Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Despite improvements in the medical management of myasthenia gravis (MG) in recent years, patients continue to report poor health and wellbeing outcomes such as high levels of fatigue, reduced quality of life (QoL), walking limitation and lowered balance confidence. Physical activity has been shown to be associated with these outcomes in other populations, however, there has been limited research in adults with MG.

Objective:

To describe physical activity and sedentary behaviour in adults with MG and to explore associations between these behaviours and fatigue, QoL, balance confidence and walking limitation.

Methods:

A self-report online survey was used to assess physical activity, sedentary behaviour, fatigue, QoL, balance confidence and walking limitation in adults with MG. Multiple linear regression was used to examine associations and descriptive statistics were used to analyse participant characteristics, physical activity, and sedentary behaviour.

Results:

Eighty-five adults with MG were included (mean age 48±16 years). Over half of participants (n = 53, 62.4%) reported sufficient physical activity to meet public health guidelines. Participants reported an average of 9 h/day of sedentary time (mean 9.0±3.5). Physical activity and fatigue (R² = 0.196), QoL (R² = 0.330), walking limitation (R² = 0.305) and balance confidence (R² = 0.304) were significantly (p < 0.05) and positively correlated, with no associations found for sedentary behaviour. When patterns of physical activity and sedentary behaviour were combined, lower fatigue (R² = 0.213), higher QoL (R² = 0.364), reduced walking limitation (R² = 0.341) and higher balance confidence (R² = 0.279) was observed in patients who had greater physical activity levels (> 150 mins/week) and lower sedentary time (< 10 h/day).

Conclusions:

Higher physical activity and lower sedentary behaviour is associated with favorable health and wellbeing outcomes in adults with MG. Further research is required to ascertain whether these behaviours may be an appropriate target intervention to improve outcomes in this population.

Keywords

Myasthenia gravis physical activity sedentary behavior fatigue walking quality of life

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune neuromuscular disease involving dysfunction at the neuromuscular junction resulting in fatigue and muscle weakness, presenting as either ocular or generalised weakness [1]. Despite increasing life expectancy and availability of treatments [2], people with MG continue to experience reduced health-related quality of life [3 –6]. Impairments such as fatigue [5 –8] and walking limitation [9] have been reported in people with MG, with interest growing in whether balance is also impaired [10, 11].

Historically, advice regarding physical activity has been conservative in people with MG given uncertainty as to the impact of activities on weakness and fatigue [12, 13]. Evidence now indicates exercise is feasible, safe and effective in improving outcomes and disease processes [14] in people with MG; specifically exercises targeting balance [15], strength and aerobic capacity [16 –19]. Additionally, improvements have been noted in walking distance (as measured by the 6-minute walk test) following various exercise interventions incorporating strength and aerobic exercises [18 –20]. Structured exercise offers opportunity for persons with MG to improve specific impairments and fitness, however, it is only one component of the broader concept of physical activity.

Physical activity and time spent sedentary (activities performed while awake in a sitting or lying position with an energy expenditure of < 1.5 METs; metabolic equivalents) [21] are important determinants of health [22]. METs are a measure of energy cost, with 1 MET equating to the energy expended at rest and ≥3 METs classified as moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) [23]. Global public health guidelines recommend that in order to attain health benefits, individuals should attain sufficient physical activity (a minimum of 150 minutes of MVPA per week) and minimise time in prolonged sitting or lying during waking hours [24, 25]. A combination of higher levels of physical activity and lower time spent sedentary is associated with reduced mortality, reduced occurrence of non-communicable diseases and improved quality of life [22, 26], with increasing levels of physical activity demonstrated to mitigate the effects of sedentary behavior [27].

There is increasing but limited research into habitual physical activity and sedentary behaviour in people with MG. Previous cross-sectional studies with relatively small sample sizes (n = 10–33) found that most participants were sufficiently physically active, however, engaged in minimal vigorous activity and had high levels of sedentary time [18 , 28–30]. More recent, larger studies (n = 779 and 69, respectively) found that between 47–54%of participants were sufficiently active [8, 31]. These studies also investigated associations between these health behaviours and several relevant outcomes. For example, lower levels of physical activity have been associated with reduced 6-minute walk test distance [28], higher fatigue and reduced health-related quality of life [8]. Additionally, negative associations have been found between physical activity and body mass index (BMI) [8, 28], age, disease severity [31] and number of comorbidities [8]. However, these findings are in conflict with other studies that did not find such associations, for example with disease severity [28, 29] and health-related quality of life [28]. Similarly, sedentary time has been positively associated with disease severity [31] and negatively associated with BMI [28]. However, these findings are conflicting between studies [28 , 31]. Further research is required to better understand these health behaviours and their potential associations given variability between studies. Given the positive effects of physical activity and the negative effects of being insufficiently physically active and engaging in higher sedentary time [27, 32], these behaviours, and specifically the combined impact of these behaviours, warrant further investigation to ensure people with MG are receiving evidence-based advice to optimise health and wellbeing outcomes.

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to describe the patterns of self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviour in adults with MG and to explore associations between these health-related behaviours and self-reported fatigue, quality of life, walking limitation and balance confidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

A cross-sectional design using a self-report electronic survey was used to evaluate physical activity and sedentary behavior in people with MG and to explore their relationship with fatigue, quality of life, walking limitation and balance confidence. Ethical approval was provided by The University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (reference number HREC/2019/000/774). The survey was available from May 2019 until September 2019 and has an estimated completion time of 20 minutes. Survey logic required responses from all questions to complete the survey.

Participants

Participants were community-dwelling adults aged between 18–80 years, independently ambulant with or without mobility aids, with stable self-reported MG symptoms for at least four weeks preceding participation and who were able to provide informed consent. All types of MG were eligible. Recruitment occurred via a convenience sample using flyers and social media advertising through various global disease-specific support groups. Advertisements included a website link to the electronic online survey, with information about the study, eligibility criteria and contact details of the research team. Potential participants were required to indicate that they met eligibility criteria and provide informed consent prior to commencing the survey.

Scales and questionnaires

Participants were asked to report demographic characteristics including age, gender, height, weight, employment, relationship status, disease duration, past medical history, treatments for MG and other medication and comorbidities. The survey can be viewed in full in Supplementary file 1.

Physical activity was measured using the Active Australia Survey [33], a self-report valid measure [34] that asks participants to report the amount of time spent in various types and intensities of activity such as walking (including for recreation and/or transport), gardening and MVPA in the last week. Time spent walking is reported in minimum bouts of 10 minutes, whereas for all other activities any duration of activity can be reported. An overall MET.min.wk^–¹ score was determined using the following formula: [time spent in walking×3.33 METs] + [time spent in moderate-intensity activity×3.33 METs] + [time spent in vigorous intensity activity×6.66 METs] [23 , 35]. As per the Active Australia guidelines, time spent in gardening was not included in the formula. Physical activity was then classified into two subcategories: insufficiently active (0 to 499 METmin.wk^–¹) or sufficiently active according to physical activity guidelines (≥500 METminutes.wk^–¹) [25, 36].

Sedentary behaviour was measured using the Past-day Recall of Sedentary Time (PAST), a self-report measure of sedentary behaviour validated in adult populations [37]. Participants were asked to report the number of minutes spent sitting or lying in various domains throughout the waking hours of the previous day (such as when working, for transport, while watching television and reading). Total sedentary time was calculated by summing the time reported in each of the domains of sedentary behaviour. The total time was then classified into two categories; < 10 and ≥10 h/day of sedentary time per day, given > 9.5 hours has been reported in the literature as associated with higher risk of early mortality [22] and adverse health outcomes [38].

Fatigue was measured using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) [39], a 21-item self-report measure used to assess perceived impact of fatigue on quality of life in physical, social and psychosocial domains. There are no reliability or validity studies for this scale in MG specifically, however, the measure has been shown to be a reliable and valid measure of fatigue in other neurological populations [40]. A higher score indicates a greater impact of fatigue on a persons’ daily life.

Quality of life was measured using the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-item (MG-QoL-15) [41], a valid survey assessing self-reported impact of disease-specific signs, symptoms and severity on quality of life [42], with a higher score indicating poorer perceived quality of life.

Walking limitation was assessed using the Walk-12G [43], a 12-item survey that assesses self-reported difficulties with walking in everyday life. Validation has occurred in other neurological conditions [43], with a higher score indicating greater limitation of walking.

Balance confidence was assessed using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC Scale) [44], a 16 item self-reported measure of perceived confidence in balance when mobilising and performing a number of everyday tasks. This scale has been validated in neurological populations [45] with higher scores indicating greater balance confidence.

Data analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS v25 (IBM Corporation). Data and model residuals were assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Participant characteristics, physical activity (METmin.wk^–1), sedentary behaviour (h/day) and clinical characteristics were analysed using descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation for normally distributed variables, median and interquartile range for non-normally distributed variables, and proportions for categorical variables). Associations between study variables (physical activity; sufficiently active (≥500METmin.wk^–¹) and insufficiently active (< 500 MET.min.wk^–¹) and sedentary behaviour (≥10 h/day; < 10 h/day) and fatigue, quality of life, walking limitation and balance confidence were assessed using multiple linear regression. To examine associations between patterns of physical activity and sedentary behaviour and study outcomes, multiple linear regression was performed using ‘sufficient physical activity and < 10 h/day sedentary’ as the reference category. All models were adjusted for age, body mass index and disease duration and unstandardized regression coefficients are presented. Level of significance was set at p < 0.05. A priori sample size calculations estimated that a minimum sample size of n = 36 was required for the current study based on previously reported correlations between fatigue and physical activity in multiple sclerosis (r = –0.45; n = 292) [46]. This study was used given the limited research investigating these correlations in people with MG at the time of study development.

RESULTS

Participant demographics and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 1 and descriptive statistics for physical activity, sedentary behaviour, fatigue, quality of life, walking limitation and balance confidence are presented in Table 2. Eighty-five participants (74%female) with an average age of 48±15.52 years completed the survey. 87%(n = 74) of participants were ambulant without a mobility aid. Around two-thirds of participants (n = 53, 62.4%) were sufficiently active according to physical activity guidelines [25] and over a third (n = 36, 42.4%) reported spending ≥10 h/day sedentary.

Table 1

Participant demographics and clinical characteristics

Measure	Participants (n = 85)
Age, mean±SD (years)	47.7±15.5
Gender, Female, n (%)	63 (74.1)
Body mass index, median [interquartile range]	26.2 [23.2–32.4]
Muscle groups affected, n (%)
Generalised	82 (96.5)
Ocular only	3 (3.5)
Disease duration, median [interquartile range], (years)	3.5 [1.5–10]
Co-morbidities, n (%)
0	28 (32.9)
1–3	41 (48.2)
> 4	16 (18.8)
Country of residence, n (%)
Australia	53 (62.4)
United States of America	24 (28.2)
New Zealand	2 (2.4)
Canada	3 (3.5)
Other	3 (3.5)
Previous or current treatments for MG, n (%)
Thymectomy	36 (42.4)
Plasmapheresis	14 (16.5)
Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy	57 (67.1)
Anticholinesterase medications	77 (90.6)
Immunosuppressive medications	70 (82.4)
Employment Status, n (%)
Full-time work or study	29 (34.1)
Part-time work or study (< 34 hours)	19 (22.4)
Retired	13 (15.3)
Unemployed	9 (10.6)
Medically retired	12 (14.1)
Home duties	3 (3.5)
Change of employment status due to MG, n (%)	44 (51.8)
Highest level of education attained, n (%)
Less than grade 12	9 (10.6)
High school graduate	13 (15.3)
Tafe/Vocational training	14 (16.5)
Higher education	49 (57.6)
Living situation, n (%)
Living alone	12 (14.11)
Living with friends/family	73 (85.9)
Ambulant without mobility aid, n (%)	74 (87.1)

Note:SD = standard deviation; MG = myasthenia gravis.

Table 2

Physical activity, sedentary behaviour, fatigue, quality of life, walking limitation and balance confidence

Measure	n = 85
Physical activity
Moderate activity METminutes.wk^–1, median [interquartile range]	233.1 [66.6–915.8]
Vigorous activity METminutes.wk^–1, median [interquartile range]	0.000 [0–799.2]
Total METminutes.wk^–1, median [interquartile range]	999 [0–11188.8]
Meeting physical activity guidelines (≥500 MET.min.wk^–1), n (%)	53 (62.4)
Not meeting physical activity guidelines (< 499 MET.min.wk^–1), n (%)	32 (37.6)
Sedentary behaviour
Sedentary behaviour, h/day, mean±SD	9.0±3.5
Sedentary < 10 h/day, n (%)	49 (57.6)
Sedentary ≥10 h/day, n (%)	36 (42.4)
Combined physical activity and sedentary behaviour
Insufficiently active (< 500 MET.min.wk^–1), sedentary ≥10 h/day, n (%)	18 (21.2)
Sufficiently active (≥500 MET.min.wk^–1), sedentary ≥10 h/day, n (%)	18 (21.2)
Insufficiently active (< 500 MET.min.wk^–1), sedentary < 10 h/day, n (%)	14 (16.5)
Sufficiently active (≥500 MET.min.wk^–1), sedentary < 10 h/day, n (%)	35 (41.2)
Modified Fatigue Impact Scale^*
Total, mean±SD	43.18±20
Physical, median [interquartile range]	23 [14.5–28]
Cognitive, mean±SD	17.2±9.8
Psychosocial, mean±SD	4±2.5
Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-Item^†, mean±SD	14.4±7.8
Walk-12G^‡, median [interquartile range]	14 [5–26]
Activities-Balance Confidence Scale^§, median [interquartile range]	73.1 [52.2–94.4]

Notes: MET = metabolic equivalents; SD = standard deviation. ^*Score is out of a possible total of 84, with higher scores indicating greater impact of fatigue on a person’s activities. The physical subscale can range from 0 to 36, cognitive 0 to 40 and psychosocial 0 to 8. ^†A score out of 60, with higher scores indicating poorer perceived quality of life. ^‡A score out of 42, with higher score indicating greater limitation to walking. ^§A percentage out of 100 of perceived balance confidence, with a higher score indicating greater confidence in balance.

Associations between physical activity and sedentary behaviour and fatigue, quality of life, walking limitation and balance confidence are reported in Table 3. Physical activity was significantly negatively associated with fatigue, quality of life and walking limitation, and positively associated with balance confidence (R² 0.196–0.330). Thus, sufficiently active participants reported reduced fatigue, higher quality of life, less walking limitation and greater balance confidence. Sedentary behaviour was not significantly associated with any of the outcomes.

Table 3

Multiple linear regression for physical activity and sedentary behaviour

Measures	Physical activity (Sufficiently active compared to insufficiently active)	Sedentary behaviour (< 10 h/day compared to ≥10 h/day)	R²
Fatigue^*
Unstandardized beta (B)	–17.65	–0.37	0.196
95%Confidence Interval	45.22, 99.32	–8.81, 8.07
P-value	≤0.000	0.931
Quality of life^†
Unstandardized beta (B)	–8.83	1.33	0.330
95%Confidence Interval	–11.88, –5.79	–1.68, 4.35
P-value	≤0.001	0.380
Walking limitation^‡
Unstandardized beta (B)	–11.06	–0.55	0.305
95%Confidence Interval	–15.54, –6.57	–5.00, 3.89
P-value	≤0.001	0.805
Balance confidence^§
Unstandardized beta (B)	20.70	4.37	0.304
95%Confidence Interval	12.28, 29.12	–4.04, 12.79
P-value	≤0.001	0.304

Notes: All models were adjusted for age, disease duration and body mass index. ^*Assessed using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale, scored out of 84 with a higher score indicating greater impact of fatigue on a person’s daily life. ^†Assessed using the Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15-Item, scored out of 60 with a higher score indicating poorer perceived quality of life. ^‡Assessed using the Walk-12G, scored out of 42 with a higher score indicating greater limitation to walking. ^§Assessed using the Activities-Balance Confidence Scale, scored as a percentage out of 100 of perceived balance confidence, with a higher score indicating greater confidence in balance.

Associations between patterns of physical activity and sedentary behaviour and the outcomes measured are reported in Table 4. Compared with the reference group (those who were sufficiently active and spent < 10 h/day sedentary), fatigue was significantly higher, quality of life was significantly lower and walking limitation was significantly greater in the insufficiently active groups (regardless of time spent sedentary). Quality of life was significantly higher and walking limitation was lower in the sufficiently active and ≥10 h/day sedentary group compared to the reference group. Balance confidence was significantly reduced among those in the insufficiently active and ≥10 h/day sedentary group. Generally, beta-coefficients were larger in those who were inactive and more sedentary compared to those who were inactive and less sedentary.

Table 4

Multiple linear regression for patterns of physical activity and sedentary behaviour and fatigue, quality of life, walking limitation and balance confidence

Measures	Sufficiently active, < 10 h/day sedentary	Sufficiently active, ≥10 h/day sedentary	Insufficiently active, < 10 h/day sedentary	Insufficiently active, ≥10 h/day sedentary	R ²
Fatigue^*
Unstandardized beta (B)	Reference category	–4.15	12.41	19.42	0.213
95%Confidence Interval		–15.01, 6.70	0.79, 24.03	8.67, 30.16
P-value		0.448	0.037	≤0.001
Quality of life^†
Unstandardized beta (B)	Reference category	–3.80	5.96	8.26	0.364
95%Confidence Interval		–7.64, 0.01	1.87, 10.06	4.48, 12.05
P-value		0.005	0.005	≤0.001
Walking limitation^‡
Unstandardized beta (B)	Reference category	–3.15	6.76	12.76
95%Confidence Interval		–8.78, 2.48	0.73, 12.80	7.18, 18.33	0.341
P-value		0.0269	0.028	≤0.001
Balance confidence^§
Unstandardized beta (B)	Reference category	1.54	–10.68	–21.81	0.279
95%Confidence Interval		–11.62, 14.70	–24.77, 3.41	–34.84, –8.78
P-value		0.816	0.135	≤0.001

DISCUSSION

The aims of this study were to describe the patterns of self-reported physical activity and sedentary behaviour in people with MG and to explore associations between these health-related behaviours and self-reported fatigue, quality of life, walking limitation and balance confidence. The findings of this study indicate that despite over half of the participants being sufficiently active, over a quarter also spent ≥10 h/day sedentary. There were significant associations found between meeting physical activity guidelines and less fatigue, greater quality of life, less walking limitation and greater balance confidence, while no significant associations were found between these variables and sedentary behaviour alone. When patterns of physical activity and sedentary behaviour were combined, there were significant dose-response relationships between these behaviours. Larger beta-coefficients were noted in those who were inactive and more sedentary compared to those who were inactive and less sedentary, indicating that sedentary behaviour alone may have an important effect on these outcomes, particularly in those who are insufficiently physically active.

These findings follow a similar pattern to previous cross-sectional studies in people with MG where most participants were sufficiently active (100%, 78%, respectively) [28, 29] with minimal engagement in vigorous activity [18 , 28–30]. Our findings on those attaining sufficient activity were lower (63%), as was the case in two other large studies where 52–54%[31] and 47%[8] of participants were considered sufficiently active. It is important to note these studies defined the threshold of sufficient physical activity differently (for example > 150 min/week or equivalent [28 , 31] versus > 240 min/week [8], and so direct comparison is not possible. Two studies reported physical activity in steps/day and so the proportion of sufficiently active participants is unclear, however given 7–8,000 steps/day is congruent with sufficient activity levels [47], it can be inferred these samples had reasonable levels of physical activity based on median steps/day of 7,872 [18] and 8,801 [30].

Variability in findings could be for several reasons which complicates collective interpretation of these findings. Firstly, there is a potential recruitment bias in the studies that found higher physical activity [18 , 28–30] as participants entered training interventions following activity monitoring as part of their baseline testing, potentially attracting participants particularly interested in physical activity. Secondly, inconsistency in measures used to collect this data is an important consideration and limits direct comparison of findings, given some of these studies used objective accelerometry [18 , 28–30], others self-report measures [8], (as was done in our study) and one a combination [31]. Self-report measures generally underestimate sedentary time [48] and give mixed results in measuring physical activity when compared to device-based measures [49], further compromising capacity to draw direct comparisons between findings. Ultimately device-based measures are the most reliable tool [49], however, online self-report surveys facilitated larger samples sizes in our study and the other studies using this method [8, 31] compared to those using device-based measures [28, 29]. This is important given the low global incidence of MG (0.3–2.8 per 100,000) [50]; online self-report allows for ease of distribution across larger geographical areas, enabling participation from people with MG who may not be located near where research is being conducted and subsequently increasing potential sample sizes. Furthermore, some studies only considered physical activity accrued in > 10 minute bouts [28 , 31] and so physical activity of lesser duration was not captured, thereby potentially underestimating the total physical activity and impacting on whether participants were considered sufficiently or insufficiently active.

Physical activity is reported in the Active Australia Survey in > 10-minute bouts for walking, and any duration for moderate or vigorous activities. Thus, shorter durations of walking were not captured in our study. A previous study in MG found that only 30%of participants reached sufficient physical activity levels when calculating MVPA based on 10-minute bouts, however when any duration of MVPA was recorded all participants were considered sufficiently active [28]. It is possible our findings may underestimate total duration of physical activity and subsequently whether participants were sufficiently or insufficiently active for this reason. Recent evidence has found any duration of physical activity is beneficial [51], contradictory to previous public health guidelines that have suggested physical activity should be accumulated in 10-minute bouts [52]. This may be of particular relevance in this population, where accruing physical activity in shorter durations may be more feasible given the impairments associated with the disease.

High levels of sedentary time found in our study are similar to that of existing literature in people with MG [28 –30]. Although no quantifiable guidelines exist to indicate target sedentary time, there is a dose-response relationship and risk of all-cause mortality gradually increases from 6–8 h/day, with a substantial increase noted from 9–9.5 h/day [22, 53]. This is concerning given people with MG have been reported to spend upwards of these thresholds in our study (9 h/day) and previous studies (11.5 h/day [28]; 10 h/day [30] and 10.9 h/day [31]). Investigation of the determinants of sedentary time in people with MG is warranted to develop targeted interventions to address this important determinant of health.

In this study, greater physical activity was significantly associated with favourable outcomes. This was similarly found in previous research in the case of fatigue and health-related quality of life [8]. However, this conflicts with other findings where no association was found between physical activity and health-related quality of life [28]. Co-variates may influence the findings of models.

Although there were no associations found be-tween sedentary behaviour alone and the outcomes assessed in this study, there were significant associations with these variables when patterns of sedentary behaviour were analysed in combination with sufficient versus insufficient physical activity. This is the first study to explore these associations in combination to single out the influence of sedentary behaviour. Our findings indicate that even in those who were inactive, lower levels of sedentary time (< 10 h/day) were associated with less fatigue, higher quality of life and less walking limitation compared to those with higher sedentary time (≥10 h/day). This is a promising finding, potentially suggesting that sedentary behaviour may be an appropriate intervention target even when physical activity is low. Increased mortality risk associated with high sedentary time appears to be mitigated with increasing physical activity and even reversed in those who are in the highest quartile for physical activity (> 2130 METminutes.wk^–¹) [27]. Considering the evidence indicating people with MG are generally sufficiently active however perform minimal vigorous activity, and are highly sedentary [28 –30], further investigation is warranted into which health behaviour/s are best targeted in this population.

The findings of this study should be considered with respect to some limitations. The online self-report method of data collection impeded capacity to objectively measure disease severity, given there is no universally used self-report measure of disease severity in this population. Similarly, self-report relies on patients being well informed of their medical history and treatments to accurately report on these factors, particularly in the case of our study where we were unable to cross-check information with clinical files given the recruitment method. Subsequently, these potential confounding factors were not accounted for in our study. However, 87%of participants in our study were independently ambulant without an aid with a median MG-QoL-15 score of 14; which may indicate moderate disease severity [4]. The association between disease severity and physical activity in this population has been conflicting in prior studies and so this warrants further investigation [8 , 29].

Overall, R² values of our models were generally low, indicating that there may be several other variables contributing to these relationships that warrant future investigation (including disease severity). For example, over half of the participants in our study reported at least one other comorbidity, which has had associations with these health behaviours in other studies in this population [8]. Future research investigating a greater number of potential contributing variables would be of benefit to improve understanding of these behaviours in people with MG.

The cross-sectional design gives insight into these behaviours at only one point in time and therefore limits the ability to determine direction of causality. Additionally, the online format gave participants the option to complete the survey any day of the week which although increases convenience, may have impacted reliability given the PAST measures sedentary time from the previous day only and sedentary time may differ between weekdays and weekend days [37].

The current study included an overrepresentation of females; given incidence of early-onset (< 50 years) MG is three times higher in females than males [54], this may explain the unequal representation given the relatively young age of our sample (48±15.5 years). Selection bias associated with web-based social media recruitment may have contributed to our young sample, given that older adults are typically underrepresented in web-based surveys [55]. Investigation into these behaviours across the lifespan is warranted to equitably capture people with MG of all ages.

In conclusion, although physical activity guidelines were met by over half of participants with MG in our study, participants also reported high levels of sedentary behaviour. Our findings provide preliminary evidence that free-living physical activity and sedentary behaviour may be potential intervention targets given our findings of associations between higher physical activity levels and lower sedentary time and less fatigue, higher quality of life, lower walking limitation and higher balance confidence. Further research is warranted to explore the impact of sedentary behaviour on MG-related symptoms, particularly in those who are physically inactive who may have challenges attaining enough physical activity to offset high sedentary time. There is a need for high quality, longitudinal studies with large sample sizes in individuals with MG that can further investigate and confirm the direction of the relationship between these variables.

Footnotes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The support of the Myasthenia Gravis Association of Queensland is gratefully acknowledged.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest to report. There was no funding associated with this study.

The supplementary material is available in the electronic version of this article: .

References

Kowalak

, Welsh

, Mayer

. Professional guide to pathophysiology. 3rd ed: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003;296–9.

Pascuzzi

. Myasthenia Gravis and Lambert-Eaton Syndrome. Therapeutic Apheresis. 2002;6(1):57–68.

Twork

, Wiesmeth

, Klewer

, Pöhlau

, Kugler

. Quality of life and life circumstances in German myasthenia gravis patients. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2010;8(1):8–129. 10.1186/1477-7525-8-129

Vemuri

, Garuda

, Gopi

, Kumar

, Kumari

. Disease Severity Assessment and Short-Term Outcome in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2020;23(2):19.10.4103/aian.AIAN_243_19

Hoffmann

, Ramm

, Grittner

, Kohler

, Siedler

, Meisel

. Fatigue in myasthenia gravis: Risk factors and impact on quality of life. Brain and Behavior. 2016;6:e00538.10.1002/brb3.538

Ruiter

, Verschuuren

JJGM

, Tannemaat

. Fatigue in patients with myasthenia gravis. A systematic review of the literature. Neuromuscular Disorders. 2020;30(8):631–9.10.1016/j.nmd.2020.06.010

Alekseeva

, Gavrilov

, Kreis

, Valko

, Weber

, Valko

. Fatigue in patients with myasthenia gra-vis. J Neurol. 2018;265(10):2312–21.10.1007/s00415-018-8995-4

Kahr Andersen

, Aadahl

, Vissing

. Fatigue, physical activity and associated factors in 779 patients with Myasthenia Gravis. Neuromuscular Disorders. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2021.05.007

Salci

, Karanfil

, Balkan

, Kütükçü

EÇ

, Ceren

, Ayvat

, et al. Functional exercise capacity evaluated by timed walk tests in myasthenia gravis. Muscle & Nerve. 2019;59(2):208–12.10.1002/mus.26345

10.

Labana

, Qureshi

, Nandakumar

, Cervellione

, Venkatraman

, Thakore

, et al. An atypical course of myasthenia gravis. Proc West Pharmacol Soc. 2007;50:140–2.

11.

Horlings

CGC

, van Engelen

BGM

, Allum

JHJ

, Bloem

. A weak balance: the contribution of muscle weakness to postural instability and falls. Nature Clinical Practice Neurology. 2008;4(9):504–15.10.1038/ncpneuro0886

12.

Hafer-Macko

, Naumes

, Macko

, Roy

, editors. Technology platform for tele-rehabilitation implementation in Mysathenia gravis at the point-of-care2016: IEEE.

13.

Grohar-Murray

, Becker

, Reilly

, Ricci

. Self-care actions to manage fatigue among myasthenia gravis patients. J Neurosci Nurs. 1998;30(3):191–9.10.1097/01376517-199806000-00007

14.

Westerberg

, Molin

, Spörndly Nees

, Widenfalk

, Punga

. The impact of physical exercise on neuromuscular function in Myasthenia gravis patients. Medicine. 2018;97(31):e11510.10.1097/md.0000000000011510

15.

Wong

, Nitz

, Williams

, Brauer

. Effects of balance strategy training in myasthenia gravis: A case study series. Muscle & Nerve. 2014;49(5):654–60.10.1002/mus.24054

16.

Rahbek

, Mikkelsen

, Overgaard

, Vinge

, Andersen

, Dalgas

. Exercise in myasthenia gravis: A feasibility study of aerobic and resistance training. Muscle & Nerve. 2016;56(4).10.1002/mus.25552

17.

Lohi

, Lindberg

, Andersen

. Physical training effects in myasthenia gravis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1993;74(11):1178–80.

18.

Westerberg

, Molin

, Lindblad

, Emtner

, Punga

. Physical exercise in myasthenia gravis is safe and improves neuromuscular parameters and physical performance-based measures: A pilot study. Muscle & Nerve. 2017;56(2):207–14.10.1002/mus.25493

19.

Birnbaum

, Porcher

, Portero

, Clair

, Demeret

, Eymard

, et al. Home-based exercise in autoimmune myasthenia gravis: a randomized controlled trial. Neuromuscular Disorders. 2021.

20.

Misra

, Kalita

, Singh

, Kapoor

, Tripathi

, Mishra

. Rest or 30-Min Walk as Exercise Intervention (RESTOREX) in Myasthenia Gravis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. European Neurology. 2021;84(3):168–74.10.1159/000513668

21.

Bames

, Behrens

, Benden

, Biddle

, Bond

, Brassard

, et al. Letter to the Editor: Standardized use of the terms” sedentary” and ”sedentary behaviours". Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism-Physiologie Appliquee Nutrition Et Metabolisme. 2012;37:540–2.

22.

Ekelund

, Tarp

, Steene-Johannessen

, Hansen

, Jefferis

, Fagerland

, et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019:l4570

10.1136/bmj.l4570

23.

Ainsworth

, Haskell

, Herrmann

, Meckes

, Bassett

DRJ

, Tudor-Locke

, et al. Compendium of Physical Activities: A Second Update of Codes and MET Values. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 2011;43(8).

24.

Australian Institute of Health Welfare. Australia’s physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines for adults (18–64 years+adults 65 years and older). 2014.

25.

World Health Organisation. Guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva 2020.

26.

Warburton

, Nicol

, Bredin

. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ. 2006;174(6):801–9.

27.

Ekelund

, Steene-Johannessen

, Brown

, Fagerland

, Owen

, Powell

, et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality? A harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet. 1302:388(10051):1302–10.10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30370-1

28.

Birnbaum

, Bachasson

, Sharshar

, Porcher

, Hogrel

J-Y

, Portero

. Free-Living Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in Autoimmune Myasthenia Gravis: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases. 2021:1–9.10.3233/jnd-210637

29.

O’Connor

, Westerberg

, Punga

. Pattern of Habitual Physical Exercise in Myasthenia Gravis Patients. Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases. 2019;6(1):85–91.10.3233/JND-180355

30.

Westerberg

, Molin

, Spörndly Nees

, Widenfalk

, Punga

. The impact of physical exercise on neuromuscular function in Myasthenia gravis patients: A single-subject design study. Medicine. 2018:97(31).

31.

Kahr Andersen

, Vissing

. Habitual Physical Activity in Patients with Myasthenia Gravis Assessed by Accelerometry and Questionnaire. Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases. 2021;Preprint:1-9.10.3233/JND-210693

32.

Lee

I-M

, Shiroma

, Lobelo

, Puska

, Blair

, Katzmarzyk

, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. The Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–29.

33.

Australian Institute of Health Welfare. The Active Australia Survey: a guide and manual for implementation, analysis and reporting. Canberra: AIHW; 2003.

34.

Brown

, Burton

, Marshall

, Miller

. Reliability and validity of a modified self-administered version of the Active Australia physical activity survey in a sample of mid-age women. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health. 2008;32(6):535–41.

35.

Haskell

, Lee

I-M

, Pate

, Powell

, Blair

, Franklin

, et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007;116(9):1081.

36.

Brown

, Bauman

, Bull

, Burton

. Development of Evidence-based Physical Activity Recommendations for Adults (18–64 years). Report prepared for the Australian Government Department of Health, August 2012. 2013.

37.

Clark

, Winkler

, Healy

, Gardiner

, Dunstan

, Owen

, et al. Adults’ past-day recall of sedentary time: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(6):1198–207.10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182837f57

38.

Rillamas-Sun

, LaMonte

, Evenson

, Thomson

, Beresford

, Coday

, et al. The Influence of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior on Living to Age 85 Years Without Disease and Disability in Older Women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018;73(11):1525–31.10.1093/gerona/glx222

39.

Fisk

, Ritvo

, Ross

, Haase

, Marrie

, Schlech

. Measuring the Functional Impact of Fatigue: Initial Validation of the Fatigue Impact Scale. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 1994;18:S79–S83.10.1093/clinids/18.supplement_1.s79

40.

Mathiowetz

. Test-retest reliability and convergent validity of the Fatigue Impact Scale for persons with multiple sclerosis. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. . 2003;57(4):389–95.

41.

Burns

, Conaway

, Cutter

, Sanders

. Less is more, or almost as much: A 15-item quality-of-life instrument for myasthenia gravis. Muscle & Nerve. 2008;38(2):957–63.10.1002/mus.21053

42.

Burns

, Grouse

, Conaway

, Sanders

. Construct and concurrent validation of the MG-QOL15 in the practice setting. Muscle & Nerve: Official Journal of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2010;41(2):219–26.

43.

Bladh

, Nilsson

, Hariz

G-M

, Westergren

, Hobart

, Hagell

. Psychometric performance of a generic walking scale (Walk-12G) in multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease. Journal of neurology. 2012;259(4):729–38.10.1007/s00415-011-6254-z

44.

Powell

, Myers

. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 50AM28-M34. 1995;50A(1):M28–M34.10.1093/gerona/50a.1.m28

45.

Ylva

, Anette

. Psychometric properties of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale in persons 0–14 days and 3 months post stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2012;34(14):1186–91.

46.

Motl

, McAuley

, Snook

, Gliottoni

. Physical activity and quality of life in multiple sclerosis: Intermediary roles of disability, fatigue, mood, pain, self-efficacy and social support. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2009;14(1):111–24.10.1080/13548500802241902

47.

Tudor-Locke

, Craig

, Brown

, Clemes

, De Cocker

, Giles-Corti

, et al. How many steps/day are enough? for adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2011;8(1):79.10.1186/1479-5868-8-79

48.

Prince

, Cardilli

, Reed

, Saunders

, Kite

, Douillette

, et al. A comparison of self-reported and device measured sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2020;17(1).10.1186/s12966-020-00938-3

49.

Prince

, Adamo

, Hamel

, Hardt

, Connor Gorber

, Tremblay

. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2008;5(1):56.10.1186/1479-5868-5-56

50.

Deenen

, Horlings

, Verschuuren

, Verbeek

, van Engelen

. The Epidemiology of Neuromuscular Disorders: A Comprehensive Overview of the Literature. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2015;2(1):73–85.

51.

Saint-Maurice

, Troiano

, Matthews

, Kraus

. Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity and All-Cause Mortality: Do Bouts Matter? Journal of the American Heart Association. 2018;7(6):e007678.10.1161/jaha.117.007678

52.

US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity guidelines for Americans 2008 [Available from: http://www.health.gov/PAGuidelines.

53.

P-W

, Steptoe

, Liao

, Hsueh

M-C

, Chen

L-J

. A cut-off of daily sedentary time and all-cause mortality in adults: a meta-regression analysis involving more than 1 million participants. BMC Medicine. 2018;16(1).10.1186/s12916-018-1062-2

54.

Gilhus

, Tzartos

, Evoli

, Palace

, Burns

, Verschuuren

JJGM

. Myasthenia gravis. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2019;5(1).10.1038/s41572-019-0079-y

55.

Bethlehem

. Selection Bias in Web Surveys. International Statistical Review. 2010;78(2):161–88.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2010.00112.x

Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour in People with Myasthenia Gravis: A Cross-Sectional Study

Abstract

Background:

Objective:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design

Participants

Scales and questionnaires

Data analysis

RESULTS

DISCUSSION

Footnotes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

References