Do Students in Gifted Programs Perform Better? Linking Gifted Program Participation to Achievement and Nonachievement Outcomes

Abstract

Growing concerns about inequitable access have made public investment in gifted programs controversial in many school districts, yet advocates maintain that gifted services provide necessary enrichment for exceptional students to succeed at school. We provide evidence on whether the typical gifted program indeed benefits elementary students’ achievement and nonachievement outcomes, using nationally representative data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, 2010–2011 kindergarten cohort. Leveraging within-school and within-student comparisons, we find that participating in a school’s gifted program is associated with reading and mathematics achievement for the average student, although associations are small. We find no evidence of a relationship between gifted participation and student absences, reported engagement with school, or student mobility. Black and low-income students do not see the academic gains that their peers experience when receiving gifted services.

Keywords

educational policy gifted education equity secondary data analysis quasi-experimental analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelson

J. L.

McCoach

D. B.

Gavin

M. K.

(2012). Examining the effects of gifted programming in mathematics and reading using the ECLS-K. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(1), 25–39.

Assouline

S. G.

Colangelo

VanTassel-Baska

Lupkowski-Shoplik

(2015). A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2). Belin-Blank Center.

Bhatt

(2009). The impacts of gifted and talented education (Working Paper 2009-10-1). Andrew Young School of Policy Studies.

Bhatt

(2011). A review of gifted and talented education in the United States. Education Finance and Policy, 6(4), 557–582.

Bui

S. A.

Craig

S. G.

Imberman

S. A.

(2014). Is gifted education a bright idea? Assessing the impact of gifted and talented programs on achievement. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(3), 30–62.

Callahan

C. M.

Moon

T. R.

(2013). Status of elementary gifted programs: 2013. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. http://www.nagc.org

Callahan

C. M.

Moon

T. R.

(2017). Describing the status of programs for the gifted: A call for action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 20–49.

Callahan

C. M.

Moon

T. R.

Azano

A. P.

Hailey

E. P.

(2015). What works in gifted education: Documenting the effects of an integrated curricular/instructional model for gifted student. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 137–167.

Card

Giuliano

(2016). Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(48), 13678–13683.

10.

Chiang

Lin

(2007). Mathematical ability of students with Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism. SAGE Publications, 11(6), 547–556.

11.

Cross

T. L.

Andersen

Mammadov

(2015). Effects of academic acceleration on the social and emotional lives of gifted students. In Assouline

S. G.

Colangelo

VanTassel-Baska

Lupkowski-Shoplik

(Eds.), A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2). Belin-Blank Center.

12.

Davis

Engberg

Epple

D. N.

Sieg

Zimmer

(2013). Bounding the impact of a gifted program on student retention using a modified regression discontinuity design. Annals of Economics and Statistics, 111/112, 10–34.

13.

Delcourt

M. A. B.

Cornell

D. G.

Goldberg

M. D.

(2007). Cognitive and affective learning outcome of gifted elementary school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 359–381.

14.

Donovan

M. S.

Cross

C. T.

(2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. National Academy Press.

15.

Ford

D. Y.

(1998). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. The Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 4–14.

16.

Ford

D. Y.

Grantham

T. C.

Whiting

G. W.

(2008). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 289–306.

17.

Ford

D. Y.

King

(2014). No Blacks allowed; Segregated gifted education in the context of Brown vs. Board of Education. Journal of Negro Education, 83(3), 300–310.

18.

Fryer

R. G.

Jr. Torelli

(2010). An empirical analysis of “acting White.” Journal of Public Economics, 94(5–6), 380–396.

19.

Fugate

C. M.

Zentall

S. S.

Gentry

(2013). Creativity and working memory in gifted students with and without characteristics of attention deficit hyperactive disorder: Lifting the mask. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(4), 234–246.

20.

Gavin

M. K.

Casa

T. M.

Adelson

J. L.

Carroll

S. R.

Sheffield

L. J.

(2009). The impact of advanced curriculum on the achievement of mathematically promising elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(3), 188–202.

21.

Goldhaber

Özek

(2019). How much should we rely on student test achievement as a measure of success? Educational Researcher, 48(7), 479–483.

22.

Goldring

E. B.

(1990). Assessing the status of information on classroom organization frameworks for gifted students. The Journal of Educational Research, 23(6), 313–327.

23.

Graham

J. W.

(2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.

24.

Grissom

J. A.

Redding

(2016). Discretion and disproportionality: Explaining the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. AERA Open, 2(1), 1–25.

25.

Grissom

J. A.

Redding

Bleiberg

J. F.

(2019). Money over merit? Socioeconomic gaps in receipt of gifted services. Harvard Educational Review, 89(3), 337–369.

26.

Gubbels

Segers

Verhoeven

(2014). Cognitive, socioemotional, and attitudinal effects of a triarchic enrichment program for gifted children. Journal of Education of the Gifted, 37(4), 378–397.

27.

Harris

Plucker

J. A.

Rapp

K. E.

Martinez

R. S.

(2009). Identifying gifted and talented English language learners: A case study. Journal for Education of the Gifted, 32(3), 368–393.

28.

Hoge

R. D.

Renzulli

J. S.

(1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Education Research, 63(4), 449–465.

29.

Kell

H. J.

Wai

(2019). Right-tail range restriction: A lurking threat to detecting associations between traits and skill among experts. Journal of Expertise, 2(4), 224–242.

30.

Kettler

(2016). Why are economists evaluating the impact of gifted education? Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(2), 81–89.

31.

King

E. W.

(2005). Addressing the social and emotional needs of twice-exceptional students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(1), 16–20.

32.

Kraft

M. A.

(2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253.

33.

Lee

Olszewski-Kubilius

Makel

M. C.

Putallaz

(2015). Gifted students’ perceptions of an accelerated summer program and social support. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(4), 265–282.

34.

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

Kell

H. J.

(2014). Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psychological Science, 25, 2217–2232.

35.

Makel

M. C.

Wai

(2016). Does economic research in education work? For which studies? Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(2), 73–80.

36.

Marsh

H. W.

Chessor

Craven

Roche

(1995). The effects of gifted and talented programs on academic self-concept: The big fish strikes again. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 285–319.

37.

Miller

D. L.

Shenhav

Grosz

M. Z.

(2019). Selection into identification in fixed effects models with application to head start (NBER Working Paper No. 26174). National Bureau of Economic Research.

38.

Murphy

P. R.

(2009). Essays on gifted education’s impact on student achievement (Doctoral dissertation). Florida State University. http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2174

39.

National Association for Gifted Children. (2008a). The history of gifted and talented education. www.nagc.org

40.

National Association for Gifted Children. (2008b). Why we should advocate for gifted and talented students. www.nagc.org

41.

Obgu

J. U.

(2004). Collective identity and the burden of “acting White” in Black history, community, and education. The Urban Review, 36(1), 1–35.

42.

Oster

(2019). Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and evidence. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 37(2), 1–18.

43.

Park

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

(2013). When less is more: Effects of grade skipping on adult STEM productivity among mathematically precocious adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 176–198.

44.

Plucker

J. A.

Makel

M. C.

Matthews

M. S.

Peters

S. J.

Rambo-Hernandez

K. E.

(2017). Blazing new trails: Strengthening policy research in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 210–218.

45.

Reardon

S. F.

(2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. In Duncan

G. J.

Murnane

R. J.

(Eds.), Whither opportunity? Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances (pp. 91–115). Russell Sage Foundation.

46.

Rinn

A. N.

Reynolds

M. J.

McQueen

K. S.

(2011). Perceived social support and the self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(3), 367–396.

47.

School Diversity Advisory Group in New York City. (2019). Making the grade II: New programs for better schools

48.

Solon

Haider

S. J.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2015). What are we weighting for? The Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 301–316.

49.

Stambaugh

Ford

D. Y.

(2015). Microaggressions, multiculturalism, and gifted individuals who are Black, Hispanic, or low income. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93(2), 192–201.

50.

Steenbergen-Hu

Makel

M. C.

Olszewski-Kubilius

(2016). What one hundred years of research says about the effects of ability grouping and acceleration on K–12 students’ academic achievement: Findings of two second-order meta-analyses. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849–899.

51.

Steenbergen-Hu

Moon

(2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 39–53.

52.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54.

53.

Tourangeau

Nord

Lê

Wellaner-Allen

Vaden-Kiernan

Blaker

Najarian

(2019). Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010-11 (ECLS-L:2011) user’s manual for the ECLS-K:2011 kindergarten-fifth grade data file and electronic codebook, restricted version (NCES-2019-101). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.

54.

Vaughn

V. L.

Feldhusen

J. F.

Asher

J. W.

(1991). Meta-analyses and review of research on pull-out programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(2), 92–98.

55.

Wai

Lubinski

Benbow

C. P.

Steiger

J. H.

(2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 860–871.

56.

Watts

T. W.

Duncan

G. J.

Chen

Claessens

Davis-Kean

P. E.

Duckworth

. . . Susperreguy

M. I.

(2015). The role of mediators in development of longitudinal mathematics achievement associations. Child Development, 86(6), 1892–1907.

57.

Willard-Holt

Weber

Morrison

K. L.

Horgan

(2013). Twice-exceptional learners’ perspectives on effective learning strategies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(4), 247–262.

58.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB