During manufacturing of multi-strand cables the conductors are subjected to twisting and pressing which result in a creation of contact regions between individual wires. The resistivity of such contact regions differs from the resistivity of copper or aluminum. In this paper the resistivity is established by comparing measurements of resistivity with simulations using a finite element method. The non-homogeneity of the contact imprint has been accounted for and the presented results show the dependence of the contact resistance on several parameters, including compression force, imprint depth, intersecting angle and stranding pitch.
LindholmP., Numerical study of coated electrical contacts, in COMSOL Conference, 2010.
2.
BraunovicM., KonchitsV.V. and MyshkinN.K., Electrical Contacts: Fundamentals, Applications and Technology. CRC press, Taylor & Francis Group, Dec. 2006.
3.
ButtaM., RipkaP., AtalayS., AtalayF.E. and LiX.P., Fluxgate effect in twisted magnetic wire, in JMMM320, 2008.
4.
DuvivierP.-Y., MandrillonV., PolizziJ.-P. and InalK., Etude de la resistance 'electrique d'un contact au /au en fonction de la force appliquee, r. L. B. C. AFM, Maison de la Mecanique, Ed., 2011. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/ 2042/37188.
5.
HolmR., Electric contacts: Theory an applications, 4th ed. Berlin, Springer Verlag, 1979.
6.
NakamuraK., YamanouchiM., YamaguchiM., ObanaT., HashimotoK., TakaoT., NishimuraA. and MitoT., Influence of intersecting angles of strands on contact resistance in cable-in-conduit conductors, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity13(2) (June 2003), 2392-2395.
7.
NakamuraK., TakaoT., GotoT. and NishimuraA., Effects of compressive force between strands on contact resistance in cable-inconduit conductors, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity17(2) (June 2007), 2466-2469.
8.
BraunovicM., Effect of connection design on the contact resistance of high power overlapping bolted joints, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies25(4) (Dec. 2002), 642-650.
9.
TimsitR., Electrical contact resistance: Properties of stationary interfaces, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies22(1) (Mar. 1999), 85-98.
10.
BoyerL., Houz'eF., KlimekG. and NoelS., Electrical and physical modeling of contact defects due to fretting, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and ManufacturingTechnology, Part A17(1) (Mar. 1994), 134-140.
11.
NakamuraM., Computer simulation for the constriction resistance depending on the form of conducting spots, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging, and ManufacturingTechnology, PartA18(2) (June 1995), 382-384.
12.
ZeroukhiY., NapieralskaE., KomezaK., MorgantiF. and VegaG., Identification of current flow depending on the mechanical deformation in a stranded cable, COMPEL, Emerald Group Publishing Limited (4) (2013), 1437-1450.
13.
ZeroukhiY., NapieralskaE., MorgantiF., KomezaK. and VegaG., Analysis of the impact of elastoplastic deformation and the mechanical-electrical behavior of an electrical conductor 1 + 6, International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics (IJAEM)45(1) (2014).
14.
GreenwoodJ.A. and WilliamsonJ.B.P., Contact of nominally flat surfaces, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences295(1442) (1966), 300-319.
15.
HolmR., Electric contacts: theory and applications. Springer, 1999. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.fr/booksflid=RBwIAQAAIAAJ.
16.
HymanD. and MehreganyM., Contact physics of gold microcontacts for mems switches, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies22(3) (Sep. 1999), 357-364.
17.
AronsteinJ. and HareT., Ac and dc electromigration failure of aluminum contact junctions, IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies28(4) (Dec. 2005), 701-709.
18.
KwakN.S., LeeJ. and JangY.H., Genetic-algorithm-based controlling of microcontact distributions to minimize electrical contact resistance, IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology2(11) (Nov. 2012), 1768-1776.
19.
BraunovicM., MyshkinN.K. and KonchitsV.V., Electrical Contacts: Fundamentals, Applications and Technology, C. press, Ed., 2006.
20.
PooleW., AshbyM. and FleckN., Micro-hardness of annealed and work-hardened copper polycrystals, Scripta Materialia34(4) (1996), 559-564. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/1359646295005242.
21.
ShinoharaK., Relationship between work-hardening exponent and load dependence of vickers hardness in copper, Journal of Materials Science28(19) (1993), 5325-5329. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00570084.
22.
GreenwoodJ.A. and WilliamsonJ.B.P., Electrical Conduction in Solids. II Theory of Temperature Dependent Conductors, Proc. Roy. Soc. London246 (1958), 3.
23.
KataokaK., ItohT., OkumuraK. and SugaT., Development of low force copper contact processes, in Proceedings of the Forty-Ninth IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts, Sept. 2003, 228-233.
24.
SaitohY., IidaK., SawadaS., ShimizuK. and HattoriY., Dependency of contact resistance on load, in Electrical contacts - 2007, the 53rd ieee holm conference on, Sept. 2007, 70-75.
25.
Dassault systems simulia corp - abaqus, - 2011 release 6.11.
