Youth who switch schools are more likely to demonstrate a wide array of negative behavioral and educational outcomes, including dropping out of high school. However, whether switching schools actually puts youth at risk for dropout is uncertain, since youth who switch schools are similar to dropouts in their levels of prior school achievement and engagement, which suggests that switching schools may be part of the same long-term developmental process of disengagement that leads to dropping out. Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997, this study uses propensity score matching to pair youth who switched high schools with similar youth who stayed in the same school. We find that while over half the association between switching schools and dropout is explained by observed characteristics prior to ninth grade, switching schools is still associated with dropout. Moreover, the relationship between switching schools and dropout varies depending on a youth’s propensity for switching schools.
AgnewR. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87.
2.
AlexanderK. L.EntwisleD. R.KabbaniN. S. (2001). The dropout process in life course perspective: Early risk factors at home and school. Teachers College Record, 103(5), 760–822.
3.
AstoneN. M.McLanahanS. S. (1994). Family structure, residential mobility, and school dropout: A research note. Demography, 31(4), 575–584.
4.
BollandJ. M.LianB.DukeN.BryantC. M.MullinsM.BryantB.Residential mobility and the behavior of underclass adolescents. Paper presented at the 2009 Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development. Denver, Colorado, April, 2009.
5.
BriggsX. D. S. (1997). Social capital and the cities: Advice to change agents. National Civic Review, 86, 111–117.
6.
BriggsX. D. S. (1998). Brown kids in white suburbs: Housing mobility and the many faces of social capital. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 177–221.
7.
CameronS. V.HeckmanJ. J. (1993). The nonequivalence of high school equivalents. Journal of Labor Economics, 11(1), 1–47.
8.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
9.
ColemanJ. S. (1990). Equality and achievement in education. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
10.
DayJ. C.NewburgerE. C. (2002). The big payoff: Educational attainment and synthetic estimates of work-life earnings. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
11.
DolandE. (2001). Give yourself the gift of a degree: Employment Policy Foundation, Washington, DC.
12.
EckertP. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
13.
EderD. (1985). The cycle of popularity: Interpersonal relations among female adolescents. Sociology of Education, 58, 154–165.
14.
EkstromR. B.GoertzM. E.PollackJ. M.RockD. A. (1986). Who drops out of high school and why? Findings from a national study. Teachers College Record, 87(3), 356–373.
15.
ElliottD. S.VossH. L. (1974). Delinquency and dropout. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
16.
EnsmingerM. E.SlusarcickA. L. (1992). Paths to high school graduation or dropout: A longitudinal study of a first-grade cohort. Sociology of Education, 65(2), 95–113.
17.
FinnJ. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.
18.
GasperJ.DeLucaS.EstacionA. (2010). Coming and going: Explaining the effects of residential and school mobility on adolescent delinquency. Social Science Research, 39, 459–476.
19.
GreeneJ. P.WintersM. A. (2006). Leaving boys behind: Public high school graduation rates. New York, NY: Center for Civic Innovation, Manhatten Institute.
20.
HaganJ.MacmillanR.WheatonB. (1996). New kid in town: Social capital and the life course effects of family migration on children. American Sociological Review, 61(3), 368–385.
21.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2004). Disruption versus tiebout improvement: The costs and benefits of switching schools. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1721–1746.
22.
HarlowC. W. (2003). Education and correctional populations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
23.
HavemanR.WolfeB.SpauldingJ. (1991). Childhood events and circumstances influencing high school completion. Demography, 28(1), 133–157.
24.
JarrettR. L. (1997). Brining families back in: Neighborhood effects on child development. In Brooks-GunnJ.DuncanG. J.AberL. (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty (vol 2., pp. 48–64). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
25.
KerbowD. (1996). Patterns of urban student mobility and local school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1(2), 147–169.
26.
KerbowD.AzcoitiaC.BuellB. (2003). Student mobility and local school improvement in Chicago. Journal of Negro Education, 72, 158–164.
27.
KrogerJ. E. (1980). Residential mobility and self-concept in adolescence. Adolescence, 15(60), 967–977.
28.
LeeV. E.BurkamD. T. (1992). Transferring high schools: An alternative to dropping out?American Journal of Education, 100, 420–453.
29.
McLanahanS.BoothK. (1989). Mother-only families: Problems, politics, and prospects. Journal of Marriage & Family, 51, 557–580.
30.
McLanahanS.SandefurG. D. (1994). Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
MenschB. S.KandelD. B. (1988). Dropping out of high school and drug involvement. Sociology of Education, 61(2), 95–113.
32.
MiaoJ.HaneyW. (2004). High school graduation rates: Alternative methods and implications [Electronic Version]. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12. Retrieved August 29, 2006from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n55
33.
MorganS. L.WinshipC. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2010). Student Mobility: Exploring the Impact of Frequent Moves on Achievement: Summary of a Workshop. A. Beatty, Rapporteur. Committee on the Impact of Mobility and Change on the Lives of Young Children, Schools, and Neighborhoods. Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
35.
PearlinL. I.MeneghanE. G.LiebermanM. A.MullenJ. T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 337–356.
36.
PribeshS.DowneyD. B. (1999). Why are residential and school moves associated with poor school performance?Demography, 36(4), 521–534.
37.
RavivA.KeinanG.AbazonY.RavivA. (1990). Moving as a stressful life event for adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 18(2), 130–140.
38.
ReamR. K. (2003). Counterfeit social capital and Mexican American underachievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(3), 237–262.
39.
ReamR. K. (2005a). Toward understanding how social capital mediates the impact of mobility on Mexican American achievement. Social Forces, 84, 201–224.
40.
ReamR. K. (2005b). Uprooting children: Mobility, social capital and mexican american underchievement. New York, NY: LFB Scholary Publishing, LLC.
41.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. E. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observation studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55.
42.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. E. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 516–524.
43.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. E. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician, 39(1), 33–38.
44.
RouseC. E. (2005). Labor market consequences of an inadequate education. Paper prepared for the symposium on the Social Costs of Inadequate Education, Teachers College Columbia University, October 2005.
45.
RubinD. E.ThomasN. (1996). Matching using estimated propensity score: Relating theory to practice. Biometrics, 52(1), 249–264.
46.
RumbergerR. W. (1983). Dropping out of high school: The influence of race, sex, and family background. American Educational Research Journal, 20(2), 199–220.
47.
RumbergerR. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 583–625.
48.
RumbergerR. W.GhatakR.PoulosG.RitterP. L.DornbuschS. M. (1995). Family influences on dropout in one California high school. Sociology of Education, 63, 283–299.
49.
RumbergerR. W.LarsonK. A. (1998). Student mobility and the increased risk of high school dropout. American Journal of Education, 107(1), 1–35.
50.
RumbergerR. W.LarsonK. A.ReamR. K.PalardyG. J. (1999). The educational consequences of mobility for California students and schools: Social Policy Analysis for California Education.
51.
RumbergerR. W.LarsonK. A.ReamR. K.PalardyG. J. (1999). The educational consequences of mobility for California students and schools. Santa Barbara, CA: Social Policy Analysis for California Education, University of California, Santa Barbara.
52.
RutterM. (1987). Psychological resilience and protective mechanisms. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 57, 316–331.
53.
SchwartzW. (1995). School dropouts: New information about an old problem. New York, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Urban Education.
54.
ShafftK. A. (2006). Poverty, residential mobility, and student transiency within a rural New York school district. Rural Sociology, 71, 212–231.
55.
SimonsR. G.BlythD. A. (1987). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
56.
SmithJ. A.ToddP. E. (2005). Does matching overcome lalonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?Journal of Econometrics, 125(1–2), 305–353.
57.
SmithT. M. (1995). The condition of education, 1995. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
58.
SouthS. J.CrowderK. D.TrentM. (1998). Children’s residential mobility and neighborhood environment following parental divorce and remarriage. Social Forces, 77, 667–693.
59.
SouthS. J.HaynieD. L.BoseS. (2005). Residential mobility and the onset of adolescent sexual activity. Journal of Marriage & Family, 67(2), 499–514.
60.
SouthS. J.HaynieD.BoseS. (2007). Student mobility and school dropout. Social Science Research, 36, 68–94.
61.
SpeareA.GoldscheiderF. K. (1987). Effects of marital status change on residential mobility. Journal of Marriage & Family, 49, 455–464.
62.
SumA.KhatiwadaI.PondN.Trub’skyyM.FoggN.PalmaS. (2003). Left behind in the labor market: Labor market problems of the nation’s out-of-school, young adult populations. Boston, MA: Center for Labor Market Studies, Northeastern University.
63.
SwansonC. B.ChaplinD. (2003). Counting high school graduates when graduates count: Measuring graduation rates under the high stakes of NCLB. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
64.
SwansonC. B.SchneiderB. (1999). Students on the move: Residential and educational mobility in america’s schools. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 54–67.
65.
TeachmanJ. D.PaaschK.CarverK. (1996). Social capital and dropping out of school early. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(3), 773–783.
66.
TempleJ. A.ReynoldsA. J. (1999). School mobility and achievement: Longitudinal findings from an urban cohort. Journal of School Psychology, 37(4), 355–377.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
