Objective: This study developed and compared separate estimates of the number of heavy drinkers (the in-need population for alcohol treatment interventions) across eight local regions in Queensland.
Method: Estimates were based on: (i) a self-report population survey of alcohol consumption; and (ii) an application of the Ledermann log-normal distribution of consumption model to liquor sale figures.
Results: Estimates based on the 1989–1990 National Health Survey (NHS) data indicated that 10.98% (n = 83 880) of adult male drinkers and 1.25% (n = 6581) of adult female drinkers in Queensland (total = 90 461) were on average drinking the equivalent of six or more standard drinks a day in the week prior to the survey (4.74% of Queensland adult drinkers, n = 90,461). Estimates based on the Ledermann model indicated that 12.18% of adult Queensland drinkers (n = 232,283) were drinking six or more standard drinks a day. Estimates based on the Ledermann model were 157% larger than estimates based on NHS data (i.e. a difference of 141 821 heavy drinkers), with large variations in the two estimates across local regions.
Conclusion: The NHS data appears to underestimate the population of heavy drinkers, whereas the Ledermann model overestimates it. In this situation, it seems preferable to use the more conservative self-report survey estimates.
RushB.A systems approach to estimating the required capacity of alcohol treatment services. British Journal of Addiction1990; 85:49–59.
2.
CrookGMOeiTPSA review of systematic and quantifiable methods of estimating the needs of a community for alcohol treatment services. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment1998 (in press).
3.
JellinekEMThe estimate of the number of alcoholics in the USA for 1949 in light of the sixth revision of the International Lists of Causes of Death. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol1952; 13:215–218.
4.
PophamREThe Jellinek alcoholism estimation formula and its application to Canadian data. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcoholism1956; 17:559–593.
5.
BrennerB.Estimating the prevalence of alcoholism: toward a modification of the Jellinek formula. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol1959; 20:255–260.
6.
SeeleyJRAlcoholism prevalence: an alternative estimation method. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol1960; 20:245–254.
7.
MidanekL.The validity of self-reported alcohol consumption and alcohol problems: a literature review. British Journal of Addiction1982; 77:357–382.
8.
PernanenK.Validity of survey data on alcohol use. In: GibbensRJIsraelYKalantHPophamRESchmidtWSmartRG, eds. Research advances in alcohol and drug problems. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley, 1974:355–374.
9.
LedermannS.Alcohol, alcoholism, alcoholisation. Vol. 1. Paris: Presses Universitaries de France, 1956:355–374.
10.
CastlesI.1989–90 National Health Survey: summary of results Australia. Catalogue no. 4364.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1991.
11.
Australian Bureau of Statistics.1989–1990 National Health Survey: Users’ Guide. Catalogue no. 4363.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1990.
12.
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC).Is there a safe level of daily consumption of alcohol for men and women? Recommendations regarding responsible drinking behaviour. 2nd ed.Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1992.
13.
SingleEWortleyS.Workshop on measurement issues in alcohol consumption: a comparison of alternative measures of alcohol consumption in the Canadian National Survey of alcohol and drug use. Addiction1994; 89:395–399.
14.
RedmanSSanson-FisherRWWilkinsonCFaheyPGibbardRWAgreement between two measures of alcohol consumption. Journal of Studies on Alcohol1987; 48:104–108.
15.
OrfordJSomersMDanielsVKirbyB.Drinking amongst medical patients: levels of risk and models of change. British Journal of Addiction1992; 87:1691–1702.
16.
Australian Bureau of Statistics.Apparent consumption of foodstuffs and nutrients, Australia 1992–93. Catalogue no. 4306.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics, 1995.
17.
BrownMMDewarMFWallaceP.Alcoholic beverage taxation and control policies. Ottawa: Brewers Association of Canada, 1982.
18.
FurstCJBeckmanLJAlcohol-related mortality and alcohol consumption statistics. Journal of Studies on Alcohol1981; 42:57–63.
19.
MillerGHAgnewN.The Ledermann model of alcohol consumption. Description, implications and assessment. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol1974; 35:877–898.
20.
PittmanDJPrimary prevention of alcohol abuse and alcoholism: an evaluation of the control of consumption policy. St. Louis: Social Science Institute, Washington University, 1980.
21.
SkogOJThe distribution of alcohol consumption: Part I: A critical discussion of the Ledermann model. F: National Institute for Alcohol Research, SIFA, 1982.
22.
DuffyJCThe distribution of alcohol consumption–30 years on. British Journal of Addiction1986; 81:735–774.
23.
SkogOJThe distribution of alcohol consumption: Part III: Evidence of a collective drinking culture. Mimeograph no. 8/85. Oslo: National Institute for Alcohol Research, SIFA, 1985.
24.
HetzelBSThe implications of increasing alcohol consumption in Australia–a new definition of the alcohol problem. Community Health Studies1978; 2:81–87.
25.
SmartRGThe relationship of availability of alcohol beverages to per capita consumption and alcoholism rates. Journal of Studies on Alcohol1977; 38:891–896.
26.
SkogOJThe collectivity of drinking cultures: a theory of the distribution of alcohol consumption. British Journal of Addiction1985; 80:83–99.
