringF.HensherD.A. (1987). “Discrete/Continuous Econometric Models and Their Application to Transport Analysis.” Transport Reviews7(3): 227-244.
33.
ManneringF.WinstonC. (1985). “A Dynamic Empirical Analysis of Household Vehicle Ownership and Utilization.” Rand Journal of Economics16(2): 215-236.
34.
MayoJ.W.MathisJ.E. (1988). “The Effectiveness of Mandatory Fuel Efficiency Standards in Reducing the Demand for Gasoline.” Applied Economics20: 211-219.
35.
MurrellD. (1980). Passenger Car Fuel Economy: EPA and Road. EPA 460/3-80-010, Environmental Protection Agency, Motor Vehicle Emission Lab, Ann Arbor Michigan.
36.
NivolaP.S.CrandallR.W. (1995). The Extra Mile. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
37.
OumT.H.Waters IIW.G.YongJ.S. (1992). “Concepts of Price Elasticities of Transport Demand and Recent Empirical Estimates.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy26(2): 139-154.
38.
PickrellD. (1994). Description of VMT Forecasting Procedure for “Car Talk” Baseline Forecasts. Manuscript, U.S. Department of Transportation, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
39.
PollackR.A.WachterM.L. (1975). “The Relevance of the Household Production Function and Its Implications for the Allocation of Time.” Journal of Political Economy83: 255-317.
40.
PullerS.L.GreeningL.A. (1997). “A Decomposition of the Household Adjustment to Gasoline Price Change.” In International Energy Markets: Competition and Policy, Proceedings of the 1817 Annual North American Conference of the international Association of Energy Economists, September 7-10, San Francisco.
41.
PullerS.L.GreeningL.A. (1996). Household Adjustment to Gasoline Price: An Analysis Using Nine Years of U.S. Survey Data. No. LBNL-40015, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.
42.
SchipperL.J.FigueroaM.F.PriceL.EspeyM. (1993). “Mind the Gap: The Vicious Circle of Measuring Automobile Use” Energy Policy21(12): 1173-1190.
43.
TrainK. (1986). Qualitative Choice Analysis: Theory, Econometrics and Application to Automobile Demand. Cambridge, MA:: MIT Press.
44.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (1997). Statistical Abstract of the United States. 117th edition, Washington, DC.
45.
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (1997a). Annual Energy Review 1996. DOE/EIA-0384(96), Washington, DC.
46.
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (1997b). Household Vehicles Energy Consumption 1994. DOE/EIA-0464(94), Washington, DC, August.
47.
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (1985). Consumption Patterns of Household Vehicles 1983. DOE/EIA-0464(83), Washington, DC, January.
48.
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (1983). Consumption Patterns of Household Vehicles, Supplement: January 1981 to September 1981. DOE/EIA-0328, Washington. DC, February.
49.
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (1982). Consumption Patterns of Household Vehicles, June 1979 to December 1980. DOE/EIA-0319, Washington, DC, April.
50.
WallsM.A.KrupnickA.J.HoodH.S. (1993). Estimating the Demand for Vehicle-Miles Traveled Using Household Survey Data: Results from the 1990 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey. Discussion Paper ENR 93-25, Energy and Natural Resources Division, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
