Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) is a widely used and actively researched imaging modality that can estimate the physical properties of an object more accurately than single-energy CT (SECT). Recently, iterative reconstruction methods called one-step methods have received attention among various approaches since they can resolve the intermingled limitations of the conventional methods. However, the one-step methods typically have expensive computational costs, and their material decomposition performance is largely affected by the accuracy in the spectral coefficients estimation.
OBJECTIVE:
In this study, we aim to develop an efficient one-step algorithm that can effectively decompose into the basis material maps and is less sensitive to the accuracy of the spectral coefficients.
METHODS:
By use of a new loss function that employs the non-linear forward model and the weighted squared errors, we propose a one-step reconstruction algorithm named generalized simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (GSART). The proposed algorithm was compared with the image-domain material decomposition and other existing one-step reconstruction algorithm.
RESULTS:
In both simulation and experimental studies, we demonstrated that the proposed algorithm effectively reduced the beam-hardening artifacts thereby increasing the accuracy in the material decomposition.
CONCLUSIONS:
The proposed one-step reconstruction for material decomposition in dual-energy CT outperformed the image-domain approach and the existing one-step algorithm. We believe that the proposed method is a practically very useful addition to the material-selective image reconstruction field.
LandryG., SecoJ., GaudreaultM., VerhaegenF., Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients, Phys. Med. Biol.58(19) (2013), 6851–6866.
2.
SchmidtB., FlohrT., Principles and applications of dual source CT, Phys. Medica79(October) (2020), 36–46.
3.
StennerP., BerkusT., KachelriessM., Empirical dual energy calibration (EDEC) for cone-beam computed tomography, Med. Phys.34(9) (2007), 3630–3641.
4.
LeeD., LeeJ., MinJ., et al., Efficient material decomposition method for dual-energy X-ray cargo inspection system, Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers, Detect. Assoc. Equip.884(September) (2018), 105–112.
5.
HünemohrN., PaganettiH., GreilichS., et al., Tissue decomposition from dual energy CT data for MC based dose calculation in particle therapy, Med. Phys.41(6) (2014), 1–14.
6.
TremblayJ.É.,
BedwaniS. and
BouchardH., A theoretical comparison of tissue parameter extraction methods for dual energycomputed tomography, Med. Phys.41(8) (2014).
7.
BärE., LalondeA., RoyleG., et al., The potential of dual-energy CT to reduce proton beam range uncertainties, Med. Phys.44(6) (2017), 2332–2344.
8.
MenK., DaiJ., ChenX., et al., Dual-energy imaging method to improve the image quality and the accuracy of dose calculation for cone-beam computed tomography, Phys. Medica36 (2017), 110–118.
9.
AlvarezR., MacovskiA., Energy selective reconstructions in X-ray Computerized Tomography, Phys. Med. Biol.21(5) (1976), 733–744.
10.
MaaßC.,
BaerM. and
KachelrießM., A practical new approach of material decomposition in image domain, Med. Phys.36(8) (2009), 3818–3829.
ZbijewskiW., GangG.J., XuJ., et al., Dual-energy cone-beam CT with a flat-panel detector: Effect of reconstruction algorithm on material classification, Med. Phys.41(2) (2014).
13.
XueY., RuanR., HuX., et al., Statistical image-domain multimaterial decomposition for dual-energy CT, Med. Phys.44(3) (2017), 886–901.
14.
HarmsJ., WangT., PetrongoloM., et al., Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization, Med. Phys.43(5) (2016), 2676–2686.
15.
TilleyS., ZbijewskiW., W.J., Stayman, Model-based material decomposition with a penalized nonlinear least-squares CT reconstruction algorithm, Phys. Med. Biol.64(3) (2019).
16.
MaaßC.,
GrimmerR. and
KachelrießM., Dual energy CT material decomposition from inconsistent rays (MDIR), IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec.1(1) (2009), 3446–3452.
17.
MaaßC.,
MeyerE. and
KachelrießM., Exact dual energy material decomposition from inconsistent rays (MDIR), Med. Phys.38(2) (2011), 691–700.
18.
KimK., YeJ.C., W. et al., Sparse-view spectral CT reconstruction using spectral patch-based low-rank penalty, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging34(3) (2015), 748–760.
19.
ZhangW., WangL., LiL., et al., Reconstruction method for DECT with one half-scan plus a second limited-angle scan using prior knowledge of complementary support set (Pri-CSS), Phys. Med. Biol.65(2) (2020).
20.
MinJ., LeeT., KimK.W., et al., Low-dose dual-energy cone-beam CT using a total-variation minimization algorithm, Med. Imaging 2011 Phys. Med. Imaging7961(March 2011) (2011), 796132.
21.
MechlemK., EhnS., SellererT., et al., Joint statistical iterative material image reconstruction for spectral computed tomography using a semi-empirical forward model, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging37(1) (2018), 68–80.
22.
CaiC., RodetT., LegoupilS., Mohammad-DjafariA., A full-spectral Bayesian reconstruction approach based on the material decomposition model applied in dual-energy computed tomography, Med. Phys.40(11) (2013), 1–16.
23.
LongY., FesslerJ., Multi-material decomposition using statistical image reconstruction in X-ray CT, Second Int. Conf. image Form. X-ray Comput. Tomogr. (Mmd) (2012), 413–416.
24.
WeidingerT., BuzugT.M., FlohrT., et al., Polychromatic iterative statistical material image reconstruction for photon-counting computed tomography, , Int. J. Biomed. Imaging2016 (2016).
25.
Foygel BarberR.,
SidkyE.Y.,
Gilat SchmidtT. and
PanX., An algorithm for constrained one-step inversion of spectral CT data, Phys. Med. Biol.61(10) (2016), 3784–3818.
26.
ChenB., ZhangZ., SidkyE.Y., et al., Image reconstruction and scan configurations enabled by optimization-based algorithms in multispectral CT, Phys. Med. Biol.62(22) (2017), 8763–8793.
27.
MoryC., SixouB., Si-MohamedS., et al., Comparison of five one-step reconstruction algorithms for spectral CT, Phys. Med. Biol.63(23) (2018).
28.
ZhaoY., ZhaoX., ZhangP., An extended algebraic reconstruction technique (E-ART) for dual spectral CT, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging34(3) (2015), 761–768.
AndersenA., KakA., Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART): A superior implementation of ART, Ultrason. Imaging6(1) (1984), 81–94.
31.
JiangM., WangG., Convergence of the simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART), IEEE Trans. Image Process.12(8) (2003), 957–961.
32.
ElbakriI.A., FessierJ.A., Segmentation-free statistical image reconstruction for polyenergetic X-ray computed tomography, Proc. - Int. Symp. Biomed. Imaging2002-Janua(2) (2002), 828–831.
33.
MeyerR.R., Sufficient conditions for the convergence of monotonic mathematicalprogramming algorithms, J. Comput. Syst. Sci.12(1) (1976), 108–121.
34.
De PierroA.R., On the relation between the isra and the em algorithm for positron emission tomography, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging12(2) (1993), 328–333.
35.
JensenJ.L.W.V., Sur les fonctions convexes et les inégalités entre les valeurs moyennes, Acta Math.30(0) (1906), 175–193.
36.
SidkyE.Y., PanX., Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization, Phys. Med. Biol.53(17) (2008), 4777–4807.
37.
SidkyE.Y., DuchinY., PanX., UllbergC., A constrained, total-variation minimization algorithm for low-intensity x-ray CT, Med. Phys.38(SUPPL.1) (2011), 117–125.
38.
MaaßC.,
BaerM. and
KachelrießM., Image-based dual energy CT using optimized precorrection functions: A practical new approach of material decomposition in image domain, Med. Phys.36(8) (2009), 3818–3829.
SeltzerS., Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients, NIST standard reference database 126, NIST Standard Reference Database126 (1996).
