Online health information seeking behavior of Croatian urological patients and liability for the violation of an individual’s right to health by disinformation

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to explore online health information seeking behavior. The method used in this study was conducting a survey by means of a questionnaire which was distributed to the urological patients of the “Dr. Juraj Navro” National Memorial Hospital in Vukovar in Croatia. The results were analysed by the SPSS statistical package utilising descriptive and inferential statistical methods (Chi-square, Mann Whitney U test). Regarding the online information sources that urological patients consult, as many as 21% of the respondents indicated that they searched for health information on Facebook. The obtained research results point to the conclusion that urological patients have a medium level of trust in online health information and indicate the need to increase the level of health literacy among patients in Croatia through various educational campaigns at the national and international level. The problem of online disinformation raises also numerous legal issues. Therefore, the legal framework of liability due to the violation of an individual’s right to health, by disinformation, was explored.

Keywords

Online health information seeking behavior legal obligations and responsibilities right to health patients Croatia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alaburić

, & Havkić

(2000). Law on public communication: commentary and practice (Zakon o javnom priopćavanju: komentar i praksa). VIV-inženjering, Zagreb.

Bansal

Koepl

L.M.

Fedorenko

C.R.

, et al. (2018). Information seeking and satisfaction with information sources among spouses of men with newly diagnosed local-stage prostate cancer. Journal of Cancer Education, 33, 32-331. Retrieved from doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1179-6.

Barbić

(2008). Civil liability in medicine (Gradanskopravna odgovornost u medicini). Zagreb: Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts.

Baunacke

Groeben

Borgmann

Salem

Kliesch

, & Huber

(2018). Andrology on the internet: Most wanted, controversial and often primary source of information for patients. Andrologia, 50(2). Retrieved from doi: 10.1111/and.12877.

Boban

(2012). The right to privacy and the right to access information in the modern information society (Pravo na privatnost i pravo na pristup informacijama u suvremenom informacijskom društvu). Collected Papers of The Faculty of Law in Split, 49(3), 575-598. Retrieved from https//hrcak.srce.hr/file/12921.

Boillat

, & Callens

(2005). The sale of medicinal products by mail-order in Europe. Yearbook of European Medical Law, 5-62.

Britz

J.J.

(1999). Access to information: the ethical challenges of the information era. The ethics of electronic information in the twenty first century, 9-29.

Buiten

de Streel

, & Peitz

(2020). Rethinking liability rules for online hosting platforms, International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 28(2), 149-171.

Callens

(2010). The EU legal framework on e-health, European observatory on health systems and policies, en ’Observatoire Social Euroéen, 561-588.

10.

Case

D.O.

, & Johnson

J.D.

(2012). Health information seeking, New York, NY: Peter Lang.

11.

Case C-18/18 Eva Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook Ireland limited, judgment of 3 October 2019.

12.

Cauffman

, & Goanta

(2021). A new order: The digital services act and consumer protection. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 12(4), 758-774.

13.

Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union, 2012/C 326/02, OJ C 326, 26.10. 2012, 391-407.

14.

Chhatre

Wittink

M.N.

Gallo

J.J.

, & Jayadevappa

(2020). Sources of information for learning and decision-making in men with localized prostate cancer. American Journal of Me’s Health, 4(5). Retrieved from doi: 10.1177/155798832094546.

15.

Chu

J.T.

Wang

M.P.

Shen

Viswanath

Lam

T.H.

, & Chan

S.S.C.

(2017). How, when and why people seek health information online: Qualitative study in Hong Kong. Interactive Journal of Medical Research, 6(2). Retrieved from https://www.i-jmr.org/2017/2/e24/.

16.

Constitutional act of the World Health Organisation from 1946. Retrieved from: www.who.int/about/governance/constitution.

17.

Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms, Official Gazette, International treaties, no. 18/97, 6/99, 14/02, 13/03, 9/05, 1/06, 2/10.

18.

Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, Official Gazette, International treaties, No. 6/07, 5/08.

19.

Convention on the rights of the child, Official Gazette of the SFRY, 15/90, National Gazette of the Republic of Croatia, International treaties, 12/93.

20.

Čizmić

(2008). Patient’s right to information paying special attention to protect the privacy of data that disclose patient’s health condition (Pravo pacijenata na obavijštenost, s posebnim osvrtom na zaštitu tajnosti podataka o zdravstvenom stanju pacijenta). Collected Papers of The Faculty of Law in Rijeka, 29(1), 227-275. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/3999.

21.

Daraz

Morrow

A.S.

Ponce

O.J.

Beuschel

Farah

M.H.

Katabi

, & Murad

M.H.

(2019). Can patients trust online health information? A meta-narrative systematic review addressing the quality of health information on the internet. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 34(9), 1884-1891.

22.

Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market, OJ L 178, 17.7.2000.

23.

Digital Single

Act.

,Retrieved from https://eur-lex, europa.eu/legal-content/HR/TXT/?uri=CELEX:520 20PC0825.

24.

Eide

Krause

, & Rosas

(2001). Economic, social and cultural rights: a textbook. Brill.

25.

Eurostat, One in two EU citizens look for health information online. 2021. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/edn-20210406-1.

26.

European Commission (2018). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions-Tackling online disinformation: a European approach, Brussel. Retrieved from https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0236&from=E.

27.

Eysenbach

Powell

Kuss

, & Sa

E.-R.

(2002). Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: A systematic review. JAMA, 287, 2691-2700.

28.

Hellawell

G.O.

Turner

K.J.

Le Monnier

K.J.

, & Brewster

S.F.

(2001). Urology and the internet: an evaluation of internet use by urology patients and of information available on urological topics. Bju International, 86(3), 191-194. Retrieved from doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00831.x.

29.

HON, Retrived from: https://www.hon.ch/en/.

30.

Hörnle

(2005). Country of origin regulation in cross-border media: One step beyond the freedom to provide services? The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 54(1), 89-126.

31.

International pact on economic, social and cultural rights, Official Gazette of the SFRY, no. 7/1971.

32.

Jia

Pang

, & Liu

L.S.

(2021). Online health information seeking behavior: A systematic review. Healthcare, 9, 1740. Retrieved from doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121740.

33.

Klarić

Vedriš

(2006). Civil law (Gradansko pravo), Official Gazette, Zagreb.

34.

Knol Radoja

Bodul

(2022). How to stop placing false information and hate speech on the internet? (Kako zaustaviti plasiranje neistinitih informacija i govor mžnje na internetu), Collected Papers of The Faculty of Law in Niš, Faculty of law Niš, 95, 135-151.

35.

Koziol

(2005). Recht auf korrekte Information durch Massenmedien und privatrechtlicher Schutz, in: Festschrift für Andreas Heldrich zum 70. Geburtstag, München.

36.

Kuczerawy

(2019). General monitoring obligations: a new cornerstone of internet regulation in the EU?, Rethinking IT and IP law – celebrating 30 years CiTiP, Intersentia.

37.

Lalazaryan

, & Zare-Farashbandi

(2014). A Review of models and theories of health information seeking behavior. International Journal of Health System and Disaster Management, 2, 193-203.

38.

Lambert

S.D.

, & Loiselle

C.G.

(2007). Health information – seeking behavior. Qualitative Health Research, 17(8), 1006-1019. Retrieved from doi: 10.1177/104973230730519.

39.

Linqi

Jiawei

, & Yuan

(2020). Health information seeking behaviors and source preferences between Chinese and U.S. populations. Journal of Health Communication, 25(6), 490-500. Retrieved from doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1806414.

40.

Mossialos

Thomson

, & Ter Linden

(2004). Information technology law and health systems in the European Union. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 20, 498.

41.

Radišić

(2004). Medical law (Medicinsko pravo), Beograd.

42.

Radišić

(2007). Liability for damage caused by medical error in treatment and informing patients (Odgovornost zbogštete izazvane lekarskom grškom u lečenju i u obavštavanju pacijenata). Beograd, Nomos. Retrieved from scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0017-0933/2007/0017-09330708270V.pd.

43.

Stratford

(2002). Striking the balance: privacy and freedom of expression under the European convention on human rights. Developing privacy rights, Oxford, Hart Publishing.

44.

Sartor

(2017). Providers liability: from the eCommerce Directive to the future, European Parliament, Directorate General for internal policies policy department: economic and scientific policy. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2017/614179/IPOL_IDA(2017)614179_EN.pdf.

45.

Šago

, & Dajak

(2022). Analysis of patient complaints and difficulties in determining the responsibility of the doctor in the procedure for compensation. Actualities of Civil Procedural Law, 261-296

46.

Taylor

H.J.

(2016). What are ‘best interests’? A critical evaluation of ‘best interests’ decision-making in clinical practice. Medical Law Review, 24(2), 176-205.

47.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Official Gazette, International treaties, no. 12/09.

48.

Van Eecke

(2021). Electronic health care services and the e-Commerce Directive, Ghent, Larcier.

49.

Vodinelić, (2003). Law on massmedia (Pravo masmedija), Faculty of business law in Belgrade, Beograd.

50.

Vojković

(2019). Civil law standard of medical treatment (Gradanskopravni standard medicinskog tretmana). Collected Papers of The Faculty of Law in Split, 56(3), 567-591. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.h/file/328927.

51.

Vojković

(2019). Civil liability for breach of medical standard and complementary economic effects (Gradanskopravna odgovornost za povredu medicinskog standarda i prateći ekonomski učinci). Collected Papers of The Faculty of Law in Rijeka, 40(2), 697-731. Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/ojs/index.php/zpfsr/article/view/12091/5958.

52.

Zhang

Zhan

Zheng

Zhang

Huang

, & Ba-Thein

(2021). Online health information-seeking behaviors and skills of Chinese college students. BMC Public Health, 21, 1-9. Retrieved from doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10801-0.