Objective: The aims were to describe the prevalence and treatment of depressive disorders among case-managed adolescents attending a regional Child and Adolescent Mental Health Service (CAMHS).
Method: An observational study was conducted in a regional CAMHS over a 3-month period. Clinicians recorded treatment of their case-managed adolescents aged 12–18 years at the end of each calendar month. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scale for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) and Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) were collected at the beginning of the study period or at entry into the service, and repeated at discharge from the service or at the conclusion of the study period. Adolescents also completed the Reynold's Adolescent Depression Scale, 2nd edition.
Results: Depressive disorders were the most common clinician diagnosis reported (22%). There was no statistically significant difference in treatment for depressed compared to non-depressed adolescents. There was a statistically significant improvement in both the HoNOSCA scores (p < 0.001) and CGAS scores (p < 0.001) for the whole sample.
Conclusion: Treatment appeared to be the same in type for depressed compared to non-depressed adolescents case managed within CAMHS.
BirmaherBRyanNDWilliamsonDE. Childhood and adolescent depression: a review of the past 10 years. Part I. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry1996; 35: 1427–1439.
2.
SawyerMGArneyFMBaghurstPA. The mental health of young people in Australia: key findings from the child and adolescent component of the national survey of mental health and well-being. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry2001;35: 806–814.
3.
BirmaherBArbelaezCBrentD. Course and outcome of child and adolescent major depressive disorder. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America2002;11: 619–637.
4.
HarringtonR. Depression, suicide and deliberate self-harm in adolescence. British Medical Bulletin2001;57: 47–60.
5.
HorowitzJL. The prevention of depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology2006;74: 401–415.
6.
BirmaherBBrentD. Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2007: 46: 1–36.
7.
National Institute of Clinical Excellence. Depression in Children and Young People. Identification and Management in Primary, Community and Secondary Care. Clinical Guideline 28. Available from URL: www.nice.org.uk. The British Psychological Society, 2005.
8.
HughesCW. Texas children's medication algorithm project: Update from Texas consensus conference panel on medication treatment of childhood major depressive disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2007;46: 667–686.
9.
Bearsley-SmithCSellickKChestersJFrancisK. Treatment content in child and adolescent mental health services: development of the treatment recording sheet. Administration and Policy in Mental Health2008; 423–435.
10.
Bearsley-SmithCBrowneOakley MSellickKVillanuevaEChestersJFrancisKReddyP. Does Interpersonal Psychotherapy improve clinical care for adolescents with depression attending a rural child and adolescent mental health service? Study protocol for a cluster randomised feasibility trial. BMC Psychiatry2007; 7: 53.
11.
CuijpersPvan LiePACvan StratenADonkerM. Examining differential effects of psychological treatment of depressive disorder: An application of trajectory analyses. Journal of Affective Disorders2005;89: 137–146.
12.
GowersSGHarringtonRCWhittonALelliottPWingJBeevorAJezzardR. A brief scale for measuring the outcomes of emotional and behavioural disorders in children: HoNOSCA. British Journal of Psychiatry1999;174: 413–416.
13.
ShafferDGouldMSBrasicJAmbrosiniPFisherPBirdHAluwahliaS. A children's global assessment scale (CGAS). Archives of General Psychiatry1983;40: 1228–1231.
Department of Health and Community Services. Victoria's Mental Health Service: The Framework for Service Delivery. Child and Adolescent Services: Psychiatric Services Branch, Victoria: 1996.
16.
ReynoldsWM. RADS-2 Professional Manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc, 2002.
17.
KesslerRCUstünTB. The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative Version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research2004;13: 93–121.
18.
BlandJMAltmanDG. Statistical notes: Multiple significance test: the Bonferroni method. British Medical Journal1995; 310: 170.
19.
EssauCA. Course and outcome of somatoform disorders in non-referred adolescents. Psychosomatics2007;48: 502–509.
20.
TaylorJYCaldwellCHBaserREFaisonNJacksonJS. Prevalence of eating disorders among Blacks in national survey of American life. International Journal of Eating Disorders2007; 40: S10–S14.
21.
GarraldaMEYatesPHigginsonI. Child and adolescent mental health service use: HoNOSCA as an outcome measure. The British Journal of Psychiatry2000;177: 52–58.
22.
BrannPColemanGLukE. Routine outcome measurement in a child and adolescent mental health service: An evaluation of HoNOSCA. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry2001;35: 370–376.
23.
KamS-EMidgleyN. Exploring ‘clinical judgement’: how do child and adolescent mental health professionals decide whether a young person needs individual psychotherapy?Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry2006; 11: 27–44.
24.
HarnettPHLoxtonNJSadlerTHidesLBaldwinA. The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents in an adolescent in-patient sample. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry2005;39: 129–135.
25.
McKnightPEMcKnightKMSidaniSFigueredoAJ. Missing Data: A Gentle Introduction. New York: The Gilford Press, 2007.
