Digital image analysis (DIA) is a new method in assessment of islet amount, which is expected to provide reliable and consistent results. We compared this method with conventional counting of small numbers of rat islets. Islets were isolated from 8 pancreases and counted in 24 samples in duplicate, first routinely by sizing according to estimated diameters under a calibrated reticule and then by processing of islets pictures taken by camera. As presumed, no significant difference was found in absolute numbers of islets per sample between DIA and conventional assessment. Volumes of islets per sample measured by DIA were on average more than 10% higher than amounts evaluated conventionally, which was statistically significant. DIA has been shown to be an important method to remove operator bias and provide consistent results. Evaluation of only two dimensions of three-dimensional objects still represents a certain limitation of this technique. With lowering of computer prices the system could become easily available for islet laboratories.
ArgibayP.; DalurzoM.; DornV.; BarbichM.; MonginiC.Fully integrated optical microscope system and computer workstation system for standardized islet measurements and analysis.Transplant. Proc.27: 3347–3348; 1995.
2.
BacusJ. W.; GraceL. J.Optical microscope system for standardized cell measurements and analyses.Appl. Optics26: 3280–3293; 1987.
3.
BreljeT. C.; ScharpD. W.; SorensonR. L.Three-dimensional imaging of intact isolated islets of Langerhans with confocal microscopy.Diabetes38: 808–814; 1989.
4.
CavanaghT.; FetterhoffT.; WileK.; WrightM. J.Time course of islet release during pancreatic dissociation: An objective method for assessing collagenase activity.Transplant. Proc.26: 3395; 1994.
5.
FetterhoffT. J.; WileK. J.; CoffingD.; CavanaghT.; WrightM. J.Quantitation of isolated pancreatic islets using imaging technology.Transplant. Proc.26: 3351; 1994.
6.
FulwylerM. J.; NguyenH.; YuY.; LambertiF.Quantitative assay of islet number, mass and purity using flow cytometry.Cell Transplant.3: 222; 1994.
HesseU.; SutherlandD. E.; FlorackG.Comparison of two methods of preparation and transplantation of islets in dogs.Diabetes35: 1109–1118; 1986.
9.
JindalR. M.; TaylorR. P.; GrayD. W. R.; EsmeraldoR.; MorrisP.A new method for quantification of islets by measurement of zinc content.Diabetes35: 1056–1062; 1992.
10.
LabarcaC.; PaigenK.A simple rapid and sensitive DNA assay procedure.Anal. Biochem.102: 344–352; 1980.
11.
LehmannR.; FernandezL. A.; SzaboS.; RicordiC.; AlejandroR.; KenyonN. S.Evaluation of islet isolation by a new method (Coulter Multisizer Ile) and manual counting.Transplant. Proc.30: 373–374; 1998.
12.
MerchantF. A.; DillerK. R.; AggarwalS. J.; BovikA. C.Viability analysis of cryopreserved rat pancreatic islets using laser scanning confocal microscopy.Cryobiology33: 236–252; 1996.
13.
RicordiC.; HeringB. J.; LondonN. J. M.Islet isolation assessment in man and large animals. In: RicordiC., ed. Pancreatic islet cell transplantation.Austin: R. G. Landes Co.;1992: 132–142.
14.
RyanE. A.; LakeyJ. R. T.; RajotteR. V.; KorbuttG. S.; KinT.; ImesS.; RabinovitchA.; ElliotJ. F.; BigamD.; KnetemanN. M.; WarnockG. L.; LarsenI.; ShapiroA. M. J.Clinical outcomes and insulin secretion after islet transplantation with the Edmonton protocol.Diabetes50: 710–719; 2001.
15.
SaudekF.; KarasovaL.; KobylkaP.; LomskyR.Increased glucagon-stimulated insulin secretion of cryopreserved rat islets transplanted into nude mice.J. Mol. Med.77: 107–110; 1999.
16.
ShapiroA. M. J.; LakeyJ. R. T.; RyanE. A.; KorbuttG. S.; TothE.; WarnockG. L.; KnetemanN. M.; RajotteR. V.Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen.N. Engl. J. Med.343: 230–238; 2000.
17.
ScharpD. W.Islet quality control testing and the islet isolation laboratory. In: RicordiC., ed. Pancreatic islet cell transplantation.Austin: R. G. Landes Co.;1992: 82–88.
18.
StegemannJ. P.; O'NeilJ. J.; NicholsonD. T.; MullonC. J. P.; SolomonB. A.Automated counting and sizing of isolated porcine islets using digital image analysis.Transplant. Proc.29: 2272–2273; 1997.
19.
StegemannJ. P.; O'NeilJ.; NicholsonD. T.; MullonC. J-P.Improved assessment of isolated islet tissue volume using digital image analysis.Cell Transplant.7: 469–478; 1998.
20.
WhiteS. A.; HughesD. P.; ContractorH. H.; LondonN. J. M.A comparison of cross sectional surface area densities between adult and juvenile porcine islets of Langerhans.Horm. Metab. Res.31: 519–524; 1999.
21.
WileK. J.; FetterhoffT. J.; CavanaghT. J.; WrightM. J.Image analysis of human pancreatic islets: A time-course approach to the evaluation of pancreatic dissociation.Transplant. Proc.27: 3246–3247; 1995.
22.
WileK. J.; SchwartzkopfW.; OlsenM.; LaxerC.; FetterhoffT. J.; CavanaghT. J.; WrightM. J.Differentiation of free and embedded porcine pancreatic islets using a novel automated image analysis algorithm.Transplant. Proc.29: 1974; 1997.
