Paradigms for the conceptualization of Cyber-Physical-Social-Thinking hyperspace: A Thematic Synthesis

Abstract

Several computing paradigms have emerged along the years integrated with the Internet of Things (IoT) as the base to realize the complex hyperspace associated to the ubiquitous Cyber-Physical-Social-Thinking hyperspace that society expects. An overlap of the principles that define those paradigms exists and, despite of previous efforts, a unified and appropriate definition of each of them is still a challenge. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to survey the existing literature about IoT and their related paradigms to obtain a model that provides a definition usable to guide in the selection of that paradigm that fits better the requirements of the system-to-be. For this aim, a rigorous and systematic Thematic Synthesis has been conducted to analyze the most relevant studies of the selected paradigms and specify a model that integrates their definitions, their relations and differences. Furthermore, Cyber-Physical-Social Systems (CPSS) has been identified as the paradigm focusing on social and human factors that better realizes the complex hyperspace of the smart world since it entails relevant and convenient aspects from other paradigms.

Keywords

IoT Social Internet of Things Internet of People Cyber-Physical systems Cyber-Physical-Social systems Smart World

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adeli,

Bagheri and

H.R.

Meimani, On the designing a secure biometric-based remote patient authentication scheme for mobile healthcare environments, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 12(2) (2021), 3075–3089. doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02465-2.

Aghajan,

Härmä,

K.I.-K.

Wang and

J.C.

Augusto, Preface, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 10(5) (2018), 359–360. doi:10.3233/AIS-180500.

Ahmadi,

Arji,

Shahmoradi,

Safdari,

Nilashi and

Alizadeh, The application of Internet of things in healthcare: A systematic literature review and classification, Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 18(4) (2019), 837–869. doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0618-4.

Al-Fuqaha,

Guizani,

Mohammadi,

Aledhari and

Ayyash, Internet of Things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 17(4) (2015), 2347–2376. doi:10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095.

S.A.

Al-Qaseemi,

H.A.

Almulhim,

M.F.

Almulhim and

S.R.

Chaudhry, IoT architecture challenges and issues: Lack of standardization, in: 2016 Future Technologies Conference (FTC), 2016, pp. 731–738. doi:10.1109/FTC.2016.7821686.

Alaa,

A.A.

Zaidan,

B.B.

Zaidan,

Talal and

M.L.M.

Kiah, A review of smart home applications based on Internet of Things, J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 97 (2017), 48–65. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.08.017.

Ashton, That “Internet of Things” thing: In the real world things matter more than ideas, RFID J. 22(7) (2009), 97–114, [Online]. Available, http://www.rfidjournal.com/articles/view?4986.

Atzori,

Iera and

Morabito, The Internet of Things: A survey, Comput. Netw. 54(15) (2010), 2787–2805. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010.

Atzori,

Iera and

Morabito, SIoT: Giving a social structure to the Internet of Things, IEEE Commun. Lett. 15(11) (2011), 1193–1195. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2011.090911.111340.

10.

Atzori,

Iera,

Morabito and

Nitti, The social Internet of Things (SIoT) – when social networks meet the Internet of Things: Concept, architecture and network characterization, Comput. Networks 56(16) (2012), 3594–3608. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.07.010.

11.

Aversano,

M.L.

Bernardi,

Cimitile and

Pecori, A systematic review on Deep Learning approaches for IoT security, Comput. Sci. Rev. 40 (2021), 100389. doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100389.

12.

Bagula,

Mandava and

Bagula, A framework for healthcare support in the rural and low income areas of the developing world, J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 120 (2018), 17–29. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.06.010.

13.

Baxter and

Sommerville, Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering, Interact. Comput. 23(1) (2011), 4–17. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003.

14.

Ben Atitallah,

Driss,

Boulila and

Ben Ghézala, Leveraging Deep Learning and IoT big data analytics to support the smart cities development, Review and future directions, Comput. Sci. Rev. 38 (2020), 100303. doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100303.

15.

Z.Z.

Bien and

H.-E.

Lee, Effective learning system techniques for human–robot interaction in service environment, Knowledge-Based Syst. 20(5) (2007), 439–456. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2007.01.005.

16.

Z.Z.

Bien,

H.-E.

Lee,

J.-H.

Do,

Y.-H.

Kim,

K.-H.

Park and

S.-E.

Yang, Intelligent interaction for human-friendly service robot in smart house environment, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 1(1) (2008), 77–93. doi:10.1080/18756891.2008.9727606.

17.

Boavida

et al., People-centric Internet of things – challenges, approach, and enabling technologies, in: Intelligent Distributed Computing IX, 2016, pp. 463–474.

18.

M.N.K.

Boulos,

Yassine,

Shirmohammadi,

C.S.

Namahoot and

Brückner, Towards an “Internet of Food”: Food ontologies for the Internet of Things, Futur. Internet 7(4) (2015), 372–392. doi:10.3390/fi7040372.

19.

Braun and

Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2) (2006), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

20.

Brereton,

B.A.

Kitchenham,

Budgen,

Turner and

Khalil, Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain, J. Syst. Softw. 80(4) (2007), 571–583. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009.

21.

Cao,

Stewart and

N.E.

Leonard, Convergence in human decision-making dynamics, Syst. Control Lett. 59(2) (2010), 87–97. doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2009.12.002.

22.

A.A.

Cardenas,

Amin and

Sastry, Secure control: Towards survivable cyber-physical systems, in: 2008 the 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 2008, pp. 495–500. doi:10.1109/ICDCS.Workshops.2008.40.

23.

Chin,

Callaghan and

Ben Allouch, The Internet-of-Things: Reflections on the past, present and future from a user-centered and smart environment perspective, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 11 (2019), 45–69. doi:10.3233/AIS-180506.

24.

Conti and

Passarella, The Internet of People: A human and data-centric paradigm for the next generation Internet, Comput. Commun. 131 (2018), 51–65. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2018.07.034.

25.

Conti,

Passarella and

Das, The Internet of People (IoP): A new wave in pervasive mobile computing, Pervasive Mob. Comput. 41 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2017.07.009.

26.

D.S.

Cruzes and

Dybå, Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering, in: 2011 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2011, pp. 275–284. doi:10.1109/ESEM.2011.36.

27.

D.S.

Cruzes,

Dybå,

Runeson and

Höst, Case studies synthesis: A thematic, cross-case, and narrative synthesis worked example, Empir. Softw. Eng. 20(6) (2015), 1634–1665. doi:10.1007/s10664-014-9326-8.

28.

De,

Zhou,

Larizgoitia Abad and

Moessner, Cyber–Physical–Social Frameworks for Urban Big Data Systems: A Survey, Appl. Sci. 7(10) (2017). doi:10.3390/app7101017.

29.

Derler,

E.A.

Lee and

Sangiovanni Vincentelli, Modeling cyber–physical systems, Proc. IEEE 100(1) (2012), 13–28. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2011.2160929.

30.

Dhelim,

Huansheng,

Cui,

Jianhua,

Huang and

K.I.-K.

Wang, Cyberentity and its consistency in the cyber-physical-social-thinking hyperspace, Comput. Electr. Eng. 81 (2020), 106506. doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.106506.

31.

Dhelim,

Ning,

Farha,

Chen,

Atzori and

Daneshmand, IoT-enabled social relationships meet artificial social intelligence, IEEE Internet Things, 2021. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2021.3081556.

32.

Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission), Horizon Europe Strategic Plan (2021–2024), 2021. doi:10.2777/083753.

33.

Doostmohammadian,

H.R.

Rabiee and

U.A.

Khan, Cyber-Social Systems: Modeling, Inference, and Optimal Design, CoRR, 2019, [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12371.

34.

Driggs-Campbell,

Shia and

Bajcsy, Improved driver modeling for human-in-the-loop vehicular control, in: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2015, pp. 1654–1661. doi:10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139410.

35.

Elazhary, Internet of Things (IoT), mobile cloud, cloudlet, mobile IoT, IoT cloud, fog, mobile edge, and edge emerging computing paradigms: Disambiguation and research directions, J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 128 (2019), 105–140. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.10.021.

36.

Fawzi,

Tabuada and

Diggavi, Secure estimation and control for cyber-physical systems under adversarial attacks, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 59(6) (2014), 1454–1467. doi:10.1109/TAC.2014.2303233.

37.

Fernandes,

Neves and

Analide, Road safety and vulnerable road users – Internet of people insights, in: {SMARTGREENS} 2017 – Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green {ICT} Systems, Porto, Portugal, April 22–24, 2017, 2017, pp. 311–316. doi:10.5220/0006359303110316.

38.

Frustaci,

Pace,

Aloi and

Fortino, Evaluating critical security issues of the IoT world: Present and future challenges, IEEE Internet Things J. 5(4) (2018), 2483–2495. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2017.2767291.

39.

Gavrilović and

Mishra, Software architecture of the Internet of Things (IoT) for smart city, healthcare and agriculture: Analysis and improvement directions, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 12(1) (2021), 1315–1336. doi:10.1007/s12652-020-02197-3.

40.

Gomez,

Chessa,

Fleury,

Roussos and

Preuveneers, Internet of Things for enabling smart environments: A technology-centric perspective, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 11(1) (2019), 23–43. doi:10.3233/AIS-180509.

41.

Gubbi,

Buyya,

Marusic and

Palaniswami, Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions, Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29(7) (2013), 1645–1660. doi:10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010.

42.

Gunes,

Peter,

Givargis and

Vahid, A survey on concepts, applications, and challenges in cyber-physical systems, KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 8(12) (2014), 4242–4268. doi:10.3837/tiis.2014.12.001.

43.

Hajjaji,

Boulila,

I.R.

Farah,

Romdhani and

Hussain, Big data and IoT-based applications in smart environments: A systematic review, Comput. Sci. Rev. 39 (2021), 100318. doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100318.

44.

Khan,

S.U.

Khan,

Zaheer and

Khan, in: Future Internet: The Internet of Things Architecture, Possible Applications and Key Challenges, in 2012 10th International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology, 2012, pp. 257–260. doi:10.1109/FIT.2012.53.

45.

Kitchenham

et al., Evaluating guidelines for reporting empirical software engineering studies, Empir. Softw. Eng. 13(1) (2008), 97–121. doi:10.1007/s10664-007-9053-5.

46.

Kitchenham and

Charters, Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, 2007.

47.

Krishnamoorthy,

Dua and

Gupta, Role of emerging technologies in future IoT-driven healthcare 4.0 technologies: A survey, current challenges and future directions, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. (2021). doi:10.1007/s12652-021-03302-w.

48.

Lagerspetz

et al., Pervasive communities in the Internet of People, in: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops), 2018, pp. 40–45. doi:10.1109/PERCOMW.2018.8480273.

49.

E.A.

Lee, Cyber physical systems: Design challenges, in: 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC), 2008, pp. 363–369. doi:10.1109/ISORC.2008.25.

50.

Lee and

Hsu, Implementation of a remote hierarchical supervision system using Petri nets and agent technology, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Part C (Applications Rev. 37(1) (2007), 77–85. doi:10.1109/TSMCC.2006.876056.

51.

J.-S.

Lee and

P.-L.

Hsu, Remote supervisory control of the human-in-the-loop system by using Petri nets and Java, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 50(3) (2003), 431–439. doi:10.1109/TIE.2003.812283.

52.

Levina and

Kranich, Mobility and the Internet of People: A morphological analysis, in: 2016 Intl IEEE Conferences on Ubiquitous Intelligence Computing, Advanced and Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing and Communications, Cloud and Big Data Computing, Internet of People, and Smart World Congress (UIC/ATC/ScalCom/CBDCom/IoP/SmartWorld), 2016, pp. 915–920. doi:10.1109/UIC-ATC-ScalCom-CBDCom-IoP-SmartWorld.2016.0144.

53.

Li,

L.D.

Xu and

Zhao, The Internet of Things: A survey, Inf. Syst. Front. 17(2) (2015), 243–259. doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9492-7.

54.

Lin,

Yu,

Zhang,

Yang,

Zhang and

Zhao, A survey on Internet of things: Architecture, enabling technologies, security and privacy, and applications, IEEE Internet Things J. 4(5) (2017), 1125–1142. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2017.2683200.

55.

Liu

et al., A review of the smart world, Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 96 (2019), 678–691. doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.09.010.

56.

Liu,

Peng,

Wang,

Yao and

Liu, Review on cyber-physical systems, IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 4(1) (2017), 27–40. doi:10.1109/JAS.2017.7510349.

57.

Liu,

Yang,

Wen,

Zhang and

Mao, Cyber-physical-social systems for command and control, IEEE Intell. Syst. 26(4) (2011), 92–96. doi:10.1109/MIS.2011.69.

58.

Lockton,

Ricketts,

Aditya Chowdhury and

C.H.

Lee, Exploring qualitative displays and interfaces, in: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2017, pp. 1844–1852. doi:10.1145/3027063.3053165.

59.

Macías,

Navarro and

González, A Microservice-Based Framework for Developing Internet of Things and People Applications, Proceedings 31(1) (2019). doi:10.3390/proceedings2019031085.

60.

Mendeley Ltd., Mendeley, www.mendeley.com, 2021.

61.

Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Excel, Software de hojas de cálculo Microsoft Excel, 2020.

62.

Microsoft Visio, Microsoft Visio, 2020.

63.

Miranda Carpintero

et al., From the Internet of Things to the Internet of People, Internet Comput. IEEE 19 (2015), 40–47. doi:10.1109/MIC.2015.24.

64.

M.H.

Miraz,

Ali,

P.S.

Excell and

Picking, A review on Internet of Things (IoT), in: Internet of Everything (IoE) and Internet of Nano Things (IoNT), in 2015 Internet Technologies and Applications (ITA), 2015, pp. 219–224. doi:10.1109/ITechA.2015.7317398.

65.

Muñoz,

J.C.

Augusto,

Tam and

Aghajan, Artificial intelligence for IoT systems, J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 12(1) (2020), 1–1. doi:10.3233/AIS-200548.

66.

Navarro-Alamán,

Lacuesta,

García-Magariño and

Lloret, EmotIoT: An IoT System to Improve Users’ Wellbeing, Appl. Sci. 12(12) (2022). doi:10.3390/app12125804.

67.

Ning,

Liu,

Ma,

L.T.

Yang and

Huang, Cybermatics: Cyber–physical–social–thinking hyperspace based science and technology, Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 56 (2016), 504–522. doi:10.1016/j.future.2015.07.012.

68.

Nitti,

Girau and

Atzori, Trustworthiness management in the social Internet of Things, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 26(5) (2014), 1253–1266. doi:10.1109/TKDE.2013.105.

69.

Niu,

Wang,

Su and

Guo, Temporal factor-aware video affective analysis and recommendation for cyber-based social media, IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 5(3) (2017), 412–424. doi:10.1109/TETC.2017.2705341.

70.

M.M.

Ogonji,

Okeyo and

J.M.

Wafula, A survey on privacy and security of Internet of Things, Comput. Sci. Rev. 38 (2020), 100312. doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100312.

71.

A.M.

Ortiz,

Hussein,

Park,

S.N.

Han and

Crespi, The cluster between Internet of things and social networks, Review and Research Challenges, IEEE Internet Things J. 1(3) (2014), 206–215. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2014.2318835.

72.

S.P.

Parikh,

Grassi,

Kumar and

Okamoto, Incorporating user inputs in motion planning for a smart wheelchair, in: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004, Proceedings, ICRA’04, Vol. 2, 2004, pp. 2043–2048. doi:10.1109/ROBOT.2004.1308124.

73.

Pasqualetti,

Dörfler and

Bullo, Attack detection and identification in cyber-physical systems, IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. 58(11) (2013), 2715–2729. doi:10.1109/TAC.2013.2266831.

74.

Paul,

Ahmad,

M.M.

Rathore and

Jabbar, Smartbuddy: Defining human behaviors using big data analytics in social Internet of things, IEEE Wirel. Commun. 23(5) (2016), 68–74. doi:10.1109/MWC.2016.7721744.

75.

Perera,

Qin,

J.C.

Estrella,

Reiff-Marganiec and

A.V.

Vasilakos, Fog computing for sustainable smart cities: A survey, ACM Comput. Surv. 50(3) (2017). doi:10.1145/3057266.

76.

Perera,

Zaslavsky,

Christen and

Georgakopoulos, Context aware computing for the Internet of Things: A survey, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 16(1) (2014), 414–454. doi:10.1109/SURV.2013.042313.00197.

77.

Perno and

C.W.

Probst, Behavioural profiling in cyber-social systems, in: Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy and Trust, 2017, pp. 507–517.

78.

Piattini,

Poels,

Genero,

A.M.

Fernández-Saez and

H.J.

Nelson, Research review: A systematic literature review on the quality of UML models, J. Database Manag. 22(3) (2011), 46–70. doi:10.4018/jdm.2011070103.

79.

Pintus,

Carboni,

Serra and

Manchinu, Humanizing the Internet of Things – Toward a Human-Centered Internet-and-Web of Things, 2015.

80.

QSR International Pty Ltd., NVivo, Qualitative Data Analysis Software | NVivo, 2020.

81.

Rajkumar,

Lee,

Sha and

Stankovic, Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution, in: Design Automation Conference, 2010, pp. 731–736. doi:10.1145/1837274.1837461.

82.

Režek Jambrak,

Nutrizio,

Djekić,

Pleslić and

Chemat, Internet of Nonthermal Food Processing Technologies (IoNTP): Food Industry 4.0 and Sustainability, Appl. Sci. 11(2) (2021). doi:10.3390/app11020686.

83.

M.S.

Roopa,

Pattar,

Buyya,

K.R.

Venugopal,

S.S.

Iyengar and

L.M.

Patnaik, in: Social Internet of Things (SIoT): Foundations, Thrust Areas, Systematic Review and Future Directions, Comput. Commun., Vol. 139, 2019, pp. 32–57. doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2019.03.009.

84.

Rowlands,

Waddell and

McKenna, Are we there yet? A technique to determine theoretical saturation, J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 56(1) (2016), 40–47. doi:10.1080/08874417.2015.11645799.

85.

Satyanarayanan, Pervasive computing: Vision and challenges, IEEE Pers. Commun. 8(4) (2001), 10–17. doi:10.1109/98.943998.

86.

J.S.

Seberger, Reconsidering the user in IoT: The subjectivity of things, Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 25(3) (2021), 525–533. doi:10.1007/s00779-020-01513-0.

87.

S.A.

Seshia,

Hu,

Li and

Zhu, Design automation of cyber-physical systems: Challenges, advances, and opportunities, IEEE Trans. Comput. Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 36(9) (2017), 1421–1434. doi:10.1109/TCAD.2016.2633961.

88.

Shi,

Wan,

Yan and

Suo, A survey of cyber-physical systems, in: 2011 International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP), 2011, pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/WCSP.2011.6096958.

89.

Shi,

Cao,

Zhang,

Li and

Xu, Edge computing: Vision and challenges, IEEE Internet Things J. 3(5) (2016), 637–646. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198.

90.

J.A.

Stankovic, Research directions for the Internet of Things, IEEE Internet Things J. 1(1) (2014), 3–9. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2014.2312291.

91.

Streitz,

Kameas and

Mavrommati, The Disappearing Computer: Interaction Design, System Infrastructures and Applications for Smart Environments, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007.

92.

Tan and

Wang, Future Internet: The Internet of Things, in: 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering(ICACTE), Vol. 5, 2010, pp. V5376–V5-380. doi:10.1109/ICACTE.2010.5579543.

93.

Tang,

Yu,

Zhou,

Wang and

Becker, Supporting rapid design and evaluation of pervasive applications: Challenges and solutions, Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 15(3) (2011), 253–269. doi:10.1007/s00779-010-0332-6.

94.

Tao,

Cheng,

Qi,

Zhang,

Zhang and

Sui, Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 94(9) (2018), 3563–3576. doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1.

95.

Thomas and

Harden, Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews, BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 8(1) (2008), 45. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-8-45.

96.

Vilarinho,

B.A.

Farshchian,

Floch and

B.M.

Mathisen, A communication framework for the Internet of People and Things based on the concept of activity feeds in social computing, in: 2013 9th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, 2013, pp. 1–8. doi:10.1109/IE.2013.24.

97.

Wang, The emergence of intelligent enterprises: From CPS to CPSS, IEEE Intell. Syst. 25(4) (2010), 85–88. doi:10.1109/MIS.2010.104.

98.

G.-G.

Wang,

Cai,

Cui,

Min and

Chen, High performance computing for cyber physical social systems by using evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm, IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 8(1) (2020), 20–30. doi:10.1109/TETC.2017.2703784.

99.

Wang,

Törngren and

Onori, Current status and advancement of cyber-physical systems in manufacturing, J. Manuf. Syst. 37 (2015), 517–527. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.04.008.

100.

Wang,

L.T.

Yang,

Liao,

Yin and

M.J.

Deen, A distributed HOSVD method with its incremental computation for big data in cyber-physical-social systems, IEEE Trans. Comput. Soc. Syst. 5(2) (2018), 481–492. doi:10.1109/TCSS.2018.2813320.

101.

Wang,

L.T.

Yang,

Xie,

Jin and

M.J.

Deen, A cloud-edge computing framework for cyber-physical-social services, IEEE Commun. Mag. 55(11) (2017), 80–85. doi:10.1109/MCOM.2017.1700360.

102.

Weiser, The computer for the 21st century, IEEE Pervasive Comput. 1(1) (2002), 19–25. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2002.993141.

103.

Whitmore,

Agarwal and

Da Xu, The Internet of Things – a survey of topics and trends, Inf. Syst. Front. 17(2) (2015), 261–274. doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9489-2.

104.

R.J.

Wieringa, Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering, Springer, 2014. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8.

105.

Xiong

et al., Cyber-physical-social system in intelligent transportation, IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2(3) (2015), 320–333. doi:10.1109/JAS.2015.7152667.

106.

L.D.

Xu,

He and

Li, Internet of Things in industries: A survey, IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics 10(4) (2014), 2233–2243. doi:10.1109/TII.2014.2300753.

107.

E.V.

Yurkevich and

L.N.

Kryukova, Optimization mechanisms of management at the industrial enterprise with the use of cyber social systems, in: 2018 Eleventh International Conference “Management of Large-Scale System Development” (MLSD), 2018, pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/MLSD.2018.8551875.

108.

Zanella,

Bui,

Castellani,

Vangelista and

Zorzi, Internet of Things for smart cities, IEEE Internet Things J. 1(1) (2014), 22–32. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2014.2306328.

109.

Zeng,

L.T.

Yang,

Lin,

Ning and

Ma, A survey: Cyber-physical-social systems and their system-level design methodology, Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 105 (2020), 1028–1042. doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.06.034.

110.

Zheng,

Cai,

Yu,

Wang and

Li, Follow but no track: Privacy preserved profile publishing in cyber-physical social systems, IEEE Internet Things J. 4(6) (2017), 1868–1878. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2017.2679483.

111.

Zheng,

Yang and

Cheng, An application framework of digital twin and its case study, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 10(3) (2019), 1141–1153. doi:10.1007/s12652-018-0911-3.