Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one of the leading causes of cancer deaths in the world, is offering a challenge to human beings, with the current modes of treatment being a palliative approach. Lack of proper curative or preventive treatment methods encouraged extensive research around the world with an aim to detect a vaccine or therapeutic target biomolecule that could lead to development of a drug or vaccine against HCC. Biomarkers or biological disease markers have emerged as a potential tool as drug/vaccine targets, as they can accurately diagnose, predict, and even prevent the diseases. Biomarker expression in tissue, serum, plasma, or urine can detect tumor in very early stages of its development and monitor the cancer progression and also the effect of therapeutic interventions. Biomarker discoveries are driven by advanced techniques, such as proteomics, transcriptomics, whole genome sequencing, micro- and micro-RNA arrays, and translational clinics. In this review, an overview of the potential of tissue- and serum-associated HCC biomarkers as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic targets for drug development is presented. In addition, we highlight recently developed micro-RNA, long noncoding RNA biomarkers, and single-nucleotide changes, which may be used independently or as complementary biomarkers. These active investigations going on around the world aimed at conquering HCC might show a bright light in the near future.

Keywords

biomarker HCC liver miRNA lncRNA prognosis prevention therapeutic

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer mortality. HCC is defined as a primary tumorigenesis in the liver, mainly in patients suffering from chronic liver cirrhosis or hepatitis B or C. The tumor gradually spreads to hepatocytes and in advanced stages metastasizes to other organs, such as lungs and brain. HCC has become one of the very common cancers causing death, affecting more than 500,000 people in the world.¹ The other main risk factors for HCC are alcohol and aflatoxin.^2,3

The Development of HCC

HCC is one of the major liver-related mortalities in cirrhosis. As shown in Figure 1, when the healthy liver is affected by hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), a gradual chronic infection leads to liver cirrhosis. Cirrhosis is characterized by a decrease in the growth of healthy hepatocytes and is due to degeneration and regeneration of cells.³ Regeneration leads to increase in fibrous scar tissue following the destruction of the healthy liver cells, which provides the environment for forming cancerous tumors.⁴ Telomerase, which plays an important role in maintaining telomere length and chromosomal stability in hepatocytes⁵ and their shortening, limits the regenerative capacity of organs during chronic disease.⁶ In a cirrhotic liver, the telomeres of the hepatocytes are significantly shorter than in noncirrhotic tissue.⁶ Telomere dysfunctions, along with p53 mutation, are associated with the onset of early-stage hepatic neoplasms.⁷

Figure 1.

Stages of Hepatocellular carcinoma development and induction of biomarkers. Highlighted liver indicates decisive stage during which liver is either dysregulated by insult or it tolerates such insult till certain limits.

Another characteristic of cirrhosis is the activation of stellate cells. This leads to an increase in the production of cytokines, growth factors, and products of oxidative stress, many of which have been shown to affect hepatocyte proliferation and so could play a role in tumor formation.⁸

The main oncogenic pathways involved in HCC are phosphoinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, myc, Wnt/β-catenin, c-Met, and hedgehog (Fig. 1–4).^9,10 Activation of Akt signaling is thought to promote tumor formation by suppressing transforming growth factor (TGF)-β-induced apoptosis, which in turn activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling, so further driving the hepatocarcinogenic process.

Figure 2.

Main factors and signaling involved in hepatocarcinogenesis.

Figure 3.

Mechanism of action of sGPC3. (A) Wild-type GPC3 bound to the cell membrane facilitates/stabilizes the interaction of Wnt and other growth factors (bFGF and HGF) with their signaling receptors. (B) sGPC3 sequesters growth factors and inhibits their interaction with signaling receptors. © 2009 UICC, reused with permission from Zittermann SI, Capurro MI, Shi W, Filmus J. Soluble glypican 3 inhibits the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cancer. 2010;126:1291-1301.

Figure 4.

14-3-3-HSF-1/HSP70 cell signaling in HCC cells. Modified from Wu YJ, Jan YJ, Ko BS, Liang SM, Liou JY. Involvement of 14-3-3 proteins in regulating tumor progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers. 2015;7(2):1022-1036, under the Creative Commons Attribution License.

Current HCC therapeutic and management methods

HCC patients are subjected to multiple treatments, including transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, brachytherapy with radioactive yytrium,^11–13 and also cytokine/hormonal therapy, such as interleukin (IL)-2.¹⁴ A potent drug sorafenib, an oral agent with antiangiogenic, proapoptotic, and Raf-kinase inhibitory properties, has been safely evaluated in clinical phase II and phase III trials.^15–17 Several drugs modulating different cell signaling mechanisms, mainly PI3K-Akt, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and RAF/MEK/ERK pathways, are being investigated for their effectiveness to control the progression of HCC. For example, KU-0060648 was found to inhibit HCC cell proliferation by both DNA-activated protein kinase-dependent and -independent mechanisms.¹⁸ A study involving VO-OHpic, a phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) inhibitor in HCC cells, demonstrated that VOOHpic inhibited HCC cell viability, cell proliferation, and colony formation in synergy with PI3K/mTOR and RAF/MEK/ERK pathway inhibitors.¹⁹ Antroquinonol, a traditional Chinese liver treatment drug, exhibited anticancer activity by activating 5′-adenosine mono phosphate (AMP) kinase and inhibiting mTOR pathway,²⁰ leading to G1 cycle arrest and cellular apoptosis. In another study, it is shown that overexpression of far upstream element-binding protein in HCC and other cancers,^21,22 which is directly regulated by P13K/Akt/mTOR pathway, could be substantially reduced by sorafenib.^23,24

Role of biomarkers in HCC

Biomarkers are the molecular indicators of the physiological status detectable in blood, urine, or tissue and can be important for the management of various diseases. Their concentrations and changes in body fluids can provide an estimate about the disease progression. Ideally, biomarkers should have high sensitivity of detection where there is small cancer, should be highly specific, and must not increase in noncancer. Their levels should increase with tumor progression and predict the prognosis. HCC is one such life-threatening condition that could be detected early or, in an optimistic note, hoped to be prevented by biomarkers' therapeutic and prognostic capabilities. Table 1 lists various categories of biomarkers upregulated in HCC.

Table 1.

Biomarkers, their origin, and the significance.

NAME	CATEGORY	DESCRIPTION	REFERENCE
Alpha Fetoprotein (AFP)	Serum glycoprotein antigen	AFP >500 ng/mL are indicative of HCC, early diagnosis and monitoring	61, 226, 227
Glypican 3 (GPC3)	Tissue biomarker-membrane bound heparin sulfate proteoglycan	GPC3 mRNA and protein significantly upregulated in HCC specifically, early diagnosis	29, 228
Des-Gamma Carboxyl Prothrombin (DCP)	Cellular enzyme-secreted by the cancerous hepatocyte (serum biomarker)	DCP >0.1 AU/mL (100 ng/mL) are highly suggestive of HCC, early diagnoses, metastasis	229
Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT)	Serum biomarker	GGTII isoform significantly upregulated in HCC	230
Alpha-1-Fucosidase (AFU)	Lysosomal enzyme, serum biomarker	More than 2-fold increase in HCC patients compared to normal, liver cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis patients, early diagnosis	86
DKK-1	Serum/secreted protein biomarker	Enhances HCC progression by accumulation of beta-catenin by Wnt signaling, early HCC biomarker	76, 231
Human carbonyl reductase-2	Secreted by Liver and kidney, serum biomarker	Detoxicating enzyme, level falls in HCC, prognosis	80
Golgi Phosphoprotein-2 (GOLPH2)/Golgi protein 73 (GP73)	Serum biomarker	Increased significantly, higher sensitivity than AFP, tumor aggressiveness	232
Transforming Growth factor beta (TGF-beta)	Serum biomarker	Tumor invasiveness, mRNA overexpressed in HCC tissue	233-235
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Family (EGFR)	Cellular (transmembrane) biomarker	Early recurrence and reduced disease-free survival following resection of hepatocellular carcinoma	236
Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)	Serum biomarker (cytokine)	Prognosis, invasiveness and metastasis	237
Fibroblast Growth factor (FGF)	Heparin binding polypeptide	FGF level >10.8 pg/mL predicts HCC and reduced disease free survival	238
Molecular markers • AFP mRNA • GGT mRNA, type B • (Insulin-like Growth factor) IGF-II mRNA • Albumin mRNA • miRNA (micro RNAs)	Serum biomarker HCC tissue Serum biomarker Serum biomarker Nucleotide biomarker	Increased postsurgical circulation depicts more chances of recurrence, extrahepatic metastasis, monitoring of postoperative recurrence, tumor spread and survival	184, 239-245
Pathological biomarkers • Heat Shock Protein (HSP70) • Glutamine synthase • Ki-67 • Survivin • E-Cadherin • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)	Tissue biomarker	Increased transformed cell proliferation, survival, cell-to-cell adhesion, neoangiogenesis	246
Hepatocyte Paraffin 1 (HepPar1)	Tissue biomarker	Decreased expression in HCC cells	247
Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen (SCCA)-IgM immunocomplex	Serum biomarker	Significant enhancement during progression to HCC	248,249
Tumor Associated Glycoprotein 72 (TAG-72)	Tissue biomarker	Upregulation indicates tumor progression and metastasis, associated with poor survival	46
Zinc-α2-glycoprotein (ZAG)	Serum biomarker (soluble glycoprotein)	Overexpressed in HCC	250
DLK-1 (Delta like protein-1)	Embryonic, kidney and neural tissue	Significantly elevated in HCC	251
Villin 1 (Vil1)	HCC tumor tissue	Upregulated Vil1 indicates transformation, vascular invasion and cancer progression	252

Tumor Tissue Biomarkers of HCC

The biopsies and extensive research on tumor tissues of HCC provide a wide range of information about the abnormal constituents of tumor cells and what constituent is upregulated in transformed or neoplastic conditions. This information has provided researchers with therapeutic targets for vaccine, drug development, and screening for surveillance or device prognostic measures to prevent HCC in the past couple of decades.^25–28 Here, we focus on some of the potential tissue biomarkers of HCC that function as appropriate targets for early diagnosis and development of antimetastatic vaccines/drugs.

Glypican-3

Glypican-3 (GPC3), a potent tissue biomarker of HCC, links to the cell membrane by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor. It is a heparan sulfate proteoglycan that is involved in regulating the cell growth. Besides, GPC3 can remove growth factors, such as hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), from the cell surface and inhibit the growth of HCC.^29,30 GPC3 is particularly expressed in HCC, but it is not produced by normal or cirrhotic hepatic cells.^29,31 Genetic studies in many mammals exhibited that glypicans can regulate the signaling of Wnt, hedgehog, and FGF.^32–35

The glypicans interact with Wnts and their signaling receptors, the frizzleds.³⁶ The GPC3 stimulates Wnt signaling activity by stabilizing the interaction with of Wnt with frizzled, resulting in the proliferation of the HCC cells. The GPC3-induced stimulatory activity requires the attachment of GPC3 to the cell membrane.³⁶ In a study by Zittermann et al,³⁰ it was demonstrated that a mutant GPC3 could not attach to the cell membrane (sGP3) and is secreted extracellularly (in the serum) and, thus, could remove the autocrine/paracrine Wnt from the cell surface of the HCC. The removal of Wnt could inhibit the proliferation of HCC and block the activity of FGF, VEGF, epidermal growth factor, and HGF.^37–39 Hence, sGPC3 (mutant GPC3) is a potent tissue biomarker that can be targeted for HCC management.

Heat shock protein 70

Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) is an essential molecular chaperon upregulated in response to heat, stress, or cell survival protection, tightly controlled by heat shock factor-1 (HSF-1). Studies have demonstrated that HSF-1 and HSP70 are involved in HCC tumor invasion and metastasis.^40,41 It has been demonstrated that 14-3-3σ protein induces HSP70 via a β-catenin/HSF-1-dependent pathway, which in its downstream modulates HCC.⁴² Hence, 14-3-3σ-HSF-1 or HSF-1/HSP70 complex is another important tissue biomarker to be targeted for developing a prognostic tool for HCC.

Tumor-associated glycoprotein 72

Tumor-associated glycoprotein 72 (TAG-72) is a cell membrane mucin-like glycoprotein complex, overexpressed in many of human adenocarcinomas but not in normal tissues.^43–45 In a study by Zhang et al,⁴⁶ it was demonstrated that TAG-72 is a new tissue biomarker in HCC that indicates the poor survival of patients (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

TAG-72 as a potent prognostic marker in various cancers: Curves showing an estimate of overall survivability of cancer patients with absence of TAG-72 expression and presence of TAG-72 expression in cancer tissue after days of treatment.

Ki-67 antigen

Ki-67 is a nuclear protein associated with cellular proliferation.⁴⁷ The Ki-67 levels were expressed significantly correlating with higher increases from grades I to IV HCC tumors. This proliferative marker, with increased expression, indicated increased severity or spread of HCC (ranging from a mean+/– SD of 4.1+/–4.01 in tumor grade I to 29+/–15.01 in grade IV tumors).⁴⁸

Hepatocyte paraffin 1

Hepatocyte paraffin 1 (HepPar1) is a monoclonal antibody prepared from a failed liver allograft,⁴⁹ which recognizes an epitope that is a component of hepatic mitochondria and not found in other normal tissues.^49,50 Hep-Par1 is often used as a marker to distinguish between HCC and secondary or metastatic hepatic neoplasms.^51,52 A strong HepPar1 expression was detected in majority of the HCC tumors (35 out of 48 HCCs),⁵³ whereas it was also expressed in nonhepatic tumors, such as lung, gallbladder, stomach, pancreas, colon, and malignant melanoma, but to a much lesser extent.^54–58

HERC5

Homologous to the E6-AP carboxyl terminus (HECT) domain and RCC-1-like domain-containing protein 5 is E3 ligase that conjugates with ISG15 to regulate several proteins. One of the main mechanisms of action of this molecule is by induction of CCL20, which in turn increases T regulatory infiltration, and it is one of the important prognostic biomarkers for tumor recurrence in HCC patients as well as survival in liver transplant patients.⁵⁹ It is also an important biomarker in the prognosis of lung cancer, and hypermethylation of promoter of HERC5 was associated with poor survival of stage 1 adenocarcinoma.^59,60

Serum Biomarkers of HCC

Alpha fetoprotein

Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) is produced by embryonic liver cells during pregnancy. It is in abundance during gestational stages, but its production is minimal after birth.⁶¹ AFP is one of the most common serum biomarkers used for the diagnosis of HCC by clinicians; however, the specificity and reliability of AFP biomarker is questioned, and it is of less value in the early stages of HCC when the tumor size is <3 cm.⁶²

AFP-L3

It is a different form of AFP that differs in binding affinity with a lectin Lens culinaris agglutinin. This form of AFP-L is used as an early biomarker of HCC when the size of tumor is <2 cm. As the size of tumor increases, the sensitivity of this marker is increased.⁶³ AFP-L is connected with Ki-67; as a marker of increased nuclear expression of Ki-67, there is a decrease in the expression of β-catenin, which is associated with distant metastasis.⁶⁴ In case of the AFP-negative HCC, β-catenin positivity is more common.⁶⁵

Glycoprotein 73

Glycoprotein 73 (GP73) is a type II Golgi-localized phosphoprotein, encoded by Golgi transmembrane type II (GOLPH2) gene located on chromosome 9q21. It is expressed in epithelial cells in several human tissues and was first identified by serum glycoproteomics.⁶⁶ GP73 is highly expressed in the tumor part of the liver; however, its expression is comparatively very less in normal part of the same liver.^67,68 Similar observations were noted in woodchuck animal model of HCC.⁶⁷ Interestingly, it can differentiate patients developing cirrhosis with that of high-grade HCC and is also an early biomarker of HCC. During insult to the liver, ie, acute hepatitis and autoimmune hepatitis, GP73 is highly expressed. Viral infections are also found to increase the GP73 secretion.⁶⁹ Oncostatin M, produced in the adipose tissues and a proinflammatory cytokine IL-6, increases the mRNA levels of GP73 as detected in HepG2 cell lines.⁷⁰ In addition to HCC, it has been found in other cancers, such as lung adenocarcinoma, testicular seminomas, renal cell carcinoma, and prostate cancer; however, in prostate cancer, it is detected only in urine and not in serum and, therefore, not a specific liver cancer biomarker.⁷¹ As given in Figure 6A, there are two major isoforms of GP73: one is complete and another is incomplete. In the incomplete form, first 10 amino acids at the N-terminal region are lacking and may have functional implications.

Figure 6.

(A) Alignment of the amino acid sequence of the two isoforms of GP73 taken from Uniprot protein ID-Q8NBJ4-1 and Uniprot protein ID-Q8NBJ4-2. Three blue box represents the glycosylation sites in two isoforms. Compared to isoform-1, isoform-2 is 10 amino acid shorter in N-terminal region. (B) Increased expression of GP73 in cirrhosis and HCC compared to the healthy controls. Increased expression of GP73 in patients infected with HBV-associated HCC and cirrhosis. Increased expression also correlates with the grading of the liver necroinflammation. Panel (B) is reused from Xu Z, Liu L, Pan X, et al. Serum golgi protein 73 (GP73) is a diagnostic and prognostic marker of chronic HBV liver disease. Tarantino G, ed. Medicine. 2015;94(12):e659, under the Creative Commons Attribution License.

APO-J

APO-J is a glycoprotein with seven glycosylated sites and is also known as clusterin.⁷² It is more sensitive and specific than AFP.⁷³ APO-J is significantly decreased in HCC patients compared to healthy controls and can be used as an independent marker of HCC.⁷² One of the recent studies also showed that it can be used as a prognostic marker and can also monitor HCC progression and metastasis.^74,75

DKK-1 Dickkopf-p1

DKK biomarker is of high importance in cases where AFP biomarker misses HCC diagnosis. Importantly, it can diagnose HCC in very early stages of cancer.^76,77 One of the studies by Zhu et al reported that DKK-1 can be used as a biomarker for HCC patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) and can predict the prognosis of such patients.⁷⁸ Studies on this biomarker are ongoing, and more robust studies are required to consider it as a biomarker.

Human carbonyl reductase-2

It is expressed in human liver as well as kidneys. During oxidative stress, the released reactive oxygen species and alpha dicarbonyl are detoxified by this enzyme.⁷⁹ The expression of human carbonyl reductase-2 (HCR2) is significantly decreased in the tumor part of the liver compared to the normal cells.⁸⁰ The decreased expression of carbonyl reductase-2 leads to cancer growth as it triggers the cell damage through reactive oxygen species and other carcinogens.

Midkine

Midkine is expressed at the time of early embryogenesis and is a heparin-binding growth factor. It is expressed during wound healing, tumorogenesis, and inflammation.⁸¹ Compared to AFP, which is significantly raised during advanced stages of HCC, midkine is marginally raised and cannot be used as the biomarker in advanced stages of HCC. However, midkine expression markedly rises during early development of HCC.⁸²

Des-γ-carboxy prothrombin

It is an important biomarker in large size HCC, and in cases where AFP misses HCC diagnosis, des-γ-carboxy prothrombin is able to detect HCC.⁸³ It is an abnormal prothrombin protein of VEGF family expressed during vitamin K deficiency/antagonist-II (PIVKA-II). During insult to the liver cells, when normal cells convert to fibroid cells or epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, hypoxic shock leads to the induction of DES.⁸⁴

α-1-Fucosidase

α-1-Fucosidase is a lysosomal enzyme that hydrolyzes fucose glucosidic bonds of glycolipids and glycoprotein. Its expression increases with liver insult similar to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and HCC patients.⁸⁵ It is one of the early HCC biomarkers and has a cut-off value of 870 nm/mL/h. Interestingly, it is raised preceding six months of development of HCC, and its value is over 700 nm/mL/h in 85% of HCC patients.⁸⁶

Hepatocyte growth factor

HGF is a cytokine produced by nonparenchymal Ito cells in the liver.⁸⁷ It stimulates the expression of immediate early genes in primary cultures of hepatocytes.⁸⁸ In hepatic regeneration, chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and HCC, HGF levels increase, and a level of 1.0 ng/mL indicates poor survival.⁸⁹ It acts as a prognostic biomarker and can predict the early tumor recurrence and metastasis.⁹⁰

Nerve growth factor

Nerve growth factor (NGF) is a member of neurotrophin family and is important for differentiation, survival, and preservation of peripheral and central nervous systems.⁹¹ NGF levels are associated with tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis. There are two receptors of NGF: high-affinity trkA^NGF and low-affinity p75^NTR. Expression of NGF and trkA^NGF increases significantly during HCC. It can differentiate between cirrhosis that develops to HCC and cirrhosis that does not lead to HCC.⁹²

Vascular endothelial growth factor

VEGF is a glycosylated cytokine that acts as a mitogen and mediates vascular permeability, angiogenesis, vasculogenesis, and endothelial cell growth-reduced survival.⁹³ Tumor characteristic and environment promotes VEGF expression and initiates VEGF signaling and thus triggers downstream MAPK cascade (Ras/RAF/MEK/ERK) which is involved in angiogenesis, proliferation and metastasis and is shown in Figure 7. VEGF levels envisage HCC recurrence, and it is a substantial biomarker for the survival of HCC patients.^94,95 A phase III clinical study conducted on 602 HCC patients receiving sorafenib showed that VEGF was one of the molecules that predicted patients' survival suggesting its role as a biomarker in the prognosis of HCC.⁹⁶

Figure 7.

Interaction between VEGF, VEGFR-2, and sVEGFR-2 via MAPK pathway. Modified from Ratnasari N, Yano Y. Do soluble vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors predict the progression of chronic hepatitis to hepatocellular carcinoma? Hepatitis. 2015;1(1):4, under the Creative Commons Attribution License.

Transforming growth factor-β

TGF-β plays an important role in the control of cellular proliferation and differentiation in HCC cells. Serum TGF-β levels are raised in HCC patients and is a long sought biomarker of HCC.⁹⁷ One of the recent reports documented the role of the TGF-β-interacting factor as one of the prognostic biomarkers of HCC.⁹⁸ Moreover, its partner mucin1 mediates TGF-β signaling by activating JNK/AP1 pathway and can also be used as a therapeutic target for the treatment of HCC.⁹⁹

Epidermal growth factor

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling is one of the important players in all the phases of hepatic injury from very early stages of inflammation to HCC development, including fibrogenesis and neoplastic transformation.¹⁰⁰ One of the forms of EGFR, ErbB3, was detected in the serum of HCC patients during the early stages of HCC development and was associated with portal vein invasion and metasatsis.¹⁰¹ One of the recent studies reported that HBV HBx protein downregulates the EGFR expression by inducing miRNA-7 in HCC cells.¹⁰² In addition, it is an important player and has tumor promoting role in non-HCC cells via live resident macrophages.¹⁰³ Using an in vivo model, a recent study determined the potential role of soluble EGFR in HCC metastasis.¹⁰⁴

Wnt

Wnt-1 protein has been described as a prognostic biomarker of HBV-related and HCV-related HCC after surgery.¹⁰⁵ GPC3 molecule, which is described in the “Glypican-3” section, promotes the growth of HCC by stimulating Wnt signaling.¹⁰⁶

Angiopointin-1/2

Angiopointin-2 levels are raised in HCC and cirrhosis, and it has been documented by several studies that elevated levels of Ang2 could be used as a marker of advanced pathological invasiveness and overall survival of HCC patients.^96,107,108 It is also shown that Ang2 contributes to multiple organ failure and sepsis.¹⁰⁹

NOTCH

Activation of NOTCH plays a prominent role in HBV-mediated HCC by proliferating hepatic cells and further supporting the growth of HCC, and this is also proved in in vivo mouse models.^110,111 NOTCH1 is one of the possible therapeutic targets for the treatment of HBx-associated HCC.¹¹² Recent studies showed that NOTCH1 and NOTCH4 are important biomarkers revealing the poor prognosis of HCC.^113,114

Oncostatin M

OSM is a member of cytokine family, which is very early secreted from the hematopoietic cells, and induces the differentiation of hepatocytes by regulating HNF4 alpha.¹¹⁵ It regulates cytokine production, such as IL-6, GM-CSF, and G-CSF. It is also shown to be elevated in HCC and acts in synergy with IL-6.¹¹⁶

Alpha-1 antitrypsin

Alpha-1 antitrypsin is a member of the SERPINA1 family of proteins, which is controlled by IL-6, TNα, and IL-1.^117,118 Increased levels of A1AT have been associated with HCC. A recent study revealed changes in the status of A1AT glycosylation during HCC and also documented that the core fucosyalation of HCC is one of the main reasons behind such changes.¹¹⁹ Compared to cirrhosis, it is significantly elevated in HCC and could also be used as a differentiation marker.¹²⁰

WFA+ M2BP

Kuno et al¹²¹ first reported an assay that uses Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive human mac2-binding protein in assessing liver fibrosis. A recent study by Yamasaki et al¹²² showed high value of measuring WFA+ M2BP and highlighted that it can be used as an independent risk factor biomarker for HCC development. Interestingly, WFA+ M2BP can predict HCC in HCV patients who respond well to the treatment and achieve the sustained virological response.¹²³

Lymphotoxin beta receptor

Lymphotoxin beta receptor is a cytokine and a member of tumor necrosis factor family, which is well known for controlling the development of lymphoid organs.¹²⁴ In HCC as well as in cholangiocarcinoma cells, lymphotoxin beta receptor is vastly expressed and sustains the oncogene activity.¹²⁵ It correlates with the upregulated Akt/NOTCH1 signaling and is a marker of poor survival in cholangiocarcinoma patients.¹²⁶

Long Noncoding RNA as Biomarkers of HCC

MALAT1

Long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) is an RNA molecule with a length of 200 bp to 100 kbp and lacks protein-coding capacity. Metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 is the lncRNA of >8 kbp transcribed from chromosome 11q13. Recently, Lai et al¹²⁷ reported that an overexpressed MALAT1 transcript could predict HCC recurrence after LT and importantly in those patients whose survival rate was also reduced. There are five SP-binding motifs upstream of the MALAT1, which lead to its overexpression,¹²⁸ In addition, an in vitro study suggested an interaction of hn-RNP-C with MALAT1 regulating cell cycle as recently studied in HepG2 cells.¹²⁹

HOTAIR

Hox antisense intergenic RNA plays a role in chromatin dynamics, cell differentiation, and cancer metastasis, which is encoded by HOXC gene cluster.¹³⁰ Once transcribed, it acts in trans to control the HOXD genes by recruiting the polycomb repressive complex 2 and silencing the transcriptional machinery.¹³¹ Patients with elevated expression of HOTAIR shows poor prognosis compared to those with reduced HOTAIR expression. Yang et al¹³² documented that HOTAIR can act as an independent prognostic biomarker in predicting the HCC recurrence in patients undergoing LT.

H19

Oncofetal H19 mRNA is abundantly expressed in the fetus.¹³³ It is paternally imprinted, which resides at chromosome 11p15.5 and is significantly expressed during tumorogenesis. Compared to AFP, the expression of H19 mRNA is much higher in HCC cases.¹³⁴ It also inhibits metastasis by stimulating miRNA-200 and inducing histone acetylation.¹³⁵

Highly upregulated in liver cancer

Highly upregulated in liver cancer is a 500 nucleotide lncRNA, which is expressed from chromosome 6p24.3¹³⁶ loci. Compared to normal liver tissue, it is highly expressed in adjacent tumor part of the liver.¹³⁷ One of the main agents responsible for HCC is HBV infection, particularly HBx. A recent study by Du et al¹³⁸ documented an important role of highly upregulated in liver cancer in HBx-mediated HCC and further implicated that it is possible due to the downregulation of p18.

Long interspersed nuclear element-1

Retrotransposons are the jumping genes, and long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1) is one of the autonomously regulated retrotransposons. A recent study by Tangkijvanich et al¹³⁹ tested the hypomethylation status of LINE-1 in 85 patients and concluded that advanced disease and tumor size are associated with levels of LINE-1 hypomethylation. Another report by Piao et al highlighted the role of LINE-1 hypomethylation in early childhood tumorogensis.¹⁴⁰ Gao et al¹⁴¹ also precisely documented that hypomethylation at two of the sites, CpG 7 and 18, is associated with poor prognosis in HCC.

Micro-RNA biomarkers of HCC

Micro-RNA and its role as biomarkers

A micro-RNA (miRNA) is a small noncoding RNA molecule that mainly functions in RNA silencing.¹⁴² Transcription of miRNA initiates from intronic region of a host gene leading to long pri-miRNA transcript. This is further processed to pre-miRNA, Pre-miRNA then transport to cytoplasm by Exportin, where it goes through further modification by Dicer developing into complete miRNA molecule as given in Figure 8. miRNAs exhibit their silencing activities by base pairing with complementary sequences within mRNA molecules,¹⁴³ by cleavage of the mRNA, chopping off its poly(A) tail, or less efficient translation of the mRNA into protein by ribosomes.¹⁴⁴ The human genome encodes for over 1000 miRNAs,¹⁴⁵ most of which are abundant in many mammalian cell types.¹⁴⁶

Figure 8.

Biogenesis of miRNA. Modified from Anwar SL, Lehmann U. MicroRNAs: Emerging novel clinical biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinomas. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2015;4(8):1631-1650, under the Creative Commons Attribution License.

Several studies indicate that miRNAs are involved in a variety of physiological processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, metabolism, and apoptosis. As given in Figure 9, miRNAs regulate important cellular angiogenesis, apoptosis and metastasis pathways. The miRNA was recognized as a distinct class of biological regulators during early 2000s.^147,148 Ongoing research has identified different miRNAs expressed in different cells and tissues.^146,149 miRNAs are detectable and stable in clinical samples, such as blood, serum, plasma, urine, and feces. Besides, the abnormal expression of miRNAs has been observed under different disease conditions, especially cancers, establishing miRNA as an important biomarker. Hence, new miRNA-based therapies are now under investigation.^150–153

Figure 9.

Mature miRNAs silenced by aberrant DNA methylation and their affected target genes and pathways that are important in the development and progression of HCC.

Role of miRNA biomarkers in HCC

miRNA dysregulation has been known to be associated with many cancers, the first studied being lymphocytic leukemia,¹⁵⁴ and hence sometimes referred to as oncomirs. miRNA levels are also used as prognostic for cancers, as low miR-324 levels could serve as indicator of poor survival in non-small-cell lung carcinoma samples.¹⁵⁵ High miR-185 or low miR-133b may correlate with metastasis and poor survival in colorectal cancer.¹⁵⁶ miR-10b is implicated in the metastasis of breast cancer cells¹⁵⁷ and the development of gastric cancer and pancreatic cancer.^158,159

A number of studies have demonstrated extensive miRNA dysregulation in various stages of HCC.¹⁶⁰ Furthermore, unique patterns of miRNA expression could be utilized as potential biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, staging, and prediction of therapeutic responses in HCC.^161–163 Expression of particular miRNAs tends to change gradually during the progression of HCC, and many tumor suppressor genes are demonstrated as the targets of the HCC oncomirs (eg, PTEN for miR-21, miR-221, and miR-222). Specific signaling pathways, such as Wnt/β-catenin, RAS, TGF-β, and JAK/STAT, are established targets for miRNA dysregulation in HCC.¹⁶³

A comprehensive demonstration of the role of miRNA dysregulation and differential miRNA expression in HCC has been done.^164,165 The advantage of miRNAs is that they are stable in frozen samples, formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues, and body fluids, including plasma/serum, urine, and saliva. This property of miRNA makes them an excellent tool for early cancer diagnosis.

Primary tissue specimens. Basal miRNA expression has been studied using deep sequencing in primary HCC specimens as well as in the healthy liver.^165,166 The most abundant miRNA expressed in healthy liver is miR-122, which is commonly downregulated in HCC. miR-199a/b is also downregulated in HCC and associated with poor survival.¹⁶⁶

Serum. Serum levels of miR-122 are significantly upregulated in HCC patients compared to healthy individuals, and the levels are decreased after therapy.¹⁶⁷ A case study reported by Li et al¹⁶⁸ involving 500 serum samples from HCC patients showed that a combination of three miRNAs' profile change, such as miR-25, miR-375, and let-7f, could distinguish between HCC and healthy controls. Serum levels of miR-16, miR-195, and miR-199a, alone or in combination, could distinguish between HCC and chronic hepatitis.¹⁶⁹ Overexpression of miR-15b, miR-21, miR-130b, and miR-183 is demonstrated in 96 tumors, which indicate that these circulating miRNAs are derived from tumor cells.¹⁶⁸ Lin et al¹⁷⁰ reported very recently that the cluster of seven miRNAs (miR-29a, miR-29c, miR-133a, miR-143, miR-145, miR-192, and miR-505) can detect the HCC with better sensitivity and similar specificity than AFP. Another recent study demonstrated that low miR-150 level in HBV-related HCC patients was associated with a significantly decreased survival (P < 0.0001).¹⁶¹

Zhou et al¹⁷¹ reported that a particular miRNA panel was able to specifically distinguish HCC from healthy individuals and HBV and cirrhosis patients, using plasma samples from 934 HBV-associated HCC patients. For example, miR-106 could distinguish between HCC from healthy individuals and chronic hepatitis patients;¹⁷² while four miRNA panels (miT-20a-5p, miR-320a, miR-324-3p, and miR-375) have a high sensitivity and specificity to differentiate HCC from benign liver lesions.¹⁷³ These findings clearly demonstrate that circulating miRNAs could be a potential diagnostic marker in HCC. As given in Figure 10, distinctive miRNAs are up-/down-regulated in hepatitis, fibrosis, steatosis and HCC, however miRNA-21, miRNA-122 and miRNA-223 are involved in Hepatitis as well as HCC.

Figure 10.

Summary of miRNAs and their targets associated with HCC, liver fibrosis, NAFLD, and hepatitis (HBV or HCV infection). miRNAs that are upregulated are indicated by red text, and miRNAs that are downregulated are indicated by green text.

miRNA as a prognostic tool in HCC

Other than their utility as a diagnostic biomarker, miRNAs are also important as prognostic tool, able to determine the tumor size, nodal, and metastasis stage of HCC, invasion, recurrence, and overall survival. miR-25 has been demonstrated to have a significant role in tumor size, nodal, and metastasis as reported by Su et al;¹⁷⁴ upregulation of miR-183¹⁷⁵ and miR-17-5p¹⁷⁶ in primary HCC samples after surgery has been associated with large tumors and higher risk of metastasis. High miR-221 expression, along with downregulation of miR-100 and miR-22, is demonstrated in primary HCC tissues with distant metastasis.^177–179 miR-222 level is important to determine the advancement of the tumor.¹⁸⁰ An overall miRNA profiling study demonstrated that upregulation of miR-25, miR-372, miR-155, and miR-182^{174,181–183} strongly correlates with shorter survival time, whereas downregulation of miR-29a-5p, miR-100, miR-29, miR-101, and miR-148a in HCC tissues depicts the cure of the HCC and an increased survival.^{177,184–186}

miRNA as a therapeutic target

Currently, active research is going on to utilize these potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers as potential therapeutic targets to manage HCC. For therapy, antagonists are being developed against oncogenic miRNAs or oncomirs, referred to as antagomirs (locked nucleic acids). A very interesting example is of miravirsen (anti-miR-122) to treat chronic HCV infection, which is currently on phase III clinical trials.¹⁸⁷ The success of the miRNA-based therapy would definitely lead to the better effectiveness of the current interferon therapy by the downregulation of the cell signaling pathway that generally renders the cells' inter-feron resistant. It is reported that sorafenib, the drug used to treat HCC patients, regulates miRNA expression. Fourteen miRNAs are upregulated by sorafenib treatment. miR-122 is an important liver-specific miRNA that maintains liver homeostasis, so the delivery of miR-122 in HCV-infected patients is currently on clinical trials.¹⁸⁸ miR-122, which is generally downregulated in HCC patients, is restored by sorafenib.¹⁸⁹ Restoration of miR-122 by sorafenib also leads to an increased sensitivity of the tumors to other drugs, such as doxorubicin¹⁹⁰ adriamycin, and vincristine.¹⁹¹ miR-26b has been shown to affect NF-kB signaling molecules to mediate chemosensitivity.¹⁹² Certain miRNAs when downregulated or upregulated induce drug resistance, hence they are targeted to develop their specific antagomirs to induce drug sensitivity for HCC treatment.

miRNA profiling and expression studies have tremendous potential for the development of new biomarkers, diagnostic and prognostic markers, as well as therapeutic molecules for the management of HCC. Hence, miRNAs are definitely the anticancer medicine for the future.

Tables 2A-C summarize the names and the roles of miR-NAs as diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic markers, respectively, in HCC.¹⁹³

Table 2.

This table summarizes the list of miRNA from different sources, being upregulated or downregulated during HCC, and their roles in HCC progression. A. Daignostic markers. B. Prognostic markers C. Therapeutic markers.

microRNA	REGULATION	SOURCE	INFORMATION
A. Diagnostic biomarkers
miR-106	Up	Plasma	Differentiate HCC from healthy control and chronic disease
miR-122	Up	Serum	Differentiate HCC from healthy control
miR-15b, miR-130b	Up	Serum	Differentiate HCC from healthy control
miR-16, miR-199a	Down	Serum	Differentiate HCC from healthy control and Chronic hepatitis
miR-183	Up	Tissue	Differentiate benign and malignant liver tumor
miR-15b, miR-130b	Up	Serum	Differentiate HCC and healthy patients and reduce after surgery
miR-18a	Up	Serum	Differentiate HCC from healthy control
miR-122, miR-192, miR-21, miR-223, miR-26a, miR-27a, miR801-	Signature	Plasma	Differentiate HCC from healthy control
miR-21	Up	Serum, Plasma	Differentiate HCC from cirrhosis and healthy controls
miR-375	Up	Serum	Differentiate HBV- and HCV-related HCC from healthy controls
miR-483	Up	Plasma	Differentiate HCC from healthy control
miR-618/miR-650	Up	Urine	Differentiate HCC and control
miR-885	Up	Serum	Differentiate HCC, cirrhosis and chronic liver patients from healthy controls
miR-92a	Down	Plasma	Differentiate HCC from healthy control
miR-25, miR-375, let-7f	Up	Serum	Differentiate HCC from healthy control
miR-20a-5p, miR-320a, miR-324-3p, miR-375	Up	Plasma	Differentiate HCC from non-cancerous lesions
miR-29a, miR-29c, miR-133a, miR-143, miR-145, miR-192, miR-505	Signature	Serum	Detect early stage HCC and AFP-negative HCC
B. Prognostic markers
miR-10b	Up	Tissue	Poor prognosis
miR-122	Down	Tissue	Poor prognosis
miR-124	Down	Tissue	Poor prognosis and aggressive type
miR-135a	Up	Tissue	Shorter overall survival and disease free survival
miR-139	Down	Tissue	Metastasis and poor prognosis
miR-155	Up	Tissue	Poor prognosis, recurrence, micro-vascular invasion
miR-182	Up	Tissue	Intrahepatic metastasis and poor prognosis
miR-199b-5p	Down	Tissue	Shorter overall survival
miR-203	Up	Tissue	Better prognosis, longer survival
miR-21, miR-221	Up	Tissue	Tumor stage and poor prognosis
miR-22	Down	Tissue	Poor survival
miR-221	Up	Tissue	Poor survival
miR-29	Down	Tissue	Shorter disease free survival
miR-29a-5p	Up	Tissue	Recurrence in early stage of HCC
miR-99a	Down	Tissue	Shorter survival
Let-7g	Down	Tissue	Poor survival
DLK1-DIO3 miRNA cluster	Up	Tissue	Poor prognosis
C19MC microRNA cluster	Up	Tissue	Poor clinico-pathological features, recurrence and shorter overall survival
miR-155, miR-15a, miR-432, miR-486-3p, miR-15b, miR-30b	Up	Tissue	Recurrence-free survival
miR-19a, miR-886, miR-43, miR-486-3p, miR-15b, miR-30b	Signature	Tissue	Overall survival and recurrent free survival
67 miRNA signature	Signature	Tissue	Differentiate recurrence after liver transplantation
miR signatures in tumor and non-tumor tissues	Signature	Tissue	Differentiate early and late recurrence
miR-326, miR-3677, miR-511-1, miR-511-2, miR-9-1, miR-9-2	Signature	Tissue	Negatively associated with overall survival
C. Therapeutic markers
miR-122	Down	Cells, tissue	Decreased sensitivity to doxorubicin
miR-122	Down	Cells, tissue	Decreased sensitivity to adriamycin, vincristin
miR-122	Down	Cells, tissue	Suppressed sensitivity to sorafenib
miR-146a	Up	Cells	Suppressed sensitivity to interferon-α
miR-193a-3p	Down	Cells, tissue	Resistance to 5-FU
miR-193b	Up	Cells, tissue	Sensitivity to cisplatin
miR-199a-3p	Down	Cells, tissue	Increased sensitivity to doxorubicin
miR-1247a	Down	Cells	Resistance to sorafenib
miR-21	Up	Cells, tissue	Resistance to interferon-α/5-FU in HCC cells
miR-34a	Down	Cells, tissue	Resistance to sorafenib
13 microRNA signature	Signature	Cells, tissue	Multidrug resistance

Note: Taken from Ref. 193.

Exosomal miRNA as a biomarker of HCC

One of the recent studies by Sohn et al¹⁹⁴ isolated exosomes from the serum of chronic hepatitis B (CHB), cirrhosis, and HCC patients and found elevated levels of miRNAs, such as miR-18a, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-224, in HCC patients compared to those with CHB or liver cirrhosis (Fig. 11), whereas serum levels of miR-101, miR-106b, miR-122, and miR-195 were lower in HCC patients compared to CHB patients.

Figure 11.

The distribution of upregulated exosomal miRNAs (miR-18a, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-224) in CHB patients, LC, and HCC. Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Experimental & Molecular Medicine, Sohn W, Kim J, Kang SH. Serum exosomal microRNAs as novel biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Mol Med. 2015;47:e184. Copyright 2015.

Genetic Variants as Biomarkers

P⁵³ A249S

AGG-to-AGT single-nucleotide transversion leads to change of codon from arginine to serine at position 249 of P⁵³ gene and one of the important hotspot genetic variations in HCC.¹⁹⁵ It is majorly detected in patients who are exposed to aflatoxin and HBV.¹⁹⁶ Some recent investigations deciphered the mechanisms by which it leads to HCC development: (1) inactivation of p16^INK4 gene by overmethylation of this gene¹⁹⁷ and (2) regulation of genes that play a main role in controlling the cell cycle switch from G to S phases.¹⁹⁸

HBV core promoter mutations

HBV mutations in the basal core promoter region are important etiological risk factors for severe liver disease and HCC.^199,200 BCP 1762 and 1764 mutations identified as an independent risk factor of HCC.^201,202 Using the plasma samples, two studies reported that these mutations have the high predictive power to reveal the predisposition to HCC and its development.^203,204

HBV PreS1 mutations/truncations

One of the largest studies, while recruiting 11,582 HBV-infected patients, reported that HBV preS mutants are associated with high risk of HCC.²⁰⁵ T53C, PreS2 initiation codon mutation, PreS1 deletion, C7A, A2962G, C2964A, and C3116T were significantly associated with HCC.^201,206 One of the effects of few such mutations/deletions is that it also alters the overlapping polymerase gene reading frame; for example, rtA181T mutation in polymerase gene leads to stop codon mutation sW172 stop in the surface region and is associated with high risk of HCC development in patients' refractory to the nucleoside therapy.²⁰⁷ Due to PreS envelope protein mutations/deletions, high-level uneven expression of these proteins leads to endoplasmic reticulum stress, causing genomic instability resulting in HCC.²⁰⁸

HBx region mutations and truncations

There are two main mechanisms by which HBV causes HCC, ie, direct and indirect. In direct mechanism, it integrates into the host liver cell genome and modulates several host genes in cis manner,²⁰⁹ and the indirect way is by trans activation of several genes by HBx protein.²¹⁰ HBx protein in serum has been shown to be one of the markers of the liver cirrhosis and liver cancer in HBV-infected HCC.²¹¹ HBx induces AFP and promotes malignant transformation of hepatocytes by activating PI3K/mTOR signaling.²¹²

Genetic Variations Identified by Next-generation Sequencing

Accumulation of genetic alterations is one of the most important mechanisms of causing HCC. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) through whole genome, whole exome, and whole transcriptome approaches has lead to revolutionary studies. A study by Ley et al²¹³ reporting NGS, first described NGS as an unbiased method discovering cancer-initiating mutations. HBV integration into the host liver genome is considered as a direct way through which HBV causes HCC. Through NGS, three recent reports described HBV integration sites in the host liver genome. Using the whole genome sequencing, Jiang et al²¹⁴ found 255 HBV integration sites in only three patients. In the second study by Sung et al,²¹⁵ 399 integrations sites were identified 75 out of 81 HCC patients. In the third study, Toh et al used 48 patients and, using the deep sequencing-mediated enrichment of HBV genomes, found that HBV integrates significantly in higher frequency in the regulatory regions of the host genes. It was reported that one of the important genes having recurrent HBV integration was TERT gene.²¹⁶ A recent study also found important TERT promoter mutations in 60% of HCC patients, and other mutated genes identified were P⁵³, CTNNB1, and ARID1 genes.²¹⁷ Although not by NGS, but by clonal sequencing, our recent in-vitro study demonstrated that hepatitis B virus can integrate in the host genome immediately after infection, and the same was proved in in vivo study by infecting Wood-chucks with Woodchuck hepatitis virus.²¹⁸ Such HBV-host integration junctions possibly have the potential to act as very early molecular biomarkers of HBV related hepatocellular dysregulation. However, the question of whether they can act as a serum biomarker (fused virus-host protein secretion) will need further work and validations. Moreover, it will be interesting to discover, if such virus-host fused, secreted, properly folded proteins indeed play a role in the development of hepatocarcinoma and could be used as a prognostic biomarker or a therapeutic target. Using the whole-exome sequencing, a recent study for the first time identified recurrent alterations in four genes: AR1D1A, RPS6KA3, NFE2L2 and IRF2. In addition in liver tumors G > T transversion were significantly enriched in the non-transcribed DNA strand and highlighted their role in HCC.²¹⁹ This study demonstrated alterations in genes responsible for activating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and an important mutation of mTOR at position S2215Y was reported.²²⁰

Summary

HCC, the neoplastic transformation of the hepatocytes, is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths around the world. People at risk of developing HCC include chronic liver disease patients with hepatitis B or C, obese or diabetic people, and heavy drinkers. HCC is developed as a consequence of chronic liver cirrhosis, where there is a decrease in hepatocyte growth and proliferation, along with scar tissue formation, that provides the platform for neoplastic tumor growth. Current methods of HCC management and treatment are more tumor oriented (chemotherapy using drugs, radiotherapy, surgical methods, such as liver resection and transplantation, and ethanol injection in the tumor cells). However, these methods are more of a palliative approach to HCC, aiming to extend the life span of patients rather than devising a curative approach. Therefore, due to the lack of a proper curative treatment of HCC, it is very important to prevent the onset of HCC or make attempts to detect the disease at a very early stage. The purpose of this review is to present before the readers, scientists, and medical professionals a detailed report of the ongoing research aiming at the discovery of biological tools for the prevention and prognosis of HCC. There are some biomolecules in the tissues and body fluids of humans whose levels change with the development of many abnormal conditions, various disease states, as well as carcinogenesis. These molecules, called biomarkers, are now regarded as important prognostic tools for early diagnosis of HCC. Active research is being conducted both at the basic and clinical levels to accurately detect the molecular targets, for developing drugs and vaccines to cure or prevent HCC. Many classes of biomarkers have been studied and detected in various stages of HCC (early and late), including peptides, glycoproteins, enzymes (soluble biomarkers), and mRNAs (nucleotide biomarkers), and can be obtained from liver tissue and serum of HCC patients. These biomolecules have also shown strong promise as molecular targets for the development of anti-metastatic vaccines or drugs. For example, some biomarkers, such as TAG-72, Golgi-localized phosphoprotein 73 (GP73), enzymes, such as α-1-fucosidase, and HGF, are overexpressed in HCC tissues and indicate poor surviv-ability in patients. There are other markers, such as HCR2 enzyme, the glycoprotein APO-J/clusterin, that are reduced significantly during HCC progression and metastasis. From the start of the new millenium, miRNAs that are small non-coding RNA silencing molecules were recognized to be a new and distinct class of cancer biomarkers, especially in HCC. miRNAs that are effectively stable and easily extractable from tissues, plasma, serum, urine, and feces have shown great potential as prognostic tools and therapeutic targets in HCC.

This review has been documented to discuss the new research going on with an aim to harness the SOS signals of the human body, the biomarkers, to detect early and prevent HCC. The success of this research would bring a new era where not only HCC but also other cancers would no more be a death sentence.

Author Contributions

Wrote first draft of the manuscript: RC. Contributed to the writing of manuscript: RC, NL. Agree with manuscript results and conclusions: RC, NL. Jointly developed the structure and arguments for the paper: RC, NL. Both authors reviewed and approved of the final manuscript.

Footnotes

Abbreviations

Acknowledgments

Authors thank all biomarker investigators and scientists who are directly and indirectly associated with the present review. We have made an effort to accommodate most of the references; however, due to space constraints, all references could not be accommodated.

References

Bugianesi

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and cancer. Clin Liver Dis. 2007; 11: 191–207, x-xi.

Bosch

F.X.

, Ribes

, Diaz

, Cleries

Primary liver cancer: worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology. 2004; 127: S5–S16.

Delhaye

, Louis

, Degraef

Relationship between hepatocyte proliferative activity and liver functional reserve in human cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1996; 23: 1003–1011.

Caillot

, Derambure

, Bioulac-Sage

Transient and etiology-related transcription regulation in cirrhosis prior to hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15: 300–309.

Wiemann

S.U.

, Satyanarayana

, Tsahuridu

Hepatocyte telomere shortening and senescence are general markers of human liver cirrhosis. FASEB J. 2002; 16: 935–942.

Farazi

P.A.

, Glickman

, Jiang

, Yu

, Rudolph

K.L.

, DePinho

R.A.

Differential impact of telomere dysfunction on initiation and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2003; 63: 5021–5027.

Farazi

P.A.

, Glickman

, Horner

, Depinho

R.A.

Cooperative interactions of p53 mutation, telomere dysfunction, and chronic liver damage in hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Cancer Res. 2006; 66: 4766–4773.

Bataller

, Brenner

D.A.

Liver fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2005; 115: 209–218.

Monga

S.P.

, Pediaditakis

, Mule

, Stolz

D.B.

, Michalopoulos

G.K.

Changes in WNT/beta-catenin pathway during regulated growth in rat liver regeneration. Hepatology. 2001; 33: 1098–1109.

10.

Monga

S.P.

Role of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in liver metabolism and cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011; 43: 1021–1029.

11.

Cormier

J.N.

, Thomas

K.T.

, Chari

R.S.

, Pinson

C.W.

Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006; 10: 761–780.

12.

Marelli

, Stigliano

, Triantos

Treatment outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma using chemoembolization in combination with other therapies. Cancer Treat Rev. 2006; 32: 594–606.

13.

Salem

, Hunter

R.D.

Yttrium-90 microspheres for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 66: S83–S88.

14.

Zhu

A.X.

Systemic therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: how hopeful should we be?

Oncologist. 2006; 11: 790–800.

15.

Abou-Alfa

G.K.

, Schwartz

, Ricci

Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24: 293–4300.

16.

Liu

, Cao

, Chen

Sorafenib blocks the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, inhibits tumor angiogenesis, and induces tumor cell apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma model PLC/PRF/5. Cancer Res. 2006; 66: 11851–11858.

17.

Forner

, Hessheimer

A.J.

, Isabel Real

, Bruix

Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2006; 60: 89–98.

18.

Chen

M.B.

, Zhou

Z.T.

, Yang

KU-0060648 inhibits hepatocellular carconoma cells through DNA-PKcs dependent and DNA-PKcs-independent mechanisms. Oncotarget. 2016. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7742. [Epub ahead of print].

19.

Augello

, Puleio

, Emma

M.R.

A PTEN inhibitor displays preclinical activity against hepatocarcinoma cells. Cell Cycle. 2016; 15: 573–583.

20.

Chiang

P.C.

, Lin

S.C.

, Pan

S.L.

Antroquinonol displays anticancer potential against human hepatocellular carcinoma cells: a crucial role of AMPK and mTOR pathways. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010; 79: 162–171.

21.

Malz

, Weber

, Singer

Overexpression of far upstream element-binding proteins: a mechanism regulating proliferation and migration of liver cancer cells. Hepatology. 2009; 50: 1130–1139.

22.

Rabenhorst

, Beinoraviciute-Kellner

, Brezniceanu

M.L.

Overexpression of the far upstream element binding protein-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma is required for tumor growth. Hepatology. 2009; 50: 1121–1129.

23.

Samarin

, Laketa

, Malz

PI3K/AKT/mTOR-dependent stabilization of oncogenic far-upstream element binding proteins in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Hepatology. 2016; 63: 813–826.

24.

Niederau

, Fischer

, Purschel

, Stremmel

, Haussinger

, Strohmeyer

Long-term survival in patients with hereditary hemochromatosis. Gastroenterology. 1996; 110: 1107–1119.

25.

Aravalli

R.N.

, Steer

C.J.

, Cressman

E.N.

Molecular mechanisms of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2008; 48: 2047–2063.

26.

Zhu

, Dai

, Pan

Metadherin promotes hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Clin Cancer Res. 2011; 17: 7294–7302.

27.

Sengupta

, Siddiqi

S.A.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: important biomarkers and their significance in molecular diagnostics and therapy. Curr Med Chem. 2012; 19: 3722–3729.

28.

Shi

G.M.

, Ke

A.W.

, Zhou

CD151 modulates expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and promotes neoangiogenesis and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2010; 52: 183–196.

29.

Capurro

, Wanless

I.R.

, Sherman

Glypican-3: a novel serum and histochemical marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2003; 125: 89–97.

30.

Zittermann

S.I.

, Capurro

M.I.

, Shi

, Filmus

Soluble glypican 3 inhibits the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cancer. 2010; 126: 1291–1301.

31.

Yamauchi

, Watanabe

, Hishinuma

The glypican 3 oncofetal protein is a promising diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2005; 18: 1591–1598.

32.

Baeg

G.H.

, Perrimon

Functional binding of secreted molecules to heparan sulfate proteoglycans in Drosophila. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000; 12: 575–580.

33.

Perrimon

, Bernfield

Specificities of heparan sulphate proteoglycans in developmental processes. Nature. 2000; 404: 725–728.

34.

Capurro

M.I.

, Xu

, Shi

, Li

, Jia

, Filmus

Glypican-3 inhibits Hedgehog signaling during development by competing with patched for Hedgehog binding. Dev Cell. 2008; 14: 700–711.

35.

Lin

Functions of heparan sulfate proteoglycans in cell signaling during development. Development. 2004; 131: 6009–6021.

36.

Capurro

M.I.

, Xiang

Y.Y.

, Lobe

, Filmus

Glypican-3 promotes the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma by stimulating canonical Wnt signaling. Cancer Res. 2005; 65: 6245–6254.

37.

Ogasawara

, Yano

, Iemura

, Hisaka

, Kojiro

Expressions of basic fibroblast growth factor and its receptors and their relationship to proliferation of human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Hepatology. 1996; 24: 198–205.

38.

Ito

, Takeda

, Higashiyama

Expression of heparin binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor in hepatocellular carcinoma: an immunohisto-chemical study. Oncol Rep. 2001; 8: 903–907.

39.

Horiguchi

, Takayama

, Toyoda

Hepatocyte growth factor promotes hepatocarcinogenesis through c-Met autocrine activation and enhanced angiogenesis in transgenic mice treated with diethylnitrosamine. Oncogene. 2002; 21: 1791–1799.

40.

Jin

, Moskophidis

, Mivechi

N.F.

Heat shock transcription factor 1 is a key determinant of HCC development by regulating hepatic steatosis and metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab. 2011; 14: 91–103.

41.

Fang

, Chang

, Yang

Heat shock factor 1 promotes invasion and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Cancer. 2012; 118: 1782–1794.

42.

Liu

C.C.

, Jan

Y.J.

, Ko

B.S.

14-3-3sigma induces heat shock protein 70 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2014; 14: 425.

43.

Jin

, Wang

, Jin

Detection of serum gastric cancer-associated MG7-Ag from gastric cancer patients using a sensitive and convenient ELISA method. Cancer Invest. 2009; 27: 227–233.

44.

Chauhan

S.C.

, Vinayek

, Maher

D.M.

Combined staining of TAG-72, MUC1, and CA125 improves labeling sensitivity in ovarian cancer: antigens for multi-targeted antibody-guided therapy. J Histochem Cytochem. 2007; 55: 867–875.

45.

Santos-Juanes

, Bernaldo de Quiros

J.F.

, Galache Osuna

Apocrine carcinoma, adenopathies, and raised TAG-72 serum tumor marker. Dermatol Surg. 2004; 30: 566–569.

46.

Zhang

, Deng

Z.S.

, Liao

M.M.

Tumor associated glycoprotein-72 is a novel marker for poor survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res. 2012; 18: 911–916.

47.

Scholzen

, Gerdes

The Ki-67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol. 2000; 182: 311–322.

48.

Mohamed

W.S.

, Omar

M.M.

, Khayri

T.M.

, Fakhr

I.M.

Assessment of the pro-liferative marker Ki-67 and p53 protein expression in HBV- and HCV-related hepatocellular carcinoma cases in Egypt. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2008; 2: 27–34.

49.

Wennerberg

A.E.

, Nalesnik

M.A.

, Coleman

W.B.

Hepatocyte paraffin 1: a monoclonal antibody that reacts with hepatocytes and can be used for differential diagnosis of hepatic tumors. Am J Pathol. 1993; 143: 1050–1054.

50.

Fasano

, Theise

N.D.

, Nalesnik

Immunohistochemical evaluation of hepatoblastomas with use of the hepatocyte-specific marker, hepatocyte paraffin 1, and the polyclonal anti-carcinoembryonic antigen. Mod Pathol. 1998; 11: 934–938.

51.

Maitra

, Murakata

L.A.

, Albores-Saavedra

Immunoreactivity for hepatocyte paraffin 1 antibody in hepatoid adenocarcinomas of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Clin Pathol. 2001; 115: 689–694.

52.

Murakata

L.A.

, Ishak

K.G.

, Nzeako

U.C.

Clearcellcarcinoma of the liver: a comparative immunohistochemical study with renal clear cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2000; 13: 874–881.

53.

Lugli

, Tornillo

, Mirlacher

, Bundi

, Sauter

, Terracciano

L.M.

Hepa-tocyte paraffin 1 expression in human normal and neoplastic tissues: tissue microarray analysis on 3,940 tissue samples. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004; 122: 721–727.

54.

Lau

S.K.

, Prakash

, Geller

S.A.

, Alsabeh

Comparative immunohistochemical profile of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and metastatic adenocarcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2002; 33: 1175–1181.

55.

Villari

, Caruso

, Grosso

, Vitarelli

, Righi

, Barresi

Hep Par 1 in gastric and bowel carcinomas: an immunohistochemical study. Pathology. 2002; 34: 423–426.

56.

Zimmerman

R.L.

, Burke

M.A.

, Young

N.A.

, Solomides

C.C.

, Bibbo

Diagnostic value of hepatocyte paraffin 1 antibody to discriminate hepatocellular carcinoma from metastatic carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration biopsies of the liver. Cancer. 2001; 93: 288–291.

57.

Kakar

, Muir

, Murphy

L.M.

, Lloyd

R.V.

, Burgart

L.J.

Immunoreactivity of Hep Par 1 in hepatic and extrahepatic tumors and its correlation with albumin in situ hybridization in hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003; 119: 361–366.

58.

Pitman

M.B.

, Triratanachat

, Young

R.H.

, Oliva

Hepatocyte paraffin 1 antibody does not distinguish primary ovarian tumors with hepatoid differentiation from metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2004; 23: 58–64.

59.

Xue

, Higgs

B.W.

, Huang

HERC5 is a prognostic biomarker for post-liver transplant recurrent human hepatocellular carcinoma. J Transl Med. 2015; 13: 379.

60.

Bernassola

, Karin

, Ciechanover

, Melino

The HECT family of E3 ubiquitin ligases: multiple players in cancer development. Cancer Cell. 2008; 14: 10–21.

61.

Chen

D.S.

, Sung

J.L.

, Sheu

J.C.

Serum alpha-fetoprotein in the early stage of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 1984; 86: 1404–1409.

62.

Wang

C.S.

, Lin

C.L.

, Lee

H.C.

Usefulness of serum des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11: 6115–6119.

63.

Cheng

, Wang

, Zhang

Prognostic role of pre-treatment serum AFP-L3% in hepatocellular carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e87011.

64.

Guzman

, Alagiozian-Angelova

, Layden-Almer

J.E.

p53, Ki-67, and serum alpha feto-protein as predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in liver transplant patients. Mod Pathol. 2005; 18: 1498–1503.

65.

Gorog

, Regoly-Merei

, Paku

, Kopper

, Nagy

Alpha-fetoprotein expression is a potential prognostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11: 5015–5018.

66.

Norton

P.A.

, Comunale

M.A.

, Krakover

N-linked glycosylation of the liver cancer biomarker GP73. J Cell Biochem. 2008; 104: 136–149.

67.

Block

T.M.

, Comunale

M.A.

, Lowman

Use of targeted glycoproteomics to identify serum glycoproteins that correlate with liver cancer in woodchucks and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102: 779–784.

68.

Block

, Mehta

A.S.

, London

W.T.

Hepatocellular carcinoma of the liver. Cancer Biomark. 2010; 9: 375–383.

69.

Kladney

R.D.

, Bulla

G.A.

, Guo

GP73, a novel Golgi-localized protein upregulated by viral infection. Gene. 2000; 249: 53–65.

70.

Liang

, Block

T.M.

, Wang

Interleukin-6 and oncostatin M are elevated in liver disease in conjunction with candidate hepatocellular carcinoma biomarker GP73. Cancer Biomark. 2012; 11: 161–171.

71.

Kristiansen

, Fritzsche

F.R.

, Wassermann

GOLPH2 protein expression as a novel tissue biomarker for prostate cancer: implications for tissue-based diagnostics. Br J Cancer. 2008; 99: 939–948.

72.

Comunale

M.A.

, Wang

, Rodemich-Betesh

Novel changes in glycosylation of serum Apo-J in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011; 20: 1222–1229.

73.

Wang

, Liu

Y.H.

, Mai

S.J.

Evaluation of serum clusterin as a surveillance tool for human hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis B virus related cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 25: 1123–1128.

74.

Nafee

A.M.

, Pasha

H.F.

, Abd El Aal

S.M.

, Mostafa

N.A.

Clinical significance of serum clusterin as a biomarker for evaluating diagnosis and metastasis potential of viral-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Biochem. 2012; 45: 1070–1074.

75.

Zheng

, Yao

, Sai

Diagnostic and prognostic significance of secretory clusterin expression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2015: 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3875–3.

76.

Shen

, Fan

, Yang

X.R.

Serum DKK1 as a protein biomarker for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a large-scale, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13: 817–826.

77.

Tsai

J.F.

, Jeng

J.E.

, Chuang

W.L.

Dickkopf-1 and hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13: e410; author reply e410–411.

78.

Zhu

, Dai

, Zhou

Biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma: progression in early diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized therapy. Biomark Res. 2013; 1: 10.

79.

Wang

, Qi

, Li

Notch1 signaling sensitizes tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells by inhibiting Akt/Hdm2-mediated p53 degradation and up-regulating p53-dependent DR5 expression. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284: 16183–16190.

80.

Liu

, Ma

, Huang

Decreased expression of the human carbonyl reductase 2 gene HCR2 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2006; 11: 230–241.

81.

Zhu

W.W.

, Guo

J.J.

, Guo

Evaluation of midkine as a diagnostic serum biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19: 3944–3954.

82.

Nault

J.C.

Molecular determinants of prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2014; 2: 31–36.

83.

Marrero

J.A.

, Feng

, Wang

Alpha-fetoprotein, des-gamma carboxyprothrombin, and lectin-bound alpha-fetoprotein in early hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2009; 137: 110–118.

84.

Murata

, Suzuki

, Okano

, Oyamada

, Yasuda

, Sakamoto

Hypoxiainduced des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin production in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2010; 36: 161–170.

85.

Wang

, Guo

, Li

Alpha-1-fucosidase as a prognostic indicator for hepatocellular carcinoma following hepatectomy: a large-scale, long-term study. Br J Cancer. 2014; 110: 1811–1819.

86.

Tangkijvanich

, Tosukhowong

, Bunyongyod

Alpha-L-fucosidase as a serum marker of hepatocellular carcinoma in Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999; 30: 110–114.

87.

Nakamura

, Muro

, Suzuki

Immunohistochemical studies on endothelial cell phenotype in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 1997; 26: 407–415.

88.

Tewari

, Mohn

K.L.

, Yue

F.E.

, Taub

Sequence of rat RL/IF-1 encoding an IkappaB, and comparison with related proteins containing notch-like repeats [corrected]. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992; 20: 607.

89.

Yamagamim

, Moriyama

, Matsumura

Serum concentrations of human hepatocyte growth factor is a useful indicator for predicting the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinomas in C-viral chronic liver diseases. Cancer. 2002; 95: 824–834.

90.

Mizuguchi

, Katsuramaki

, Nobuoka

Serum hyaluronate level for predicting subclinical liver dysfunction after hepatectomy. World J Surg. 2004; 28: 971–976.

91.

Levi-Montalcini

The nerve growth factor 35 years later. Science. 1987; 237: 1154–1162.

92.

Rasi

, Serafino

, Bellis

Nerve growth factor involvement in liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2007; 13: 4986–4995.

93.

Treiber

, Wex

, Rocken

, Fostitsch

, Malfertheiner

Impact of biomarkers on disease survival and progression in patients treated with octreotide for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2006; 132: 699–708.

94.

Zhu

A.X.

, Finn

R.S.

, Mulcahy

A phase II and biomarker study of ramucirumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the VEGF receptor-2, as first-line monotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19: 6614–6623.

95.

Poon

R.T.

, Ho

J.W.

, Tong

C.S.

, Lau

, Ng

I.O.

, Fan

S.T.

Prognostic significance of serum vascular endothelial growth factor and endostatin in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2004; 91: 1354–1360.

96.

Llovet

J.M.

, Pena

C.E.

, Lathia

C.D.

Plasma biomarkers as predictors of outcome in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012; 18: 2290–2300.

97.

Bedossa

, Peltier

, Terris

, Franco

, Poynard

Transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) and TGF-beta 1 receptors in normal, cirrhotic, and neoplastic human livers. Hepatology. 1995; 21: 760–766.

98.

Liu

Z.M.

, Tseng

H.Y.

, Tsai

H.W.

, Su

F.C.

, Huang

H.S.

Transforming growth factor beta-interacting factor-induced malignant progression of hepatocellular carcinoma cells depends on superoxide production from Nox4. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015; 84: 54–64.

99.

, Liu

, Shao

Mucin1 mediates autocrine transforming growth factor beta signaling through activating the c-Jun N-terminal kinase/activator protein 1 pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015; 59: 116–125.

100.

Berasain

, Avila

M.A.

The EGFR signalling system in the liver: from hepatoprotection to hepatocarcinogenesis. J Gastroenterol. 2014; 49: 9–23.

101.

Hsieh

S.Y.

, He

J.R.

, Yu

M.C.

Secreted ERBB3 isoforms are serum markers for early hepatoma in patients with chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. J Proteome Res. 2011; 10: 4715–4724.

102.

Chen

Y.J.

, Chien

P.H.

, Chen

W.S.

Hepatitis B virus-encoded X protein downregulates EGFR expression via inducing microRNA-7 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Evidence Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013; 2013: 10.

103.

Lanaya

, Natarajan

, Komposch

EGFR has a tumour-promoting role in liver macrophages during hepatocellular carcinoma formation. Nat Cell Biol. 2014; 16(972-981): 971–977.

104.

, Gao

, Wang

Lower serum soluble-EGFR is a potential biomarker for metastasis of HCC demonstrated by N-glycoproteomic analysis. Discov Med. 2015; 19: 333–341.

105.

Lee

H.H.

, Uen

Y.H.

, Tian

Y.F.

Wnt-1 protein as a prognostic biomarker for hepatitis B-related and hepatitis C-related hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18: 1562–1569.

106.

, Kim

Glypican-3: a new target for cancer immunotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 2011; 47: 333–338.

107.

Scholz

, Rehm

V.A.

, Rieke

Angiopoietin-2 serum levels are elevated in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007; 102: 2471–2481.

108.

Diaz-Sanchez

, Matilla

, Nunez

Serum angiopoietin-2 level as a predictor of tumor invasiveness in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013; 48: 334–343.

109.

David

, Mukherjee

, Ghosh

C.C.

Angiopoietin-2 may contribute to multiple organ dysfunction and death in sepsis*. Crit Care Med. 2012; 40: 3034–3041.

110.

Wang

, Zhou

, Xia

, Sun

, Wang

, Cheng

Activated Notch signaling is required for hepatitis B virus X protein to promote proliferation and survival of human hepatic cells. Cancer Lett. 2010; 298: 64–73.

111.

Villanueva

, Alsinet

, Yanger

Notch signaling is activated in human hepatocellular carcinoma and induces tumor formation in mice. Gastroenterology. 2012; 143(1660-1669): e1667.

112.

Sun

, Wang

, Luo

, Wang

, Cheng

Notch1 is a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of human hepatitis B virus X protein-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2014; 31: 933–939.

113.

Ahn

, Hyeon

, Park

C.K.

Notch1 and Notch4 are markers for poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013; 12: 286–294.

114.

, Jiao

, Jing

Prognostic value of Notch-1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2015; 8: 3105–3114.

115.

Rose

T.M.

, Bruce

A.G.

Oncostatin M is a member of a cytokine family that includes leukemia-inhibitory factor, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, and interleukin 6. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991; 88: 8641–8645.

116.

Kinoshita

, Sekiguchi

, Xu

M.J.

Hepatic differentiation induced by oncostatin M attenuates fetal liver hematopoiesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999; 96: 7265–7270.

117.

Blum

H.E.

Molecular targets for prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis. 2002; 20: 81–90.

118.

Morgan

, Kalsheker

N.A.

Regulation of the serine proteinase inhibitor (SER-PIN) gene alpha 1-antitrypsin: a paradigm for other SERPINs. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 1997; 29: 1501–1511.

119.

Comunale

M.A.

, Rodemich-Betesh

, Hafner

Linkage specific fucosylation of alpha-1-antitrypsin in liver cirrhosis and cancer patients: implications for a biomarker of hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 2010; 5: e12419.

120.

Wang

, Long

R.E.

, Comunale

M.A.

Novel fucosylated biomarkers for the early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18: 1914–1921.

121.

Kuno

, Ikehara

, Tanaka

A serum “sweet-doughnut” protein facilitates fibrosis evaluation and therapy assessment in patients with viral hepatitis. Sci Rep. 2013; 3: 1065.

122.

Yamasaki

, Tateyama

, Abiru

Elevated serum levels of Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive human Mac-2 binding protein predict the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis C patients. Hepatology. 2014; 60: 1563–1570.

123.

Sasaki

, Yamasaki

, Abiru

Serum wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive mac-2 binding protein values predict the development of hepatocellular carcinoma among patients with chronic hepatitis C after sustained virological response. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0129053.

124.

Wolf

M.J.

, Seleznik

G.M.

, Zeller

, Heikenwalder

The unexpected role of lymphotoxin beta receptor signaling in carcinogenesis: from lymphoid tissue formation to liver and prostate cancer development. Oncogene. 2010; 29: 5006–5018.

125.

Haybaeck

, Zeller

, Wolf

M.J.

A lymphotoxin-driven pathway to hepato-cellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2009; 16: 295–308.

126.

Scarzello

A.J.

, Jiang

, Back

LT βR signalling preferentially accelerates oncogenic AKT-initiated liver tumours. Gut. 2015.

127.

Lai

M.C.

, Yang

, Zhou

Long non-coding RNA MALAT-1 overexpression predicts tumor recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation. Med Oncol. 2012; 29: 1810–1816.

128.

Huang

, Huang

, Shen

Sp1 cooperates with Sp3 to upregulate MALAT1 expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2015; 34: 2403–2412.

129.

Liu

W.T.

, Lu

, Tang

G.H.

LncRNAs expression signatures of hepatocellular carcinoma revealed by microarray. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20: 6314–6321.

130.

Bhan

, Mandal

S.S.

LncRNA HOTAIR: a master regulator of chromatin dynamics and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015; 1856: 151–164.

131.

Cai

, Song

X.Q.

, Cai

J.P.

, Zhang

HOTAIR: a cancer-related long non-coding RNA. Neoplasma. 2014; 61: 379–391.

132.

Yang

, Zhou

, Wu

L.M.

Overexpression of long non-coding RNA HOTAIR predicts tumor recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma patients following liver transplantation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18: 1243–1250.

133.

Gabory

, Jammes

, Dandolo

The H19 locus: role of an imprinted non-coding RNA in growth and development. Bioessays. 2010; 32: 473–480.

134.

Shi

, Sun

, Liu

, Yao

, Song

Long non-coding RNAs: a new frontier in the study of human diseases. Cancer Lett. 2013; 339: 159–166.

135.

Zhang

, Yang

, Yuan

J.H.

Epigenetic activation of the MiR-200 family contributes to H19-mediated metastasis suppression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2013; 34: 577–586.

136.

Zhao

, Guo

, Chen

, Hu

, Wang

, Sun

Role of long non-coding RNA HULC in cell proliferation, apoptosis and tumor metastasis of gastric cancer: a clinical and in vitro investigation. Oncol Rep. 2014; 31: 358–364.

137.

Panzitt

, Tschernatsch

M.M.

, Guelly

Characterization of HULC, a novel gene with striking up-regulation in hepatocellular carcinoma, as noncoding RNA. Gastroenterology. 2007; 132: 330–342.

138.

, Kong

, You

Elevation of highly up-regulated in liver cancer (HULC) by hepatitis B virus X protein promotes hepatoma cell proliferation via down-regulating p18. J Biol Chem. 2012; 287: 26302–26311.

139.

Tangkijvanich

, Hourpai

, Rattanatanyong

, Wisedopas

, Mahachai

, Mutirangura

Serum LINE-1 hypomethylation as a potential prognostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Chim Acta. 2007; 379: 127–133.

140.

Piao

, Wang

, Zhang

Hypomethylation of long interspersed nuclear element-1 is involved in the early tumorigenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Interdiscipl Histopathol. 2014; 2(4): 191–196.

141.

Gao

X.D.

, Qu

J.H.

, Chang

X.J.

Hypomethylation of long interspersed nuclear element-1 promoter is associated with poor outcomes for curative resected hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2014; 34: 136–146.

142.

Ambros

The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature. 2004; 431: 350–355.

143.

Bartel

D.P.

MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell. 2009; 136: 215–233.

144.

Fabian

M.R.

, Sonenberg

, Filipowicz

Regulation of mRNA translation and stability by microRNAs. Annu Rev Biochem. 2010; 79: 351–379.

145.

Bentwich

, Avniel

, Karov

Identification of hundreds of conserved and nonconserved human microRNAs. Nat Genet. 2005; 37: 766–770.

146.

Lagos-Quintana

, Rauhut

, Yalcin

, Meyer

, Lendeckel

, Tuschl

Identification of tissue-specific microRNAs from mouse. Curr Biol. 2002; 12: 735–739.

147.

Reinhart

B.J.

, Slack

F.J.

, Basson

The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2000; 403: 901–906.

148.

Lau

N.C.

, Lim

L.P.

, Weinstein

E.G.

, Bartel

D.P.

An abundant class of tiny RNAs with probable regulatory roles in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 2001; 294: 858–862.

149.

Wienholds

, Kloosterman

W.P.

, Miska

MicroRNA expression in zebrafish embryonic development. Science. 2005; 309: 310–311.

150.

, Feng

, Coukos

, Zhang

Therapeutic microRNA strategies in human cancer. AAPS J. 2009; 11: 747–757.

151.

Trang

, Weidhaas

J.B.

, Slack

F.J.

MicroRNAs as potential cancer therapeutics. Oncogene. 2008; 27(suppl 2): S52–S57.

152.

Hydbring

, Badalian-Very

Gayane clinical applications of microRNAs. F1000Res. 2013; 2: 136.

153.

Fasanaro

, Greco

, Ivan

, Capogrossi

M.C.

, Martelli

microRNA: emerging therapeutic targets in acute ischemic diseases. Pharmacol Ther. 2010; 125: 92–104.

154.

Musilova

, Mraz

MicroRNAs in B-cell lymphomas: how a complex biology gets more complex. Leukemia. 2015; 29: 1004–1017.

155.

Vosa

, Vooder

, Kolde

Identification of miR-374a as a prognostic marker for survival in patients with early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011; 50: 812–822.

156.

Akcakaya

, Ekelund

, Kolosenko

miR-185 and miR-133b deregulation is associated with overall survival and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol. 2011; 39: 311–318.

157.

Role of miR-10b in breast cancer metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. 2010; 12: 210.

158.

Liu

, Zhu

, Cao

, Ren

, Fang

miR-10b promotes cell invasion through RhoC-AKT signaling pathway by targeting HOXD10 in gastric cancer. Int J Oncol. 2012; 40: 1553–1560.

159.

Ouyang

, Gore

, Deitz

, Korc

microRNA-10b enhances pancreatic cancer cell invasion by suppressing TIP30 expression and promoting EGF and TGF-beta actions. Oncogene. 2014; 33: 4664–4674.

160.

Borel

, Konstantinova

, Jansen

P.L.

Diagnostic and therapeutic potential of miRNA signatures in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012; 56: 1371–1383.

161.

Wong

C.M.

, Wong

C.C.

, Lee

J.M.

, Fan

D.N.

, Au

S.L.

, Ng

I.O.

Sequential alterations of microRNA expression in hepatocellular carcinoma development and venous metastasis. Hepatology. 2012; 55: 1453–1461.

162.

Iorio

M.V.

, Croce

C.M.

MicroRNA dysregulation in cancer: diagnostics, monitoring and therapeutics. A comprehensive review. EMBO Mol Med. 2012; 4: 143–159.

163.

Wei

, Huang

G.L.

, Zhang

M.Y.

Clinical significance and prognostic value of microRNA expression signatures in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19: 4780–4791.

164.

Huang

, He

The role of microRNAs in liver cancer progression. Br J Cancer. 2011; 104: 235–240.

165.

Law

P.T.

, Wong

Emerging roles of microRNA in the intracellular signaling networks of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 26: 437–449.

166.

Hou

, Lin

, Zhou

Identification of miRNomes in human liver and hepatocellular carcinoma reveals miR-199a/b-3p as therapeutic target for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2011; 19: 232–243.

167.

, Cheng

S.Q.

, Wang

, Li

, Chen

Y.F.

, Gao

C.F.

Serum microRNAs as biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e28486.

168.

L.M.

, Hu

Z.B.

, Zhou

Z.X.

Serum microRNA profiles serve as novel biomarkers for HBV infection and diagnosis of HBV-positive hepatocarcinoma. Cancer Res. 2010; 70: 9798–9807.

169.

Jiang

, Li

, Cheng

, Zhang

B.H.

Plasma microRNA might as a potential biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma and chronic liver disease screening. Tumour Biol. 2015; 36: 7167–7174.

170.

Lin

X.J.

, Chong

, Guo

Z.W.

A serum microRNA classifier for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre, retrospective, longitudinal biomarker identification study with a nested case-control study. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16: 804–815.

171.

Zhou

, Yu

, Gao

Plasma microRNA panel to diagnose hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29: 4781–4788.

172.

Sun

, Ma

, Wu

Characterization of the liver tissue interstitial fluid (TIF) proteome indicates potential for application in liver disease biomarker discovery. J Proteome Res. 2010; 9: 1020–1031.

173.

Huang

, Huang

, Ni

, Peng

, Sheng

, Du

Plasma microRNAs are promising novel biomarkers for early detection of colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2010; 127: 118–126.

174.

Z.X.

, Zhao

, Rong

Z.H.

, Geng

W.M.

, Wu

Y.G.

, Qin

C.K.

Upregulation of microRNA-25 associates with prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagn Pathol. 2014; 9: 47.

175.

Liang

, Gao

, Shi

Expression and significance of microRNA-183 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci World J. 2013; 2013: 381874.

176.

Yang

, Yin

, Wang

miR-17-5p promotes migration of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-heat shock protein 27 pathway. Hepatology. 2010; 51: 1614–1623.

177.

Yoon

S.O.

, Chun

S.M.

, Han

E.H.

Deregulated expression of microRNA-221 with the potential for prognostic biomarkers in surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 2011; 42: 1391–1400.

178.

Chen

, Zhao

, Ma

Downregulation of microRNA-100 correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cell Biochem. 2013; 383: 49–58.

179.

Shi

, Xu

MicroRNA-22 is down-regulated in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed Pharmacother. 2013; 67: 375–380.

180.

, Wang

, Yu

, Chen

, Luo

Expression of serum miR-221 in human hepatocellular carcinoma and its prognostic significance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011; 406: 70–73.

181.

, Guo

, Zou

, Zhu

, Zhang

Upregulation of microRNA-372 associates with tumor progression and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cell Biochem. 2013; 375: 23–30.

182.

Han

Z.B.

, Chen

H.Y.

, Fan

J.W.

, Wu

J.Y.

, Tang

H.M.

, Peng

Z.H.

Up-regulation of microRNA-155 promotes cancer cell invasion and predicts poor survival of hepatocellular carcinoma following liver transplantation. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012; 138: 153–161.

183.

Wang

, Li

, Shen

, Wang

, Yang

, Zhang

MicroRNA-182 downregulates metastasis suppressor 1 and contributes to metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2012; 12: 227.

184.

Xiong

, Fang

J.H.

, Yun

J.P.

Effects of microRNA-29 on apoptosis, tumorigenicity, and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2010; 51: 836–845.

185.

Zhang

, Zheng

, Hai

MicroRNA-148b expression is decreased in hepato-cellular carcinoma and associated with prognosis. Med Oncol. 2014; 31: 984.

186.

Zhu

H.T.

, Dong

Q.Z.

, Sheng

Y.Y.

MicroRNA-29a-5p is a novel predictor for early recurrence of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection. PLoS One. 2012; 7: e52393.

187.

Janssen

H.L.

, Reesink

H.W.

, Lawitz

E.J.

Treatment of HCV infection by targeting microRNA. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 1685–1694.

188.

Hsu

S.H.

, Wang

, Kota

Essential metabolic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-tumorigenic functions of miR-122 in liver. J Clin Invest. 2012; 122: 2871–2883.

189.

Bai

, Nasser

M.W.

, Wang

MicroRNA-122 inhibits tumorigenic properties of hepatocellular carcinoma cells and sensitizes these cells to sorafenib. J Biol Chem. 2009; 284: 32015–32027.

190.

Yang

, Zhang

, Wang

Modulation of the unfolded protein response is the core of microRNA-122-involved sensitivity to chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Neoplasia. 2011; 13: 590–600.

191.

, Xia

, Ma

MicroRNA-122 sensitizes HCC cancer cells to adriamycin and vincristine through modulating expression of MDR and inducing cell cycle arrest. Cancer Lett. 2011; 310: 160–169.

192.

Zhao

, Wang

, Zhou

, Zhu

, Gong

, Zhuang

S.M.

MicroRNA-26b suppresses the NF-kappaB signaling and enhances the chemosensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by targeting TAK1 and TAB3. Mol Cancer. 2014; 13: 35.

193.

Anwar

S.L.

, Lehmann

MicroRNAs: emerging novel clinical biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinomas. J Clin Med. 2015; 4: 1631–1650.

194.

Sohn

, Kim

, Kang

S.H.

Serum exosomal microRNAs as novel biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Mol Med. 2015; 47: e184.

195.

Hussain

S.P.

, Schwank

, Staib

, Wang

X.W.

, Harris

C.C.

TP53 mutations and hepatocellular carcinoma: insights into the etiology and pathogenesis of liver cancer. Oncogene. 2007; 26: 2166–2176.

196.

Gouas

, Shi

, Hainaut

The aflatoxin-induced TP53 mutation at codon 249 (R 249S): biomarker of exposure, early detection and target for therapy. Cancer Lett. 2009; 286: 29–37.

197.

Matsuda

, Ichida

, Matsuzawa

, Sugimura

, Asakura

p16(INK4) is inactivated by extensive CpG methylation in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 1999; 116: 394–400.

198.

Zhang

Y.J.

, Jiang

, Chen

C.J.

Amplification and overexpression of cyclin D1 in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993; 196: 1010–1016.

199.

Chauhan

, Kazim

S.N.

, Bhattacharjee

, Sakhuja

, Sarin

S.K.

Basal core promoter, precore region mutations of HBV and their association with e antigen, genotype, and severity of liver disease in patients with chronic hepatitis B in India. J Med Virol. 2006; 78: 1047–1054.

200.

Fang

Z.L.

, Sabin

C.A.

, Dong

B.Q.

HBV A1762T, G1764A mutations are a valuable biomarker for identifying a subset of male HBsAg carriers at extremely high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103: 2254–2262.

201.

Liu

, Zhang

, Gu

Associations between hepatitis B virus mutations and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009; 101: 1066–1082.

202.

Yang

H.I.

, Yeh

S.H.

, Chen

P.J.

Associations between hepatitis B virus genotype and mutants and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008; 100: 1134–1143.

203.

Kuang

S.Y.

, Jackson

P.E.

, Wang

J.B.

Specific mutations of hepatitis B virus in plasma predict liver cancer development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101: 3575–3580.

204.

Kuang

S.Y.

, Lekawanvijit

, Maneekarn

Hepatitis B 1762T/1764A mutations, hepatitis C infection, and codon 249 p53 mutations in hepatocellular carcinomas from Thailand. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14: 380–384.

205.

Pollicino

, Cacciola

, Saffioti

, Raimondo

Hepatitis B virus PreS/S gene variants: pathobiology and clinical implications. J Hepatol. 2014; 61: 408–417.

206.

L.S.

, Liu

J.X.

, Liu

T.T.

Association of hepatitis B virus pre-S deletions with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in Qidong, China. PLoS One. 2014; 9: e98257.

207.

Yeh

C.T.

, Chen

, Hsu

C.W.

Emergence of the rtA181T/sW172* mutant increased the risk of hepatoma occurrence in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. BMC Cancer. 2011; 11: 398.

208.

Wang

H.C.

, Wu

H.C.

, Chen

C.F.

, Fausto

, Lei

H.Y.

, Su

I.J.

Different types of ground glass hepatocytes in chronic hepatitis B virus infection contain specific pre-S mutants that may induce endoplasmic reticulum stress. Am J Pathol. 2003; 163: 2441–2449.

209.

Buendia

M.A.

, Neuveut

Hepatocellular carcinoma. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2015; 5: a021444.

210.

Gearhart

T.L.

, Bouchard

M.J.

The hepatitis B virus X protein modulates hepatocyte proliferation pathways to stimulate viral replication. J Virol. 2010; 84: 2675–2686.

211.

Zhang

, Wu

L.Y.

, Zhang

Anti-hepatitis B virus X protein in sera is one of the markers of development of liver cirrhosis and liver cancer mediated by HBV. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2009; 2009: 289068.

212.

Zhu

, Guo

, Li

Hepatitis B virus X protein induces expression of alpha-fetoprotein and activates PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway in liver cells. Oncotarget. 2015; 6: 12196–12208.

213.

Ley

T.J.

, Mardis

E.R.

, Ding

DNA sequencing of a cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukaemia genome. Nature. 2008; 456: 66–72.

214.

Jiang

, Jhunjhunwala

, Liu

The effects of hepatitis B virus integration into the genomes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Genome Res. 2012; 22: 593–601.

215.

Sung

W.K.

, Zheng

, Li

Genome-wide survey of recurrent HBV integration in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2012; 44: 765–769.

216.

Toh

S.T.

, Jin

, Liu

Deep sequencing of the hepatitis B virus in hepatocellular carcinoma patients reveals enriched integration events, structural alterations and sequence variations. Carcinogenesis. 2013; 34: 787–798.

217.

Nault

J.C.

, Zucman-Rossi

TERT promoter mutations in primary liver tumors. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2016; 40: 9–14.

218.

Chauhan

, Churchill

N.D.

, Michalak

T.I.

Initial sites of hepadnavirus integration with host genome after de novo infection of human hepatocytes and wood-chuck model of hepatitis B. (unpublished).

219.

Guichard

, Amaddeo

, Imbeaud

Integrated analysis of somatic mutations and focal copy-number changes identifies key genes and pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nature Genetics. 2012; 44(6): 694–698.

220.

Janku

, Kaseb

A.O.

, Tsimberidou

A.M.

, Wolff

R.A.

, Kurzrock

Identification of novel therapeutic targets in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma using targeted next generation sequencing. Oncotarget. 2014; 5: 3012–3022.

221.

Sanyal

A.J.

, Yoon

S.K.

, Lencioni

The etiology of hepatocellular carcinoma and consequences for treatment. Oncologist. 2010; 15(suppl 4): 14–22.

222.

Y.J.

, Jan

Y.J.

, Ko

B.S.

, Liang

S.M.

, Liou

J.Y.

Involvement of 14-3-3 proteins in regulating tumor progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers. 2015; 7: 1022–1036.

223.

, Liu

, Pan

Serum Golgi protein 73 (GP73) is a diagnostic and prognostic marker of chronic HBV liver disease. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015; 94: e659.

224.

Ratnasari

, Yano

Do soluble vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors predict the progression of chronic hepatitis to hepatocellular carcinoma?

Journal of Hepatitis 2015; 1: 4.

225.

W.M.

, Zhu

, Wang

W.M.

Hotair mediates hepatocarcinogenesis through suppressing miRNA-218 expression and activating P14 and P16 signaling. J Hepatol. 2015; 63: 886–895.

226.

J.T.

Serum alpha-fetoprotein and its lectin reactivity in liver diseases: a review. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 1990; 20: 98–105.

227.

Khien

V.V.

, Mao

H.V.

, Chinh

T.T.

Clinical evaluation of lentil lectin-reactive alpha-fetoprotein-L3 in histology-proven hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Biol Markers. 2001; 16: 105–111.

228.

Nakatsura

, Yoshitake

, Senju

Glypican-3, overexpressed specifically in human hepatocellular carcinoma, is a novel tumor marker. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003; 306: 16–25.

229.

Weitz

I.C.

, Liebman

H.A.

Des-gamma-carboxy (abnormal) prothrombin and hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical review. Hepatology. 1993; 18: 990–997.

230.

Cui

, He

, Zhang

Diagnostic value of protein induced by vitamin K absence (PIVKAII) and hepatoma-specific band of serum gammaglutamyl transferase (GGTII) as hepatocellular carcinoma markers complementary to alpha-fetoprotein. Br J Cancer. 2003; 88: 1878–1882.

231.

, Yang

, Xu

Elevated expression of DKK1 is associated with cytoplasmic/nuclear beta-catenin accumulation and poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinomas. J Hepatol. 2009; 50: 948–957.

232.

Marrero

J.A.

, Romano

P.R.

, Nikolaeva

GP73, a resident Golgi glycoprotein, is a novel serum marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2005; 43: 1007–1012.

233.

Okumoto

, Hattori

, Tamura

Possible contribution of circulating transforming growth factor-beta1 to immunity and prognosis in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2004; 24: 21–28.

234.

Ikeguchi

, Iwamoto

, Taniguchi

, Katano

, Hirooka

The gene expression level of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) as a biological prognostic marker of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2005; 24: 415–421.

235.

Song

B.C.

, Chung

Y.H.

, Kim

J.A.

Transforming growth factor-beta1 as a useful serologic marker of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2002; 94: 175–180.

236.

Ito

, Takeda

, Sakon

Expression and clinical significance of erb-B receptor family in hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2001; 84: 1377–1383.

237.

Osada

, Kanematsu

, Imai

, Goshima

Clinical significance of serum HGF and c-Met expression in tumor tissue for evaluation of properties and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008; 55: 544–549.

238.

Poon

R.T.

, Ng

I.O.

, Lau

, Yu

W.C.

, Fan

S.T.

, Wong

Correlation of serum basic fibroblast growth factor levels with clinicopathologic features and postoperative recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2001; 182: 298–304.

239.

Jeng

K.S.

, Sheen

I.S.

, Tsai

Y.C.

Circulating messenger RNA of alpha-fetoprotein: a possible risk factor of recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2004; 139: 1055–1060.

240.

Sheen

I.S.

, Jeng

K.S.

, Tsai

Y.C.

Is the expression of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase messenger RNA an indicator of biological behavior in recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma?

World J Gastroenterol. 2003; 9: 468–473.

241.

Himoto

, Kuriyama

, Zhang

J.Y.

Analyses of autoantibodies against tumor-associated antigens in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Oncol. 2005; 27: 1079–1085.

242.

Cheung

S.T.

, Fan

S.T.

, Lee

Y.T.

Albumin mRNA in plasma predicts post-transplant recurrence of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Transplantation. 2008; 85: 81–87.

243.

Yao

, Liang

, Huang

MicroRNA-30d promotes tumor invasion and metastasis by targeting Galphai2 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2010; 51: 846–856.

244.

Coulouarn

, Factor

V.M.

, Andersen

J.B.

, Durkin

M.E.

, Thorgeirsson

S.S.

Loss of miR-122 expression in liver cancer correlates with suppression of the hepatic phenotype and gain of metastatic properties. Oncogene. 2009; 28: 3526–3536.

245.

Ura

, Honda

, Yamashita

Differential microRNA expression between hepatitis B and hepatitis C leading disease progression to hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2009; 49: 1098–1112.

246.

Fartoux

, Decaens

Contribution of biomarkers and imaging in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011; 35(suppl 1): S21–S30.

247.

Minervini

M.I.

, Demetris

A.J.

, Lee

R.G.

, Carr

B.I.

, Madariaga

, Nalesnik

M.A.

Utilization of hepatocyte-specific antibody in the immunocytochemical evaluation of liver tumors. Mod Pathol. 1997; 10: 686–692.

248.

Guido

, Roskams

, Pontisso

Squamous cell carcinoma antigen in human liver carcinogenesis. J Clin Pathol. 2008; 61: 445–447.

249.

Beneduce

, Castaldi

, Marino

Squamous cell carcinoma antigenimmunoglobulin M complexes as novel biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer. 2005; 103: 2558–2565.

250.

Zhao

Y.J.

, Ju

, Li

G.C.

Tumor markers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Clin Oncol. 2013; 1: 593–598.

251.

Jin

Z.H.

, Yang

R.J.

, Dong

, Xing

B.C.

Progenitor gene DLK1 might be an independent prognostic factor of liver cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2008; 8: 371–377.

252.

Xieraili

, Yasen

, Mogushi

Villin 1 is a predictive factor for the recurrence of high serum alpha-fetoprotein-associated hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Cancer Sci. 2012; 103: 1493–1501.

Tissue- and Serum-Associated Biomarkers of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

The Development of HCC

Current HCC therapeutic and management methods

Role of biomarkers in HCC

Tumor Tissue Biomarkers of HCC

Glypican-3

Heat shock protein 70

Tumor-associated glycoprotein 72

Ki-67 antigen

Hepatocyte paraffin 1

HERC5

Serum Biomarkers of HCC

Alpha fetoprotein

AFP-L3

Glycoprotein 73

APO-J

DKK-1 Dickkopf-p1

Human carbonyl reductase-2

Midkine

Des-γ-carboxy prothrombin

α-1-Fucosidase

Hepatocyte growth factor

Nerve growth factor

Vascular endothelial growth factor

Transforming growth factor-β

Epidermal growth factor

Wnt

Angiopointin-1/2

NOTCH

Oncostatin M

Alpha-1 antitrypsin

WFA+ M2BP

Lymphotoxin beta receptor

Long Noncoding RNA as Biomarkers of HCC

MALAT1

HOTAIR

H19

Highly upregulated in liver cancer

Long interspersed nuclear element-1

Micro-RNA biomarkers of HCC

Micro-RNA and its role as biomarkers

Role of miRNA biomarkers in HCC

miRNA as a prognostic tool in HCC

miRNA as a therapeutic target

Exosomal miRNA as a biomarker of HCC

Genetic Variants as Biomarkers

P 53 A249S

HBV core promoter mutations

HBV PreS1 mutations/truncations

HBx region mutations and truncations

Genetic Variations Identified by Next-generation Sequencing

Summary

Author Contributions

Footnotes

Abbreviations

Acknowledgments

References

P⁵³ A249S