This study examines whether the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE-IT grant program identifies and funds institutions that improve faculty gender equity. By using matching procedures and a two-way fixed-effect event study, we find that when universities received ADVANCE-IT grants, their proportion and headcount of women faculty as full-time new-hire, overall faculty, and tenured and tenure-track faculty are not different from multiple comparison groups of universities—including universities that received other types of ADVANCE grants. Drawing on the concept of intersectionality, we further disaggregate women faculty into subracial/ethnic groups. We did not find consistent evidence supporting that ADVANCE-IT universities increase the proportion or headcount of women faculty in subracial/ethnic groups. We discuss implications for federal grantmaking and diversifying higher education faculty.
Aguilar-SmithS. (2022). A critical qualitative study of inequities in Hispanic-serving institutions’ grant-seeking competitiveness. Educational Policy, 37, 1637–1671. https://doi.org/10.1177/089590-48221120272
2.
AlfredM. V.RayS. M.JohnsonM. A. (2019). Advancing women of color in STEM: An imperative for US global competitiveness. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422318814551
3.
Arbuckle-KeilG. A.ValentineD. (2010). Initial impacts of an NSF ADVANCE-IT award to Rutgers University from the viewpoint of the Camden Campus. In KarukstisK. K.GourleyB. L.RossiM.WrightL. L. (Eds.), Mentoring strategies to facilitate the advancement of women faculty (pp. 43–59). American Chemical Society.
4.
BellR. E.LairdJ. D.PfirmanS. L.MutterJ. C.BalstadR. G.CaneM. A. (2005). An experiment in institutional transformation: The NSF ADVANCE program for women at the Earth Institute at Columbia University. Oceanography, 18(1), 25–34.
5.
BensonC. M.JonesT. R.PrenovitzS. J.EhrenbergR. G. (2016). Increasing the share of female faculty within humanities departments: Does the gender of university leaders matter? (ILR Working Paper 170). https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/workingpapers/188
6.
BettingerE. P.LongB. T. (2005). Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. American Economic Review, 95(2), 152–157.
7.
BradleyS. W.GarvenJ. R.LawW. W.WestJ. E. (2018). The impact of chief diversity officers on diverse faculty hiring (No. w24969). National Bureau of Economic Research.
8.
CaetanoC.CallawayB.PayneS.RodriguesH. S. A. (2022). Difference in differences with time-varying covariates. arXiv:2202.02903.
9.
CallawayB.Goodman-BaconA.Sant’AnnaP. H. (2021). Difference-in-differences with a continuous treatment. arXiv:2107.02637.
10.
CarrellS. E.PageM. E.WestJ. E. (2009). Sex and science: How professor gender perpetuates the gender gap. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1101–1144. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.3.1101
CornwellC.KelloughJ. E. (1994). Women and minorities in federal government agencies: Examining new evidence from panel data. Public Administration Review, 54(3), 265–270.
13.
CrenshawK. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 139–167.
14.
CrenshawK. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Inter-sectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
15.
CulpepperD.White-LewisD.O’MearaK.TempletonL.AndersonJ. (2023). Do rubrics live up to their promise? Examining how rubrics mitigate bias in faculty hiring. The Journal of Higher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2023.2168411
16.
DavisS. N.JacobsenS. K.RyanM. (2015). Gender, race, and inequality in higher education: An intersectional analysis of faculty-student undergraduate research pairs at a diverse university. Race, Gender & Class, 22(3–4), 7–30.
17.
De ChaisemartinC.D’HaultaœuilleX. (2022). Two-way fixed effects and differences-in-differences with heterogeneous treatment effects: A survey (No. w29691). National Bureau of Economic Research.
18.
DeCuir-GunbyJ. T.Walker-DeVoseD. C. (2013). Expanding the counterstory: The potential for critical race mixed methods studies in education. In LynnM.DixsonA. D. (Eds.), The handbook of critical race theory in education (pp. 248–259). Routledge.
19.
DobbinF.SchrageD.KalevA. (2015). Rage against the iron cage: The varied effects of bureaucratic personnel reforms on diversity. American Sociological Review, 80(5), 1014–1044. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415596416
20.
EckesS. E. (2005). Diversity in higher education: The consideration of race in hiring university faculty. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 2005(1), 33–52.
21.
FalkenheimJ. (2022). Doctorate recipients from U.S. Universities: 2021 (NSF 23-300). National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf23300
22.
FayerS.LaceyA.WatsonA. (2017). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
23.
FernandezF.BakerD. P.FuY. C.MunozI. G.FordK. S. (2021). A symbiosis of access: proliferating STEM PhD training in the U.S. from 1920-2010. Minerva, 59, 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09422-5
24.
FernandezF.RoH. K.WilsonM. (2022). The color of law school: Examining gender and race intersectionality in law school admissions. American Journal of Education, 128(3), 455–485. https://doi.org/10.1086/71911
25.
FinkelS. K.OlswangS.SheN. (1994). Childbirth, tenure, and promotion for women faculty. The Review of Higher Education, 17(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1994.0016
26.
FinkelsteinM. J.ConleyV. M.SchusterJ. H. (2016). Taking the measure of faculty diversity. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America Institute.
27.
FoxM. F. (2008). Institutional transformation and the advancement of women faculty: The case of academic science and engineering. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 23, pp. 73–103). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6959-8_3
28.
Fries-BrittS. L.YoungerT. K.HallW. D. (2010). Lessons from high-achieving students of color in Physics. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148), 75–83.
29.
FurquimF.CorralD.HillmanN. (2020). A primer for interpreting and designing difference-in-differences studies in higher education research. In PernaL. W. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 35, pp. 1–58). Springer.
30.
GarciaA. L.RincónB.HinojosaJ. K. (2020). “There was something missing”: How Latinas construct compartmentalized identities in STEM. In GonzalezE. M.FernandezF.WilsonM. (Eds.), An asset-based approach to advancing Latina students in STEM (pp. 181–192). Routledge.
31.
GaylesJ. G.AmpawF. (2014). The impact of college experiences on degree completion in STEM fields at four-year institutions: Does gender matter?The Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 439–468. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2014.0022
32.
GoldJ. R.GatesA. J.HaqueS. A.MelsonM. C.NelsonL. K.ZippelK. (2022). The NSF ADVANCE Network of Organizations. ADVANCE Journal, 3(1), 33822.
33.
Goodman-BaconA. (2018). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing (No. w25018). National Bureau of Economic Research.
34.
GossK. A. (2020). The paradox of gender equality: How American women’s groups gained and lost their public voice. University of Michigan Press.
35.
GrandyJ. (1998). Persistence in science of high-ability minority students: Results of a longitudinal study. The Journal of Higher Education, 69(6), 589–620.
GriffinK. A. (2020). Institutional barriers, strategies, and benefits to increasing the representation of women and men of color in the professoriate: Looking beyond the pipeline. In PernaL. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 35, pp. 1–73). Springer.
38.
GriffinK. A.BennettJ.YorkT. (2020). Leveraging promising practices: Improving the recruitment, hiring, and retention of diverse & inclusive faculty. Aspire Alliance.
HancockA. M. (2007). Intersectionality as a normative and empirical paradigm. Politics & Gender, 3(2), 248–254.
41.
HarleyD. A. (2008). Maids of academe: African Ame-rican women faculty at Predominately White Insti-tutions. Journal of African American Studies, 12, 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-007-9030-5
42.
HendersonL.HerringC. (2013). Does critical diversity pay in higher education? Race, gender, and departmental rankings in research universities. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 1(3), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2013.818565
43.
HuntV. H.MorimotoS.ZajicekA.LisnicR. (2012). Intersectionality and dismantling institutional privilege: The case of the NSF ADVANCE program. Race, Gender & Class, 19(1–2), 266–290.
44.
HurtadoS.AlvarezC. L.Guillermo-WannC.CuellarM.ArellanoL. (2012). A model for diverse learning environments. In SmartJ.PaulsenM. (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 27, pp. 41–122). Springer.
45.
JangS. T. (2018). The implications of intersectionality on Southeast Asian female students’ educational outcomes in the United States: A critical quantitative intersectionality analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 55(6), 1268–1306. https://doi.org/10.31022F0002831218777225
46.
Jean-MarieG.Lloyd-JonesB. (2011). Women of color in higher education: Changing directions and new perspectives. Emerald Group Publishing.
47.
JohnsonD. R. (2011). Women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(152), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.410
48.
JohnsonD. R. (2012). Campus racial climate perceptions and overall sense of belonging among racially diverse women in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Development, 53(2), 336–346.
KamimuraA. (2020). “Cuida Tu Casa Y Deja La Ajena”: Focusing on retention as a self-perpetuating engine for recruiting Latina faculty in STEM. In GonzalezE. M.FernandezF.WilsonM. (Eds.), An asset-based approach to advancing Latina students in STEM (pp. 57–74). Routledge.
51.
KatznelsonI. (2005). When affirmative action was white: An untold history of racial inequality in twentieth-century America. W. W. Norton & Company.
52.
KezarA. J. (2001). Understanding and facilitating change in higher education in the 21st century: Recent research and conceptualizations. ASHE-ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.
53.
KezarA. J. (2007). Tools for a time and place: Phased leadership strategies to institutionalize a diversity agenda. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 413–439.
54.
KimS.KalevA.DobbinF. (2012). Progressive corporations at work: The case of diversity programs. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 36(2), 171–214.
55.
LaursenS. L.AustinA. E.SotoM.MartinezD. (2015a). ADVANCing the agenda for gender equity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(4), 16–24.
56.
LaursenS. L.AustinA. E.SotoM.MartinezD. (2015b). Strategic institutional change to support advancement of women scientists in the academy: Initial lessons from a study of ADVANCE IT projects. In HolmesM. A.O’ConnellS.DuttK. (Eds.), Women in the geosciences: Practical, positive practices toward parity (pp. 37–49). John Wiley.
57.
LiD.KoedelC. (2017). Representation and salary gaps by race-ethnicity and gender at selective public universities. Educational Researcher, 46(7), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X17726535
58.
LongJ. E. (1975). Public-private sectoral differences in employment discrimination. Southern Economic Journal, 42(1), 89–96.
59.
LopezM. J.GutmanR. (2017). Estimation of causal effects with multiple treatments: A review and new ideas. Statistical Science, 32(3), 432–454.
60.
LópezN.ErwinC.BinderM.ChavezM. J. (2018). Making the invisible visible: Advancing quantitative methods in higher education using critical race theory and intersectionality. Race Ethnicity and Education, 21(2), 180–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2017.1375185
61.
MarshallC. (2005). Feminist critical policy analysis I. Routledge.
62.
MatiasJ. N.LewisN. A.HopeE. C. (2022). US universities are not succeeding in diversifying faculty. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 1606–1608. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01495-4
63.
McCaffreyD. F.GriffinB. A.AlmirallD.SlaughterM. E.RamchandR.BurgetteL. F. (2013). A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models. Statistics in Medicine, 32(19), 3388–3414.
64.
McCaffreyD. F.RidgewayG.MorralA. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 403–425.
65.
MeinE.GuerraH. M.Herrera-RochaL. (2020). Latina undergraduates in engineering/computer science on the US–Mexico border. In GonzalezE. M.FernandezF.WilsonM. (Eds.), An asset-based approach to advancing Latina students in STEM (pp. 131–146). Routledge.
66.
MoodyJ. (2004). Faculty diversity: Problems and solutions. Routledge.
67.
MorganS. L.HardingD. J. (2006). Matching estimators of causal effects prospects and pitfalls in theory and practice. Sociological Methods & Research, 35(1), 3–60.
68.
MorimotoS. A.ZajicekA. M.HuntV. H.LisnicR. (2013). Beyond binders full of women: NSF ADVANCE and initiatives for institutional transformation. Sociological Spectrum, 33(5), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2013.818505
69.
MuseusS. D.LivermanD. (2010). High-performing institutions and their implications for studying underrepresented minority students in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148), 17–27.
70.
MuseusS. D.PalmerR. T.DavisR. J.MarambaD. (2011). Factors that influence success among racial and ethnic minority college students in the STEM circuit. ASHE Higher Education Report, 36(6), 53–85.
71.
NaffK. C.KelloughJ. E. (2003). Ensuring employment equity: Are federal diversity programs making a difference?International Journal of Public Administration, 26(12), 1307–1336. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120024399
72.
National Science Foundation. (2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2019 (Special Report NSF Number 19-304). www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/
RabovskyT. M.EllisW. C. (2014). Higher education and congressional influence on administrative decisions: An examination of NSF and NIH research grant funding to four-year universities. Social Science Quarterly, 95(3), 740–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12001
RodgersA. J.LieraR. (2023). When race becomes capital: Diversity, faculty hiring, and the entrenchment of racial capitalism in higher education. Educational Researcher. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231175359
80.
RomanE.CarbotC. B. (2006). Freeriders and diversity in the legal academy: A new Dirty Dozen List?Indiana Law Journal, 83, 1235–1266.
81.
RothJ. (2022). Pretest with caution: Event-study estimates after testing for parallel trends. American Economic Review: Insights, 4(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1257/aeri.20210236
82.
RothJ.Sant’AnnaP. H.BilinskiA.PoeJ. (2023). What’s trending in difference-in-differences? A synthesis of the recent econometrics literature. Journal of Econometrics, 235, 2218–2244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2023.03.008
83.
SablanJ. R. (2019). Can you really measure that? Combining critical race theory and quantitative methods. American Educational Research Journal, 56(1), 178–203. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218798325
84.
SchuddeL. (2018). Heterogeneous effects in edu-cation: The promise and challenge of incorporating intersectionality into quantitative methodological approaches. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18759040
85.
SensoyÖ.DiAngeloR. (2017). “We are all for diversity, but . . .”: How faculty hiring committees reproduce whiteness and practical suggestions for how they can change. Harvard Educational Review, 87(4), 557–580.
86.
SmithD. G.TurnerC. S.Osei-KofiN.RichardsS. (2004). Interrupting the usual: Successful strategies for hiring diverse faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 75(2), 133–160.
87.
SmithJ. L.HandleyI. M.ZaleA. V.RushingS.PotvinM. A. (2015). Now hiring! Empirically testing a three-step intervention to increase faculty gender diversity in STEM. BioScience, 65(11), 1084–1087. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biv138
88.
SmithJ. L.StoopC. D.YoungM.BelouR.HeldS. (2017). Grant writing bootcamp: An intervention to enhance the research capacity of academic women in STEM. BioScience, 67, 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix050
89.
SolankiS. M.XuD. (2018). Looking beyond academic performance: The influence of instructor gender on student motivation in STEM fields. American Educational Research Journal, 55(4), 801–835. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218759034
90.
SunL.AbrahamS. (2021). Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006
91.
TierneyW. G.SalleeM. W. (2008). Do organizational structures and strategies increase faculty diversity: A cultural analysis. American Academic, 4(1), 159–184.
92.
TsuiL. (2007). Effective strategies to increase diversity in STEM fields: A review of the research literature. The Journal of Negro Education, 76(4), 555–581.
93.
UmbachP. D. (2006). The contribution of faculty of color to undergraduate education. Research in Higher Education, 47(3), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9391-3
WeberM. (2015). Bureaucracy. In ShafritzJ. M.OttJ. S.JangY. S. (Eds.), Classics of organization theory (8th ed., pp. 78–83). Thomson Wadsworth.
99.
WeltonA. D.OwensD. R.Zamani-GallaherE. M. (2018). Anti-racist change: A conceptual framework for educational institutions to take systemic action. Teachers College Record, 120(14), 1–22.
100.
ZemskyR.ShamanS.BaldridgeS. C. (2020). The college stress test: Tracking institutional futures across a crowded market. Johns Hopkins University Press.
101.
ZuberiT. (2003). Thicker than blood: How racial statistics lie. University of Minnesota Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
