Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Many schools and districts have considerable discretion when hiring teachers, yet little is known about how that discretion should be used. Using data from a new teacher screening system in the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), we find that performance during screening, and especially performance on specific screening assessments, is significantly and meaningfully predictive of hired teachers’ evaluation outcomes, contributions to student achievement, attendance, and mobility. However, applicants’ performance on individual components of the screening process are differentially predictive of different teacher outcomes, highlighting challenges and potential trade-offs faced by districts during screening.

Keywords

school/teacher effectiveness teacher characteristics policy policy analysis regression analyses secondary data analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angrist

J. D.

Guryan

(2008). Does teacher testing raise teacher quality? Evidence from state certification requirements. Economics of Education Review, 27, 483–503.

Buddin

Zamarro

(2009). Teacher qualifications and student achievement in urban elementary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 66, 103–115.

Cannata

Rubin

Goldring

Grissom

J. A.

Neumerski

C. M.

Drake

T. A.

Schuermann

(2017). Using teacher effectiveness data for information-rich hiring. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53, 180–222.

Chetty

Friedman

J. N.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2014a). Measuring the impacts of teachers I: Evaluating bias in teacher value-added estimates. American Economic Review, 104, 2593–2632.

Chetty

Friedman

J. N.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2014b). Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104, 2633–2679.

Chingos

M. M.

Peterson

P. E.

(2011). It’s easier to pick a good teacher than to train one: Familiar and new results on the correlates of teacher effectiveness. Economics of Education Review, 30, 449–465.

Clotfelter

C. T.

Ladd

H. F.

Vigdor

J. L.

(2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26, 673–682.

Clotfelter

C. T.

Ladd

H. F.

Vigdor

J. L.

(2009). Are teacher absences worth worrying about in the United States? Education Finance and Policy, 4, 115–149.

Correia

(2015). Singletons, cluster-robust standard errors and fixed effects: A bad mix. Unpublished paper. Duke University, NC.

10.

Cowan

Goldhaber

Hayes

Theobald

(2016). Missing elements in the discussion of teacher shortages. Educational Researcher, 45, 460–462.

11.

Delfgaauw

Dur

(2007). Signaling and screening of workers’ motivation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 62, 605–624.

12.

Delli

D. A.

Vera

E. M.

(2003). Psychological and contextual influences on the teacher selection interview: A model for future research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17, 137–155.

13.

Engel

Jacob

B. A.

Curran

F. C.

(2014). New evidence on teacher labor supply. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 36–72.

14.

Frank

K. A.

Maroulis

S. J.

Duong

M. Q.

Kelcey

B. M.

(2013). What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin’s causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35, 437–460.

15.

Goldhaber

Grout

Huntington-Klein

(2017). Screen twice, cut once: Assessing the predictive validity of applicant selection tools. Education Finance and Policy, 12, 197–223.

16.

Griffith

McDougald

(2016). Undue process: Why bad teachers in twenty-five diverse districts rarely get fired. Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Retrieved from https://fordhaminstitute.org/national/research/undue-process-why-bad-teachers-twenty-five-diverse-districts-rarely-get-fired

17.

Hanushek

E. A.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2012). The distribution of teacher quality and implications for policy. Annual Review of Economics, 4, 131–157.

18.

Hanushek

E. A.

Rivkin

S. G.

Schiman

J. C.

(2016). Dynamic effects of teacher turnover on the quality of instruction. Economics of Education Review, 55, 132–148.

19.

Horrace

W. C.

Oaxaca

R. L

. (2006). Results on the bias and inconsistency of ordinary least squares for the linear probability model. Economics Letters, 90, 321–327.

20.

Huang

Cappelli

(2010). Applicant screening and performance-related outcomes. The American Economic Review, 100, 214–218.

21.

Jacob

B. A.

Rockoff

J. E.

Taylor

E. S.

Lindy

Rosen

(2018). Teacher applicant hiring and teacher performance: Evidence from DC public schools. Journal of Public Economics, 166, 81–97.

22.

Kane

T. J.

Rockoff

J. E.

Staiger

D. O.

(2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27, 615–631.

23.

Koedel

Mihaly

Rockoff

J. E.

(2015). Value-added modeling: A review. Economics of Education Review, 47, 180–195.

24.

Kraft

M. A.

(2017). Teacher effects on complex cognitive skills and social-emotional competencies. Journal of Human Resources, 54(1), 1–36.

25.

Ladd

H. F.

(2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 235–261.

26.

Levin

Quinn

(2003). Missed opportunities: How we keep high-quality teachers out of urban classrooms. The New Teacher Project. Retrieved from https://tntp.org/assets/documents/MissedOpportunities.pdf

27.

Metzger

S. A.

M.-J.

(2008). Commercial teacher selection instruments: The validity of selecting teachers through beliefs, attitudes, and values. Review of Educational Research, 78, 921–940.

28.

Milanowski

A. T.

Odden

A. R.

(2007). A new approach to the cost of teacher turnover. Retrieved from https://www.crpe.org/publications/new-approach-cost-teacher-turnover

29.

Miller

R. T.

Murnane

R. J.

Willett

J. B.

(2008). Do teacher absences impact student achievement? Longitudinal evidence from one urban school district. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 181–200.

30.

Oyer

Schaefer

(2011). Personnel economics: Hiring and incentives. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.) The handbook of labor economics (1st ed., Vol. 4B, pp. 1769–1816). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.

31.

Painter

S. R.

(2000). Principals’ perceptions of barriers to teacher dismissal. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14, 253–264.

32.

Papay

J. P.

Kraft

M. A.

(2016). The productivity costs of inefficient hiring practices: Evidence from late teacher hiring. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35, 791–817.

33.

Ronfeldt

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50, 4–36.

34.

Sajjadiani

Sojourner

A. J.

Kammeyer-Mueller

J. D.

Mykerezi

. (2019). Using machine learning to translate applicant work history into predictors of performance and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/apl0000405

35.

Strunk

K. O.

Marsh

Bruno

(2017). An effective teacher for every student: Developing a research agenda to further policy change. Stanford: Policy Analysis for California Education.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB

Making the Cut: The Effectiveness of Teacher Screening and Hiring in the Los Angeles Unified School District

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material