Spectral parametric segmentation of contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT to detect bone metastasis: feasibility sensitivity study using whole-body bone scintigraphy

Abstract

Background

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) images may be underutilized for the evaluation of skeletal metastasis. Spectral parametric segmentation of DECT can produce bone-iodine separated images, which have the potential to detect bone metastases.

Purpose

To evaluate the potential of bone-iodine separation in the detection of bone metastasis with spectral parametric segmentation of DECT images which are acquired at clinical follow-up for patients with prior malignancy.

Material and Methods

The institutional review board approved the protocol of this retrospective review. Chest DECT scans using fast kV-switching between 80 and 140 kVp were included in this study. Bone-iodine separated reformatted images were produced by spectral parametric segmentation of synthesized monochromatic images. All chest CT images of 702 metastatic lesions from 54 patients were retrospectively evaluated in terms of visualization of metastatic lesions compared with ^99mTc-MDP (methylene diphosphonate) whole-body bone scintigraphy (WBBS) as reference standard of diagnosis.

Results

Spectral parametric segmentation images of DECT visualized metastatic lesions in 92.3% (n = 648/702). Osteoblastic metastases were delineated as subtle enhancing lesions on DECT in comparison to WBBS.

Conclusion

Spectral parametric segmentation of iodine from cortical and medullary bone allowed visualization of bone metastasis. DECT might be utilized for the screening or detection of bone metastases.

Keywords

Dual-energy CT computed tomography (CT)bone scintigraphy bone metastases

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boland

Lane

Sundaresan

. Metastatic disease of the spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982; 169: 95–102.

Guillevin

Vallee

Lafitte

. Spine metastasis imaging: review of the literature. J Neuroradiol 2007; 34: 311–321.

Berrettoni

Carter

. Mechanisms of cancer metastasis to bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: 308–312.

Mundy

. Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 584–593.

Rybak

Rosenthal

. Radiological imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastases. Q J Nucl Med 2001; 45: 53–64.

Cook

Fogelman

. The role of positron emission tomography in the management of bone metastases. Cancer 2000; 88: 2927–2933.

Lell

Ruehm

Kramer

. Cranial computed tomography angiography with automated bone subtraction: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol 2009; 44: 38–43.

Bamberg

Dierks

Nikolaou

. Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1424–1429.

Pache

Krauss

Strohm

. Dual-energy CT virtual noncalcium technique: detecting posttraumatic bone marrow lesions–feasibility study. Radiology 2010; 256: 617–624.

10.

Johnson

Krauss

Sedlmair

. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 1510–1517.

11.

Lee

Park

Song

. Metal artefact reduction in gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy CT with and without metal artefact reduction software. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 2357–2364.

12.

Kaza

Platt

Cohan

. Dual-energy CT with single- and dual-source scanners: current applications in evaluating the genitourinary tract. Radiographics 2012; 32: 353–369.

13.

Alvarez

Macovski

. Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerized tomography. Phys Med Biol 1976; 21: 733–744.

14.

Cockerill

Gamble

Vadas

. Angiogenesis: models and modulators. Int Rev Cytol 1995; 159: 113–160.

15.

Folkman

. What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 4–6.

16.

Dvorak

Brown

Detmar

. Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor, microvascular hyperpermeability, and angiogenesis. Am J Pathol 1995; 146: 1029–1039.

17.

Vaupel

Kallinowski

Okunieff

. Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review. Cancer Res 1989; 49: 6449–6465.

18.

Lee

Purdie

Stewart

. CT imaging of angiogenesis. Q J Nucl Med 2003; 47: 171–187.

19.

Axel

. Cerebral blood flow determination by rapid-sequence computed tomography: theoretical analysis. Radiology 1980; 137: 679–686.

20.

Miles

. Measurement of tissue perfusion by dynamic computed tomography. Br J Radiol 1991; 64: 409–412.

21.

Carroll

. Tunable monochromatic X rays: a new paradigm in medicine. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 583–590.

22.

Carroll

. Tunable, monochromatic X-rays: an enabling technology for molecular/cellular imaging and therapy. J Cell Biochem 2003; 90: 502–508.

23.

Dilmanian

. Computed tomography with monochromatic x rays. Am J Physiol Imaging 1992; 7: 175–193.

24.

Dilmanian

Parsons

. Single-and dual-energy CT with monochromatic synchrotron x-rays. Phys Med Biol 1997; 42: 371–387.

25.

Montner

Lehr

Oravez

. Quantitative evaluation of a dual energy CT system. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11: 144–150.

26.

Hounsfield

. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 1973; 46: 1016–1022.

27.

Krasnicki

Podgorski

Guzinski

. Novel clinical applications of dual energy computed tomography. Adv Clin Exp Med 2012; 21: 831–841.

28.

Johnson

TRC

Fink

Schoenberg

Reiser

. Dual energy CT in clinical practice. Heidelberg: Springer, 2011: 21–34.

29.

Zhang

Liu

. Objective characterization of GE discovery CT750 HD scanner: gemstone spectral imaging mode. Med Phys 2011; 38: 1178–1188.

30.

Karcaaltincaba

Aktas

. Dual-energy CT revisited with multidetector CT: review of principles and clinical applications. Diagn Interv Radiol 2011; 17: 181–194.

31.

Sommer

Johnson

Becker

. The value of dual-energy bone removal in maximum intensity projections of lower extremity computed tomography angiography. Invest Radiol 2009; 44: 285–292.

32.

Henzler

Fink

Schoenberg

. Dual-energy CT: radiation dose aspects. Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: S16–S25.

33.

Information About Radiation from Diagnostic Imaging Procedures. Environmental Health and Radiation Safety, University of Penslvania. See http://www.ehrs.upenn.edu/media_files/docs/pdf/websiteinfo(2).pdf.