Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) constitutes 90% of pancreatic cancers. PDAC is a complex and devastating disease with only 1%–3% survival rate in five years after the second stage. Treatment of PDAC is complicated due to the tumor microenvironment, changing cell behaviors to the mesenchymal type, altered drug delivery, and drug resistance. Considering that pancreatic cancer shows early invasion and metastasis, critical research is needed to explore different aspects of the disease, such as elaboration of biomarkers, specific signaling pathways, and gene aberration. In this review, we highlight the biomarkers, the fundamental signaling pathways, and their importance in targeted drug delivery for pancreatic cancers.

Keywords

EGFR KRAS PIM mTOR NF-kB PAF EMT MMPs RAGE MYC pancreatic cancer stem cells miRNA pancreatic cancer

Introduction

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by a series of molecular aberrations.¹ Due to the heterogeneity and the complex nature, it is hard to diagnose and treat this malignancy, which has only a 1%–3% survival rate in five years after the second stage.² In most cases, diagnosis occurs in the later stages, with a well-developed, dense, desmoplastic stroma and metastasis to other organs. The spreading of the disease from the pancreas to multiple distant sites renders major surgery impossible. The complexity of the disease manifests as different, patient-specific, aberrant biochemical pathways and makes the treatment challenging. The dense extracellular matrix (desmoplasia) in PDAC leads to early development of hypoxia, expression of inflammatory cytokines and other extracellular components, and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). All of these incriminating factors make drug delivery complicated, resulting in drug resistance and disease relapse.³

Altered gene expression patterns and mutations are frequently observed in PDAC.¹ Gene expression microarray analysis has identified the following three main subtypes of PDAC: classical, quasimesenchymal, and exocrine like. The classical PDAC cells (BxPC3 and CaPan-2) have the characteristic epithelial-like genes, while the quasimesenchymal cells (Panc-1 and MiaPaCa-2) express mesenchymal features. Exocrine-like primary tumor cells overexpress digestive enzymes.⁴ For example, tissue microarray analysis detected the expressions of ABCC3 and TLR2 in AsPC-1, CaPan-1, HPAFII, PSN-1, and SU86.86 pancreatic cancer cell lines. ABCC3 is an ATP-binding cassette mostly observed in the tumor tissues of pancreatic cancer and may be used for cell surface-targeted imaging and delivery of therapeutics.⁵ Discovery of other biomarkers and aberrant biochemical pathways (contributing to tumorigenicity) has made tremendous progress in recent years. Despite the considerable research and clinical studies, PDAC is still a lethal disease. In this review article, we summarize the biomarkers of PDAC and recent developments of targeting several pathways for treating the disease.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a transmembrane glycoprotein of the EGFR family, is overexpressed in 40%–70% of patient samples with pancreatic cancer.^1,6 The ErbB, also known as the human EGFR-1 (HER-1), belongs to the EGFR family. The glycoprotein EGFR has an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain, a transmembrane domain, and an extracellular domain for ligand binding. Interactions of the tumor growth factor-α and EGF with the extracellular domain lead to dimerization and autophosphorylation of EFGR protein, producing downstream signal transduction. Activation of the EGFR kinase stimulates the following two signaling pathways: RAS-RAF-mitogen-activated ERK-activating kinase (MEK)-mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-PTEN-Akt-mTOR-GSK3 (Fig. 1).^7,8

Figure 1.

Signaling pathways stimulated by the activation of EGFR kinase.

The anticancer drugs erlotinib and gefitinib inhibit the autophosphorylation of EFGR tyrosine kinase by competing with adenosine triphosphate in the intracellular domain.⁷ The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved erlotinib as a combination therapy (with gemcitabine) for PDAC. Boeck et al⁹ evaluated the overexpression of EGFR in tumor tissues treated with erlotinib from 181 phase III randomized patients by immunohistochemistry (49% showed EGFR overexpression). Cardnell et al reported that EMT leads to resistance to EGFR inhibitors and metastatic progression of PDAC.¹⁰ Recently, researchers have discovered the role of Na+/H+ exchanger protein NHE1 in promoting EGFR signaling pathway and pancreatic cancer metastasis. The coadministration of cariporide (an NEH1 inhibitor) with erlotinib results in a decreased three-dimensional colony growth and invasion for both classical (BxPC3 and CaPan-2) and quasimesenchymal (Panc-1 and MiaPaCa-2) pancreatic cancer cell lines.¹¹ Anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (eg, cetuximab and panitumumab) inhibit receptor dimerization at the extracellular domain. In a recent phase II clinical study, radiotherapy along with cetuximab increased radiosensitivity in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.¹²

Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral (KRAS) oncogene is a GTPase protein belonging to the RAS gene family.¹³ In 1982, the mutated human RAS gene was found to be activated in cancer.¹⁴ The KRAS proto-oncogene point mutation occurs in 75%–95% of PDAC.¹ The most common mutation is the replacement of glycine with aspartate at position 12 (KrasG12D). KRAS in pancreatic cancer is characterized by the mutation type, allelic ratio, and tumor subtype.^15,16 Tumors with high dependency on KRAS might have poor prognosis.⁴

KRAS oncogene mutation activates the P21 RAS protein and a series of signaling pathways.¹⁷ The RAS protein is located on the inner surface of the cell membrane and binds to guanosine triphosphate (GTP)/guanosine diphosphate (GDP). In the presence of RAS mutation, GTPase cannot undergo transition from the GTP (active) form to GDP (inactive) form, and RAS remains in a permanently active state, resulting in a cascade of downstream activation.¹³ Figure 2 depicts the RAS protein regulation GTP/GDP cycle. Prenylation of the RAS protein increases its capability to interact with cell membrane and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) compartments via the hydrophobic C terminus.¹⁸ Farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyltransferase I, respectively, attach the farnesyl (15 carbon) and geranylgeranyl (20 carbon) isoprenoid lipids to the cysteine residue of RAS protein with the C terminus of CAAX (C: cysteine, A: aliphatic amino acids, and X: usually serine or methionine).^14,18 To inhibit the RAS protein, a farnesyltransferase inhibitor for posttranslational prenylation Tipifarnib (R115777) was investigated in conjunction with gemcitabine in a double-blinded phase III clinical study on advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the results did not show any statistically significant clinical benefit over gemcitabine and placebo.¹⁹ The lack of increased efficacy may be due to the presence of other RAS isoforms (such as non-farnesylated RAS) or the RAS-independent activity of tipifarnib.^17,19

Figure 2.

RAS protein regulation through the GTP/GDP cycle.

Pao et al²⁰ investigated KRAS mutation and the development of drug resistance to monotherapy by EGFR inhibitors (erlotinib and gefitinib) in non-small lung carcinoma. Cotreatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer with erlotinib and gemcitabine did not significantly increase survival, even though 60% of the patients harbored EGFR expression.²¹ Moreover, in a phase II clinical study, treatment with gemcitabine along with cetuximab (an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody) was not more effective than gemcitabine alone.²² Lee et al²³ suggested an alternate mechanism for EGFR signaling in KRAS-mutated pancreatic cancer cells that does not follow the canonical MAPK pathway. Moreover, inactivation of Akt might happen as a result of treatment with an EGFR inhibitor, such as erlotinib.²⁴ Three major signaling pathways, PI3K-3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1-Akt, Raf-Mek-Erk, and Ral-GEFs, are affected by the KRAS oncogene in PDAC.^4,25,26 The PI3K-3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 downstream pathway is mostly dominant in Kras-driven PDAC.^26,27 Inhibition of tumor growth was demonstrated by blocking and deletion of Pdk-1 in the PI3K pathway in a Kras-engineered mouse model.²⁶ Collins et al²⁸ reported a mouse model of on and off Kras oncogene that developed metastatic PDAC. Inhibition of the MEK-ERK pathway using AZD-6224 in combination with glycosphingolipid synthesis inhibitor 1-Phenyl-2-decanoyl-amino-3-morpholino-1-propanol (PDMP) induced apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer.²⁹ Recently, Lindberg et al ruled out the effect of EGFR and HER-2 signaling pathways on the growth of patient-derived PDAC xenograft (PDX) using mice bearing wild-type and mutant Kras alleles. Coadmin-istration of panitumumab (anti-EGFR antibody) and trastu-zumab (anti-HRE2 antibody) synergistically enhanced the anticancer effect of trametinib (an MEK inhibitor) in PDX mouse models.¹ Khvalevsky et al developed the biodegradable polymer matrix Local Drug EluteR (LODER) to encapsulate Kras G12D siRNA. LODER drug eluter inhibited tumor growth by decreasing the Kras expression in an orthotopic mouse model of PDAC.³⁰

Matrix Metalloproteinases

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are zinc-dependent endopeptidases of the metzincin superfamily and degrade extracellular matrix. Therefore, they have a significant role in tissue remodeling and tumor progression in pancreatic cancer. Overexpression of MMP-1 (collagenase), MMP-2 (gelatinases-A), MMP-7 (matrilysin), MMP-9 (gelatinase-B), MMP-10, MMP-11 (stromelysin), and MMP-13 (collagenase) is observed in pancreatic cancer.^31–33

Since MMPs play a key role in altering cell behavior, inhibition of MMPs is an attractive approach for anticancer therapy. Small synthetic metalloproteinase inhibitors showed promising results in preclinical studies but failed in phase III clinical trials due to lack of specificity.³⁴ We recently reported MMP-9-triggered release of the anticancer drug gemcitabine from liposomes. The liposomes presented a layer of polyethylene glycol on the surface for long circulation and accumulation in the tumor by the enhanced permeation and retention effect. At the tumor site, the enhanced concentration of the reducing agent glutathione reductively removed the polyethylene glycol layer and exposed the substrate peptides toward MMP-9-mediated hydrolysis. The loss of liposomal structural integrity led to the rapid release of encapsulated gemcitabine and reduction in xenograft pancreatic tumor volume in mice.³⁵ Munshi et al³⁶ reported that increased collagen leads to the overexpression of MMP-14 (MT1-MMP) in the desmoplastic regions of pancreatic cancer, causing tumor progression and gemcitabine resistance. Srivastava et al³⁷ reported the inhibition of MMP-2, −7, −9, and −12 by epigallocatechin-3-gallate (extracted from green tea) in vitro and xenograft mouse model of pancreatic cancer.

Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts

The membrane-associated receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE) belongs to immunoglobulin-like receptor family. RAGE is present in normal cells, such as epithelial cells, neurons, smooth muscle cells, and hepatocytes. The expression is upregulated in cancers and diverse types of diseases, including diabetes, Alzheimer's, osteoarthritis, and cardiovascular.³⁸ Several signaling cascades (eg, PI3K-Akt, MAPK, and small GTPase) are activated upon stimulation by binding of the ligands S100P, S100A4, and S100A6 to the RAGE. Overexpression of the ligands S100P and S100A6 are reported in pancreatic cancer. In a recent study, the administration of 5-methyl cromolyn (an S100 inhibitor) resulted in the reduction of tumor growth and metastasis in an orthotopic mouse model of PDAC.³⁹

Nuclear Factor Kappa B

The nuclear transcription factor kappa B (NF-kB) belongs to the Rel/NF-kB protein and has significant roles in targeting genes for encoding cytokines, cell growth, cell molecule adhesion, apoptosis, and inflammatory responses.⁴⁰ Overactivation of NF-kB pathway is observed in 70% of pancreatic cancer cell lines.⁴¹ In most cases, the noncanonical NF-kB pathway overexpression is present in PDAC.⁴² Small molecule inhibitors for NF-kB have not yet progressed to the clinical trials. However, several researchers have studied the inhibitory effects of curcumin (extracted from turmeric) on the expression of NF-kB using in vitro and in vivo models of pancreatic cancer.^43,44 Kurzrock et al⁴⁵ reported the inhibition of NF-kB and reduced toxicity for advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with 8 g of oral curcumin (phase II clinical trial).

Mammalian Target of Rapamycin

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a serine/threonine-associated PI3K signaling pathway responsible for cell proliferation, growth, and survival. The mTOR pathway is deregulated in several cancers, including PDAC.⁴⁶ Moreover, the mTOR pathway activation has been observed in pancreatic cancer stem cells (PCSCs).⁴⁷ The FDA has approved an mTOR inhibitor (Afinitor) to treat subependymal giant cell astrocytoma (SEGA) associated with tuberous sclerosis (TS) and renal cancer carcinoma. Morran et al⁴⁸ demonstrated that the FDA-approved mTOR inhibitor rapamycin along with gemcitabine decreased the tumor size and proliferation in a PTEN-deficient, mouse strain with KRasG21D mutation (KC model) of pancreatic cancer. Coadministration of rapamycin and the PI3K inhibitor LY294002 impeded the proliferation and growth of PCSCs by blocking the PI3K-mTOR signaling pathway.⁴⁹

Proto-oncogene Serine/Threonine-protein Kinase

Proto-oncogene serine/threonine-protein kinase (PIM) proteins belong to serine/threonine kinase family and are upregulated in several tumors, eg, sarcoma, hepatocellular cancer, prostate cancer, and PDAC. Specifically, PIM1 and PIM3 are overexpressed in pancreatic cancer.⁵⁰ Moreover, hypoxia and Kras oncogene regulate the PIM proteins. The PIM regulates several signaling pathways in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis. The shRNA-mediated knockdown of PIM1 in MIAPaCa-2 and Capan-1 pancreatic cancer cell lines revealed that the PIM1 protein plays a significant role in anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent growth, invasion, and radioresistance for pancreatic cancer cells.⁵¹

V-MYC Avian Myelocytomatosis Viral Oncogene

V-MYC avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene (MYC) protein is a transcriptional factor and has an important role in genetic and epigenetic regulations of PDAC.⁵² The overexpression of Myc was observed in 32% of primary and 29% of metastatic pancreatic tumors.⁵³ Myc accelerates metabolism and proliferation of tumor cells and angiogenesis.⁵² Zhou et al⁵⁴ demonstrated the expression of Myc in multipotent progenitor cells during differentiation into the exocrine and endocrine cells in pancreatic organogenesis. Impeding the c-Myc in pdx1⁺ multipotent progenitor cells resulted in altered differentiation and reduced proliferation of exocrine and endocrine pancreatic cells in a mouse model.⁵⁵ Several signaling pathways, such as PI3K-Akt, RAS-MAPK, cyclin-dependent kinase 2, and NF-kB, have a role in posttranslational alteration of Myc.⁵²

Platelet-Activating Factor

Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is involved in the phospholipid-regulating MAPK signaling pathway. PAF overexpression in pancreatic cancer leads to cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Jun et al⁵⁶ demonstrated that the PAF ectopic activation of the MAPK signaling occurred via the activation of LAM TOR3 pathway, causing neoplasia in pancreatic cancer.

Cell Surface Antigen CD109

CD109, a glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoprotein, was recognized as a cell surface antigen on some normal hematopoietic and metpoietic tumor cells.⁵⁷ CD109 engages in the EGF signaling in SK-MG-1 glioblastoma cells.⁵⁸ The cell surface glycoprotein CD109 was identified in BxPC3 cells from primary pancreatic cancer. CD109 glycoprotein is expressed in the BxPC3, MIACaPa-2, and Panc-1 cell lines. Also, CD109 overexpression was observed in PDAC. The expression of CD109 was evaluated in normal pancreatic tissues and PDAC samples by cell-surface capture technique and immunohistochemistry.⁵⁹

PCSC Biomarkers

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are inherently immortalized, can self-renew, asymmetrically divide, and differentiate into stem cells. Discovery of PCSCs was first reported in 2007.⁶⁰ PCSCs contribute to tumor progression, metastasis, and resistance to common chemotherapy.⁶¹ Although several cell surface markers, such as CD133, C-Met, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1), and “side population cells and the triplet combination CD44+CD24+ESA+,”⁶² have been reported, none is unique to the PCSCs (Table 1).⁶¹ Molejon et al^63,64 reported the high expression of the cell surface marker CD44 in recurrent PDAC. Maeda et al⁶⁵ reported that high expression of the cell surface marker CD133 reduced patient survival to 2.1 months, in contrast to 23.5 months when the marker is not expressed at a high level. Pancreatic cancer cells characterized by CD44⁺CD24⁺ESA⁺ on their surface showed resistance to gemcitabine and radiotherapy.⁶⁶ Hong et al⁶⁷ reported that CD44 has a key role in gemcitabine resistance in PCSCs.

Table 1.

Surface markers of pancreatic cancer stem cells.

CELL SURFACE MARKER	PERCENTAGE	CHARACTERISTICS
CD133	1.09–3.21%	Tumorigenicity and metastasis
C-Met	2–16%	Tumor growth and metastasis
ALDH-1	16%	Tumorigenicity and tumor-initiation
CD44+CD24+ ESA+	0.2–0.8%	Tumorigenicity and self-renewal

Various cellular signaling pathways, such as Notch, Wnt, and hedgehog, can facilitate the formation of stem cells in pancreatic cancer.⁶⁸ Sonic hedgehog is usually overexpressed in pancreatic tissues and PCSCs. Deregulation of sonic hedgehog pathway causes pathogenesis and desmoplasia in PDAC.⁶⁹ Cyclopamine, IPI-269609, and GDC-0449 are hedgehog inhibitors. Cyclopamine inhibits PCSCs and reduces endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in vitro and in vivo.⁶⁹ Moreover, expression of the cell surface biomarkers CD133 and CD44 decreases in gemcitabine-resistant cells after cyclopamine therapy.⁷⁰ Feldmann et al⁷¹ reported that in an orthotopic xenograft model of PDAC, treatment with cyclopamine and gemcitabine decreased the expression of ALDH, resulting in reduced invasion of PDAC.

The Notch signaling pathway has important roles in cellular differentiation, apoptosis, stem cell regeneration, EMT, drug resistance, and tumorigenesis.⁷² The Notch signaling pathway proteins are overexpressed in pancreatic cancer cells and PCSCs.^68,73 Notch acts as the tumor suppressor in the skin and small cell carcinomas but as an oncogenic protein in pancreatic cancer.⁷³ Notch signaling pathway is activated through γ-secretase. The γ-secretase inhibitor MRK-003 can be used to block the Notch signaling pathway in pancreatic cancer. Coadministration of MRK-003 and gemcitabine resulted in reduced tumor size in PDAC xenograft model.⁷⁴

Another cell surface biomarker of CSCs is the tyrosine kinase C-Met. Cabozantinib, a C-Met inhibitor, impedes sphere formation and escalates apoptosis via downregulation of C-Met, CD 133, and SOX2 in PCSCs.⁷⁵ Cotreatment of XL184 (a C-Met inhibitor) with gemcitabine or XL184 alone reduced cell proliferation and growth of PCSC in NOD-SCID mice.⁷⁶ Recent research by Singh et al⁷⁷ reported that PAK4 (p-21 activated kinase 4, serine/threonine kinase family) activates the STAT3 signaling pathway, resulting in a stemness phenotype. In addition, they demonstrated that the PAK4 overexpression in PCSCs compared to the non-CSCs is associated with chemotherapy resistance and sphere formation.

Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition

Through the process of EMT, epithelial cells lose their normal characteristics, such as apical-basal polarity, cell-cell tight junctions, and transition to spindle-like, motile, and invasive mesenchymal cells.⁷⁸ EMTs can be of the following three types: Type I (embryogenesis), Type II (wound healing and organ fibrosis), and Type III (cancer).⁷⁹ In addition to embryogenesis and wound healing,⁸⁰ EMT plays pivotal roles in metastasis and drug resistance in pancreatic and other cancers.⁸¹ Due to the EMT in pancreatic cancer, epithelial cells downregulate E-cadherin and upregulate vimentin, N-cadherin, and fibronectin.⁷⁸ For pancreatic cancer patients with EMT in the primary tumor, 75% showed metastasis to the lungs and liver.⁸² Tumor microenvironmental factors, such as hypoxia, inflammatory cytokines, extracellular components, and mechanical characters contribute to EMT progression.³ The inflammatory cytokines' transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-1, and interleukin-6 cause progression of EMT in PDAC.³ The TGFβ signaling pathway can act either as a tumor suppressor or as a tumor promoter, depending on the stage of PDAC.⁸³ The TGFβ signaling pathway leads to apoptosis in the early phases of the tumor but in later stages contributes to tumor progression and invasion via EMT.⁸⁴

The TGFβ signaling pathway upregulates TWIST1, SNAIL1, and SNAIL2 transcription factors.³ TGFβ pathway inhibitors, such as trabedersen (AP12009) and galunisertib (LY2157299), decreased metastasis and invasion in animal model studies and clinical trials.^85,86 In contrast, the TGFβ inhibitors SB431542 and galunisertib showed opposite effects when the Panc-1 cells and normal fibroblasts (VI-38) were cocultured in a three-dimensional collagen gel. The Panc-1 cells showed rapid invasion, changes in morphology, and EMT after treatment with TGFβ inhibitors. It is possible that the secreted hepatocyte growth factor from the fibroblasts and the cancer cells (in response to TGFβ inhibitors) cause invasion and cell proliferation of the Panc-1 cells into the collagen gel.⁸⁷

MicroRNAs in Pancreatic Cancer

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, single-stranded, noncoding, 20–25 nucleotide RNA sequences with regulatory effects on gene expressions and in several physiological and pathological processes.⁸⁸ miRNAs behave as tumor suppressors and oncogenes in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Overexpression of the oncogene miRNAs (oncomir) increases in tumor progression, while tumor suppressors inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis.⁸⁹ The miRNAs are expressed selectively in the tumor tissues⁹⁰ and inactivate the tumor suppressor genes p53, p16, and SMAD4 in pancreatic cancer.⁹¹

The miR-21 is upregulated in pancreatic cell lines and tissue and decreases survival rate significantly.⁹² The miR-21 overexpression is reported as the lesion initiator, causing tumor progression in a KRAS (G12D) mouse model.⁹² The miR-155 is also upregulated in pancreatic cancer and contributes to tumor progression. Knockdown of miR-155 downregulates EGFR, KRAS, and MT1-MMP expressions, leading to inhibition of cell proliferation.⁹³ The upregulation of miR-221 in pancreatic cancer leads to distant metastasis and unresectable tumors.⁹⁴

Point mutation of p53 is present in 50%–70% of human pancreatic cancers.⁹⁵ The p53 facilitates transcription of a vast number of miRNAs. Stress signaling in cells induced by hypoxia and starvation upregulates p53 and activates the expressions of several genes, such as miR-107, −34a/b/c, and miR-34. The expressed miRNAs modulate apoptosis and inhibit hypoxia in PDAC.^91,96 Mutation of p53 mediates transcription of miR-130b and miR-155, modifies the expressions of the corresponding target genes (ZEB1 and ZNF652), and leads to cell proliferation and invasion in several cancers.^97,98 In addition, p53 mutation impairs maturation of miR-145 and miR-16-1 causing cell proliferation, invasion, and migration in PDAC.⁹¹

Hypermethylation of the DNA regions coding for the miRNAs suppresses their expressions. For example, the miRNA-124 genes in pancreatic cancer tissues are silenced via hypermethylation, resulting in cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and decreased survival rates. Silencing of miRNA-124 occurs via downregulation of Rac1, proceeding to the inactivation of the MKK4-JNK-c-Jun pathway.⁹⁹ miRNA-200a and miR-205 are downregulated during EMT in PDAC in response to TGFβ. Expression of the miR-200 family mediates regulation of the E-cadherin and suppresses transcriptions of ZEB1 and SIP1.¹⁰⁰ Wellner et al¹⁰¹ demonstrated that ZEB1 inhibits the expression of the miRNA-200 family and regulates the activation of EMT in PCSCs. The down- and upregulated miRNAs in pancreatic cancer are summarized in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2.

Downregulated miRNA genes in pancreatic cancer.

miRNA	TARGET	PATHWAY	REFERENCE
miR-96	KRAS, AKT	KRAS, PI3K-AKT	113
mi-126	KRAS, CRK	KRAS	114
mi-217	KRAS, AKT	KRAS, PI3K-AKT	115
Let-7	KRAS, RREB1	KRAS	114
miR-144	Notch-1	Notch	116
miR-148	MAPK	Cell cycle	116
miR-34a	CDK6	Cell cycle	117
miR-3548	Gli-1	Hedgehog	118

Table 3.

Upregulated miRNA genes in pancreatic cancer

miRNA	TARGET	PATHWAY	REFERENCE
miR-21	PTEN, PDCD4	KRAS	119
mi-210	NPTX-1, EFNA3	Angiogenesis	120
mi-155	HIF-1a, VEZF1	Angiogenesis	121
miR-222	c-kit, VEZF2, ANGPTL2	Angiogenesis	121
miR-203	EphA2, EphB7	Angiogenesis	121
miR-132	Rb1	Cell cycle	122
miR-212	Rb1	Cell cycle	122

Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

Diagnostic staging of pancreatic cancer is the key to the treatment of the disease. Computed tomography is routinely used to determine the tumor stage and the resectability. Tumor characteristics, such as size, vascularity, lymphatic node, locations, and degree of metastasis, ascertain the success of the surgery.¹⁰² The carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in body fluids is a biomarker for diagnosis, prognosis, and determining chemotherapy response for pancreatic adenocarcinoma, albeit not specific for the disease.^103,104 Table 4 shows the validated serum biomarkers for pancreatic cancer.¹⁰³ Chemotherapy and radiation still are the primary treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Surgical removal of the tumor followed by six months of gemcitabine treatment increased the median patient survival to 22.8 months and the one-year survival to 70%.¹⁰⁵ Locally advanced pancreatic cancer is treated with an initial chemotherapy and subsequent 5-fluorouracil chemoradiation.¹⁰⁶ Several clinical trials also show promising results (Table 5). In the CONKO-001 randomized, multicenter trial, patients with completely resectable tumors were treated for six months with gemcitabine (following surgery). The gemcitabine treatment showed the median disease-free survival of 13.4% (confidence interval 95%) compared to 6.7% (confidence interval 95%) for the nontreated group.¹⁰⁵ Clinical trials also suggest that the combination of gemcitabine and fluorouracil derivatives (CAP/S-1) improve the one-year survival rates compared to monotherapy with the drugs.¹⁰⁷ Gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX (FOL: folinic acid, F: 5-fluorouracil, IRIN: irinotecan hydrochloride, OX: oxaliplatin) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel are the suggested treatments for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.^108–110

Table 4.

Serum biomarkers in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

TUMOR MARKERS	SPECIFICITY	SENSITIVITY	REFERENCE
CA19-9	70-90%	70-95%	104
CA-50	34-90%	65-95%	123
CA-242	65-95%	65-82%	123
M2-PK	64-95%	71-79%	123
CEA	50-59%	40-92%	124

Table 5.

Selected phase III clinical trials for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.

TREATMENTS	MEDIAN SURVIVAL (MONTHS)	OBJECTIVE RESPONSE	BEST TREATMENT TOXICITIES GRADE (III/IV)	REFERENCE
Gemcitabine vs Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel	8.5 vs 6.7	23% vs 7%	Fatigue, neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy	108
FOLFIRINOX vs Gemcitabine	11.1 vs 6.8	31.6% vs 9.4%	Fatigue, neutropenia, diarrhea	110
Gemcitabine vs Fluorouracil	5.65 vs 4.41	5.4% vs 1%	neutropenia	109

Conclusion

PDAC is a sequence of complex deviations at the molecular levels.¹¹¹ Cell signaling pathway alterations, pancreatic stem cells, and EMT led to resistance to conventional chemotherapy. In this review, we summarize the primary molecular changes, biomarkers, and small molecule inhibitors for blocking different pathways of PDAC. Although several inhibitors are reported for most of the molecular aberrations, extensive efforts need to be made to bring the research to the clinics. Targeted delivery reduces toxicity and enhances the efficacy of the anticancer drugs.¹¹² The knowledge of biomarkers and small molecule inhibitors is expected to promote further research and development of targeted therapies, alleviating the severe side effects of pancreatic cancer therapy and increasing the survival rates.

Author Contributions

Analyzed the data: FK. Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: FK. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: SM. Agree with manuscript results and conclusions: FK and SM. Jointly developed the structure and arguments for the paper: FK and SM. Made critical revisions and approved final version: FK and SM. Both author reviewed and approved of the final manuscript.

Footnotes

Abbreviations

References

Lindberg

J.M.

, Newhook

T.E.

, Adair

S.J.

Co-treatment with panitumumab and trastuzumab augments response to the MEK inhibitor trametinib in a patient-derived xenograft model of pancreatic cancer. Neoplasia. 2014; 16(7): 562–571.

American Cancer Society, Pancreatic Cancer (2015). 2015. http://www.cancer.org/cancer/pancreaticcancer/index

Jung

H-Y

, Fattet

, Yang

Molecular pathways: linking tumor microenviron-ment to epithelial-mesenchymal transition in metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2015; 21(5): 962–968.

Collisson

E.A.

, Sadanandam

, Olson

Subtypes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and their differing responses to therapy. Nat Med. 2011; 17(4): 500–503.

Morse

D.L.

, Balagurunathan

, Hostetter

Identification of novel pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell-surface targets by gene expression profiling and tissue microarray. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010; 80(5): 748–754.

Yamanaka

, Friess

, Kobrin

, Buchler

, Beger

, Korc

Coexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor and ligands in human pancreatic cancer is associated with enhanced tumor aggressiveness. Anticancer Res. 1992; 13(3): 565–569.

Philip

P.A.

Targating epidermal growth factor receptor-related signalling pathway in pancreatic cancer. Pancrease. 2015; 44: 1041–1052.

Oliveira-Cunha

, Newman

W.G.

, Siriwardena

A.K.

Epidermal growth factor receptor in pancreatic cancer. Cancers. 2011; 3(2): 1513–1526.

Boeck

, Jung

, Laubender

EGFR pathway biomarkers in erlotinibtreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: translational results from the randomised, crossover phase 3 trial AIO-PK0104. Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(2): 469–476.

10.

Cardnell

, Diao

, Wang

An epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) gene signature to predict resistance to EGFR inhibition and AXL identification as a therapeutic target in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: abstr6011.

11.

Cardone

R.A.

, Greco

M.R.

, Zeeberg

A novel NHE1-centered signaling cassette drives epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent pancreatic tumor metastasis and is a target for combination therapy. Neoplasia. 2015; 17(2): 155–166.

12.

Rembielak

A.I.

, Jain

, Jackson

A.S.

Phase II trial of cetuximab and conformal radiotherapy only in locally advanced pancreatic cancer with concurrent tissue sampling feasibility study. Transl Oncol. 2014; 7(1): 55–64.

13.

Ryan

M.B.

, Der

C.J.

, Wang-Gillam

, Cox

A.D.

Targeting RAS-mutant cancers: is ERK the key?

Trends Cancer. 2015; 1(3): 183–198.

14.

Cox

A.D.

, Der

C.J.

Ras history. Small GTPases. 2010; 1(1): 2–27.

15.

di Magliano

M.P.

, Logsdon

C.D.

Roles for KRAS in pancreatic tumor development and progression. Gastroenterology. 2013; 144(6): 1220–1229.

16.

Lennerz

J.K.

, Stenzinger

Allelic ratio of KRAS mutations in pancreatic cancer. Oncologist. 2015; 20: e8–e9.

17.

Bournet

, Buscail

, Muscari

, Cordelier

, Buscail

Targeting KRAS for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of pancreatic cancer: hopes and realities. Eur J Cancer. 2015; 54: 75–83.

18.

Wang

, Casey

P.J.

Protein prenylation: unique fats make their mark on biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016; 17(2): 110–122.

19.

Van Cutsem

, van de Velde

, Karasek

Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22: 1430–1438.

20.

Pao

, Wang

T.Y.

, Riely

G.J.

KRAS mutations and primary resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib. PLoS Med. 2005; 2(1): e17.

21.

Kelley

R.K.

, Ko

A.H.

Erlotinib in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Biologics. 2008; 2(1): 83–95.

22.

Philip

P.A.

, Benedetti

, Corless

C.L.

Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: southwest oncology group-directed intergroup trial S0205. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3605–3610.

23.

Lee

, Heinrich

E.L.

, Lu

Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling to the mitogen activated protein kinase pathway bypasses Ras in pancreatic cancer cells. Pancreas. 2016; 45(2): 286–292.

24.

Buck

, Eyzaguirre

, Haley

J.D.

, Gibson

N.W.

, Cagnoni

, Iwata

K.K.

Inactivation of Akt by the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor erlotinib is mediated by HER-3 in pancreatic and colorectal tumor cell lines and contributes to erlotinib sensitivity. Mol Cancer Ther. 2006; 5(8): 2051–2059.

25.

Feldmann

, Mishra

, Hong

S-M

,. Inhibiting the cyclin-dependent kinase CDK5 blocks pancreatic cancer formation and progression through the suppression of Ras-Ral signaling. Cancer Res. 2010; 70(11): 4460–4469.

26.

Eser

, Reiff

, Messer

Selective requirement of PI3K/PDK1 signaling for Kras oncogene-driven pancreatic cell plasticity and cancer. Cancer Cell. 2013; 23(3): 406–420.

27.

Karreth

F.A.

, Frese

K.K.

, DeNicola

G.M.

, Baccarini

, Tuveson

D.A.

C-Raf is required for the initiation of lung cancer by K-RasG12D. Cancer Discov. 2011; 1(2): 128–136.

28.

Collins

M.A.

, Brisset

J-C

, Zhang

Metastatic pancreatic cancer is dependent on oncogenic Kras in mice. PLoS One. 2012; 7(12): e49707.

29.

Wang

, Wei

, Wang

, Ma

J-L

Hui

P-P.

The glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor PDMP sensitizes pancreatic cancer cells to MEK/ERK inhibitor AZD-6244. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015; 456(3): 821–826.

30.

Khvalevsky

E.Z.

, Gabai

, Rachmut

I.H.

Mutant KRAS is a druggable target for pancreatic cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013; 110(51): 20723–20728.

31.

Bloomston

, Zervos

E.E.

, Rosemurgy

II Matrix metalloproteinases and their role in pancreatic cancer: a review of preclinical studies and clinical trials. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002; 9(7): 668–674.

32.

Vandenbroucke

R.E.

, Libert

Is there new hope for therapeutic matrix metalloproteinase inhibition?

Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014; 13(12): 904–927.

33.

Shay

, Lynch

C.C.

, Fingleton

Moving targets: emerging roles for MMPs in cancer progression and metastasis. Matrix Biol. 2015; 44–46: 200–206.

34.

Coussens

L.M.

, Fingleton

, Matrisian

L.M.

Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors and cancer–trials and tribulations. Science. 2002; 295(5564): 2387–2392.

35.

Kulkarni

P.S.

, Haldar

M.K.

, Nahire

R.R.

MMP-9 responsive PEG cleavable nanovesicles for efficient delivery of chemotherapeutics to pancreatic cancer. Mol Pharm. 2014; 11(7): 2390–2399.

36.

Dangi-Garimella

, Krantz

S.B.

, Barron

M.R.

Three-dimensional collagen I promotes gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer through MT1-MMP-mediated expression of HMGA2. Cancer Res. 2011; 71(3): 1019–1028.

37.

Shankar

, Ganapathy

, Hingorani

S.R.

, Srivastava

R.K.

EGCG inhibits growth, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis of pancreatic cancer. Front Biosci. 2007; 13: 440–452.

38.

Xie

, Méndez

J.D.

, Méndez-Valenzuela

, Aguilar-Hernández

M.M.

Cellular signalling of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). Cell Signal. 2013; 25(11): 2185–2197.

39.

Arumugam

, Ramachandran

, Sun

Designing and developing S100P inhibitor 5-methyl cromolyn for pancreatic cancer therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013; 12(5): 654–662.

40.

Wang

, Abbruzzese

J.L.

, Evans

D.B.

, Larry

, Cleary

K.R.

, Chiao

P.J.

The nuclear factor-kB RelA transcription factor is constitutively activated in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res. 1999; 5(1): 119–127.

41.

Chiao

P.J.

, Ling

Kras, Pten, NF-kB, and inflammation: dangerous liaisons. Cancer Discov. 2011; 1(2): 103–105.

42.

Oeckinghaus

, Ghosh

The NF-kB family of transcription factors and its regulation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009; 1(4): a000034.

43.

Kurzrock

, Li

Liposome-encapsulated curcumin: in vitro and in vivo effects on proliferation, apoptosis, signaling, and angiogenesis. In: ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings. Orlando, FL; 2005: 4091.

44.

Kunnumakkara

A.B.

, Guha

, Krishnan

, Diagaradjane

, Gelovani

, Aggarwal

B.B.

Curcumin potentiates antitumor activity of gemcitabine in an orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer through suppression of proliferation, angiogenesis, and inhibition of nuclear factor-kB-regulated gene products. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(8): 3853–3861.

45.

Dhillon

, Aggarwal

B.B.

, Newman

R.A.

Phase II trial of curcumin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008; 14(14): 4491–4499.

46.

Chiarini

, Evangelisti

, McCubrey

J.A.

, Martelli

A.M.

Current treatment strategies for inhibiting mTOR in cancer. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015; 36(2): 124–135.

47.

Mueller

M.T.

, Hermann

P.C.

, Witthauer

Combined targeted treatment to eliminate tumorigenic cancer stem cells in human pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2009; 137(3): 1102–1113.

48.

Morran

D.C.

, Wu

, Jamieson

N.B.

Targeting mTOR dependency in pancreatic cancer. Gut. 2014; 63(9): 1481–1489.

49.

Zhou

, Wang

, Liu

[Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway is critical for survival and proliferation of pancreatic cancer stem-like side population cells]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008; 88(42): 2994–2998.

50.

, Zhang

, Wang

, You

, Zhao

PIM kinases: an overview in tumors and recent advances in pancreatic cancer. Future Oncol. 2014; 10(5): 865–876.

51.

, Allsop

S.A.

, Witherspoon

S.M.

The oncogenic kinase Pim-1 is modulated by K-Ras signaling and mediates transformed growth and radioresistance in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells. Carcinogenesis. 2011; 32(4): 488–495.

52.

Hessmann

, Schneider

, Ellenrieder

, Siveke

MYC in pancreatic cancer: novel mechanistic insights and their translation into therapeutic strategies. Oncogene. 2015.

53.

Schleger

, Verbeke

, Hildenbrand

, Zentgraf

, Bleyl

c-MYC activation in primary and metastatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: incidence, mechanisms, and clinical significance. Modern Pathol. 2002; 15(4): 462–469.

54.

Zhou

, Law

A.C.

, Rajagopal

, Anderson

W.J.

, Gray

P.A.

, Melton

D.A.

A multipotent progenitor domain guides pancreatic organogenesis. Dev Cell. 2007; 13(1): 103–114.

55.

Bonal

, Thorel

, Ait-Lounis

, Reith

, Trumpp

, Herrera

P.L.

Pancreatic inactivation of c-Myc decreases acinar mass and transdifferentiates acinar cells into adipocytes in mice. Gastroenterology. 2009; 136(1): 309–319.

56.

Jun

, Lee

, Kim

H-C

,. PAF-mediated MAPK signaling hyperactivation via LAMTOR3 induces pancreatic tumorigenesis. Cell Rep. 2013; 5(2): 314–322.

57.

Hashimoto

, Ichihara

, Watanabe

Expression of CD109 in human cancer. Oncogene. 2004; 23(20): 3716–3720.

58.

Zhang

J-M

, Murakumo

, Hagiwara

CD109 attenuates TGF-β1 signaling and enhances EGF signaling in SK-MG-1 human glioblastoma cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015; 459(2): 252–258.

59.

Haun

R.S.

, Fan

C-Y

, Mackintosh

S.G.

, Zhao

, Tackett

A.J.

CD109 overexpression in pancreatic cancer identified by cell-surface glycoprotein capture. J Proteomics Bioinform. 2014: S10–S13. doi: 10.4172/jpb.S10–003.

60.

, Heidt

D.G.

, Dalerba

Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(3): 1030–1037.

61.

Zhan

H-X

, Xu

J-W

, Wu

, Zhang

T-P

S-Y.

Pancreatic cancer stem cells: new insight into a stubborn disease. Cancer Lett. 2015; 357(2): 429–437.

62.

Fitzgerald

T.L.

, McCubrey

J.A.

Pancreatic cancer stem cells: association with cell surface markers, prognosis, resistance, metastasis and treatment. Adv Biol Regul. 2014; 56: 45–50.

63.

Molejon

M.I.

, Tellechea

J.I.

, Moutardier

Targeting CD44 as a novel therapeutic approach for treating pancreatic cancer recurrence. Oncoscience. 2015; 2(6): 572.

64.

Molejon

M.I.

, Tellechea

J.I.

, Loncle

Deciphering the cellular source of tumor relapse identifies CD44 as a major therapeutic target in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015; 6(10): 7408–7423.

65.

Maeda

, Shinchi

, Kurahara

CD133 expression is correlated with lymph node metastasis and vascular endothelial growth factor-C expression in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2008; 98(8): 1389–1397.

66.

Lee

C.J.

, Dosch

, Simeone

D.M.

Pancreatic cancer stem cells. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(17): 2806–2812.

67.

Hong

S.P.

, Wen

, Bang

, Park

, Song

S.Y.

CD44-positive cells are responsible for gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer cells. Int J Cancer. 2009; 125(10): 2323–2331.

68.

Takebe

, Harris

P.J.

, Warren

R.Q.

, Ivy

S.P.

Targeting cancer stem cells by inhibiting Wnt, Notch, and Hedgehog pathways. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011; 8(2): 97–106.

69.

Xia

, Chen

, Miele

, Sarkar

F.H.

, Wang

Targeting pancreatic cancer stem cells for cancer therapy. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012; 1826(2): 385–399.

70.

Yao

, An

, Wie

Cyclopamine reverts acquired chemoresistance and down-regulates cancer stem cell markers in pancreatic cancer cell lines. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011; 141: w13208.

71.

Feldmann

, Dhara

, Fendrich

Blockade of hedgehog signaling inhibits pancreatic cancer invasion and metastases: a new paradigm for combination therapy in solid cancers. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(5): 2187–2196.

72.

Wang

, Ahmad

, Li

, Azmi

A.S.

, Miele

, Sarkar

F.H.

Targeting notch to eradicate pancreatic cancer stem cells for cancer therapy. Anticancer Res. 2011; 31(4): 1105–1113.

73.

Lobry

, Oh

, Aifantis

Oncogenic and tumor suppressor functions of Notch in cancer: it's NOTCH what you think. J Exp Med. 2011; 208(10): 1931–1935.

74.

Mizuma

, Rasheed

Z.A.

, Yabuuchi

The gamma secretase inhibitor MRK-003 attenuates pancreatic cancer growth in preclinical models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012; 11(9): 1999–2009.

75.

Hage

, Rausch

, Giese

The novel c-Met inhibitor cabozantinib overcomes gemcitabine resistance and stem cell signaling in pancreatic cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2013; 4(5): e627.

76.

, Wu

J.J.

, Hynes

c-Met is a marker of pancreatic cancer stem cells and therapeutic target. Gastroenterology. 2011; 141(6): 2218–2227.

77.

Tyagi

, Marimuthu

, Bhardwaj

p-21 activated kinase 4 (PAK4) maintains stem cell-like phenotypes in pancreatic cancer cells through activation of STAT3 signaling. Cancer Lett. 2016; 370(2): 260–267.

78.

Dangi-Garimella

, Krantz

S.B.

, Shields

M.A.

, Grippo

P.J.

, Munshi

H.G.

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and pancreatic cancer progression. In: Grippo

P.J.

, Munshi

H.G.

, eds. Pancreatic Cancer and Tumor Microenvironment. Trivandrum (India): Transworld Research Network; 2012.

79.

Thiery

J.P.

, Acloque

, Huang

R.Y.

, Nieto

M.A.

Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell. 2009; 139(5): 871–890.

80.

Barriere

, Fici

, Gallerani

, Fabbri

, Rigaud

Epithelial mesenchymal transition: a double-edged sword. Clin Transl Med. 2015; 4(1): 14.

81.

Jiang

J-H

, Liu

, Cheng

Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer: Is it a clinically significant factor?

Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015; 1855(1): 43–49.

82.

Rasheed

Z.A.

, Yang

, Wang

Prognostic significance of tumorigenic cells with mesenchymal features in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010; 102(5): 340–351.

83.

Javle

, Li

, Tan

Biomarkers of TGF-β signaling pathway and prognosis of pancreatic cancer. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1).

84.

Drabsch

, Ten Dijke

TGF-β signalling and its role in cancer progression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012; 31(3-4): 553–568.

85.

Schlingensiepen

K.H.

, Jaschinski

, Lang

S.A.

Transforming growth factor-beta 2 gene silencing with trabedersen (AP 12009) in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Sci. 2011; 102(6): 1193–1200.

86.

Gaspar

N.J.

, Li

, Kapoun

A.M.

Inhibition of transforming growth factor β signaling reduces pancreatic adenocarcinoma growth and invasiveness. Mol Pharmacol. 2007; 72(1): 152–161.

87.

Oyanagi

, Kojima

, Sato

Inhibition of transforming growth factor-β signaling potentiates tumor cell invasion into collagen matrix induced by fibroblast-derived hepatocyte growth factor. Exp Cell Res. 2014; 326(2): 267–279.

88.

Kim

V.N.

MicroRNA biogenesis: coordinated cropping and dicing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005; 6(5): 376–385.

89.

Zhang

, Pan

, Cobb

G.P.

, Anderson

T.A.

microRNAs as oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Dev Biol. 2007; 302(1): 1–12.

90.

Volinia

, Calin

G.A.

, Liu

C-G

,. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006; 103(7): 2257–2261.

91.

Rachagani

, Macha

M.A.

, Heimann

Clinical implications of miRNAs in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015; 81: 16–33.

92.

Dillhoff

, Liu

, Frankel

, Croce

, Bloomston

MicroRNA-21 is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer and a potential predictor of survival. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; 12(12): 2171–2176.

93.

Ali

, Banerjee

, Logna

Inactivation of Ink4a/Arf leads to deregulated expression of miR NAs in K-Ras transgenic mouse model of pancreatic cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2012; 227(10): 3373–3380.

94.

Kawaguchi

, Komatsu

, Ichikawa

Clinical impact of circulating miR-221 in plasma of patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(2): 361–369.

95.

Morton

J.P.

, Timpson

, Karim

S.A.

Mutant p53 drives metastasis and overcomes growth arrest/senescence in pancreatic cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010; 107(1): 246–251.

96.

Brunetti

, Russo

, Scarpa

MicroRNA in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: predictive/prognostic biomarkers or therapeutic targets?

Oncotarget. 2015; 6(27): 23323–23341.

97.

Dong

, Karaayvaz

, Jia

Mutant p53 gain-of-function induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition through modulation of the miR-130b-ZEB1 axis. Oncogene. 2013; 32(27): 3286–3295.

98.

Neilsen

P.M.

, Noll

J.E.

, Mattiske

Mutant p53 drives invasion in breast tumors through up-regulation of miR-155. Oncogene. 2013; 32(24): 2992–3000.

99.

Wang

, Chen

, Zhang

Methylation-mediated silencing of the miR-124 genes facilitates pancreatic cancer progression and metastasis by targeting Rac1. Oncogene. 2014; 33(4): 514–524.

100.

Park

S.M.

, Gaur

A.B.

, Lengyel

, Peter

M.E.

The miR-200 family determines the epithelial phenotype of cancer cells by targeting the E-cadherin repressors, ZEB1 and ZEB2. Genes Dev. 2008.

101.

Wellner

, Schubert

, Burk

U.C.

The EMT-activator ZEB1 promotes tumorigenicity by repressing stemness-inhibiting microRNAs. Nat Cell Biol. 2009; 11(12): 1487–1495.

102.

Conroy

, Bachet

J-B

, Ayav

Current standards and new innovative approaches for treatment of pancreatic cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2016; 57: 10–22.

103.

Ballehaninna

U.K.

, Chamberlain

R.S.

Biomarkers for pancreatic cancer: promising new markers and options beyond CA 19-9. Tumour Biol. 2013; 34(6): 3279–3292.

104.

Ballehaninna

U.K.

, Chamberlain

R.S.

The clinical utility of serum CA 19-9 in the diagnosis, prognosis and management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an evidence based appraisal. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2012; 3(2): 105–119.

105.

Oettle

, Neuhaus

, Hochhaus

Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the conko-001 randomized trial. JAMA. 2013; 310(14): 1473–1481.

106.

Huguet

, Andre

, Hammel

Impact of chemoradiotherapy after disease control with chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in GERCOR phase II and III studies. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(3): 326–331.

107.

, Yan

, Liu

, Zhen

, Yang

, Cao

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-fluorouracil combination therapy in the management of advanced pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2014; 9(8): e104346.

108.

Von Hoff

D.D.

, Ervin

, Arena

F.P.

Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(18): 1691–1703.

109.

Burris

III , Moore

M.J.

, Andersen

Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997; 15(6): 2403–2413.

110.

Conroy

, Desseigne

, Ychou

FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364(19): 1817–1825.

111.

Jones

, Zhang

, Parsons

D.W.

Core signaling pathways in human pancreatic cancers revealed by global genomic analyses. Science. 2008; 321(5897): 1801–1806.

112.

Patra

C.R.

, Bhattacharya

, Wang

Targeted delivery of gemcitabine to pancreatic adenocarcinoma using cetuximab as a targeting agent. Cancer Res. 2008; 68(6): 1970–1978.

113.

, Lu

, Liu

miRNA-96 suppresses KRAS and functions as a tumor suppressor gene in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 2010; 70(14): 6015–6025.

114.

Jiao

L.R.

, Frampton

A.E.

, Jacob

MicroRNAs targeting oncogenes are down-regulated in pancreatic malignant transformation from benign tumors. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2): e32068.

115.

Zhao

W.G.

, Yu

S.N.

, Lu

Z.H.

, Ma

Y.H.

, Gu

Y.M.

, Chen

The miR-217 microRNA functions as a potential tumor suppressor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by targeting KRAS. Carcinogenesis. 2010; 31(10): 1726–1733.

116.

Sureban

S.M.

, May

, Lightfoot

S.A.

DCAMKL-1 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human pancreatic cells through a miR-200a-dependent mechanism. Cancer Res. 2011; 71(6): 2328–2338.

117.

Lodygin

, Tarasov

, Epanchintsev

Inactivation of miR-34a by aberrant CpG methylation in multiple types of cancer. Cell Cycle. 2008; 7(16): 2591–2600.

118.

Tsuda

, Ishiyama

, Li

, Ioannides

C.G.

, Abbruzzese

J.L.

, Chang

D.Z.

Synthetic microRNA designed to target glioma-associated antigen 1 transcription factor inhibits division and induces late apoptosis in pancreatic tumor cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12(21): 6557–6564.

119.

Kent

O.A.

, Fox-Talbot

, Halushka

M.K.

RREB1 repressed miR-143/145 modulates KRAS signaling through downregulation of multiple targets. Oncogene. 2013; 32(20): 2576–2585.

120.

Kulshreshtha

, Ferracin

, Wojcik

S.E.

A microRNA signature of hypoxia. Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 27(5): 1859–1867.

121.

Greither

, Grochola

L.F.

, Udelnow

, Lautenschlager

, Wurl

, Taubert

Elevated expression of microRNAs 155, 203, 210 and 222 in pancreatic tumors is associated with poorer survival. Int J Cancer. 2010; 126(1): 73–80.

122.

Park

J-K

, Henry

J.C.

, Jiang

miR-132 and miR-212 are increased in pancreatic cancer and target the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011; 406(4): 518–523.

123.

Harsha

H.C.

, Kandasamy

, Ranganathan

A compendium of potential biomarkers of pancreatic cancer. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(4): e1000046.

124.

Szajda

S.D.

, Waszkiewicz

, Chojnowska

, Zwierz

Carbohydrate markers of pancreatic cancer. Biochem Soc Trans. 2011; 39(1): 340–343.

Biomarkers and Targeted Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor

Kirsten Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene

Matrix Metalloproteinases

Receptor for Advanced Glycation Endproducts

Nuclear Factor Kappa B

Mammalian Target of Rapamycin

Proto-oncogene Serine/Threonine-protein Kinase

V-MYC Avian Myelocytomatosis Viral Oncogene

Platelet-Activating Factor

Cell Surface Antigen CD109

PCSC Biomarkers

Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition

MicroRNAs in Pancreatic Cancer

Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

Conclusion

Author Contributions

Footnotes

Abbreviations

References