With the acceleration of technological change and globalization, companies face increasing environmental uncertainty and complexity. The COVID-19 pandemic has severely damaged the global supply chain and aggravated the operational risks of supply chains. Industry and academia have conducted studies on the construction of resilient and integrated supply chains, and to date a bulk of empirical literature has already been accumulated. A notable feature of existing literature is the heterogeneity in the characterization of the relationship between supply chain resilience, supply chain integration, and supply chain performance. In this study meta-analysis and structural equation modeling (MASEM) methods are integrated to construct a theoretical framework of supply chain resilience, supply chain integration, and supply chain performance. 45 empirical studies (73 effect size data, 2092 samples) are selected from 10,623 papers published over the years 2013 to 2021 to explore the transmission mechanisms, the role of mediator variable, and boundary conditions of the relationship between supply chain resilience and supply chain performance. The results show that supply chain resilience can promote supply chain performance. Moreover, supply chain integration (supplier integration, internal integration, and customer integration) plays a partial mediating role for the impact of supply chain resilience on supply chain performance. Situations and measurement factors such as industry type, national culture (power distance), sampling area, and logistics performance have a certain impact on the relationship, and the usage of different indicators may lead to marked differences in conclusions regarding the relationship. By extracting the conclusions of existing empirical studies, this study proposes new insights into the mechanism of action of supply chain resilience, supply chain integration, and supply chain performance and provides specific suggestions for future supply chain management.
DrogeC., VickeryS.K. and JacobsM.A., Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product/process strategy and service performance? An empirical study, Int J Prod Econ137(2) (2012), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.02.005
2.
SwinkM., NarasimhanR. and WangC., Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance, J Oper Manag25(1) (2007), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.006
3.
LziuC.L. and LeeM.Y., Integration, supply chain resilience, and service performance in third-party logistics providers, Int J Log Manag29(1) (2018), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2016-0283
4.
RileyJ.M., KleinR., MillerJ. and SridharanV., How internal integration, information sharing, and training affect supply chain risk management capabilities, Int J Phys Dist Log Manag46(10) (2016), 953–980. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-10-2015-0246
5.
DaneseP. and RomanoP., Supply chain integration and efficiency performance: a study on the interactions between customer and supplier integration, Supply Chain Manag: Int J16(4) (2011), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541111139044
6.
WongC.Y., WongC.W.Y. and BoonS., Effects of green supply chain integration and innovation on environmental and cost performance, Int J Prod Res58(15) (2020), 4589–4609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1756510
7.
PonomarovS.Y. and HolcombM.C., Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience, Int J Log Manag20(1) (2009), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090910954873
8.
SiagianH., TariganZ.J.H. and JieF., Supply Chain Integration Enables Resilience, Flexibility, and Innovation to Improve Business Performance in COVID-19 Era, Sustain13(9) (2021), 4669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094669
9.
YuW., JacobsM.A., ChavezR. and YangJ., Dynamism, disruption orientation, and resilience in the supply chain and the impacts on financial performance: A dynamic capabilities perspective, Int J Prod Econ218 (2019), 352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.013
10.
MandalS., BhattacharyaS., KorasigaV.R. and SarathyR., The dominant influence of logistics capabilities on integration: Emprical evidence from supply chain resilience, Int J Disaster Resil Environ8(4) (2017), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJDRBE-05-2016-0019
11.
WielandA. and WallenburgC.M., The influence of relational competencies on supply chain resilience: a relational view, Int J Phys Dist Log Manag43(4) (2013), 300–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-08-2012-0243
RalstonP. and BlackhurstJ., Industry 4.0 and resilience in the supply chain: a driver of capability enhancement or capability loss?Int J Prod Res58 (2020), 5006–5019. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1736724
15.
ParkY.W., BlackhurstJ., PaulC. and ScheibeK.P., An analysis of the ripple effect for disruptions occurring in circular flows of a supply chain network *, Int J Prod Res2 (2021), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2021.1934745
16.
HohensteinN.-O., FeiselE., HartmannE. and GiuniperoL., Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience, Int J Phys Dist Log Manag.45(1/2) (2015), 90–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM-05-2013-0128
17.
DolguiA., IvanovD. and SokolovB., Ripple effect in the supply chain: an analysis and recent literature, Int J Prod Res56(1–2) (2017), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1387680
18.
ZhaoK., ZuoZ. and BlackhurstJ.V., Modelling supply chain adaptation for disruptions: An empirically grounded complex adaptive systems approach, J Oper Manag65(2) (2019), 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1009
19.
KamalahmadiM. and ParastM.M., A review of the literature on the principles of enterprise and supply chain resilience: Major findings and directions for future research, Int J Prod Econ171(1) (2016), 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.023
20.
AutryC.W., WilliamsB.D. and GolicicS., Relational and Process Multiplexity in Vertical Supply Chain Triads: An Exploration in the U.S. Restaurant Industry, J Bus Log35(1) (2014), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12034
21.
AllredC.R., FawcettS.E., WallinC. and MagnanG.M., A dynamic collaboration capability as a source of competitive advantage, Decis Sci42(1) (2011), 129–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00304.x
22.
DevarajS., KrajewskiL. and WeiJ.C., Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: The role of production information integration in the supply chain, J Oper Manag25(6) (2007), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.002
23.
PaulrajA., LadoA.A. and ChenI.J., Inter-organizational communication as a relational competency: Antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer–supplier relationships, J Oper Manag26(1) (2008), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.04.001
24.
FayeziS., ZutshiA. and O’LoughlinA., Understanding and development of supply chain agility and flexibility: a structured literature review, Int J Manag Rev19(4) (2017), 379–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12096
25.
FayeziS., ZutshiA. and O’LoughlinA., Flexibility and relationship integration as antecedents of organisations’ supply chain agility, Int J Innovat Manag Technol4(2) (2013), 175–177. DOI: 10.7763/IJIMT.2013.V4.385
26.
SwaffordP.M., GhoshS. and MurthyN.N., A framework for assessing value chain agility, Int J Oper Prod Manag26(2) (2006), 118–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610641639
27.
VargasM.J.A. and KelleyK.J., Bullwhip severity in conditions of uncertainty: regional vs global supply chain strategies, Int J Emerg Mark15(1) (2020), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-02-2017-0050
28.
FlynnB.B., HuoB. and ZhaoX., The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach, J Oper Manag28(1) (2010), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001
29.
ZhaoX., HuoB., SelenW. and YeungJ.H.Y., The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration, J Oper Manag29(1) (2011), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.04.004
30.
TurkulainenV., RohJ., WhippleJ.M. and SwinkM., Managing internal supply chain integration: Integration mechanisms and requirements, J Bus Log38(4) (2017), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12165
31.
CaoZ., HuoB., LiY. and ZhaoX., The impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration: a contingency and configuration approach, Supply Chain Manag Int J20(1) (2015), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-11-2013-0426
32.
WongC.W.Y., LaiK.-H. and ChengT.C.E., Value of information integration to supply chain management: Roles of internal and external contingencies, J Manag Inform Syst28(3) (2011), 161–199. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222280305
33.
YuW., JacobsM.A., SalisburyW.D. and EnnsH., The effects of supply chain integration on customer satisfaction and financial performance: An organizational learning perspective, Int J Prod Econ146(1) (2013), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.07.023
34.
HofstedeG., HofstedeG.J. and MinkovM., Cultures and Organizations: software of the mind. McGraw Hill, New York (2010).
KamalM.M. and IraniZ., Analysing supply chain integration through a systematic literature review: a normative perspective, Supply Chain Manag: Int J19(5/6) (2014), 523–557. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0491
37.
ZailaniS. and RajagopalP., Supply chain integration and performance: US versus East Asian companies, Supply Chain Manag: Int J10(5) (2005), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540510624205
38.
MartíL., PuertasR. and GarcíaL., The importance of the logistics performance index in international trade, Econ46(24) (2014), 2982–2992. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.916394
39.
MontazemiA.R. and Qahri-SaremiH., Factors affecting adoption of online banking: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study, Inform Manag52(2) (2015), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.11.002
YuL., LiH., HeW., WangF.K. and JiaoS., A metaanalysis to explore privacy cognition and information disclosure of internet users, Int J Inform Manag (2020), 51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.09.011
42.
BorensteinM., HedgesL.V., HigginsJ.P.T. and RothsteinH.R., Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley and Sons (2009).
ViswesvaranC. and OnesD.S., Theory testing: Combining psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations modeling, Pers Psychol48(4) (1995), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01784.x
45.
JiangK., LepakD.P., HuJ. and BaerJ.C., How does human resource management influence organizational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms, Acad Manag J55(6) (2012), 1264–1294. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0088
46.
RothsteinH.R., SuttonA.J. and BorensteinM., Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. John Wiley & Sons (2006).
47.
HigginsJ.P., ThompsonS.G., DeeksJ.J. and AltmanD.G., Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses, Brit Med J327 (2003), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
48.
BelhadiA., ManiV., KambleS.S., KhanS.A.R. and VermaS., Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: an empirical investigation, Ann Oper Res (2021), 1–26. doi: 10.1007/s10479-021-03956-x
49.
GuM., YangL. and HuoB., The impact of information technology usage on supply chain resilience and performance: An ambidexterous view, Int J Prod Econ232 (2021), 107956. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107956
50.
OhS., MoonH.C. and ZhongY., Contingency Management and Supply Chain Performance in Korea: A COVID-19 Pandemic Approach, Sustainability (2020), 12. doi: 10.3390/su12239823
51.
ShukorA.A.A., NewazM.S., RahmanM.K. and TahaA.Z., Supply chain integration and its impact on supply chain agility and organizational flexibility in manufacturing firms, International Journal of Emerging Markets16 (2020), 1721–1744. doi: 10.1108/ijoem-04-2020-0418
52.
JajjaM.S.S., ChathaK.A. and FarooqS., Impact of supply chain risk on agility performance: Mediating role of supply chain integration, International Journal of Production Economics205 (2018), 118–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.032
53.
Van HoekR., EllingerA.E. and JohnsonM., Great divides: internal alignment between logistics and peer functions, Int J Log Manag19(2) (2008), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090810895924
54.
IftikharA., PurvisL. and GiannoccaroI., A meta-analytical review of antecedents and outcomes of firm resilience, Journal of Business Research135 (2021), 408–425. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.06.048
55.
PerrowC., Normal accidents. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2011).
56.
PipraniA.Z., MohezarS. and JaafarN.I., Supply chain integration and supply chain performance: The mediating role of supply chain resilience, International Journal of Supply Chain Management9(3) (2020), 58–73.
57.
M and BusbyJ., An exploratory analysis of counterfeiting strategies, International Journal of Operations & Production Management35 (2015), 110–144. doi: 10.1108/ijopm-04-2012-0174
