This article introduces a conceptual framework for conducting mixed methods within the alcohol research field by suggesting that any data analysis – qualitative or quantitative – is also a narrative or social representation. Theoretically, the paper draws on Andrew Abbott (1997; 1998) and Howard Becker (2007), arguing that three ordered forms of representation are performed in quantitative analyses based on survey studies: The first order of representation refers to how participants respond to or interpret a survey question; the second to the arrangement and interpretation of variables in quantitative analysis and shows that measurements can have networks of meanings and the third to ways of merging quantitative analysis with other material, such as qualitative data.
Data and Method
Empirically, the paper illustrates the first order of representation through an analysis of 13 focus group interviews. In these young people discussed selected international survey questions, which later were used in two representative surveys on alcohol and illegal drug use, conducted in 2005 amongst 2 000 15-16-year-olds and in 2008 amongst 5 000 17-19-year-olds.
Conclusion
The article discusses how insights of the first order of representation are useful when researchers wish to carry out the second and third orders of representation.
AbbottA. (1992): From causes to events. Notes on Narrative Positivism.Sociological Methods and Research20(4): 428–455
2.
AbbottA. (1997): Seven types of ambiguity.Theory and Society26(2-3): 357–391
3.
AbbottA. (1998): The causal devolution.Sociological Methods & Research27(2): 148–181
4.
AbbottA. (2001): From causes to events. In: AbbottA. (red.): Time matters: On theory and method.Chicago: University of Chicago Press
5.
BeckerH. S. (1953): Becoming a marihuana user.The American Journal of Sociology59(3): 235–242
6.
BeckerH. (1996): The Epistemology of Qualitative Research. In: JessorR., & ColbyA., & Schweder.R. (red.): Essays on Ethnography and Human Development.Chicago: University of Chicago Press
7.
BeckerH. (2007): Telling about society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press
8.
BloorM., & FranklandJ., & ThomasM., & RobsonK. (2001): Focus Groups in Social Research.London: SAGE Publications
9.
BrymanA. (2007): Barriers to Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.Journal of Mixed Methods Research1(1): 8–22
10.
ChristiansenM., & VikP.W., & JarchowA. (2002): College student heavy drinking in social contexts versus alone.Addictive Behaviors27: 393–404
11.
CreswellJ. W., & Plano ClarkV. L. (2007): Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research.Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications
12.
Del BocaF. K., & DarkesJ. (2003): The validity of self-reports of alcohol consumption: state of the science and challenges for research.Addiction98: 1–12
13.
DemantJ. (2006): Fokusgruppen – spørgsmål til fænomener i nuet (The Focus Group – Questions regarding Phenomena in the Present). In: BjergO., & VilladsenK. (eds.): Sociologiske Metoder.Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur
14.
DemantJ., & ØstergaardJ. (2007): Partying as everyday life: Investigations of teenagers’ leisure life.Journal of Youth Studies10(5): 517–537
15.
DemersA., & KairouzS., & AdlafE.M., & GliksmanL., & Newton-TaylorB., & MarchandA. (2002): Multilevel analysis of situational drinking among Canadian undergraduates.Social Science & Medicine55(3): 415–424
16.
DouglasM. (2003): Constructive Drinking. Perspectives on Drink from Anthropology.London: Routledge
17.
EngelsR.C.M.E., & KnibbeR.A., & DropM.J. (1999): Visiting public drinking places: An explorative study into the functions of pub-going for late adolescents.Substance Use & Misuse34(9): 1261–1280
18.
GarveyP. (2005): Drunk and (Dis)Orderly. Norwegian Drinking Parties in the Home. In: WilsonT. (ed): Drinking Cultures. Alcohol and Identity.New York.Berg
19.
GreenfieldT. K. (2000): Ways of measuring drinking patterns and the difference they make: experience with graduated frequencies.Journal of Substance Abuse12(1-2): 33–49
20.
GreenfieldT.K., & RoomR. (1997): Situational norms for drinking and drunkenness: Trends in the US adult population, 1979–1990.Addiction92(1): 33–47
21.
GuiseJ.M., & GillJ.S. (2007): ‘Binge drinking? It's good, it's harmless fun’: a discourse analysis of accounts of female undergraduate drinking in Scotland.Health Education Research22: 895–906
22.
GusfieldJ. (2003): Passage to Play. In: DouglasM. (ed.): Constructive Drinking. Perspectives on Drink from Anthropology.London: Routledge
23.
HarrissonT. (1970): The pub. In: HarrissonT. (ed.): The pub and the people: a work-town study/by Mass observation.Welwyn Garden City
24.
HaraldsenG., & DaleT. (2002): Hvordan spørge barn og ungdom? In: AndersenD., & OttosenM.H. (ed.): Børn som respondenter: Om børns medvirken i survey [Children as respondents: When children participate in survey].Copenhagen: The Danish National Centre for Social Research
25.
HerringR., & BerridgeV., & ThomB. (2008): Binge drinking: an exploration of a confused concept.Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health62: 476–79
26.
HibellB., & AnderssonB., & BjarnassonT., & AhlströmS., & BalakirevaO., & KokkeviA., & MorganM. (2004): The Espad Report 2003. Alcohol and Other Drug Use Among Students in 35 European Countries.Stockholm: ESPAD
27.
HibellB., & GuttormssonU., & AhlströmS., & BalakirevaO., & BjarnassonT., & KokkeviA., & KrausL. (2009): The 2007 Espad Report. Substance use Among Students in 35 European Countries.Stockholm: ESPAD
28.
JärvinenM., & DemantJ., & ØstergaardJ. (2010) (eds): Stoffer og natteliv [Drugs and Night life]. København: Hans Reitzels
29.
KritzerH. M. (1996): The data puzzle: The nature of interpretation in quantitative research.American Journal of Political Science40(1): 1–32
30.
KuntscheE., & RehmJ., & GmelG. (2004): Characteristics of binge drinkers in Europe.Social Science & Medicine59: 113–127
31.
LaBrieJ.W., & PedersenE.R., & TawalbehS. (2007): Classifying risky-drinking college students: another look at the two-week drinker-type categorization.Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs68: 86–90
32.
LangeJ.E., & ClappJ.D., & TurrisiR., & ReavyR., & JaccardJ., & JohnsonM.B., & VoasR.B., & LarimerM. (2002): College binge drinking: What is it? Who does it?Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research26(5): 723–730
33.
LincolnS. (2005): ‘Feeling the Noise: Teenagers, Bedrooms and Music’.Leisure studies24(4): 399–414
34.
LintonenT., & RimpeläM. (2001): Validity of the concept of ‘self-perceived drunkenness’ in adolescent health surveys.Journal of Substance Use6(3): 145–150
35.
MacLachlenM., & SmythC. (2004): Binge drinking and youth culture: Alternative perspectives.Reheny: The Liffey Press
36.
MeashamF., & BrainK. (2005): ‘Binge’ drinking, British alcohol policy and the new culture of intoxication.Crime Media Culture1(3): 262–283
37.
MidanikL.T. (1999): Drunkenness, feeling the effects and 5+ measures.Addiction94(6): 887–897
38.
MidanikL.T., & HinesA.M. (1991): Understand Ways of Answering Standard Questions – Protocol Analysis in Alcohol Survey-Research.Drug and Alcohol Dependence27(3): 245–252
39.
MorganD. (2007): Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism regained: Methodological implications of combing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.Journal of Mixed Methods Research1(1): 48–76
40.
OesterleS., & HillK.G., & HawkinsJ.D., & GuoJ., & CatalanoR.F., & AbbottR.D. (2004): Adolescent heavy episodic drinking trajectories and health in young adulthood.Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs65: 204–212
RaitasaloK., & KnibbeR.A., & KrausL. (2005): Retrieval strategies and cultural differences in answering survey questions on drinking: a cross-national comparison.Addiction Research and Theory13(4): 359–372
43.
RoomR., & BaborT., & RehmJ. (2005): Alcohol and public health.Lancet.365: 519–530
44.
SandeA. (2002): Intoxication and rite of pas-sage to adulthood in Norway.Contemporary Drug Problems29(2): 277–303
45.
ScottJ. (2000): Children as Respondents: The Challenge of Quantitative Methods. In: JamesA., & ChristensenP. (ed.): Conducting research with Children.Brighton: Falmer Press
46.
ShinerM., & NewburnT. (1997): Definitely, maybe not? The normalisation of recreational drug use amongst young people. Sociology.Journal of the British Sociological Association31(3): 511–529
47.
SilvermanD. (2007): A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about qualitative research.London: Sage publications
48.
SmithT. W. (1987): The Art of Asking Questions, 1936–1985.Public Opinion Quarterly51(4): 95–108
49.
StruninL. (2001): Assessing alcohol consumption: developments from qualitative research methods.Social Science & Medicine53(2): 215–226
50.
StaxH. (2003): Med sproget som måleredskab – om udforskning, testning og forbedring for forståelse af spørgeskemabaseret forskning [Language as a tool – challenges, testing and preparation of survey research].Metode og Data89: 4–23
51.
TashakkoriA., & CreswellJ.W. (2007): Editorial: The new era of mixed methods.Journal of Mixed Methods Research1(1): 3–7
52.
TurrisiR., & MallettK.A., & MastroleoN.R., & LarimerM.E. (2006): Heavy drinking in college students: who is at risk and what is being done about it?The Journal of General Psychology133: 401–420
ØstergaardJ., & RøgeskovM., & RasmussenP.S. (2010): Unges Rusmiddelprofil. In: JärvinenM., & DemantJ., & ØstergaardJ. (red.): Stoffer og natteliv.København: Hans Reitzels
55.
ØstergaardJ. (2008): Youth, Binge and the Parents’ Paradox. PhD no. 47.Copenhagen: Department of Sociology
56.
ØstergaardJ. (2009): Learning to Become an Alcohol User. Adolescents Taking Risks and Parents Living with Uncertainty.Addiction Research and Theory17(1): 30–53.
