This study provides the first large-scale quantitative exploration of mathematical vocabulary use in upper elementary U.S. classrooms. Our approach employs natural language processing techniques to describe variation in teachers’ and students’ use of mathematical vocabulary in 1,657 fourth- and fifth-grade lessons in 317 classrooms in four districts over 3 years. Students’ exposure to mathematical vocabulary varies substantially across lessons and between teachers. Results suggest that teacher modeling, defined as the frequency of mathematical vocabulary in teacher talk, does not substantially cause students to uptake mathematical vocabulary but that teachers may encourage student use of mathematical vocabulary by means other than mere modeling or exposure. We find that teachers who more frequently model mathematical vocabulary use are more effective at raising student test scores.
AtkinsonR. K.DerryS. J.RenklA.WorthamD. (2000). Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 181–214. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002181
2.
Bacher-HicksA.KoedelC. (2023). Estimation and interpretation of teacher value added in research applications. In HanushekE. A.ManchinS.WoessmannL. (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 6, pp. 93–134). Elsevier Science & Technology.
3.
BallD. L.ThamesM. H.PhelpsG. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
4.
BarnesE. M.StephensS. J. (2019). Supporting mathematics vocabulary instruction through mathematics curricula. The Curriculum Journal, 30(3), 322–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1614470
5.
DaleM. E.GodleyA. J.CapelloS. A.DonnellyP. J.D’MelloS. K.KellyS. P. (2022). Toward the automated analysis of teacher talk in secondary ELA classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 110, Article 103584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103584
6.
DemszkyD.HillH. C. (2023). The NCTE transcripts: A dataset of elementary math classroom transcripts. In Proceedings of the 18th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (pp. 528–538). Association for Computational Linguistics.
7.
DemszkyD.LiuJ.MancenidoZ.CohenJ.HillH.JurafskyD.HashimotoT. (2021). Measuring conversational uptake: A case study on student-teacher interactions. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (pp. 1638–1653). Association for Computational Linguistics.
8.
Ernst-SlavitG.MasonM. R. (2011). “Words that hold us up”: Teacher talk and academic language in five upper elementary classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 22(4), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.04.004
9.
GrossmanP.LoebS.CohenJ.WyckoffJ. (2013). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers’ value-added scores. American Journal of Education, 119(3), 445–470. https://doi.org/10.1086/669901
10.
GürefeN. (2018). Mathematical language skills of mathematics prospective teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 661–671. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060410
11.
Hassinger-DasB.JordanN. C.DysonN. (2015). Reading stories to learn math. The Elementary School Journal, 116(2), 242–264. https://doi.org/10.1086/683986
12.
HillH. C.LitkeE.LynchK. (2018). Learning lessons from instruction: Descriptive results from an observational study of urban elementary classrooms. Teachers College Record, 120(12), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812001207
13.
HughesE. M.PowellS. R.StevensE. A. (2016). Supporting clear and concise mathematics language: Instead of that, say this. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916654901
14.
KellyS.OlneyA. M.DonnellyP.NystrandM.D’MelloS. K. (2018). Automatically measuring question authenticity in real-world classrooms. Educational Researcher, 47(7), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18785613
15.
KhistyL. L.ChvalK. B. (2002). Pedagogic discourse and equity in mathematics: When teachers’ talk matters. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(3), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217360
16.
LaneC.O’MearaN.WalshR. (2019). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ use of the mathematics register. Issues in Educational Research, 29(3), 790–806.
17.
LinX.PengP.ZengJ. (2021). Understanding the relation between mathematics vocabulary and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. The Elementary School Journal, 121(3), 504–540. https://doi.org/10.1086/712504
18.
LiuJ.CohenJ. (2021). Measuring teaching practices at scale: A novel application of text-as-data methods. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(4), 587–614. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737211009267
19.
ManskiC. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542.
20.
PimmD. (2019). Routledge Revivals: Speaking mathematically (1987): Communication in mathematics classrooms. Routledge.
21.
PowellS. R.DriverM. K. (2015). The influence of mathematics vocabulary instruction embedded within addition tutoring for first-grade students with mathematics difficulty. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(4), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714564574
22.
PowellS. R.DriverM. K.RobertsG.FallA. M. (2017). An analysis of the mathematics vocabulary knowledge of third- and fifth-grade students: Connections to general vocabulary and mathematics computation. Learning and Individual Differences, 57, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.011
23.
PurpuraD. J.NapoliA. R.WehrspannE. A.GoldZ. S. (2017). Causal connections between mathematical language and mathematical knowledge: A dialogic reading intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2016.1204639
24.
RubensteinR. N.ThompsonD. R. (2002). Understanding and supporting children’s mathematical vocabulary development. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.9.2.0107
25.
SchleppegrellM. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560601158461
26.
StoneC.DonnellyP. J.DaleM.CapelloS.KellyS.GodleyA.D’MelloS. K. (2019). Utterance-level modeling of indicators of engaging classroom discourse. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 420–425). Educational Data Mining. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED599238.pdf
27.
ThompsonD. R.RubensteinR. N. (2000). Learning mathematics vocabulary: Potential pitfalls and instructional strategies. The Mathematics Teacher, 93(7), 568–574. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.93.7.0568
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
