Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (GVS) has long been used as a vestibular stimulus. A major issue observed in GVS research was the high variability of the responses, which has led some researchers to question its diagnostic utility.

OBJECTIVES:

Determine the diagnostic accuracy of galvanically induced nystagmus for the diagnosis of subjects with unilateral peripheral vestibular hypofunction.

METHODS:

A total of 195 dizzy patients were prospectively enrolled, forming a consecutive series as they were received. Individuals with spontaneous nystagmus or using vestibular sedatives were excluded. Nystagmus induced by a 4 mA galvanic stimulus was compared with the caloric test as a reference standard.

RESULTS:

Of the 195 subjects tested with GVS, 115 were subjects with a unilateral peripheral vestibular hypofunction. The presence of nystagmus showed an AUC of only 0.529 (0.478 to 0.580, p = 0.125), and the maximum slow phase velocity of nystagmus showed an AUC of only 0.523 (0.472 to 0.573, p = 0.439).

CONCLUSIONS:

Since neither AUC is better than random discrimination, this study concludes that GVS-induced nystagmus is not useful as a diagnostic tool for unilateral peripheral vestibular hypofunction. These findings discourage the use of GVS-induced nystagmus in the clinical setting.

Keywords

Vestibular diagnostic tests routine galvanic skin response

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

D.G.

Altman ,

Machin ,

T.N.

Bryant and

M.J.

Gardner , editors. Statistics with confidence. 2nd ed. Bristol: BMJ Books; 2000.

E.J.

Blonder and

Davis , The galvanic falling reaction in patients with verified intracranial neoplasms, JAMA 107 (1936), 411–412.

P.M.

Bossuyt ,

J.B.

Reitsma ,

D.E.

Bruns , et al., STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies, BMJ 351 (2015), h5527.

Clopper and

E.S.

Pearson , The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial, Biometrika 26 (1934), 404–413.

Cohen ,

S.B.

Yakushin and

G.R.

Holstein , What Does Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Actually Activate? Front Neurol 2 (2011), 90.

I.S.

Curthoys and

H.G.

MacDougall , What Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation Actually Activates, Front Neurol 3 (2012), 117.

E.R.

DeLong ,

D.M.

DeLong and

D.L.

Clarke-Pearson , Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach, Biometrics 44(3) (1988), 837–845.

Fitzpatrick and

Day , Probing the human vestibular system with galvanic stimulation, J Appl Physiol 96(6) (2004), 2301–2316.

Goldberg ,

Fernandez and

Smith , Responses of vestibular nerve afferents in the squirrel monkey to externally applied galvanic currents, Brain Res 252(1) (1982), 156–160.

10.

Hajian-Tilaki , Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics, J Biomed Inform 48 (2014), 193–204.

11.

Hitzig , Über die beim Galvanisieren des Kopfes entstehenden Störungen der Muskelinnervation und der Vorstellungen vom Verhalten im Raume[About perturbations of muscle innervation and imaginations of behavior in space during head galvanization], Reichert und du Bois-ReymondsArch (1871), 716–770.

12.

Kim and

I.S.

Curthoys , Responses of primary vestibular neurons to galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) in the anaesthetised guinea pig, Brain Res Bull 64(3) (2004), 265–271.

13.

Krstulovic ,

Atrache Al Attrache ,

Perez Garrigues ,

Argente-Escrig ,

Bataller Alberola and

Morera Perez , Increased Velocity Storage in Subjects with Meniere’s Disease. JIntAdv Otol 12(1) (2016), 87–91.

14.

MacDougall ,

Brizuela ,

Burgess and

Curthoys , Between-subject variability and within-subject reliability of the human eye-movement response to bilateral galvanic (DC) vestibular stimulation, Exp Brain Res 144 (2002), 69–78.

15.

H.G.

MacDougall ,

A.E.

Brizuela ,

A.M.

Burgess ,

I.S.

Curthoys and

G.M.

Halmagyi , Patient and normal three-dimensional eye-movement responses to maintained (DC) surface galvanic vestibular stimulation, Otol Neurotol 26(3) (2005), 500–511.

16.

MacDougall ,

Brizuela and

Curthoys , Linearity, symmetry and additivity of the human eye-movement response to maintained unilateral and bilateral surface galvanic (DC) vestibular stimulation, Exp Brain Res 148(2) (2003), 166–175.

17.

N.D.

Mercaldo ,

K.F.

Lau and

X.H.

Zhou , Confidence intervals for predictive values with an emphasis to case control studies, Statistics in Medicine 26 (2007), 2170–2183.

18.

C.E.

Metz , Basic principles of ROC analysis, Semin Nucl Med 8(4) (1978), 283–298.

19.

Moore ,

MacDougall ,

Peters ,

Bloomberg ,

Curthoys and

Cohen , Modeling locomotor dysfunction following spaceflight with Galvanic vestibular stimulation, Exp Brain Res 174(4) (2006), 647–659.

20.

C.R.

Pfaltz , The diagnostic importance of the galvanic test in otoneurology, Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel) 31(4) (1969), 193–203.

21.

Proctor ,

Glackin ,

Shimizu ,

Smith and

Liet-man , Reference values for serial vestibular testing, Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 95(1 Pt 1) (1986), 83–90.

22.

Purkyne , Commentatio de examine physiologico organi visus et systematis cutanei [Commentary on the Physiological Examination of the Visual Organs and the Cutaneous System]. 1st ed. Pragae: Vratislaviae; 1819, pp. 88.

23.

Schlosser ,

Ünterberg and

Clarke , Üsing video-oculography for galvanic evoked vestibulo-ocular monitoring in comatose patients, JNeurosciMethods 145(1–2) (2005), 127–131.

24.

D.L.

Simel ,

Rennie and

P.M.

Bossuyt , The STARD statement for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: Application to the history and physical examination, J Gen Intern Med 23(6) (2008), 768–774.

Usefulness of galvanically induced nystagmus as a diagnostic test of peripheral vestibular hypofunction

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

OBJECTIVES:

METHODS:

RESULTS:

CONCLUSIONS:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References