Novice teachers improve substantially in their first years on the job, but we know remarkably little about the nature of this skill development. Using data from Tennessee, we leverage a feature of the classroom observation protocol that asks school administrators to identify an item on which the teacher should focus their improvement efforts. This “area of refinement” overcomes a key measurement challenge endemic to inferring from classroom observation scores the development of specific teaching skills. We show that administrators disproportionately identify two skills when observing novice teachers: classroom management and presenting content. Struggling with classroom management, in particular, is associated with early career attrition. Using a returns to experience framework, we observe improvement in these skills among teachers who remain.
AtteberryA.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2015). Do first impressions matter? Predicting early career teacher effectiveness. AERA Open, 1(4), 2332858415607834.
2.
BartanenB.KwokA. (2021). Examining clinical teaching observation scores as a measure of preservice teacher quality. American Educational Research Journal, 58(5), 887–920.
3.
BellC.JamesJ.TaylorE.S.WyckoffJ. (2024). Measuring returns to experience using supervisor ratings of observed performance: The case of classroom teachers. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22584
4.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.RockoffJ.WyckoffJ. (2008). The narrowing gap in new york city teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 793–818.
5.
CappellaE.AberJ. L.KimH. Y.GitomerD.BellC. (2016). Teaching beyond achievement tests: Perspectives from developmental and education science. Handbook of Research on Teaching, 5, 249–347.
6.
ClotfelterC. T.LaddH. F.VigdorJ. L. (2007). Teacher credentials and student achievement: Longitudinal analysis with student fixed effects. Economics of Education Review, 26(6), 673–682.
7.
DickensonT. S.HodgesT. E.WattsJ.BrownA.FanX.&South Carolina Teacher Education Advancement Consortium., et al(2022). Summary of results for the South Carolina teacher exit survey from the 2021–2022 pilot administration.
8.
Feiman-NemserS.SchwilleS.CarverC.YuskoB. (1999). A conceptual review of literature on new teacher induction. Education Resources Information Center (ERIC).
9.
FergusonR. F.DanielsonC. (2015). How framework for teaching and tripod 7cs evidence distinguish key components of effective teaching. In T. J. Kane, K. A. Kerr, & R. C. Pianta (Eds.), Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the measures of effective teaching project (pp. 98–143). Wiley Online Books.
10.
FreemanJ.SimonsenB.BriereD. E.MacSuga-GageA. S. (2014). Pre-service teacher training in classroom management: A review of state accreditation policy and teacher preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(2), 106–120.
11.
FullerF. F.BownO. H. (1975). Becoming a teacher. Teachers College Record, 76(6), 25–52.
12.
GrayL.TaieS. (2015). Public school teacher attrition and mobility in the first five years: Results from the first through fifth waves of the 2007–08 beginning teacher longitudinal study (First look; NCES 2015-337). National Center for Education Statistics.
13.
GreenbergJ.PutmanH.WalshK. (2014). Training our future teachers: Classroom management (Revised). National Council on Teacher Quality.
14.
GrissomJ. A.LoebS. (2017). Assessing principals’ assessments: Subjective evaluations of teacher effectiveness in low-and high-stakes environments. Education Finance and Policy, 12(3), 369–395.
15.
GrossmanP. L. (1992). Why models matter: An alternate view on professional growth in teaching. Review of educational research, 62(2), 171–179.
16.
HafenC. A.HamreB. K.AllenJ. P.BellC. A.GitomerD. H.PiantaR. C. (2015). Teaching through interactions in secondary school classrooms: Revisiting the factor structure and practical application of the classroom assessment scoring system–secondary. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5–6), 651–680.
17.
HammernessK. (2011). Classroom management in the United States: A view from New York City. Teaching Education, 22(2), 151–167.
18.
HarrisD. N.SassT. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of public economics, 95(7-8), 798–812.
19.
HunterS. B. (2018). History of team teacher evaluation policy (Technical Report). Tennessee Education Research Alliance.
20.
KaganD. M. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129–169.
21.
KaneT. J.RockoffJ. E.StaigerD. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 615–631.
22.
KaneT. J.StaigerD. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains (Research paper; Met project). Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
23.
KraftM. A.GilmourA. F. (2017). Revisiting the widget effect: Teacher evaluation reforms and the distribution of teacher effectiveness. Educational Researcher, 46(5), 234–249.
24.
KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476–500.
25.
KraftM. A.PapayJ. P.ChiO. L. (2020). Teacher skill development: Evidence from performance ratings by principals. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 39(2), 315–347.
26.
KwokA. (2021). Managing classroom management preparation in teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 27(1–4), 206–222.
27.
LevineA. (2006). Educating school teachers. Education Schools Project.
28.
MalmbergL.-E.HaggerH.BurnK.MuttonT.CollsH. (2010). Observed classroom quality during teacher education and two years of professional practice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 916–932.
29.
OstB. (2014). How do teachers improve? The relative importance of specific and general human capital. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(2), 127–151.
30.
PapayJ. P.LaskiM. (2021). Understanding the dynamics of teacher productivity development: Evidence on teacher improvement in Tennessee (Working Paper). Tennessee Education Research Alliance.
31.
PomeranceL.WalshK. (2020). 2020 teacher prep review: Clinical practice & classroom managementNational Council on Teacher Quality.
32.
ReddingC.NguyenT. D. (2020). Recent trends in the characteristics of new teachers, the schools in which they teach, and their turnover rates. Teachers College Record, 122(7), 1–36.
33.
RivkinS. G.HanushekE. A.KainJ. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.
34.
RobertsonM. (2006). Why novice teachers leave. Principal Leadership, 6(8), 33–36.
35.
RockoffJ. E. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94(2), 247–252.
36.
RussR. S.SherinB. L.SherinM. G. (2016). What constitutes teacher learning. In GitomerD. H.BellC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed., pp. 391–438). American Educational Research Association.
37.
SmithT. M.IngersollR. M. (2004). What are the effects of induction and mentoring on beginning teacher turnover?American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 681–714.
38.
StevensonN. A.VanLoneJ.BarberB. R. (2020). A commentary on the misalignment of teacher education and the need for classroom behavior management skills. Education and Treatment of Children, 43(4), 393–404.
39.
WatzkeJ. L. (2007). Longitudinal research on beginning teacher development: Complexity as a challenge to concerns-based stage theory. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(1), 106–122.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
