Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The application of an intelligent logistics information platform has promoted the development of logistics informatization, and how user usage intention can be improved is an important link for accelerating the promotion of the intelligent logistics information platform. The influencing factor model of user usage intention on an intelligent logistics information platform was developed based on the technology acceptance model, and empirical verification was performed for research hypotheses based on a questionnaire survey to identify the key factors that influence user usage intention and the influencing paths. Results show that information resource, management service, and platform technology have significantly positive influences on user perceived usefulness (PU); management service, platform technology, and application effect have significantly positive influences on perceived ease of use (PEOU); PEOU has a prominently positive influence on PU; and PEOU and PU have significantly positive influences on user usage intention. On this basis, suggestions for optimizing intelligent logistics information platform were proposed.

Keywords

Intelligent logistics information platform user usage intention influencing factors technology acceptance model

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

McFarlane ,

Giannikas and

Lu , Intelligent logistics: Involving the customer, Computers in Industry81 (2016), 105-115.

F.C.

Tung ,

S.C.

Chang and

C.M.

Chou , An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry, International Journal of Medical Informatics77(5) (2008), 324–335.

Ramanathan ,

Ramanathan and

L.W.L.

Ko , Adoption of RFID technologies in UK logistics: Moderating roles of size, barcode experience and government support, Expert Systems with Applications41(1) (2014), 230–236.

C.Y.

Lin and

Y.H.

Ho , An empirical study on the adoption of RFID technology for logistics service providers in China, International Business Research2(1) (2009), 23–36.

Jereb , Mastering logistics investment management, Transformations in Business & Economics16(1)(2017), 100–120.

Reiner , Customer-oriented improvement and evaluation of supply chain processes supported by simulation models, International Journal of Production Economics96(3) (2005), 381–395.

Benbasat and

Barki , Quo vadis TAM?Journal of the Association for Information Systems8(4) (2007), 211–218.

Aranburu-Zabalo ,

Lasa-Erle ,

Iruretagoiena-Irazusta ,

Reguera-Bakhache and

J.K.

Gerrikagoitia-Arrien , New user centered methodologies for software development in the industry 4.0 era, DYNA92(5) (2017), 492–492.

Centobelli ,

Cerchione ,

Murino and

Gallo , Layout and material flow optimization in digital factory, International Journal of Simulation Modelling15(2) (2016), 223–235.

10.

A.M.

Rahimi , Neuro-fuzzy system modelling for the effects of intelligent transportation on road accident fatalities, Tehnički vjesnik–Technical Gazette24(4) (2017), 1165–1171.

11.

C.H.

Yang ,

D.T.

Chen ,

Z.L.

Huang and

H.B.

Liu , Design of a third-party reverse logistics network under a carbon tax scheme, Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review9(5) (2016), 126–134.

12.

J.J.

Bartholdi III ,

D.D.

Eisenstein and

Y.F.

Lim , Selforganizing logistics systems, Annual Reviews in Control34(1) (2010), 111–117.

13.

Aldin and

Stahre , Electronic commerce, marketing channels and logistics platforms––a wholesaler perspective, European Journal of Operational Research144(2) (2003), 270–279.

14.

M.C.B.

Cheng and

J.J.

Wang , An integrative approach in measuring hub-port supply chain performance: Potential contributions of a logistics and transport data exchange platform, Case Studies on Transport Policy4(2) (2016), 150–160.

15.

Tanrikulu and

Gelibolu , The impacts of perceived market orientation in higher education: Student as a customer, Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala49 (2015), 156–172.

16.

Hasan and

M.U.

Ahmed , Effects of interface style on user perceptions and behavioral intention to use computer systems, Computers in Human Behavior23 (6) (2007), 3025-3037.

17.

M.Y.

Yi and

Hwang , Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Selfefficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model, International Journal of Human–Computer Studies59(4) (2003), 431–449.

18.

Venkatesh and

F.D.

Davis , A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies, Management Science46(2) (2000), 186–204.

19.

Luarn and

H.H.

Lin , Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking, Computers in Human Behavior21(6) (2005), 873–891.

20.

C.C.

Bienstock ,

M.B.

Royne ,

Sherrell and

T.F.

Stafford , An expanded model of logistics service quality: Incorporat ing logistics information technology, International Journal of Production Economics113(1) (2008), 205–222.

21.

Lee and

B.G.

Kim , Factors affecting the usage of intranet: A confirmatory study, Computers in Human Behavior25(1) (2009), 191–201.

22.

F.Y.

Pai ,

K.I.

Huang , Applying the technology acceptance model to the introduction of healthcare information systems, Technological Forecasting and Social Change78(4) (2011), 650–660.

23.

W.H.

DeLone and

E.R.

McLean , Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable, Information Systems Research3(1) (1992), 60–95.

24.

L.F.

Pitt ,

R.T.

Watson and

C.B.

Kavan , Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness, MIS Quarterly19(2) (1995), 173–187.

25.

W.H.

DeLone and

E.R.

McLean , The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-years update, Journal of Management Information Systems19(4) (2003), 9–30.

26.

J.V.

Chen ,

D.C.

Yen and

Chen , The acceptance and dif fusion of the innovative smart phone use: A case study of a delivery service company in logistics, Information & Management46(4) (2009), 241–248.

27.

Gunasekaran ,

Patel and

R.E.

McGaughey , A framework for supply chain performance measurement, International Journal of Production Economics87 (3) (2004), 333–347.

28.

Bhagwat and

M.K.

Sharma , Performance measure ment of supply chain management: A balanced scorecard approach, Computers & Industrial Engineering53(1) (2007), 43–62.

29.

Lai ,

Ngai and

Cheng , Measures for evaluating sup ply chain performance in transport logistics, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review38(6) (2002), 439–456.

30.

Chopra ,

R.K.

Jha and

Jain , A survey on ultra-dense network and emerging technologies: Security challenges and possible solutions, Journal of Network and Computer Applications95(2017), 54–78.

31.

Venkatesh ,

M.G.

Morris ,

G.B.

Davis and

F.D.

Davis , User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view, Mis Quarterly27(3) (2003), 425–478.

32.

J.S.

Jeong and

Hong , Customer orientation and performance outcomes in supply chain management, Journal of Enterprise Information Management20(5) (2007), 578–594.

33.

F.D.

Davis ,

R.P.

Bagozzi and

P.R.

Warshaw , Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology22(14) (1992), 1111–1132.

34.

Ahn ,

Ruy and

Han , The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of Internet shopping malls, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications3(4) (2004), 405–420.

35.

Zhang and

V.R.

Prybutok , An empirical study of online shopping: A service perspective, International Journal of Services Technology and Management5(1) (2004), 1–13.

36.

Hong ,

J.Y.L.

Thong ,

W.M.

Wong and

K.Y.

Tam , Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and systems characteristics, Journal of Management Information Systems18(3) (2002), 97–124.

37.

M.M.

Hossain and

V.R.

Prybutok , Consumer acceptance of RFID technology: An exploratory study, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management55(2) (2008), 316–328.

38.

Pahnila ,

Siponen and

Zheng , Integrating habit into UTAUT: The Chinesee eBay case, Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems3(2) (2011), 1–30.

39.

F.D.

Davis , Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, Mis Quarterly13(3) (1989), 319–340.

40.

I.B.

Yahia ,

Al-Neama and

Kerbache , Investigating the drivers for social commerce in social media platforms: Importance of trust, social support and the platform perceived usage, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services41 (2018), 11–19.

41.

Venkatesh ,

J.Y.L.

Thong and

Xu , Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology, MIS Quarterly36(1) (2012), 157–178.

42.

Lee and

B.G.

Kim , Factors affecting the usage of intranet: A confirmatory study, Computers in Human Behavior25(1) (2009), 191–201.

43.

Cha , Predictors of television and online video platform use: A coexistence model of old and new video platforms, Telematics and Informatics30(4) (2013), 296–310.

44.

R.W.

Brislin , Back-translation for cross-cultural research, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology1(3) (1970), 185–216.

Factors influencing user usage intention on intelligent logistics information platform

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References