A Meta-Analysis of Class Sizes and Ratios in Early Childhood Education Programs: Are Thresholds of Quality Associated With Greater Impacts on Cognitive,Achievement,and Socioemotional Outcomes?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2017
A Meta-Analysis of Class Sizes and Ratios in Early Childhood Education Programs: Are Thresholds of Quality Associated With Greater Impacts on Cognitive,Achievement,and Socioemotional Outcomes?
This study uses data from a comprehensive database of U.S. early childhood education program evaluations published between 1960 and 2007 to evaluate the relationship between class size, child–teacher ratio, and program effect sizes for cognitive, achievement, and socioemotional outcomes. Both class size and child–teacher ratio showed nonlinear relationships with cognitive and achievement effect sizes. For child–teacher ratios 7.5:1 and lower, the reduction of this ratio by one child per teacher predicted an effect size of 0.22 standard deviations greater. For class sizes 15 and smaller, one child fewer predicted an effect size of 0.10 standard deviations larger. No discernible relationship was found for larger class sizes and child–teacher ratios. Results were less clear for socioemotional outcomes due to a small sample.
*Abbott-ShimM.LambertR.McCartyF. (2003). A comparison of school readiness outcomes for children randomly assigned to a Head Start program and the program’s wait list. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 8, 191–214.
2.
*AmetjianA. (1965). The effects of a preschool program upon the intellectual development and social competency of lower class children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
3.
*BarnettW. S.JungK.LamyC.WongV.CookT. (2007, March). Effects of five state prekindergarten programs on early learning. Paper presented at the SRCD annual meeting, Boston, MA.
4.
BlatchfordP.BassettP.BrownP. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher-pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 21, 715–730.
5.
BlauD. M. (1999). The effect of child care characteristics on child development. The Journal of Human Resources, 34, 786–822.
*BridgeC. A.TownleyK. F.HemmeterM. L.de MesquitaP. B. (1994). Third party evaluation of the Kentucky Education Reform Act preschool programs. Lexington: University of Kentucky, College of Education and College of Human Environmental Sciences.
8.
*BryantD. M.Peisnar-FeinbergE. S.CliffordR. M. (1993). Evaluation of public preschool programs in North Carolina. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina.
9.
BurchinalM.HowesC.PiantaR.BryantD.EarlyD.CliffordR.BarbarinO. (2008). Predicting child outcomes at the end of Kindergarten from the quality of pre-kindergarten teacher-child interactions and instruction. Applied Developmental Science, 12, 140–153. doi:10.1080/10888690802199418
10.
BurchinalM.VandergriftN.PiantaR.MashburnA. (2010). Threshold analysis of association between child care quality and child outcomes for low-income children in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 166–176.
11.
BurgessK.ChienN.MorrisseyT.SwensonK. (2014). Trends in the use of early care and education, 1995–2011: Descriptive analysis of child care arrangements from national survey data (Report from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
12.
CamilliG.VargasS.RyanS.BarnettW. S. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effects of early education interventions on cognitive and social development. Teachers College Record, 112, 579–620.
13.
*ChesterfieldR.ChavezR.ChesterfieldK. B.Hayes-LatimerK.LaBelleT.LevineH.. . . WatsonP. (1982). An evaluation of the Head Start Bilingual Bicultural Curriculum Development Project. Final report (Prepared for the Administration on Aging [DHHS]). Los Angeles, CA: Juarez & Associates.
14.
ChingosM. M. (2013). Class size and student outcomes: Research and policy implications. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32, 411–438.
15.
ChingosM. M. (2012). The impact of a universal class-size reduction policy: Evidence from Florida’s statewide mandate. Economics of Education Review, 31, 543–562.
16.
ChoH.GlewweP.WhitlerM. (2012). Do reductions in class size raise students’ test scores? Evidence from population variation in Minnesota’s elementary schools. Economics of Education Review, 31, 77–95.
17.
*CicarelliV. G.CooperW. H.GrangerR. L. (1969). The impact of Head Start: An evaluation of the effects of Head Start on children’s cognitive and affective development (Vol. 2, Prepared for the Office of Economic Opportunity). Athens: Westinghouse Learning Corporation and Ohio University.
18.
*CoffmanA. O.DunlapJ. M. (1968). The effects of assessment and personalized programming on subsequent intellectual development of prekindergarten and kindergarten children (Office of Education, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Cooperative Research Project #6-1328). University City, MO: School District of University City.
19.
CooperH.HedgesL. V. (2009). Research synthesis as a scientific process. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 3–17). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
20.
*Di LorenzoL. T.SalterR.BradyJ. J. (1969). Prekindergarten programs for educationally disadvantaged children (Final report). New York: New York State Department of Education.
21.
EarlyD. M.IrukaI. U.RitchieS.BarbarinO. A.WinnD.-M. C.CrawfordG. M.FromeP. M.CliffordR. M.BurchinalM.HowesC.BryantD. M.PiantaR. C. (2010). How do pre-kindergartners spend their time? Gender, ethnicity, and income as predictors of experiences in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 177–193.
22.
EarlyD. M.BryantD. M.PiantaR. C.CliffordR. M.BurchinalM. R.RitchieS.BarbarinO. (2006). Are teachers’ education, major, and credentials related to classroom quality and children’s academic gains in pre-kindergarten?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21, 174–195. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.04.004
23.
*EricksonE. L.McMillanJ.BonnellJ.HofmanL.CallahanO. D. (1969). Experiments in Head Start and early education: The effects of teacher attitude and curriculum structure on preschool disadvantaged children (Final report). Washington, DC: The Office of Economic Opportunity.
24.
*EstebanM. (1987). A comparison of Head Start and non-Head Start reading readiness scores of low-income kindergarten children of Guam (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Dissertation Abstracts International. (UMI No. 8808677)
25.
FinnJ. D.PannozzoG. M.AchillesC. M. (2003). The “why’s” of class size: Student behavior in small classes. Review of Educational Research, 73, 321–368.
26.
*FredeE.JungK.BarnettW. S.LamyC. E.FiguerasA. (2007). The Abbott preschool program longitudinal effects study (APPLES). New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.
27.
GlassG. V.SmithM. L. (1979). Meta-analysis of class size and achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1, 2–16.
28.
GoreyK. M. (2001). Early childhood education: A meta-analytic affirmation of the short- and long-term benefits of educational opportunity. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 9–30.
29.
*GormleyW. T.GayerT. (2005). Promoting school readiness in Oklahoma: An evaluation of Tulsa’s pre-k program. Journal of Human Resources, 40, 533–558.
30.
*HerzogE.NewcombC. H.CisinI. H. (1973). Preschool and postscript: An evaluation of the inner-city program. Washington, DC: Social Research Group, Washington University.
31.
HowesC.BurchinalM.PiantaR.BryantD.EarlyD.CliffordR.BarbarinO. (2008). Ready to learn? Children’s pre-academic achievement in pre-Kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 27–50.
32.
HowesC.PhillipsD. A.WhitebookM. (1992). Thresholds of quality: Implications for the social development of children in center-based child care. Child Development, 63, 449–460.
33.
JacobR. T.CrepsC. L.BoulayB. (2004). Meta-analysis of research and evaluation studies in early childhood education. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
34.
JepsenC.RivkinS. (2009). Class size reduction and student achievement the potential tradeoff between teacher quality and class size. Journal of Human Resources, 44, 223–250.
35.
*KarnesM. B.HodginsA. S.StoneburnerR. L.StudleyW. M.TeskaJ. A. (1968). Effects of a highly structured program of language development on intellectual functioning and psycholinguistic development of culturally disadvantaged three-year-olds. The Journal of Special Education, 2, 405–412.
36.
*KellyE. J. (1970). The New Nursery School Research Project: Evaluating the effectiveness of an open, responsive environment in achieving selected objectives of early childhood education (Final report). Greeley: University of Colorado.
37.
*LarsenJ. M. (1985). Family influences on competence in low-risk preschool children. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Society for Research in Child Development.
38.
*LarsonD. F. (1969). The effects of a preschool experience upon intellectual functioning among four-year-old, white children in rural Minnesota. Mankato: Minnesota State University, College of Education.
39.
*LarsenJ. M.HiteC. H. (1983). The effects of preschool on educationally-advantaged children: First phases of a longitudinal study. Intelligence, 7, 345–352.
40.
LayzerJ. I.GoodsonB. D.BernsteinL.PriceC. (2001). National evaluation of family support programs, Volume A: The meta-analysis, final report. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
41.
*LeeV. E.SchnurE.Brooks-GunnJ. (1988). Does Head Start work? A 1-year follow-up comparison of disadvantaged children attending Head Start, no preschool, and other preschool programs. Developmental Psychology, 24, 210–222.
42.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
43.
LipseyM. W.HoferK. G.DongN.FarranD. C.BilbreyC. (2013). Evaluation of the Tennessee voluntary prekindergarten program: End of pre-k results from the randomized control design (Research Report). Nashville, TN: Peabody Research Institute, Vanderbilt University.
44.
MagnusonK.ShagerH. (2010). Early education: Progress and promise for low-income children. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1186–1198.
45.
MashburnA. J.PiantaR. C.HamreB. K.DownerJ. T.BarbarinO.BryantD.. . . HowesC. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79, 732–749.
46.
McKeyR. H.CondelliL.GansonH.BarrettB. J.McConkeyC.PlantzM. C. (1985). The impact of Head Start on children, families and communities: Final report of the Head Start evaluation, synthesis and utilization project. Washington, DC: CSR.
47.
*McNamaraJ. R. (1968). Evaluation of the effects of Head Start experience in the area of self-concept, social skills, and language skills (ED 028 832, Pre-Publication Draft). Miami, FL: Dade County Board of Public Instruction.
48.
MilesiC.GamoranA. (2006). Effects of class size and instruction on Kindergarten achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 287–313.
49.
*MillerL. B.DyerJ. L. (1972). Four preschool programs: Their dimensions and effects. Washington, DC: Public Health Service.
50.
MostellerF. (1995). The Tennessee study of class size in the early school grades. The Future of Children, 5, 113–127.
51.
National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2004). Young children develop in an environment of relationships (Working Paper No. 1). Available from www.developingchild.harvard.edu
52.
NelsonG.WesthuesA.MacLeodJ. (2003). A meta-analysis of longitudinal research on preschool prevention programs for children. Prevention & Treatment, 6, 31a.
53.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (1999). Child outcomes when child care center classes meet recommended standards for quality. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1072–1077.
54.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2002). Child-care structure → process → outcome: Direct and indirection effects of child-care quality on young children’s development. Psychological Science, 13, 199–206.
55.
NICHD & DuncanG. J. (2003). Modeling the impacts of child care quality on children’s preschool cognitive development. Child Development, 74, 1454–1475.
56.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2004). Does class size in first grade relate to children’s academic and social performance or observed classroom practices?Developmental Psychology, 40, 651–664.
57.
*NummedalS. G.SternC. (1971, February). Head Start graduates: One year later. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
58.
PhillipsenL. C.BurchinalM. R.HowesC.CryerD. (1997). The prediction of process quality from structural features of child care. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 281–303.
59.
PiantaR.HowesC.BurchinalM.BryantD.CliffordR.EarlyD.BarbarinO. (2005). Features of Pre-Kindergarten programs, classrooms, and teachers: Do they predict observed classroom quality and child-teacher interactions?Developmental Science, 9, 144–159.
60.
*PilcherL. C. (1994). Georgia Prekindergarten Program evaluation [with] executive summary. Atlanta: Georgia State University Early Childhood Education.
61.
PumaM.BellS.CookR.HeidC. (2010). Head Start impact study: Final report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
62.
PumaM. J.OlsenR. B.BellS. H.PriceC. (2009). What to do when data are missing in group randomized trials. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.
63.
*ReynoldsA. J. (1995). One year of preschool intervention or two: Does it matter?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 1–31.
64.
RuoppR. (1979). Children at the center: Summary findings and their implications. Cambridge, MA: Abt Books.
65.
SabolT. J.Soliday HongS. L.PiantaR. C.BurchinalM. R. (2013). Can rating Pre-K programs predict children’s learning. Science, 341, 845–846.
66.
ShagerH.SchindlerH.MagnusonK.DuncanG.YoshikawaH.HartC. (2013). Can research design explain variation in head start research results? A meta-analysis. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35, 76–95.
67.
*SmithE. J.PellinB. J.AgrusoS. A. (2003). Bright beginnings: An effective literacy-focused PreK program for educationally disadvantaged four-year-old children. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
68.
*SontagM.SellaA. P.ThorndikeR. L. (1969). The effect of Head Start training on the cognitive growth of disadvantaged children. The Journal of Educational Research, 62, 387–389.
69.
*U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2005). Head Start impact study: First year findings. Washington, DC: Author.
70.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1996). Head Start program performance standards. Washington, DC: Head Start Bureau.
71.
*VanceB. J. (1967). The effect of preschool group experience on various language and social skills in disadvantaged children. Final report. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED019989)
72.
VandellD. L.BelskyJ.BurchinalM.SteinbergL.VandergriftN.NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2010). Do effects of early child care extend to age 15 years? Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. Child Development, 81, 737–756.
73.
*WardenB. A. (1998). A study to determine the effectiveness of preschool on kindergarten readiness and achievement (Unpublished master’s thesis). Salem-Teikyo University, NC.
74.
*WeikartD. P.BondJ. T.McNeilJ. T. (1978). The Ypsilanti Perry Pre-School Project: Pre-school years and longitudinal results through fourth grade. Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
75.
WeilandC.YoshikawaH. (2013). Impacts of a prekindergarten program on children’s mathematics, language, literacy, executive function and emotional skills. Child Development, 84, 2112–2130.
76.
*WeisbergH. I. (1974). Short term cognitive effects of head start programs: A report on the third year of planned variation–1971-72. Cambridge, MA: Huron Institute.
77.
WilsonD. (2009). Systematic coding. In CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 159–176). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
78.
*XiangZ.SchweinhartL. J. (2002). Effects five years later: The Michigan School Readiness Program evaluation through age 10 (Prepared for the Michigan State Board of Education). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.
79.
*ZiglerE. F.AbelsonW. D.TrickettP. K.SeitzV. (1982). Is an intervention program necessary in order to improve economically disadvantaged children’s IQ scores?Child Development, 53, 340–348.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
