This study analyses how contemporary American films on “new”, behavioural addictions (sex, gambling and shopping) visualise the inner experience of being addicted.
Design
A close-reading of cinematic techniques (such as cinematography, editing, sound and colour) at the beginning of six films explores how the spectator is invited into an affective engagement with the film, and how being addicted can be visualised through these techniques.
Results
Despite genre differences and various types of addiction problems, the analysed films all employ expressive techniques that resonate with each other. Being addicted is imagined through confessional monologues which provide access into the anomalous inner experience, through a sensualising of the objects of addiction as both enticing and repelling, and through an aesthetics of disconnections and distance. While similar modes recur, the cinematic image of being addicted can also be subversive.
Conclusion
The affective modes of the films emphasise intimacy and exploration of the self, central to the modern strategies of managing addiction problems. However, the cinematic images also enable subversive affective registers of images of addiction as an inner experience.
BoothroydD. (2007). Cinematic heroin and narcotic modernity. In AhrensR., & StierstorferK. (Eds.), Symbolism: An international annual of critical aesthetics (pp. 7–28). New York: AMS Press.
2.
BrennanT. (2004). The transmission of affect.New York: Cornell University Press.
3.
CherryB. (2009). Horror.London: Routledge.
4.
CubittS. (2005). The cinema effect.Cambridge: MIT Press.
5.
DeleuzeG. (2005). Cinema 1: The movement-image (H. Tomlinson, Trans.). London: Continuum. (Original work published 1983).
6.
DementJ. W. (1999). Going for broke: The depiction of compulsive gambling in film.Lanham: The Scarecrow Press.
7.
DenzinN. (2001). Hollywood shot by shot: Alcoholism in American cinema.New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
8.
ElsterJ. (1999). Strong feelings: Emotion, addiction and human behavior.Cambridge: MIT Press.
9.
FitzgeraldJ. (2010). Images of the desire for drugs.Health Sociology Review,12(2), 205–217.
10.
GriffithsM. (2004). An empirical analysis of the film “The gambler”.International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction,1(2), 39–43.
11.
HaroldC. (2000). The rhetorical function of the abject body: Transgressive corporeality in Trainspotting.Jac: A Journal of Composition Theory,20(4), 865–887.
12.
HellmanM. (2010). Construing and defining the out of control: Addiction in the media 1968–2008 (Doctoral dissertation). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
13.
HerdD. (1986). Ideology, melodrama, and the changing role of alcohol problems in American film.Contemporary Drug Problems,13(2), 213–247.
14.
HerseyC. (2005). Script(ing) Treatment: Representations of recovery from addiction in Hollywood film.Contemporary Drug Problems,32(3), 467–493.
15.
HerzogA. (2008). Suspended gestures: Schizoanalysis, affect and the face in cinema. In BuchananI., & MacCormackP. (Eds.), Deleuze and the schizoanalysis of cinema (pp. 63–74). London: Continuum.
16.
HickmanT. A. (2002). Heroin chic: The visual culture of narcotic addiction.Third Text,16(2), 119–136.
17.
HickmanT. A. (2007). The secret leprosy of modern days: Narcotic addiction and cultural crisis in the United States, 1870–1920.Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
18.
KeaneH. (2003). What is wrong with addiction?Melbourne: Melbourne University Publishing.
19.
KeaneH., MooreD., & FraserS. (2011). Addiction and dependence: Making realities in DSM.Addiction,106(5), 875–877.
20.
KyröläK. (2010). The weight of images: Affective engagements with fat corporeality in the media (Doctoral dissertation). Turku: University of Turku.
21.
LaineT. (2012). Feeling cinema: Emotional dynamics in film studies.London: Continuum.
22.
LevineH. (1978). The discovery of addiction: Changing conceptions of habitual drunkenness in America.Journal of Studies on Alcohol,39(1), 143–174.
23.
MalinsP. (2004). Machinic assemblages: Deleuze, Guattari and an ethico-aesthetics of drug use.Janus Head,7(1), 84–104.
24.
ManovichL. (1995). From the externalization of the psyche to the implantation of technology. In RötzerF. (Ed.), Mind revolution: Interface brain/computer (pp. 90–100). Munich: Akademie zum dritten Jahrtausend.
25.
MetzC. (1977). “Trucage” and the film.Critical Inquiry,3(4), 657–675.
26.
MetzC. (1982). Psychoanalysis and cinema: The imaginary signifier.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
27.
PaasonenS. (2012). Carnal resonance: Affect and online pornography.Cambridge: MIT Press.
28.
PeeleS. (1987). Visions of addiction: Major contemporary perspectives on addiction and alcoholism.New York: Lexington Books.
29.
PistersP. (2008). Delirium cinema or machines of the invisible. In BuchananI., & MacCormackP. (Eds.), Deleuze and the schizoanalysis of cinema (pp. 102–115). London: Continuum.
30.
PowellA. (2007). Deleuze, altered states and film.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
31.
RantalaV., & SulkunenP. (2012). Is pathological gambling just a big problem or also an addiction?Addiction Research & Theory,20(1), 1–10.
32.
ReinarmanC. (1995). The twelve-step movement and advanced capitalist culture: The politics of self-control in postmodernity. In DarnovskyM., EpsteinB., & FlacksR. (Eds.), Cultural politics and social movements (pp. 90–109). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
33.
RoomR. (2003). The cultural framing of addiction.Janus Head,6(2), 221–234.
34.
SedgwickE. K. (1992). Epidemics of the will. In CraryJ., & KwinterS. (Eds.), Incorporations (pp. 582–595). New York: Zone Books.
35.
SobchackV. (2004). Carnal thoughts: Embodiment and the moving image culture.Berkeley: University of California Press.
36.
SulkunenP. (1997). Addiktio: alkoholismi maallikkoajattelussa. In SulkunenP., & TörrönenJ. (Eds.), Semioottisen sosiologian näkökulmia. Sosiaalisen todellisuuden rakentuminen ja ymmärrettävyys (pp. 195–217). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
37.
SulkunenP. (2007). Images of addiction: Representations of addiction in films.Addiction Research & Theory,15(6), 543–559.
38.
ThompsonK. (1999). Storytelling in the new Hollywood: Understanding classical narrative technique.Harvard: Harvard University Press.
39.
ValverdeM. (1998). Diseases of the Will: Alcohol and the dilemmas of freedom.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
WurmserL. (1974). Psychoanalytic considerations of the etiology of compulsive drug use.Journal of American Psychoanalytical Association,22(4), 820–843.
41.
AinsworthA. (Director). (2000). Too much sex [Motion picture].Canada & United States: Backwards Films.
