This study examined predictors of persistence and fadeout across multiple cluster randomized controlled trials that evaluated a preschool mathematics curriculum. We used meta-analytic methods to explore how impacts on student mathematics achievement faded between post-test (i.e., endline) and 1-year follow-up. We found that the magnitude of the impact at post-test was a strong predictor of the 1-year follow-up impact. Contrary to popular theory, we found that intervention impacts faded faster when students attended sites that showed more learning in the year following the end of the intervention. Factors related to intervention fidelity and dosage did not strongly predict fadeout patterns after considering the magnitude of the post-test effect. Results suggest that educational program evaluators can use immediate impacts to forecast follow-up effects.
AbenavoliR. M. (2019). The mechanisms and moderators of “fade-out”: Towards understanding why the skills of early childhood program participants converge over time with the skills of other children. Psychological Bulletin, 145(12), 1103–1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000212
2.
AtheyS.ChettyR.ImbensG. W.KangH. (2025). The surrogate index: Combining short-term proxies to estimate long-term treatment effects more rapidly and precisely. Review of Economic Studies, rdaf087. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdaf087
3.
BaileyD. H.DuncanG. J.CunhaF.FoormanB. R.YeagerD. S. (2020). Persistence and fade-out of educational-intervention effects: Mechanisms and potential solutions. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 21(2), 55–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100620915848
4.
BaileyD. H.DuncanG. J.OdgersC. L.YuW. (2017). Persistence and fadeout in the impacts of child and adolescent interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 7–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1232459
5.
BaileyD. H.DuncanG. J.WattsT.ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2018). Risky business: Correlation and causation in longitudinal studies of skill development. American Psychologist, 73(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000146
6.
BaileyD. H.JenkinsJ. M.Alvarez-VargasD. (2020). Complementarities between early educational intervention and later educational quality? A systematic review of the sustaining environments hypothesis. Developmental Review, 56, Article 100910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2020.100910
7.
BaileyD. H.NguyenT.JenkinsJ. M.DominaT.ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. S. (2016). Fadeout in an early mathematics intervention: Constraining content or pre-existing differences?Developmental Psychology, 52, 1457–1469.
8.
BiermanK. L.NixR. L.HeinrichsB. S.DomitrovichC. E.GestS. D.WelshJ. A.GillS. (2014). Effects of Head Start REDI on children’s outcomes 1 year later in different kindergarten contexts. Child Development, 85(1), 140–159.
9.
BitlerM. P.HoynesH. W.DominaT. (2014). Experimental evidence on distributional effects of Head Start (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 20434). https://doi.org/10.3386/w20434
10.
BlackP.WiliamD. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–76.
11.
BotvinC. M.JenkinsJ. M.CarrR. C.DodgeK. A.ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.WattsT. W. (2024). Can peers help sustain the positive effects of an early childhood mathematics intervention?. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 67, 159–169.
12.
CampbellD. T.FreyP. W. (1970). The implications of learning theory for the fade-out of gains from compensatory education. Compensatory Education: A National Debate, 3, 455–463.
CarrR. C.JenkinsJ. M.WattsT. W.Peisner-FeinbergE. S.DodgeK. A. (2024). Investigating if high-quality kindergarten teachers sustain the pre-K boost to children’s emergent literacy skill development in North Carolina. Child Development, 95(4), 1200–1217.
15.
ClarkC. A.PritchardV. E.WoodwardL. J. (2010). Preschool executive functioning abilities predict early mathematics achievement. Developmental Psychology, 46(5), 1176.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2008). Experimental evaluation of the effects of a research-based preschool mathematics curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 443–494.
18.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2011). Early childhood mathematics intervention. Science, 333(6045), 968–970.
19.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.LayzerC.UnluF. (2023). Implementation of a scale-up model in early childhood: Long-term impacts on mathematics achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 54(1), 64–88. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc-2020-0245
20.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.LayzerC.UnluF.FeslerL. (2020). Effects on mathematics and executive function of a mathematics and play intervention versus mathematics alone. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(3), 301–333.
21.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. H.LiuX. H. (2008). Development of a measure of early mathematics achievement using the Rasch model: The research-based early maths assessment. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 457–482.
22.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.SpitlerM. E.LangeA. A.WolfeC. B. (2011). Mathematics learned by young children in an intervention based on learning trajectories: A large-scale cluster randomized trial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(2), 127–166.
23.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.WolfeC. B. (2011). TEAM—Tools for early assessment in mathematics. McGraw-Hill Education.
24.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.WolfeC. B.SpitlerM. E. (2013). Longitudinal evaluation of a scale-up model for teaching mathematics with trajectories and technologies: Persistence of effects in the third year. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 812–850. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831212469270
25.
CunhaF.HeckmanJ. J. (2007). The technology of skill formation. American Economic Review, 97(2), 31–47.
26.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK. A.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.PaganiL. S.FeinsteinL.EngelM.Brooks-GunnJ.SextonH.DuckworthK.JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
27.
DuncanG. J.SojournerA. J. (2013). Can intensive early childhood intervention programs eliminate income-based cognitive and achievement gaps?Journal of Human Resources, 48(4), 945–968.
28.
DurkinK.LipseyM. W.FarranD. C.WiesenS. E. (2022). Effects of a statewide pre- kindergarten program on children’s achievement and behavior through sixth grade. Developmental Psychology, 58(3), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001301
29.
ElangoS.GarcíaJ. L.HeckmanJ. J.HojmanA. (2016). Early childhood education. In MoffittR. A. (Ed), Economics of means-tested transfer programs in the United States (Vol. 2, pp. 235–297). University of Chicago Press.
30.
EngelM.ClaessensA.FinchM. A. (2013). Teaching students what they already know? The (mis)alignment between mathematics instructional content and student knowledge in kindergarten. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373712461850
31.
HartE. R.BaileyD. H.LuoS.SenguptaP.WattsT. W. (2024). Fadeout and persistence of intervention impacts on social–emotional and cognitive skills in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. Psychological Bulletin, 150(10), 1207.
32.
HillC. J.BloomH. S.BlackA. R.LipseyM. W. (2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2(3), 172–177.
33.
HoferK. G.FarranD. C.CummingsT. P. (2013). Preschool children’s math-related behaviors mediate curriculum effects on math achievement gains. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(3), 487–495.
34.
HoferK. G.LipseyM. W.DongN.FarranD. C. (2013). Results of the early math project—Scale-up cross-site results (Working Paper). Peabody Research Institute.
35.
JenkinsJ. M.WattsT. W.MagnusonK.GershoffE. T.ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.DuncanG. J. (2018). Do high-quality kindergarten and first-grade classrooms mitigate preschool fadeout?Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 11(3), 339–374.
36.
JohnsonR. C.JacksonC. K. (2019). Reducing inequality through dynamic complementarity: Evidence from Head Start and public school spending. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 310–349.
37.
KangC. Y.DuncanG. J.ClementsD. H.SaramaJ.BaileyD. H. (2019). The roles of transfer of learning and forgetting in the persistence and fadeout of early childhood mathematics interventions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 590.
38.
KlineP.WaltersC. R. (2016). Evaluating public programs with close substitutes: The case of Head Start. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1795–1848.
39.
LiW.DuncanG. J.MagnusonK.SchindlerH. S.YoshikawaH.LeakJ. (2020). Timing in early childhood education: How cognitive and achievement program impacts vary by starting age, program duration, and time since the end of the program (EdWorkingPaper: 20-201). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://doi.org/10.26300/5tvg-nt21
40.
McCormickM. P.PralicaM.WeilandC.HsuehJ.MoffettL.Guerrero-RosadaP.WeissmanA.ZhangK.MaierM. F.SnowC. E.DaviesE.TaylorA.SachsJ. (2022). Does kindergarten instruction matter for sustaining the prekindergarten (PreK) boost? Evidence from individual-and classroom-level survey and observational data. Developmental Psychology, 58(7), 1298.
41.
MorrisP. A.MatteraS. K.MaierM. F. (2016). Making Pre-K Count: Improving Math Instruction in New York City. MDRC.
42.
NajarianM.SnowK.LennonJ.KinseyS.MulliganG. (2010). Early childhood longitudinal study, birth cohort (ECLS-B) preschool-kindergarten 2007 psychometric report (NCES Technical / Methodological Report (National Center for Education Statistics) No. NCES 2010-009). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010009.pdf
43.
PearmanA.SpringerM.LipseyM.LachowiczM.SwainW.FarranD. (2020). Teachers, schools, and pre-K effect persistence: An examination of the sustaining environment hypothesis. Journal of Research in Educational Effectiveness, 13(4), 547–573. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2020.1749740
44.
ReardonS. F. (2019). Educational opportunity in early and middle childhood: Using full population administrative data to study variation by place and age. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 5(2), 40–68.
45.
RohrerJ. M.ArslanR. C. (2021). Precise answers to vague questions: Issues with interactions. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(2), 25152459211007368.
46.
StudentS. R. (2022). Vertical scales, deceleration, and empirical benchmarks for growth. Educational Researcher, 51(8), 536–543.
47.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48.
48.
WattsT. W.DuncanG. J.SieglerR. S.Davis-KeanP. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360.
49.
WattsT. W.JenkinsJ. M.DodgeK. A.CarrR. C.SauvalM.BaiY.EscuetaM.DuerJ.LaddH.MuschkinC.Peisner-FeinbergE.AnanatE. (2023). Understanding heterogeneity in the impact of public preschool programs. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 87(4).
50.
WeissM. J.BloomH. S.Verbitsky-SavitzN.GuptaH.VigilA. E.CullinanD. N. (2017). How much do the effects of education and training programs vary across sites? Evidence from past multisite randomized trials. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(4), 843–876.
51.
WixtedJ. T. (2004). The psychology and neuroscience of forgetting. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 235–269.
52.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Riverside Publishing.
53.
ZhaiF.Brooks-GunnJ.WaldfogelJ. (2014). Head Start’s impact is contingent on alternative type of care in comparison group. Developmental Psychology, 50(12), 2572.
