School districts offer specialized programming for secondary students who experience high rates of course failure or low credit accumulation. While these alternative programs are meant to increase student success, little research evaluates outcomes for students attending them. In this study, we used propensity score matching (PSM) to investigate the effectiveness of secondary alternative schools on four student outcomes: school attendance, credits earned, number of office referrals, and number of suspensions. Findings from Poisson regression analyses indicate that attending an academic remediation–focused alternative school is associated with significantly lower attendance but also with earning significantly more credits than enrollment in a traditional school. In addition, enrollment in an alternative school is associated with significantly less office referrals and suspensions than enrollment in a traditional school. Implications for policy, practice, and further research are discussed.
AllensworthE. M.EastonJ. Q. (2005). The on-track indicator as a predictor of high school graduation. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research, University of Chicago.
2.
BalfanzR.HerzogL.Mac IverD. J. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42, 223–235.
3.
BlakesleeJ. E.QuestA. D.PowersJ.PowersL. E.GeenenS.NelsonM.. . . McHughE. (2013). Reaching everyone: Promoting the inclusion of youth with disabilities in evaluating foster care outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1801–1808.
4.
ChaneyB.BurgdorfK.AtashN. (1997). Influencing achievement through high school graduation requirements. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 229–244.
5.
DuggerJ. M.DuggerC. W. (1998). An evaluation of a successful alternative high school. The High School Journal, 81, 218–228.
6.
DynarskiM.WoodR. (1997). Helping high-risk youths: Results from the alternative schools demonstration program. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.
7.
FrancoM. S.PatelN. H. (2011). An interim report on a pilot credit recovery program in a large, suburban Midwestern high school. Education, 132, 15–27.
8.
FranklinC.StreeterC. L.KimJ. S.TripodiS. J. (2007). The effectiveness of a solution-focused, public alternative school for dropout prevention and retrieval. Children & Schools, 29, 133–144.
9.
GuoS.FraserM. W. (2010). Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications (Vol. 12). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
10.
HallforsD.VeveaJ. L.IritaniB.ChoH.KhatapoushS.SaxeL. (2002). Truancy, grade point average, and sexual activity: A meta-analysis of risk indicators for youth substance use. Journal of School Health, 72, 205–211.
11.
HemphillS.ToumbourouJ.HerrenkohlT.McMorrisB.CatalanoR. (2006). The effect of school suspensions and arrests on subsequent adolescent antisocial behavior in Australia and the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 736–744.
12.
KellyM.KimJ. S.FranklinC. (2008). Solution focused brief therapy in schools: The 360 degree view of practice and research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
KleinerB.PorchR.FarrisE. (2002). Public alternative schools and programs for students at risk of education failure: 2000-01 (NCES 2002-004). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
14.
KlemA. M.ConnellJ. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262–273.
15.
LangeC. M.SlettenS. J. (2002). Alternative education: A brief history and research synthesis. Alexandria, VA: Project Forum at National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
16.
LassenS. R.SteeleM. M.SailorW. (2006). The relationship of school-wide positive behavior support to academic achievement in an urban middle school. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 701–712.
17.
LehrC. A.TanC.YsseldykeJ. (2009). Alternative schools: A synthesis of state-level policy and research. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 19–32.
18.
LuiselliJ. K.PutnamR. F.HandlerM. W.FeinbergA. B. (2005). Whole-school positive behaviour support: Effects on student discipline problems and academic performance. Educational Psychology, 25, 183–198.
19.
MalmgrenK. W.GagnonJ. C. (2005). School mobility and students with emotional disturbance. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14, 299–312.
20.
MartinN.BrandB. (2006). Federal, state, and local roles supporting alternative education. Washington, DC: American Youth Policy Forum.
21.
NicholsJ. D. (2003). Prediction indicators for students failing the state of Indiana high school graduation exam. Preventing School Failure, 47, 112–120.
22.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, § 115, Stat. 1425 (2002).
23.
PutnamR. F.LuiselliJ. K.HandlerM. W.JeffersonG. L. (2003). Evaluating student discipline practices in a public school through behavioral assessment of office referrals. Behavior Modification, 27, 505–523.
24.
RaywidM. A. (1994). Alternative schools: The state of the art. Educational Leadership, 52, 26–31.
25.
RobyD. E. (2004). Research on school attendance and student achievement: A study of Ohio schools. Educational Research Quarterly, 28, 3–16.
26.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
27.
SkibaR. J.MichaelR. S.NardoA. C.PetersonR. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. Urban Review, 34, 317–342.
28.
SkibaR. J.PetersonR. L.WilliamsT. (1997). Office referrals and suspension: Disciplinary intervention in middle schools. Education & Treatment of Children, 20, 295–315.
29.
SugaiG.SpragueJ. R.HornerR. H.WalkerH. M. (2000). Preventing school violence: The use of office discipline referrals to assess and monitor school-wide discipline interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8, 94–101.
30.
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2012). Helping to ensure equal access to education: Report to the President and Secretary of Education—Under Section 203(b)(1) of the Department of Education Organization Act, FY 2009-12. Washington, DC: Author.
31.
VandammeJ. P.MeskensN.SuperbyJ. F. (2007). Predicting academic performance by data mining methods. Education Economics, 15, 405–419.
32.
WangX.BlombergT. G.LiS. D. (2005). Comparison of the educational deficiencies of delinquent and nondelinquent students. Evaluation Review, 29, 291–312.
33.
WilkersonK. L.AfacanK.PerzigianA. B.JustinW.LequiaJ. (in press). Behavior-focused alternative schools: Impact on student outcomes. Behavioral Disorders.
