Free accessResearch articleFirst published online 1998-6
Comparison of Treatments of Persistent Conduct Problems in Primary School Children: A Preliminary Evaluation of a Modified Cognitive-Behavioural Approach
Objective: Treatment for persistent conduct problems in primary school children was developed using a modification of cognitive-behavioural therapy (MCBT). Its effectiveness was evaluated by comparing it with conjoint family therapy (FT) and eclectic therapy (ET).
Method: Children with persistent conduct problems were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. They were assessed prior to treatment and then 6 months after. Measures included symptoms of the child; parents' mental health; stress of parenting; family functioning; and parental relationship. In addition, parents' and children's perception of the therapy were assessed and a treatment record was developed to track the treatment process.
Results: Thirty-two children were recruited for the study. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of effectiveness between the three groups. In terms of parents' perception of the therapy, there was no difference on the perception of the qualities of the therapists, but on the perception of therapy MCBT was considered to be higher in cognitive-behavioural orientation.
Conclusion: Further research using a larger sample is required to evaluate MCBT. The study supports the idea that controlled treatment studies can be carried out within busy mental health services.
RobinsLNConduct disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry1991; 32:193–212.
2.
EarlsF.Oppositional defiant and conduct disorders. In: RutterMTaylorETaylorHL, eds. Child and adolescent psychiatry. Modern approaches. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1994:308–329.
3.
RobinsLNDeviant children grown up. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1966.
4.
ZoccolilloMPicklesAQuintonDRutterM.The outcome of childhood conduct disorder: implications for defining adult personality disorder and conduct disorder. Psychological Medicine1992; 22:971–986.
5.
RobinsLNPricePKAdult disorders predicted by childhood conduct problems: results from the NIMH Epidemiological Catchment Areas Project. Psychiatry1992; 54:116–132.
6.
ShamsieJHulchyC.Youth with conduct disorder: a challenge to be met. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry1991; 36:405–414.
7.
KazdinAESiegelTCBassD.Cognitive problem-solving skills training and parent management training in the treatment of antisocial behaviour in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology1992; 60:733–747.
8.
SandersMRDaddsMRBehavioral family intervention. Psychology Practitioner Guidebooks. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1993.
9.
KendallPCCognitive–behavioral treatment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology1995; 23:107–124.
10.
HoarPScarthLForbesF.Audit of the Edinburgh Child Psychiatry Out-Patient Service. ACPP Review and Newsletter1995; 17:139–148.
11.
AchenbachTM, ed. Manual for the Child Behaviour Checklist 4–18 and 1991 profile. Burling, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, 1991.
12.
EybergSMRossAWAssessment of child behaviour problems: the validation of a new inventory. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology1978; 7:113–116.
13.
RoweKJRoweKSThe relationship between inattentiveness in the classroom and reading achievement: methodological issues. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry1992; 31:349–356.
14.
RoweKJRoweKSThe RBRI user's manual. Melbourne: Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, 1993.
15.
Romans-ClarksonEEWaltonVHerbisonPMullenPEValidity of the GHQ-28 in New Zealand women. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry1983; 54:116–132.
16.
EpsteinNBThe McMaster Family Assessment Device. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy1983; 9:171–180.
17.
AbidinRRThe stresses of parenting (special issue). Journal of Clinical Child Psychology1990; 19:297–400.
18.
SpanierG.Spanier Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family1979; 38:15–28.
19.
HarterS.The Perceived Competence Scale for children. Child Development1982; 53:87–97.
20.
BirlesonPHudsonIBuchananDGWolffS.Clinical evaluation of a self-rating scale for depressive disorder in childhood (Depression Self-Rating Scale). Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry1987; 28:43–60.
21.
BlochSHarariE.The psychotherapies. In: BlochSSinghB, eds. Foundation of clinical psychiatry. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1994:408–442.
22.
KotsopoulosSElwoodSOkeL.Parent satisfaction in a child psychiatric service. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry1989; 34:530–533.
23.
SiloveDParkerGManicavasagarV.Perceptions of general and specific therapist behaviours. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease1990; 178:292–299.
24.
PattersonGRA social learning approach to family intervention: III. Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia, 1982.
25.
BarnesGGFamily therapy. In: RutterMTaylorEHersovE, eds. Child and adolescent psychiatry, modern approaches. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1994:946–967.
26.
WeiszJRDonenbertGRHannSSKauneckisD.Child and adolescent psychotherapy outcomes in experiments vs. clinics: why the disparity?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology1995; 23:83–106.
27.
BickmanL.A continuum of care: more is not always better. American Psychologist1996; 51:689–701.