Teacher performance pay is often introduced with the goal of reducing gaps in test scores across groups, yet little is known about how well they achieve this aim. We ask, “Do test score-based teacher incentives impact the Black–White test score gap?” Using student–teacher matched data and a difference-in-differences approach in which the performance of a teacher’s students before and after the policy is compared, we find that performance pay increases the conditional Black–White gap. The effect is particularly evident when bonuses are large, consistent with a causal response to performance pay.
AhnT. (2013). The missing link: Estimating the impact of incentives on teacher effort and instructional effectiveness using teacher accountability legislation data. Journal of Human Capital, 7(3), 230–273.
2.
AtkinsonA.BurgessS.CroxsonB.GreggP.PropperC.SlaterH.WilsonD. (2009). Evaluating the impact of performance-related pay for teachers in England. Labour Economics, 16(3), 251–261.
3.
BandieraO.BarankayI.RasulI. (2007). Incentives for managers and inequality among workers: Evidence from a firm-level experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 729–773.
4.
BelfieldC. R.HeywoodJ. S. (2008). Performance pay for teachers: Determinants and consequences. Economics of Education Review, 27(3), 243–252.
5.
BondT. N.LangK. (2013). The evolution of the Black-White test score gap in Grades K–3: The fragility of results. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 1468–1479.
6.
BurgessS.GreavesE. (2013). Test scores, subjective assessment, and stereotyping of ethnic minorities. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(3), 535–576.
7.
ChiangH.SperoniC.HerrmannM.HallgrenK.BurkanderP.WellingtonA. (2017). Evaluation of the teacher incentive fund: Final Report on implementation and impacts of pay-for-performance across four years (NCEE 2018-4004). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=NCEE20184004
8.
EbertsR.HollenbeckK.StoneJ. (2002). Teacher performance incentives and student outcomes. Journal of Human Resources, 37, 913–927.
9.
FergusonR. F. (1998). Can schools narrow the Black-White test score gap? In JencksC.PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 318–374). Brookings Institution Press.
10.
FiglioD. N.KennyL. W. (2007). Individual teacher incentives and student performance. Journal of Public Economics, 91(5), 901–914.
11.
FryerR. G. (2013). Teacher incentives and student achievement: Evidence from New York City public schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(2), 373–407.
12.
FryerR. G.LevittS. (2006). The Black-White test score gap through third grade. American Law and Economics Review, 8(2), 249–281.
13.
GershensonS.HoltS. B.PapageorgeN. W. (2016). Who believes in me? The effect of student–teacher demographic match on teacher expectations. Economics of Education Review, 52, 209–224.
GoldhaberD.DeArmondM.DeBurgomasterS. (2011). Teacher attitudes about compensation reform: Implications for reform implementation. ILR Review, 64(3), 441–463.
16.
GoodmanS. F.TurnerL. J. (2013). The design of teacher incentive pay and educational outcomes: Evidence from the New York City bonus program. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(2), 409–420.
17.
Goodman-BaconA. (2018). Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing (No. w25018). National Bureau of Economic Research.
HedgesL. V.NowellA. (1998). Black-White test score convergence since 1965. In JencksC.PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black-White test score gap (pp. 149–181). Brookings Institution Press.
20.
HillA. J.JonesD. (2020). The impacts of performance pay on teacher effectiveness and retention: Does teacher gender matter?Journal of Human Resources, 55(1), 349–385.
21.
HolmstromB.MilgromP. (1991). Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 7, 24–52.
JacksonC. K. (2014). Teacher quality at the high school level: The importance of accounting for tracks. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(4), 645–684.
24.
JacksonC. K.SchneiderH. S. (2015). Checklists and worker behavior: A field experiment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(4), 136–168.
25.
KoppichJ. E. (2010). Teacher unions and new forms of teacher compensation. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(8), 22–26.
26.
LaddH. F.WalshR. P. (2002). Implementing value-added measures of school effectiveness: Getting the incentives right. Economics of Education Review, 21(1), 1–17.
27.
LavyV. (2002). Evaluating the effect of teachers’ group performance incentives on pupil achievement. Journal of Political Economy, 110(6), 1286–1317.
28.
LavyV. (2009). Performance pay and teachers’ effort, productivity, and grading ethics. American Economic Review, 99(5), 1979–2011.
29.
LazearE. P. (2000). Performance pay and productivity. American Economic Review, 90(5), 1346–1361.
30.
MansfieldR. K. (2015). Teacher quality and student inequality. Journal of Labor Economics, 33(3, Pt. 1), 751–788.
31.
MilanowskiA. (2007). Performance pay system preferences of students preparing to be teachers. Education Finance and Policy, 2(2), 111–132.
32.
NealD. (2011). The design of performance pay in education. In HanushekE. (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 4, pp. 495–550). Elsevier Science.
33.
NealD.SchanzenbachD. W. (2010). Left behind by design: Proficiency counts and test-based accountability. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(2), 263–283.
34.
PaarschH. J.ShearerB. (2000). Piece rates, fixed wages, and incentive effects: Statistical evidence from payroll records. International Economic Review, 41(1), 59–92.
35.
PapageorgeN. W.GershensonS.KangK. M. (2020). Teacher expectations matter. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 102(2), 234–251.
36.
PenneyJ. (2017). Test score measurement and the black-white test score gap. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(4), 652–656.
37.
PodgurskyM. J.SpringerM. G. (2007). Teacher performance pay: A review. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(4), 909–949.
38.
RangelM. A.ShiY. (2020) First impressions: The case of teacher racial bias. IZA Institute of Labor Economics. http://ftp.iza.org/dp13347.pdf
39.
RebackR. (2008). Teaching to the rating: School accountability and the distribution of student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5), 1394–1415.
40.
RothsteinJ. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 175–214.
41.
ShearerB. (2004). Piece rates, fixed wages and incentives: Evidence from a field experiment. Review of Economic Studies, 71(2), 513–534.
42.
SojournerA. J.MykereziE.WestK. L. (2014). Teacher pay reform and productivity panel data evidence from adoptions of Q-Comp in Minnesota. Journal of Human Resources, 49(4), 945–981.
43.
SpringerM. G.BallouD.HamiltonL.LeV.LockwoodJ. R.McCaffreyD.PepperM.StecherB. (2010). Teacher pay for performance: Experimental evidence from the project on incentives in teaching. National Center on Performance Incentives at Vanderbilt University.
44.
TaylorM. C. (1979). Race, sex, and the expression of self-fulfilling prophecies in a laboratory teaching situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 897–912.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
