High definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) has been administered over single brain regions for small numbers of sessions. Safety, feasibility and tolerability of HD-tDCS over multiple brain regions, multiple daily stimulations and long periods are not established.
Objective:
We studied safety, feasibility and tolerability of daily HD-tDCS over 2-4 brain regions for 20 sessions in healthy adults.
Methods:
Five healthy adults underwent physical and neurological examination, electrocardiogram (EKG), electroencephalogram (EEG) and cognitive screening (ImpACT) before, during and after HD-tDCS. Four networks (left/right temporoparietal and frontal) were stimulated in sequence (20 min each) using HD-tDCS in 20 daily sessions. Sessions 1–10 included sequential stimulation of both temporoparietal networks, sessions 11–15 stimulations of 4 networks and sessions 16–20 two daily stimulation cycles of 4 networks/cycle (1.5 mA/network). Side effects, ImpACT scores and EEG power spectrum were compared before and after HD-tDCS.
Results:
All subjects completed the trial. Adverse events were tingling, transient redness at the stimulation site, perception of continuing stimulation after end of session and one self-resolving headache. EEG power spectrum showed decreased delta power in frontal areas several days after HD-tDCS. While at the group level ImpACT scores did not differ before and after stimulations, we found a trend for correlation between decreased EEG delta power and individual improvements in ImpACT scores after HD-tDCS.
Conclusion:
Prolonged, repeat daily stimulation of multiple brain regions using HD-tDCS is feasible and safe in healthy adults. Preliminary EEG results suggest that HD-tDCS may induce long lasting changes in excitability in the brain.
AlonzoA.,
BrassilJ.,
TaylorJ.L.,
MartinD., &
LooC.K. (2012). Daily transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) leadsto greater increases in cortical excitability than second dailytranscranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimulation, 5, 208–213.
2.
ArdolinoG.,
BossiB.,
BarbieriS., &
PrioriA. (2005). Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain. Journal of Physiology, 568, 653–663.
3.
Arul-AnandamA.P.,
LooC., &
MitchellP. (2010). Induction of hypomanic episode with transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of ECT, 26, 68–69.
4.
BaccaroA.,
BrunoniA.R.,
BensenorI.M., &
FregniF. (2010). Hypomanic episode in unipolar depression during transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuropsychiatrica, 22, 316–318Acta.
5.
BarhamM.P.,
EnticottP.G.,
ConduitR., &
LumJ.A. (2016). Transcranial electrical stimulation during sleep enhances declarative (but not procedural) memory consolidation: Evidence from a meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehor Reviews, 63, 65–77avi.
6.
BindmanL.J., LippoldO.C., & RedfearnJ.W. (1964a). Relation between the size and form of potentials evoked by sensory stimulation and the background electrical activity in the cerebral cortex of the rat. Journal of Physiology, 171, 1–25.
7.
BindmanL.J., &
LippoldO.C., & RedfearnJ.W. (1964b). The Action of Brief Polarizing Currents on the Cerebral Cortex of the Rat (1) During Current Flow and (2) in the Production of Long-Lasting after-Effects. Journal of Physiology, 172, 369–382.
8.
BoggioP.S.,
NunesA.,
RigonattiS.P.,
NitscheM.A.,
Pascual-LeoneA., &
FregniF. (2007). Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25, 123–129.
9.
BolyM.,
JonesB.,
FindlayG.,
PlumleyE.,
MensenA.,
HermannB.,
TononiJ., &
MagantiR. (2017). Altered sleep homeostasis correlates with cognitive impairment in patients with focal epilepsy. Brain, 140, 1026–1040.
10.
BorckardtJ.J.,
BiksonM.,
FrohmanH.,
ReevesS.T.,
DattaA.,
BansalV.,
MadanA.,
BarthK., &
GeorgeM.S. (2012). A pilotstudy of the tolerability and effects of high-definitiontranscranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). on painperception. Journal of Pain, 13, 112–120.
11.
BrunoniA.R. (2012). Clinical Research with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and Future Directions. Brain Stimulation, 5, 175–195.
12.
BrunoniA.R.,
ValiengoL.,
ZanaoT.,
OliveiraJ.,
BensenorI.M., &
FregniF. (2011). Manic psychosis following transcranialdirect current stimulation and sertraline. Journal ofNeuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 23, E4–5.
13.
BrunyeT.T.,
CantelonJ.,
HolmesA.,
TaylorH.A., &
MahoneyC.R. (2014). Mitigating cutaneous sensation differences during tDCS: comparing sham versus low intensity control conditions. Brain Stimulation, 7, 832–835.
14.
Caparelli-DaquerE.M.,
ZimmermannT.J.,
MooshagianE.,
ParraL.C.,
RiceJ.K.,
DattaA.,
BiksonM., &
WassermannE.M. (2012). A pilot study on effects of 4x1 high-definition tDCS on motor cortex excitability. Conference proceedings, Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference, 2012, 735–738.
15.
CapponD.,
JahanshahiM., &
BisiacchiP. (2016). Value and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation in the cognitive rehabilitation: A critical review since 2000. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 10, 157.
16.
CarterR.E. (2004). Application of stochastic processes to participant recruitment in clinical trials. Control Clinical Trials, 25, 429–436.
17.
CreutzfeldtO.D.,
FrommG.H., &
KappH. (1962). Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity. Experimental Neurology, 5, 436–452.
18.
DaSilvaA.F.,
TruongD.Q.,
DosSantosM.F.,
TobackR.L.,
DattaA., &
BiksonM. (2015). State-of-art neuroanatomical target analysis of high-definition and conventional tDCS montages used for migraine and pain control. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 9, 89.
19.
DattaA.,
BansalV.,
DiazJ.,
PatelJ.,
ReatoD., &
BiksonM. (2009). Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimulation, 2, 201–207.
20.
DmochowskiJ.P.,
DattaA.,
BiksonM.,
SuY., &
ParraL.C. (2011). Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. Journal of Neural Engineering, 8, 046011.
21.
DonnellA.,
NascimentoT.,
LawrenceM.,
GuptaV.,
ZiebaT.,
TruongD.Q.,
BiksonM.,
DattaA.,
BellileE., &
DaSilvaA.F. (2015). High-definition and non-invasive brain modulation of pain and motor dysfunction in chronic TMD. Brain Stimulation, 8, 1085–1092.
22.
EdwardsD.,
CortesM.,
DattaA.,
MinhasP.,
WassermannE.M., &
BiksonM. (2013). Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: A basis for high-definition tDCS. Neuroimage, 74, 266–275.
23.
FerrucciR.,
BortolomasiM.,
VergariM.,
TadiniL.,
SalvoroB.,
GiacopuzziM.,
BarbieriS., &
PrioriA. (2009). Transcranial direct current stimulation in severe, drug-resistant major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 118, 215–219.
24.
FerrucciR.,
MarcegliaS.,
VergariM.,
CogiamanianF.,
Mrakic-SpostaS.,
MameliF.,
ZagoS.,
BarbieriS., &
PrioriA. (2008). Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation impairs the practice-dependent proficiency increase in working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 20, 1687–1697.
25.
FregniF.,
BoggioP.S.,
NitscheM.A.,
RigonattiS.P., &
Pascual-LeoneA. (2006). Cognitive effects of repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with depression. Depression and Anxiety, 23, 482–484.
26.
FregniF.,
NitscheM.A.,
LooC.K.,
BrunoniA.R.,
MarangoloP.,
LeiteJ.,
CarvalhoS.,
BologniniN.,
CaumoW.,
PaikN.J.,
SimisM.,
UedaK.,
EkhitanH.,
LuuP.,
TuckerD.M.,
TylerW.J.,
BrunelinJ.,
DattaA.,
JuanC.H.,
VenkatasubramanianG.,
BoggioP.S., &
BiksonM. (2015). Regulatory Considerations for the Clinical and Research Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS): Review and recommendations from an expert panel. Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs, 32, 22–35.
27.
FregniF., &
Pascual-LeoneA. (2007). Technology insight: Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. National Clinical Practice in Neurology, 3, 383–393.
28.
FrocD.J.,
ChapmanC.A.,
TrepelC., &
RacineR.J. (2000). Long-term depression and depotentiation in the sensorimotor cortex of the freely moving rat. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 438–445.
29.
FusterJ.M. (2015) The Prefrontal Cortex, 5th Edn. New York, NY: Academic Press.
30.
GarnettE.O., &
den OudenD.-B. (2015). Validating a sham condition for use in high definition transcranial direct current stimulation. Brain Stimulation, 8, 551–554.
31.
KilnerJ.M., &
FristonK. (2010). Topological inference for EEG and MEG. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 4, 1272–1290.
32.
KuoH.-I.,
BiksonM.,
DattaA.,
MinhasP.,
PaulusW.,
KuoM.-F., &
NitscheM.A. (2013). Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 × 1 ring tDCS: A neurophysiological study. Brain Stimulation, 6, 644–648.
33.
LandsnessE.,
BrunoM.A.,
NoirhommeQ.,
RiednerB.,
GosseriesO.,
SchnakersC.,
MassiminiM.,
LaureysS.,
TononimG., &
BolyM. (2011). Electrophysiological correlates of behavioural changes in vigilance in vegetative state and minimally conscious state. Brain, 134, 2222–2232.
34.
LiebetanzD.,
NitscheM.A.,
TergauF., &
PaulusW. (2002). Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability. Brain, 125, 2238–2247.
35.
LooC.,
MartinD.,
PigotM.,
Arul-AnandamP.,
MitchellP., &
SachdevP. (2009). Transcranial direct current stimulation priming of therapeutic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: A pilot study. Journal of ECT, 25, 256–260.
MattaiA.,
MillerR.,
WeisingerB.,
GreensteinD.,
BakalarJ.,
TossellJ.,
WassermannE.M.,
RapoportJ., &
GoglayN. (2011). Tolerability of transcranial direct current stimulation in childhood-onset schizophrenia. Brain Stimulation, 4, 275–280.
38.
MerzagoraA.C.,
FoffaniG.,
PanyavinI.,
Mordillo-MateosL.,
AguilarJ.,
OnaralB., &
OlivieroA. (2010). Prefrontal hemodynamic changes produced by anodal direct current stimulation. Neuroimage, 49, 2304–2310.
39.
MinhasP.,
BansalV.,
PatelJ.,
HoJ.S.,
DiazJ.,
DattaA., &
BiksonM. (2010). Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 190, 188–197.
40.
MirandaP.C.,
FariaP., &
HallettM. (2009). What does the ratio of injected current to electrode area tell us about current density in the brain during tDCS?Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 1183–1887.
41.
Monte-SilvaK.K.,
KuoM.F.,
LiebetanzD.,
PaulusW., &
NitscheM.A. (2011). Shaping the optimal repetition interval for cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Journal of Neurophysiology, 103, 1735–1740.
42.
MooreC.G.,
CarterR.E.,
NietertP.J., &
StewartP.W. (2011). Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and translational research. Clinical Translational Science, 4, 332–337.
NiewenhuysR.,
VoogdJ., &
vam HeuizenC. (2008) Telencephalon: Neocortex, In: The Human Central Nervous System. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, 3rd edition, pp. 491–679.
45.
NikolinS.,
LooC.K.,
BaiS.,
DokosS., &
MartinD.M. (2015). Focalised stimulation using high definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to investigate declarative verbal learning and memory functioning. Neuroimage, 117, 11–19.
46.
NitscheM.A.,
CohenL.G.,
WassermannE.M.,
PrioriA.,
LangN.,
AntalA.,
PaulusW.,
HummelF.,
BoggioP.S.,
FregniF., &
Pascual-LeoneA. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimulation, 1, 206–223.
47.
NitscheM.A.,
DoemkesS.,
KarakoseT.,
AntalA.,
LiebetanzD.,
LangN.,
TergauF., &
PaulusW. (2007). Shaping the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 97, 3109–3117.
48.
NitscheM.A.,
FrickeK.,
HenschkeU.,
SchlitterlauA.,
LiebetanzD.,
LangN.,
HenningS., &
TergauF., & PaulusW. (2003a). Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. Journal of Physiology, 553, 293–301.
49.
NitscheM.A.,
LiebetanzD.,
LangN.,
AntalA., &
TergauF., & PaulusW. (2003b). Safety criteria for transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in humans. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 2220–2222. author reply 2-3.
50.
NitscheM.A., &
PaulusW. (2000). Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of Physiology, 527, 633–639.
51.
PalmU.,
KeeserD.,
SchillerC.,
FintescuZ.,
ReisingerE.,
NitscheM.,
ReisingerE., &
PadbergF. (2008). Skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimulation, 1, 386–387.
PoreiszC.,
BorosK.,
AntalA., &
PaulusW. (2007). Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Research Bullettin, 72, 208–214.
54.
PrioriA.,
HallettM., &
RothwellJ.C. (2009). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation?Brain Stimulation, 2, 241–245.
55.
PurpuraD.P., &
McMurtryJ.G. (1965). Intracellular activities and evoked potential changes during polarization of motor cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 28, 166–185.
56.
RichardsonJ.,
DattaA.,
DmochowskiJ.,
ParraL.C., &
FridrikssonJ. (2015). Feasibility of using high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) to enhance treatment outcomes in persons with aphasia. Neurorehabilitation, 36, 115–126.
57.
RigonattiS.P.,
BoggioP.S.,
MyczkowskiM.L.,
OttaE.,
FiquerJ.T.,
RibeiroR.B.,
NitscheM.A.,
Pascuall-LeoneA., &
FregniF. (2008). Transcranial direct stimulation and fluoxetine for the treatment of depression. European Psychiatry, 23, 74–76.
58.
SchlaugG., &
RenjaV. (2008). Transcranial direct current stimulation: A noninvasive tool to facilitate stroke recovery. Expert Reviews in Medical Devices, 5, 759–768.
59.
SiebnerH.R.,
LangN.,
RizzoV.,
NitscheM.A.,
PaulusW.,
LemonR.N., &
RothwellJ.C. (2004). Preconditioning of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: Evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 3379–3385.
60.
SteriadeM.,
TimofeevI., &
GrenierF. (2001). Natural waking and sleep states: A view from inside neocortical neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85, 1969–1985.
61.
StaggC.J.,
BestJ.G.,
StephensonM.C.,
O’SheaJ.,
WylezinskaM.,
KincsesZ.T.,
MorrisP.G.,
MatthewsP.M., &
Johansen-BergH. (2009). Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neurotransmitters by transcranial stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 5202–5206.
62.
TadiniL.,
El-NazerR.,
BrunoniA.R.,
WilliamsJ.,
CarvasM.,
BoggioP.S.,
PrioriA.,
Pascual-LeoneA., &
FregniF. (2011). Cognitive, mood and EEG effects of noninvasive cortical stimulation with weak electrical currents. Journal of ECT, 27, 134–140.
63.
VargaE.T.,
TerneyD.,
AtkinsM.D.,
NikanorovaM.,
JeppesenD.S.,
UldallmP.,
HjalgrimH., &
BeniczkyS. (2011). Transcranial direct current stimulation in refractory continuous spikes and waves during slow sleep: A controlled study. Epilepsy Research, 97, 142–145.
64.
VillamarM.F.,
VolzM.S.,
BiksonM.,
DattaA.,
DaSilvaA.F., &
FregniF. (2013a). Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). Journal of Visualized Experiments, 77, e50309.
65.
VillamarM.F.,
WivatvongvanaP.,
PatumanondJ.,
BiksonM.,
TruongD.Q.,
DattaA.,
FregniF., et al. (2013b). Focal modulation of the primary motor cortex in fibromyalgia using 4×1-ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS): Immediate and delayed analgesic effects of cathodal and anodal stimulation. Journal of Pain, 14, 371–383.
66.
WorsleyK.J.,
MarrettS.,
NeelinP.,
VandalA.C.,
FristonK.J., &
EvansA.C. (1996). A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Human Brain Mapping, 4, 58–73.
67.
YoungS.J.,
BertuccoM.,
Sheehan-StrossR., &
SangerT.D. (2013). Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation in children with dystonia a pilot open-label trial. Journal of Child Neurology, 28, 1238–1244.
