Middle school transitions are increasingly required, despite documented negative effects on general education students (GENs). We explore if and how the move to middle school differentially affects students with disabilities (SWDs), a large and low-performing group. Using an instrumental variables strategy and New York City (NYC) data on nine student cohorts, we find the middle school transition causes a 0.29 SD decline in SWD math performance, a 0.16 SD decline in English language-arts (ELA) performance, and a one percentage point increase in grade retention. Accounting for potential mediators (e.g., peer cohort stability) does not substantially explain estimated effects on SWD performance. However, the middle school transition has similarly large negative effects on GENs, suggesting the need to ease this transition for all students.
AkosP. (2017). Transition programs. In MertensS. B.CaskeyM. M.FlowesN. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of middle grades education (2nd ed., pp. 407–411). Information Age Publishing.
2.
AkosP.RoseR. A.OrthnerD. (2015). Sociodemographic moderators of middle school transition effects on academic achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(2), 170–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614529367
3.
AndersonK. P. (2021). The relationship between inclusion, absenteeism, and disciplinary outcomes for students with disabilities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0162373720968558
4.
AndersonM. L. (2008). Multiple inference and gender differences in the effects of early intervention: A reevaluation of the Abecedarian, Perry preschool, and Early Training Projects. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1481–1495. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214508000000841
5.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics. Princeton University Press.
6.
ArciaE. (2007). A comparison of elementary/K-8 and middle schools’ suspension rates. Urban Education, 42(5), 456–469. https://doi.org/10.0.4.153/0042085907304879
7.
AtteberryA.WedowR.CookN. J.McEachinA. (2022). A replication of a quasi-experimental approach to estimating middle school structural transition effects on student learning trajectories. Educational Policy, 36(7), 1612–1651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904820987797
BallisB.HeathK. (2021). The long-run impacts of special education. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 13(4), 72–111. https://doi.org/10.0.4.233/pol.20190603
10.
Barnard-BrakL.LechtenbergerD. (2010). Student IEP participation and academic achievement across time. Remedial and Special Education, 31(5), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932509338382
ByrnesV.RubyA. (2007). Comparing achievement between K–8 and middle schools: A large-scale empirical study. American Journal of Education, 114(1), 101–135. https://doi.org/10.0.4.62/520693
13.
CappellaE.SchwartzK.HillJ.KimH. Y.SeidmanE. (2019). A national sample of eighth-grade students: The impact of middle grade schools on academic and psychosocial competence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(2), 167–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431617735653
14.
CosierM.Causton-TheoharisJ.TheoharisG. (2013). Does access matter? Time in general education and achievement for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 34(6), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513485448
15.
DiSalvoR. W. (2022). An examination of test score trajectories around school switching due to grade configuration. Education Finance and Policy, 17(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.0.4.138/edfp_a_00336
FishR. E. (2019). Standing out and sorting in: Exploring the role of racial composition in racial disparities in special education. American Educational Research Journal, 56(6), 2573–2608. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0002831219847966
19.
GianoZ.WilliamsA. L.BecnelJ. N. (2022). Grade retention and school dropout: Comparing specific grade levels across childhood and early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 42(1), 33–57. https://doi.org/10.0.4.153/02724316211010332
20.
GilmourA. F.HenryG. T. (2018). A comparison of teacher quality in math for late elementary and middle school students with and without disabilities. The Elementary School Journal, 118(3), 426–451. https://doi.org/10.1086/696140
21.
GoldmanS. E.BurkeM. M. (2017). The effectiveness of interventions to increase parent involvement in special education: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Exceptionality, 25(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2016.1196444
22.
GoldringR.TaieS.RiddlesM. (2014). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2012-13 teacher follow-up survey (NCES 2014-077). National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2014077
23.
GottfriedM. A. (2010). Evaluating the relationship between student attendance and achievement in urban elementary and middle schools: An instrumental variables approach. American Educational Research Journal, 47(2), 434–465. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209350494
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2002). Inferring program effects for special populations: Does special education raise achievement for students with disabilities?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 584–599. https://doi.org/10.0.4.138/003465302760556431
26.
HongK.ZimmerR.EngbergJ. (2018). How does grade configuration impact student achievement in elementary and middle school grades?Journal of Urban Economics, 105, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.0.3.248/j.jue.2018.02.002
27.
HurwitzS.PerryB.CohenE. D.SkibaR. (2020). Special education and individualized academic growth: A longitudinal assessment of outcomes for students with disabilities. American Educational Research Journal, 57(2), 576–611. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0002831219857054
JamesD. (2018). Students with disabilities transitioning from elementary to middle school: A qualitative study (Publication No. 2071904803) [Doctoral dissertation, Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2071904803/abstract/5D14058586DC4E73PQ/1
30.
JessenS. B. (2013). Special education & school choice: The complex effects of small schools, school choice and public high school policy in New York City. Educational Policy, 27(3), 427–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904812453997
31.
JonesN.WintersM. A. (2022). Are two teachers better than one?: The effect of co-teaching on students with and without disabilities. Journal of Human Resources, 0420-10834R3. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.0420-10834R3
32.
KimH. Y.SchwartzK.CappellaE.SeidmanE. (2014). Navigating middle grades: Role of social contexts in middle grade school climate. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(1–2), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9659-x
33.
KnestingK.HokansonC.WaldronN. (2008). Settling in: Facilitating the transition to an inclusive middle school for students with mild disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 55(3), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349120802268644
34.
LaiI.WoodW. J.ImbermanS. A.JonesN. D.StrunkK. O. (2021). Teacher quality gaps by disability and socioeconomic status: Evidence from Los Angeles. Educational Researcher, 50(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0013189X20955170
35.
Mac IverM. A.Mac IverD. J. (2006). Which bets paid off? Early findings on the impact of private management and K-8 conversion reforms on the achievement of Philadelphia Students. Review of Policy Research, 23(5), 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.0.4.87/j.1541-1338.2006.00250.x
MerlinJ. (2020). Spotlight on American Education Week, Part 1: Celebrating U.S. public education with the National Teacher and Principal Survey (NTPS). National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/blogs/nces/2020/11/18/default
39.
MorganP. L.WangY.WoodsA. D.MandelZ.FarkasG.HillemeierM. M. (2019). Are U.S. schools discriminating when suspending students with disabilities? A best-evidence synthesis. Exceptional Children, 86(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919868528
40.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2020). Table 204.60. Percentage distribution of students 6 to 21 years old served under Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B, by educational environment and type of disability: Selected years, fall 1989 through fall 2018. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d19/tables/dt19_204.60.asp
RockoffJ. E.LockwoodB. B. (2010). Stuck in the middle: Impacts of grade configuration in public schools. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11), 1051–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.017
SchenkerN.GentlemanJ. F. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55(3), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001317097960
47.
SchnoesC.ReidR.WagnerM.MarderC. (2006). ADHD among students receiving special education services: A national survey. Exceptional Children, 72(4), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.0.4.153/001440290607200406
48.
SchwartzA. E.HopkinsB. G.StiefelL. (2021). The effects of special education on the academic performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 40(2), 480–520. https://doi.org/10.0.3.234/pam.22282
49.
SchwartzA. E.StiefelL.CordesS. A. (2017). Moving matters: The causal effect of moving schools on student performance. Education Finance and Policy, 12(4), 419–446. https://doi.org/10.0.4.138/edfp_a_00198
50.
SchwartzA. E.StiefelL.RubensteinR.ZabelJ. (2011). The path not taken: How does school organization affect eighth-grade achievement?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0162373711407062
51.
SchwerdtG.WestM. R. (2013). The impact of alternative grade configurations on student outcomes through middle and high school. Journal of Public Economics, 97, 308–326. https://doi.org/10.0.3.248/j.jpubeco.2012.10.002
52.
SetrenE. (2021). Targeted vs. general education investments: Evidence from special education and English language learners in Boston Charter Schools. The Journal of Human Resources, 56(4), 1073–1112. https://doi.org/10.0.13.40/jhr.56.4.0219-10040R2
53.
ShifrerD. (2013). Stigma of a label: Educational expectations for high school students labeled with learning disabilities. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54(4), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.0.4.153/0022146513503346
StiefelL.ShiferawM.SchwartzA. E.GottfriedM. (2018). Who feels included in school? Exa mining feelings of inclusion among students with disabilities. Educational Researcher, 47(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0013189X17738761
56.
WelshR. O. (2017). School Hopscotch: A comprehensive review of K–12 student mobility in the United States. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 475–511. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316672068
57.
WelshR. O.LittleS. (2018). The school discipline dilemma: A comprehensive review of disparities and alternative approaches. Review of Educational Research, 88(5), 752–794. https://doi.org/10.0.12.30/0034654318791582
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
