This study aimed to investigate the performance of a charter school network, Harmony Public Schools (HPS), in a 3-year longitudinal student-level research study of high school mathematics, reading, and science performance using 2009–2011 Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skill student data. Propensity-score-matched public (N = 19) and Harmony (N = 11) schools' performances were compared. We conducted a two-level multivariate analysis of covariance on binary outcomes (pass–no pass) for grades 9–11. HPS performed significantly better at grade 9 and worse at grade 11, with no statistical differences at grade 10 in mathematics. Type of school was not significant at either grade 9 or 10 for reading. For science performances, Harmony charter schools performed better at 10th grade and significantly better at 11th grade. Implications of the findings were discussed as to whether charter schools keep their promises of providing quality education.
BelskyJ., & MacKinnonC. (1994). Transition to school: Developmental trajectories and school experiences. Early Education and Development, 5(2), 106–119.
2.
BierleinL. A. (1995). Charter Schools: A New Approach to Public Education. NASSP Bulletin, 79(572), 12–20.
3.
BifulcoR., & LaddH. F. (2006). The impacts of charter schools on student achievement: Evidence from North Carolina. Education Finance and Policy, 1(1), 50–90.
4.
BohnstengelR. E. (2012). Leadership and autonomy: An examination of the governance and management practices of four charter schools in charleston, South Carolina. ProQuest LLC.
5.
BookerK., GilpatricS. M., GronbergT., & JansenD. W. (2004). Charter school performance in Texas.Texas A & M University.
6.
ClarkM. A., GleasonP. H. I. L. I. P., TuttleC. C., & SilverbergM. K. (2011). Do charter schools improve student achievement? Evidence from a national randomized study. Mathematica Working Paper. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
FinnC. E., BierleinL. A., & MannoB. V. (1996). America's charter schools get started. Brooklings Review, 20, 18–21.
12.
GleasonP., ClarkM., TuttleC. C., & DwoyerE. (2010). The Evaluation of Charter School Impacts: Final Report. NCEE 2010-4029. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
13.
GreenJ. P., ForsterG., & WintersM. A. (2003). Apples to apples: An evaluation of charter schools serving general student populations. Retrieved from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/pdf/ewp_01.pdf
14.
GronbergT. J., JansenD. W., & TaylorL. L. (2012). The relative efficiency of charter schools: A cost frontier approach. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 302–317.
HanushekE. A., KainJ. F., & RivkinS. G. (2004). Disruption versus Tiebout improvement: The costs and benefits of switching schools. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9), 1721–1746.
17.
HanushekE. A., KainJ. F., RivkinS. G., & BranchG. F. (2007). Charter school quality and parental decision making with school choice. Journal of Public Economics, 91(5), 823–848.
HinojosaM. (2009). A Comparison of Open Enrollment Charter Schools and Traditional Public Schools in a Texas Region.Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest LLC.
21.
HoxbyC. M. (2004). Achievement in charter schools and regular public schools in the United States: Understanding the differences.Harvard University. National Bureau of Economic Research.
22.
LovelessT. (2002). The Brown Center Report on American Education: How Well Are American Students Learning? With Special Sections on Arithmetic, High School Culture, and Charter Schools.Washington, DC: Brookings.
23.
MalloyC. L., & WohlstetterP. (2003). Working conditions in charter schools. Education and Urban Society, 35(2), 219.
24.
NathanJ. (1999). Charter Schools: Creating Hope and Opportunity for American Education. The Jossey-Bass Education Series.Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104.
National Association for Year-round Education (NAYRE) (2009). Retrieved June 8, 2013 from http://nayre.org/about.html.
27.
NealR. (2008). Extended school day and year are under review across the country. School Reform News, 17.
28.
NiY. (2012). Teacher working conditions in charter schools and traditional public schools: A comparative study. Teachers College Record, 114(3), 1–21.
29.
PodgurskyM., & DaleB. (2001). Personnel Policy in Charter Schools.Thomas B. Ford-ham Foundation.
30.
SahinA., & TopN. (2015). STEM students on the stage (sos): Promoting student voice and choice in STEM education through an interdisciplinary, standards-focused project-based learning approach. Journal of STEM Education: Innovation and Research.16(3), 24–33.
SahinA., WillsonV., & CapraroR. M. (2013). Can charter schools be silver bullets to the American educational system? Proceedings of American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Francisco, CA.
33.
SassT. R. (2006). Charter schools and student achievement in Florida. Education Finance and Policy, 1(1), 91–122.
34.
SchneiderJ. (1999). Five prevailing charter types. School Administrator, 56(7), 29–31.
35.
TaylorL. L., AlfordB. L., RollinsK. B., BrownD. B., StillisanoJ. R., & WaxmanH. C. (2011). Evaluation of Texas charter schools 2009–10.Report prepared for the Texas Education Agency, Austin, TX.
ZimmerR. W., GillB., BookerK., Lavertu, SassT. R., & WitteJ. (2009). Charter schools in eight states: Effects on achievement, attainment, integration, and competition. Retrieved from file:///Users/alpaslansahin/Downloads/RAND_MG869.pdf
43.
ZimmerR., GillB., BookerK., LavertuS., & WitteJ. (2012). Examining charter student achievement effects across seven states. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 213–224.
