Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The obesity epidemic in the USA threatens the gains that have been made in the prevention and treatment of stroke. Both obesity and stroke disproportionately affect women more than men. Understanding the effect of obesity on stroke risk in women may be a useful stepping stone to reducing the burden of stroke in this vulnerable population. This article reviews the association between stroke and general obesity, abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome in women. All three factors have been shown to independently increase stroke risk in women.

Keywords

abdominal obesity BMI hemorrhagic stroke ischemic stroke metabolic syndrome obesity waist circumference waist-to-hip ratio women

Although substantial gains have been made in recent years in identifying, treating and controlling vascular risk factors [1 –3], rates of Type 2 diabetes [4] and obesity [5] have increased, potentially impeding reductions in stroke incidence. The prevalence of obesity is slightly higher in women than men; the proportion of obese women in the year 2007–2008 was 35.5%, compared to 32.2% among men [5]. Continuing with the trajectory of the past 30 years will result in 86% of Americans becoming overweight or obese by the year 2030 [6]. In the setting of the burgeoning obesity epidemic, it is vital to gain an understanding of the effects of obesity on stroke risk and to determine if there are sex differences in these effects.

Stroke, which is characterized by a disruption of the blood supply to a portion of the brain, is the leading cause of disability and the fourth leading cause of death in the USA. Of all strokes, 87% are ischemic and the remainder are hemorrhagic (10% intracerebral hemorrhage and 3% subarachnoid hemorrhage) [7]. Ischemic stroke is caused by an occlusion or stenosis of an artery, reducing blood flow to the brain, while intracerebral hemorrhage is caused by blood vessel rupture, with subsequent bleeding into the brain parenchyma.

The public health burden of stroke in women is large. Due to women's greater longevity and the higher risk of stroke with age (the risk of stroke can nearly double each decade after 55 years of age), more women than men have stroke each year, and at least 55,000 more women than men die every year from stroke [8], which comprises 7.6% of all female deaths. It has been projected that by the year 2050, with the aging of the US population, stroke incidence will be 30% higher in women than in men [9]. In addition, there has been a recent increase in stroke prevalence among middle-aged women in the setting of stable stroke prevalence rates among similarly aged men [10 –12].

Given the developing disproportionate prevalence of both obesity and stroke in women, an understanding of the effects of obesity on stroke risk in women may prove useful in mitigating the burden of stroke in women. This article will discuss the associations between general and abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetSD) and stroke. In addition, the influence of gender, age and race/ethnicity on the effects of obesity on stroke risk will be examined.

BMI & stroke risk

BMI is the most widely-used indicator for overall obesity. Among adults, a BMI of 18.5–24.9 kg/m² corresponds to a healthy weight, a BMI of 25.0–29.9 kg/m² is overweight, and a BMI ≥30.0 kg/m² is obese. Numerous studies have found an association between elevated BMI and risk of stroke [13 –21]. Although a few studies have shown that elevated BMI was no longer associated with increased stroke risk after adjustment for confounders [13,16,18], numerous studies have found that BMI >27 kg/m² was associated with increased risk for stroke compared with normal weight subjects, even after adjusting for confounders such as Type 2 diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and hypertension [14,15,17,20,21]. There is a graded association between elevated BMI and stroke risk; the risk of total or ischemic stroke rises linearly with increasing BMI or increases in a stepwise fashion for higher BMI categories [17,19,21 –23]. In fact, each 1 unit increase in BMI leads to a 5% increase in ischemic or general stroke risk in women [13,14,17]. One study found an inverse relationship between elevated BMI and ischemic stroke; the authors suggested this may have been due to low BMI among the elderly, heavy drinkers and smokers with stroke [24]. Table 1 displays key characteristics of the studies that evaluated the relationship between BMI and stroke risk in women.

Table 1.

Elevated BMI and stroke in women.

First author	Study site	Subjects (n)	Median years of study	Type of study	End point	Stroke subtype s included	Conclusions	Ref.
Bazzano	China	154,736	8.3	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	HR: 1.43 for BMI 25–29.9 kg/m²HR: 1.72 for BMI ≥30 kg/m²	[21]
Hu	Finland	49,996	19.5	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	HR: 1.08 for BMI 25–29.9 kg/m²HR: 1.30 for BMI ≥30 kg/m²	[20]
Winter	Germany	1137	~1	Case–control	Clinically defined stroke and TIA	I and H	OR: 1.39 for BMI 25–29.9 kg/m²OR: 2.97 for BMI 30–34.9 kg/m²	[18]
Saito	Japan	71,722	7.9	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	HR: 1.29 for BMI 27–29.9 kg/m²HR: 2.16 for BMI ≥30 kg/m²	[19]
Kurth	USA	39,053	10	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I, H and undefined	HR: 1.37 for BMI 30–34.9 kg/m²HR: 2.05 for BMI ≥35 kg/m²	[17]
Yatsuya	USA	13,549	16.9	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I	HR: 1.15 (black), 1.49 (white) forBMI: 28.6–32.0 kg/m²HR: 1.43, 2.12 for BMI ≥32 kg/m²		[16]
Strazzullo	Asia, Europe and the USA	2,274,961	17.5	Review of prospective longitudinal cohorts	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	HR: 1.22 for overweightHR: 1.64 for obese	[15]
Zhang	China	67,083	~4	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	HR: 1.51 for BMI 24.4–26.5 kg/m²HR: 1.71 for BMI ≥26.6 kg/m²	[14]
Lu	Sweden	33,578	~11	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	HR: 1.2 for BMI 25–29.9 kg/m²HR: 1.4 for BMI ≥ 30 kg/m²	[26]
Rexrode	USA	116,759	16	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	HR: 1.90 for BMI 29–31.9 kg/m²HR: 2.37 for BMI ≥32 kg/m²	[13]

H: Hemorrhagic stroke; HR: Hazard ratio; I: Ischemic stroke; OR: Odds ratio; TIA: Transient ischemic attack; WC: Waist circumference.

Conflicting data exists with regards to sex differences in the effect of obesity on stroke risk. One study found a moderate correlation between BMI and stroke for men and no correlation in women [25], while another study came to the opposite conclusion [19].

The relationship between hemorrhagic stroke and BMI seems perhaps more complex, with conflicting studies showing no significant correlation [13,15,17,26], a positive correlation [14,19,21] and a U-shaped association in women [20].

Age is likely to influence the impact of obesity on stroke risk. A study of 154,736 individuals in rural China found that the effect of elevated BMI on stroke is greater in individuals who were <60 years [21]. Among 13,733 middle-aged women who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, abdominal adiposity was independently associated with prior stroke [10,11].

Race/ethnicity also affects the impact of obesity on stroke risk. Most studies have relied on primarily Caucasian or European participants. In the rare studies including multiethnic populations, one study of over 2 million individuals found that excess body weight was a better stroke predictor in North American and European populations versus Asian populations, even though definitions of overweight and obesity were shifted downward for Eastern populations [15]. Nonetheless, even in Asian populations, BMI is a reliable predictor of stroke [16].

Abdominal adiposity & stroke risk

BMI may be an imprecise approximation of obesity, particularly because men and women have different body fat distributions even if they have equal total weights [27]. Several studies have suggested that abdominal adiposity has more significant health implications than overall adiposity and may more accurately indicate the degree of atherosclerotic or cardiovascular risk [28,29]. Abdominal adiposity can be measured using waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist-to-stature ratio (WSR). WC is the circumference of the abdomen around the top of the hipbone. Abdominal obesity is defined by WC >35 inches for women and >40 inches for men. WHR ratio is calculated by WC divided by the hip circumference; WSR is calculated by WC divided by height. Studies have investigated WC, WHR, and WSR in their abilities to predict stroke risk.

Numerous studies have found that elevated WC is an independent risk factor for total and/or ischemic stroke, after adjusting for potential confounders in multivariate models (Table 2) [11,14,18,20,22,26,30,31]. A study of 13,549 individuals revealed that WC was strongly associated with ischemic stroke risk, but this effect disappeared after adjusting for Type 2 diabetes and hypertension [16]; however, other studies have demonstrated that elevated WC is independently associated with a 2–4.25-fold increased risk for ischemic stroke [18,30]. As with BMI, there is a graded association between WC and stroke risk; a study of 67,000 women found a 2% amplification of total stroke risk with each 1 unit increase in WC [14]. The relationship between WC and hemorrhagic stroke is less clear; two studies have found no correlation, while another demonstrated a positive association [14,20,26].

Table 2.

Abdominal obesity and stroke in women.

First author	Study site	Subjects (n)	Median years of study	Type of study	Marker used	End point	Stroke subtypes included	Conclusions	Ref.
Boden-Albala	USA	3298	6.4	Prospective cohort	WC	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	HR: 1.5 for WC>35 inches	[22]
Hu	Finland	49,996	19.5	Prospective cohort	WC and WHR	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	HR: 0.63 for WC,HR: 0.71 for WHR	[20]
Winter	Germany	1137	~1	Case–control	WC and WHR	Clinically defined stroke, TIA	I and H	OR: 7.53 for WC ≥88 cmOR: 9.93 for WHR ≥0.85OR: 8.66 for WSR>0.54	[18]
Suk	USA	1718	~4	Case–control	WHR	Clinically defined stroke	I	OR: 2.6 for WHR>0.86	[24]
Yatsuya	USA	13,549	16.9	Prospective cohort	WC and WHR	Clinically defined stroke	I	HR: 1.65 (black), 1.97 (white) for WC 108–178 cmHR: 2.45, 1.76 for WHR 0.99–1.39	[16]
Wang	Finland	991	13.8	Prospective cohort	WC	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	HR: 1.52 for WC ≥88 cm	[31]
Zhang	China	67,083	~4	Prospective cohort	WC, WHR and WSR	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	HR: 1.77 for WC ≥84.1 cmHR: 1.59 for WHR ≥0.85HR: 1.91 for WSR ≥0.54	[14]
Lu	Sweden	33,578	~11	Prospective cohort	WC, WHR and WSR	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	HR: 2.3 for WC ≥90 cmHR: 2.4 for WHR ≥0.88HR: 2.5 for WSR 0.5–0.539	[26]
Milionis	Greece	329	5	Case–control	WC	Clinically defined stroke	I	OR: 1.99 for WC >88 cm	[30]

H: Hemorrhagic stroke; HR: Hazard ratio; I: Ischemic stroke; OR: Odds ratio; TIA: Transient ischemic attack; WC: Waist circumference; WHR: Waist-to-hip ratio; WSR: Waist-to-stature ratio.

Several studies have compared WC to other abdominal obesity markers like WHR and WSR in predicting stroke risk. No difference in predictive value was found in comparison to WHR [14,16] and WSR [14], but one study found WC to be the worst predictor of the three [18].

Sex differences in the effect of abdominal obesity on stroke risk are ambiguous. Of the nine studies showing an association between abdominal obesity and stroke risk, six found this correlation in women [11,14,18,22,24,26]. A correlation between elevated WC and stroke risk was found in men but not women in two studies [16,20]. In addition, studies have found a trend suggesting that elevated WC increased stroke risk to a larger extent in women than in men [18,22].

The relationship between WC and stroke has been investigated in four multiethnic populations. Two studies found no correlation between elevated WC and stroke risk in a nonwhite population [16,24]. In a study of 67,000 women in China, even when the analysis was restricted to those with BMI <25 kg/m², elevated WC was associated with an increased risk for total stroke [14]. This suggests that the relationship between WC and stroke is present regardless of whether it is accompanied by elevated BMI and may hold true for Asian populations that are generally less obese.

One of the common critiques of using WHR or WSR as diagnostic clinical tools is that both are harder to measure and standardize in comparison to BMI and WC [24]. Still, it seems that all measurements could potentially be useful stroke-risk predictors. Various studies have found a correlation between increased WHR and stroke risk in both men and women [14,16,18,20,24,26]. In studies that found this correlation in women, adjustment for potential confounders such as Type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia and hypertension attenuated the effect in two studies [16,26]. Other studies found that every successive category of WHR increased ischemic or total stroke risk, even after adjustment for covariates [14,18,24]. The relationship between elevated WHR and hemorrhagic stroke is more obscure. While one study found that elevated WHR was correlated with hemorrhagic stroke [14], others have found no association [20,26]. Comparison of data are made difficult by the use of various categorizations for WHR, including dividing WHR measurements into tertiles [18], quartiles [20,24] or quintiles [14,16,26].

Regarding sex differences in the influence of WHR on stroke risk, one study found that men were more significantly affected by high WHR than women, and this difference was exaggerated when BMI was adjusted for [24]. In another study population of 33,578 women, adjustment for BMI further solidified the relationship between elevated WHR and stroke [26]. A single study demonstrated a stronger effect of WHR on stroke risk in women compared with men; this difference was thought to be a result of under representation of female stroke survivors [20]. One study found that the population attributable fraction, the proportion of stroke instances that could have been prevented if an individual was in the bottom 60% of WHR measurements versus in the top 40% of the population, was 21.7% [16]. This percentage was higher than that for BMI and WC, suggesting that treating high WHR in at-risk patients is of utmost importance. Other research has echoed the importance of WHR in assessing stroke risk by naming it the best predictor in comparison to WSR and WC [18,26], while further studies demonstrated that it was on par with other a bdominal obesity m arkers [14,16].

Waist-to-stature ratio is the least common mode of measuring abdominal adiposity, and the role of height as a factor in cerebrovascular risk has been controversial at best, with studies both demonstrating and rejecting a correlation [32]. Several studies found an association between elevated WSR and stroke risk [14,18,26]. One study of 67,000 women found a graded association between WSR and stroke risk; a 0.01 unit increase in WSR led to a 3% increased risk for total stroke, while a study of 33,578 women found that any individual with a WSR greater than 0.54 had excess stroke risk [14,26]. Further studies are required to clarify how WSR compares to other markers of obesity as a stroke risk predictor.

Metabolic syndrome & stroke risk

Metabolic syndrome, characterized by insulin resistance, abdominal adiposity, dyslipidemia and hypertension, is associated with an assortment of recognized stroke risk factors, and affects approximately one-fourth of the adult population in the USA [33]. Although there are numerous definitions of MetSD, all are consistently linked to cardiovascular risk [34]. MetSD may disproportionately affect black and Hispanic women [22,34].

There remains a debate surrounding whether MetSD components should be kept as separate entities that are clinically managed independent of one another, or if as a whole, MetSD confers added stroke risk and thus must be targeted as a single clustered disorder [34]. Supporting the latter, several studies have found that MetSD is linked with an increased risk of stroke, after adjustment for its components [31,35,36]. In addition, suffering from increasing numbers of MetSD components is associated with higher stroke risk [37,38]. Numerous studies have found an increased stroke risk in men and/or women with MetSD (Table 3) [22,30,31,35 –37,39 –44]. Of these 13 studies, nine studies of a female-only populations found an association between MetSD and stroke [22,35 –38,40 –44]. All but four of the studies utilized a prospective study design that followed subjects for a median of at least 5 years and adjusted for various confounders, including smoking, alcohol, physical activity, and cardiovascular disease. Data are lacking regarding the correlation between hemorrhagic stroke and MetSD; the one study that assessed this relationship found that MetSD was associated with hemorrhagic stroke in women [38].

Table 3.

Metabolic syndrome and stroke in women.

First author	Study site	Subjects (n)	Median years of study	Type of study	End point	Stroke subtypes included	MetSD definition used	Conclusions	Ref.
Boden-Albala	USA	3298	6.4	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	NCEP-ATP III	HR: 2.0	[22]
Chen	Taiwan	3453	10.4	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I	NCEP-ATP III	HR: 2.5	[37]
Wang	Finland	991	13.8	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	NCEP-ATP III, WHO, EGIR and IDF	HR: 1.49–1.80	[31]
Ninomiya	USA	10,357	6	Retrospective cohort	Self-reported stroke	Undefined	NCEP-ATP III	OR: 2.20	[40]
Najarian	USA	2097	14	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	NCEP-ATP III	HR: 2.81	[35]
Takahashi	Japan	1493	6.4	Prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I	Other	HR: 23.1	[42]
Li	USA, Europe and Asia	92,732	Variable	Review of prospective cohort	Clinically defined stroke	I and H	NCEP-ATP III and WHO	HR: 1.54	[43]
Milionis	Greece	329	5	Case–control	Clinically defined stroke	I	NCEP-ATP III	OR: 2.59	[30]

EGIR: European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance; H: Hemorrhagic stroke; HR: Hazard ratio; I: Ischemic stroke; IDF: International Diabetes Federation; MetSD: Metabolic Syndrome; NCEP-ATP III: National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III; OR: Odds ratio.

The public health impact of MetSD may be more substantial than the influence of its individual parts. One study revealed that 19% of strokes could be avoided if MetSD was eliminated [22]. Another study revealed that MetSD components had a larger effect on the likelihood of stroke than MetSD [38]. To date, only one study has directly investigated the connection between metabolic syndrome and the prediction for second stroke [45]. Therefore, the value of screening stroke survivors for MetSD is undetermined.

The subsequent question is which of the MetSD components independently confers the largest stroke risk? This is a practical research question since within a population with MetSD, it may be possible to isolate persons with an exaggerated stroke risk based on the MetSD criteria they meet. In one study of 10,357 individuals, hypertriglyceridemia had the highest odds ratio in both men and women [40]. In a study comparing MetSD definitions, components that were shown to separately predict stroke included insulin resistance defined by European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance, central obesity defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP), and impaired glucose tolerance defined by the WHO [31]. In another instance, the NCEP definition was employed and abdominal obesity and hypertension had the highest hazard ratios for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, respectively [38].

Studies have suggested that obesity is most central to the effect of MetSD on stroke risk. Some authors have claimed that the central obesity component is the most fundamental piece of the MetSD puzzle [39,42] since it can predispose individuals to Type 2 diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia [42]. One study of 599 individuals with Type 2 diabetes revealed that MetSD or combinations of its components was not associated with ischemic stroke, but WC was independently associated with stroke [46]. Another study revealed that in the presence of MetSD, elevated WC and BMI was associated with greater stroke risk [30]. In addition, one study found that the dose–response effect of MetSD on ischemic stroke worsened in those who were obese [37]. Similarly, another study suggested that if the MetSD definition included a measure of obesity, especially abdominal obesity, then MetSD predicted stroke [31]. Alternatively, one study revealed that elevated WC was the only component of MetSD that did not independently increase stroke risk [40].

Several studies have shown sex differences in the effect of MetSD on stroke risk. MetSD confers a higher stroke risk upon women than men [14,42,43] and MetSD accounts for a larger percentage of stroke events in women than in men (30 vs 4%) [22]. These sex discrepancies may be owing to higher general and abdominal obesity levels within women than men [5,12,47]. General obesity commands a larger stroke risk in women with MetSD [38] and women with MetSD are more likely to be abdominally obese than men [12,22].

Studies have found conflicting results regarding the effect of MetSD on stroke risk in different racial/ethnic populations. A study of 3298 individuals found that MetSD conferred a greater risk of stroke in the Hispanic population than in black and white populations [22]. Another study of 10,347 individuals found that non-Hispanic black individuals with MetSD had higher odds of stroke compared with non-Hispanic white individuals [40].

Potential pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the impact of obesity on stroke

The pathophysiologic mechanism by which general obesity increases stroke risk is poorly understood. One proposed mechanism is that obesity is associated with a prothrombotic and proinflammatory state that in turn raises levels of acute phase reactants like C-reactive protein. High levels of C-reactive protein may decrease endothelial cell production of nitric oxide; this may then instigate a cascade of events that leads to vasoconstriction, leukocyte adherence, platelet activation, oxidation and thrombosis [48,49]. This cascade results in hypertension, which consequently increases stroke risk [14,39,50,51]. Circulating coagulation factors [37] and attenuation of the protective effect of high density lipoprotein-cholesterol [30] owing to general obesity may also play a role.

The biological pathways by which abdominal adiposity increases stroke risk are also not yet understood, but platelet activation, inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, an overactive endocannabinoid system [52], or MetSD may all serve key roles in the process. In addition, increased V-LDL production due to the high lipolytic activity of abdominal adipose tissue [24,26] may increase stroke risk.

Similar to general and abdominal obesity, the avenues that confer to MetSD a stroke risk beyond those risks attributable to its components are as of yet unknown, but several pathways have been suggested. When it was first established, another common name for the MetSD was the insulin resistance syndrome, which emphasized it as a possible precursor for Type 2 diabetes [39,56]. If certain MetSD components combine to establish a prediabetic state, then its ability to increase stroke risk is plausible, given that Type 2 diabetes is an established stroke risk factor. MetSD may have a larger population impact than Type 2 diabetes since it is more widespread [35]. Other probable pathways include increased inflammatory markers and atherosclerosis resulting from MetSD [39,43,56].

Lifestyle interventions & stroke

Lifestyle factors such as a healthy diet [57 –59], physical activity [60 –65], abstinence from smoking [66 –68], moderate alcohol intake [69 –73] and maintenance of a healthy BMI (18.5–24.9 kg/m²) [17,74] reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality. Adherence to a combination of healthy lifestyle practices [75 –82] reduces coronary events [75,77], ischemic stroke [78], all-cause mortality [76,81,82] and cardiovascular mortality [76,81].

Lifestyle intervention strategies to prompt changes in behavior vary widely in terms of success rates and specific methods used. Improving adherence requires a multifaceted approach, combining cognitive, behavioral and affective components [83,84]. Shared treatment decisions tend to be more effective, where patients incorporate risk-reduction options within their own personal resources and values [84,85]. It is important to provide information regarding personal risk to motivate patients to incorporate lifestyle change; the health belief model suggests that individuals' health-related behaviors can be explained by their perceived risk of a medical condition [86]. Finally, self-efficacy is essential; stroke survivors need to know that they can produce desired effects by their actions [87].

Although adherence to lifestyle advice ranges from 20 to 90% [88 –90], several counseling-based interventions in nonstroke populations have been effective in promoting lifestyle change [84,91 –93]. The Diabetes Prevention Program demonstrated a 58% reduction in diabetes incidence among nondiabetic persons with elevated fasting and postload plasma glucose concentrations [91]. A randomized controlled trial of lifestyle counseling for adult family members of patients hospitalized with cardiovascular disease resulted in improvement in diet score and exercise [93]. A Cochrane review of randomized/quasi-randomized trials of behavioral, pharmacological or multicomponent interventions to help patients stop smoking revealed that intensive counseling that begun during the hospital stay and continued with supportive contacts for at least a month postdischarge increased smoking cessation rates after discharge [94]. Finally, hospital initiation of secondary stroke prevention medications and diet/exercise counseling has been successful in improving vascular risk factors, recurrent events, and mortality for patients hospitalized with coronary artery disease [95] and stroke [96].

Conclusion

Both general obesity and abdominal adiposity are correlated with stroke risk in women. Elevated BMI, a marker of general obesity, is associated with increased stroke risk, even after adjustment for potential confounders such as hypertension, Type 2 diabetes or dyslipidemia. Elevated markers of abdominal obesity, such as elevated WC, WHR and WSR all independently increase stroke risk in women. Although BMI does not account for body fat distribution, there is no unequivocal evidence suggesting that abdominal obesity markers fare better as stroke risk predictors.

MetSD has consistently been shown to be associated with increased stroke risk and likely confers stroke risk beyond its components. While more evidence is required, it appears MetSD may increase stroke risk to a larger extent in women than men.

Although the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the effects of obesity on cerebrovascular disease are poorly understood, potential causal pathways include proinflammatory states, elevated levels of C-reactive protein, accelerated atherosclerosis, insulin resistance, platelet activation and endothelial dysfunction.

Maintaining certain lifestyle factors such as a healthy diet, adequate exercise, a healthy BMI, restraint from smoking, and moderate alcohol intake can all contribute to the reduction of stroke risk. Types of interventions including physician-assisted, hospital-initiated and collaborative strategies are ever-evolving fields that continue to uncover effective methods for behavior modification.

Future perspective

As the obesity epidemic continues gaining momentum and people are forced to deal with the resulting health effects, health professionals need to tackle obesity through implementation of lifestyle management strategies and employment of pharmaceutical interventions. Ideally, more accurate stroke risk-assessments will be developed. Since stroke risk is closely related to the presence of MetSD, prevention of MetSD could act as a defense against stroke [36,97]. Although lowering weight via reduction of caloric intake and increase in daily physical activity is optimal, bariatric surgery is being utilized more regularly for those who are morbidly obese [98]. Those with a high risk in the short term will benefit more from drug therapies that treat elevated blood pressure, insulin resistance, prothrombotic and proinflammatory states [97].

Areas of active research include understanding the neuroendocrine regulation of obesity and genetic determinants of this regulation [99,100]. Although studies have consistently found a correlation between abdominal obesity and increased stroke risk, the effects of inflammation in fat are independent of BMI [101]. Recent studies utilizing adipose tissue biopsies have demonstrated possible links between decreased adipogenic and lipogenic profiles of abdominal fat, abdominal cell differentiation, and insulin resistance [102,103]. Although laborious and impractical for regular clinical use, these surgical biopsies are nonetheless important analytic tools for research concerning the pathophysiological effects of obesity [104]. In addition, visceral adipose tissue is thought to have higher vascular risk than the subcutaneous adipose tissue sampled in these biopsies.

As the obesity pandemic continues, novel ideas concerning the treatment of obesity will certainly arise. Interventions to reduce obesity will likely require a multidisciplinary approach, including community-based participation. Thus far, research regarding the effects of weight reduction on stroke risk is lacking [105].

New pharmacological therapies will also surely arise, and a new line of promising compounds may help reduce weight by targeting serotonergic systems [106]. Some compounds that are currently being studied as potential treatment options for the components of MetSD include metformin, magnesium, pioglitazone, telmisartan, niacin and topiramate [36]. The success of metformin for treatment of Type 2 diabetes has sparked interest in the development of other compounds that also activate AMP protein kinase for treatment of metabolic disorders [107]. Despite ongoing research on drug treatments, researchers continue to stress the importance of lifestyle modifications as the ideal method of treatment for the metabolic syndrome [108].

Genomics research is also in full force and this will undoubtedly influence our understanding of stroke in the coming years. Genome-wide association study approaches are currently being applied to stroke [109]. Many studies have already isolated potential loci that could lead to genetic predispositions for cardiovascular disease, proposing a future where biomarkers make highly personalized treatment of atherosclerosis a possibility [110]. A recent study suggests that the heritability of ischemic stroke is much higher in women than in men [111].

In conclusion, in the setting of the obesity pandemic, a multifaceted approach, incorporating lifestyle interventions and medications will likely be needed to begin to curb the effects of obesity on cardiovascular health in women.

Executive summary

BMI & stroke risk

Women with a BMI of >27 kg/m² have an increased risk of stroke.

Stroke risk rises with higher BMI values.

Elevated BMI increases stroke risk in all racial/ethnic groups.

Abdominal adiposity markers & stroke risk

Elevated waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, and waist-to-stature ratio are each associated with an increase in stroke risk, even after controlling for covariates.

Metabolic syndrome & stroke risk

Metabolic syndrome is associated with an increase in stroke risk among women.

Metabolic syndrome may confer stroke risk beyond its components.

Areas for future research

Pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the effect of obesity on stroke risk.

Novel therapeutic interventions for preventing stroke in obese individuals.

The mechanisms underlying sex differences in the effect of obesity on stroke risk.

Footnotes

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

References

Papers of special note have been highlighted as:

of interest

of considerable interest

Cutler

Sorlie

Wolz

Thom

Fields

Roccella

. Trends in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control rates in United States adults between 1988–1994 and 1999–2004. Hypertension 52(5), 818–827 (2008).

Hyre

Muntner

Menke

Raggi

. Trends in ATP-III-defined high blood cholesterol prevalence, awareness, treatment and control among U.S. adults. Ann. Epidemiol. 17(7), 548–555 (2007).

Gregg

Cheng

Cadwell

. Secular trends in cardiovascular disease risk factors according to body mass index in US adults. JAMA 293(15), 1868–1874 (2005).

Cowie

Rust

Ford

. Full accounting of diabetes and pre-diabetes in the U.S. population in 1988–1994 and 2005–2006. Diabetes Care 32(2), 287–294 (2009).

Flegal

Carroll

Ogden

Curtin

. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA 303(3), 235–241 (2010).

Wang

Beydoun

Liang

Caballero

Kumanyika

. Will all Americans become overweight or obese? estimating the progression and cost of the US obesity epidemic. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16(10), 2323–2330 (2008).

10.

Roger

Lloyd-Jones

. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 123(4), e18–e209 (2011).

11.

Lloyd-Jones

Adams

Brown

. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 121(7), e46–e215 (2010).

12.

Gargano

, Reeves MJ, for the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry Michigan Prototype Investigators. Sex differences in stroke recovery and stroke-specific quality of life: results from a statewide stroke registry. Stroke 38(9), 2541–2548 (2007).

13.

Towfighi

Saver

Engelhardt

Ovbiagele

. A midlife stroke surge among women in the United States. Neurology 69(20), 1898–1904 (2007).

14.

Towfighi

Zheng

Ovbiagele

. Weight of the obesity epidemic: rising stroke rates among middle-aged women in the United States. Stroke 41(7), 1371–1375 (2010).

15.

Towfighi

Markovic

Ovbiagele

. Persistent Sex disparity in midlife stroke prevalence in the United States. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 31(4), 322–328 (2011).

16.

There is an emerging sex disparity in midlife stroke prevalence in the USA, potentially as a result of the obesity epidemic

17.

Rexrode

Hennekens

Willett

. A prospective study of body mass index, weight change, and risk of stroke in women. JAMA 277(19), 1539–1545 (1997).

18.

Zhang

Shu

Gao

Yang

Zheng

. General and abdominal adiposity and risk of stroke in Chinese women. Stroke 40(4), 1098–1104 (2009).

19.

Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratios and waist-to-stature ratios are correlated with stroke risk in a population of over 67,000 women, despite the population's lower-than-average median BMI

20.

Strazzullo

D'elia

Cairella

Garbagnati

Cappuccio

Scalfi

. Excess body weight and incidence of stroke: meta-analysis of prospective studies with 2 million participants. Stroke 41(5), e418–e426 (2010).

21.

This comprehensive review of prospective cohort studies establishes positive correlations between overweight, obesity and stroke incidence in Europe, Asia and the USA

22.

Yatsuya

Folsom

Yamagishi

North

Brancati

Stevens

. Race-and sex-specific associations of obesity measures with ischemic stroke incidence in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Stroke 41(3), 417–425 (2010).

23.

Kurth

Gaziano

Rexrode

. Prospective study of body mass index and risk of stroke in apparently healthy women. Circulation 111(15), 1992–1998 (2005).

24.

Winter

Rohrmann

Linseisen

. Contribution of obesity and abdominal fat mass to risk of stroke and transient ischemic attacks. Stroke 39(12), 3145–3151 (2008).

25.

Saito

Iso

Kokubo

Inoue

Tsugane

. Body mass index, weight change and risk of stroke and stroke subtypes: the Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective (JPHC) study. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 35(2), 283–291 (2011).

26.

Tuomilehto

Silventoinen

Sarti

Mannisto

Jousilahti

. Body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-hip ratio on the risk of total and type-specific stroke. Arch. Intern. Med. 167(13), 1420–1427 (2007).

27.

Bazzano

Whelton

. Body mass index and risk of stroke among Chinese men and women. Ann. Neurol. 67(1), 11–20 (2010).

28.

Boden-Albala

Sacco

Lee

. Metabolic syndrome and ischemic stroke risk: Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke 39(1), 30–35 (2008).

29.

Park

Y-W

Zhu

Palaniappan

Heshka

Carnethon

Heymsfield

. The Metabolic syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factor findings in the US population from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Arch. Intern. Med. 163(4), 427–436 (2003).

30.

Suk

Sacco

Boden-Albala

. Abdominal obesity and risk of ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke 34(7), 1586–1592 (2003).

31.

Asplund

Karvanen

Giampaoli

. Relative risks for stroke by age, sex, and population based on follow-up of 18 European populations in the MORGAM project. Stroke 40(7), 2319–2326 (2009).

32.

Adami

Weiderpass

. Prospective study of body size and risk for stroke amongst women below age 60. J. Intern. Med. 260(5), 442–450 (2006).

33.

Elevated waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratios and waist-to-stature ratios are strongly linked (hazard ratios >2.0) to stroke risk in a younger female population

34.

Lovejoy

Sainsbury

, Stock Conference 2008 Working Group. Sex differences in obesity and the regulation of energy homeostasis. Obes. Rev. 10(2), 154–167 (2009).

35.

Snijder

Van Dam

Visser

Seidell

. What aspects of body fat are particularly hazardous and how do we measure them? Int. J. Epidemiol. 35(1), 83–92 (2006).

36.

De Koning

Merchant

Pogue

Anand

. Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular events: meta-regression analysis of prospective studies. Eur. Heart J. 28(7), 850–856 (2007).

37.

Milionis

Filippatos

Derdemezis

. Excess body weight and risk of first-ever acute ischaemic non-embolic stroke in elderly subjects. Eur. J. Neurol. 14(7), 762–769 (2007).

38.

Wang

Ruotsalainen

Moilanen

Lepisto

Laakso

Kuusisto

. The metabolic syndrome predicts incident stroke: a 14-year follow-up study in elderly people in Finland. Stroke 39(4), 1078–1083 (2008).

39.

Samaras

Elrick

Storms

. Is short height really a risk factor for coronary heart disease and stroke mortality? A review. Med. Sci. Monit. 10(4), RA63–RA76 (2004).

40.

Grundy

. Metabolic syndrome pandemic. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 28(4), 629–636 (2008).

41.

Gami

Witt

Howard

. Metabolic syndrome and risk of incident cardiovascular events and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 49(4), 403–414 (2007).

42.

Najarian

Sullivan

Kannel

Wilson

D'Agostino

Wolf

. Metabolic syndrome compared with Type 2 diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Offspring Study. Arch. Intern. Med. 166(1), 106–111 (2006).

43.

Towfighi

Ovbiagele

. Metabolic syndrome and stroke. Curr. Diab. Rep. 8(1), 37–41 (2008).

44.

Chen

Bai

Yeh

Chiu

Pan

. Influence of metabolic syndrome and general obesity on the risk of ischemic stroke. Stroke 37(4), 1060–1064 (2006).

45.

Chen

Lindsey

Khera

. Independent associations between metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis: observations from the Dallas Heart Study. Diab. Vasc. Dis. Res. 5(2), 96–101 (2008).

46.

Kurl

Laukkanen

Niskanen

. Metabolic syndrome and the risk of stroke in middle-aged men. Stroke 37(3), 806–811 (2006).

47.

Ninomiya

L'Italien

Criqui

Whyte

Gamst

Chen

. Association of the metabolic syndrome with history of myocardial infarction and stroke in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Circulation 109(1), 42–46 (2004).

48.

Wannamethee

Shaper

Lennon

Morris

. Metabolic Syndrome vs Framingham risk score for prediction of coronary heart disease, stroke, and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch. Intern. Med. 165(22), 2644–2650 (2005).

49.

Takahashi

Bokura

Kobayashi

Iijima

Nagai

Yamaguchi

. Metabolic syndrome increases the risk of ischemic stroke in women. Intern. Med. 46(10), 643–648 (2007).

50.

Liu

. Association between metabolic syndrome and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 25(6), 539–547 (2008).

51.

This is a comprehensive meta-analysis of recent prospective studies examining the relationship between metabolic syndrome and stroke

52.

Milionis

Rizos

Goudevenos

Seferiadis

Mikhailidis

Elisaf

. Components of the metabolic syndrome and risk for first-ever acute ischemic nonembolic stroke in elderly subjects. Stroke 36(7), 1372–1376 (2005).

53.

Furie

Kasner

Adams

. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 42(1), 227–276 (2011).

54.

Protopsaltis

Korantzopoulos

Milionis

. Metabolic syndrome and its components as predictors of ischemic stroke in Type 2 diabetic patients. Stroke 39(3), 1036–1038 (2008).

55.

Ford

Zhao

Tsai

. Trends in obesity and abdominal obesity among adults in the United States from 1999–2008. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 35(5), 736–743 (2010).

56.

Verma

Wang

. A self-fulfilling prophecy: C-reactive protein attenuates nitric oxide production and inhibits angiogenesis. Circulation 106(8), 913–919 (2002).

57.

Venugopal

Devaraj

Yuhanna

Shaul

Jialal

. Demonstration that C-reactive protein decreases eNOS expression and bioactivity in human aortic endothelial cells. Circulation 106(12), 1439–1441 (2002).

58.

Sesso

Buring

Rifai

Blake

Gaziano

Ridker

. C-reactive protein and the risk of developing hypertension. JAMA 290(22), 2945–2951 (2003).

59.

Rexrode

Pradhan

Manson

Buring

Ridker

. Relationship of total and abdominal adiposity with CRP and IL-6 in women. Ann. Epidemiol. 13(10), 674–682 (2003).

60.

Després

J-P

. Targeting abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome to manage cardiovascular disease risk. Heart 95(13), 1118–1124 (2009).

61.

Haffner

. Insulin resistance, inflammation, and the prediabetic state. Am. J. Cardiol. 92(4A), J18–J26 (2003).

62.

Olijhoek

van der Graaf

Banga

J-D

Algra

Rabelink

Visseren

FLJ

. The metabolic syndrome is associated with advanced vascular damage in patients with coronary heart disease, stroke, peripheral arterial disease or abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur. Heart J. 25(4), 342–348 (2004).

63.

Park

Kwon

Roh

. Metabolic syndrome is more associated with intracranial atherosclerosis than extracranial atherosclerosis. Eur. J. Neurol. 14(4), 379–386 (2007).

64.

Bonora

Kiechl

Willeit

. Carotid atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease in the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 26(4), 1251–1257 (2003).

65.

Trichopoulou

Costacou

Bamia

Trichopoulos

. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet and survival in a Greek population. N. Engl. J. Med. 348(26), 2599–2608 (2003).

66.

Liu

Manson

Lee

. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: The Women's Health Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 72(4), 922–928 (2000).

67.

Huijbregts

Feskens

Rasanen

. Dietary pattern and 20 year mortality in elderly men in Finland, Italy, and The Netherlands: longitudinal cohort study. BMJ 315(7099), 13–17 (1997).

68.

Mensink

Deketh

Mul

Schuit

Hoffmeister

. Physical activity and its association with cardiovascular risk factors and mortality. Epidemiology 7(4), 391–397 (1996).

69.

Lee

Paffenbarger

Jr . Physical activity and stroke incidence: the Harvard Alumni Health Study. Stroke 29(10), 2049–2054 (1998).

70.

Tanasescu

Leitzmann

Rimm

Willett

Stampfer

. Exercise type and intensity in relation to coronary heart disease in men. JAMA 288(16), 1994–2000 (2002).

71.

Berlin

Colditz

. A meta-analysis of physical activity in the prevention of coronary heart disease. Am. J. Epidemiol. 132(4), 612–628 (1990).

72.

Leon

Connett

. Physical activity and 10.5 year mortality in the multiple risk factor intervention trial (MRFIT). Int. J. Epidemiol. 20(3), 690–697 (1991).

73.

Leon

Myers

Connett

. Leisure time physical activity and the 16-year risks of mortality from coronary heart disease and all-causes in the multiple risk factor intervention trial (MRFIT). Int. J. Sports Med. 18(Suppl. 3), S208–S215 (1997).

74.

Kawachi

Colditz

Stampfer

. Smoking cessation in relation to total mortality rates in women. A prospective cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 119(10), 992–1000 (1993).

75.

Kawachi

Colditz

Stampfer

. Smoking cessation and decreased risk of stroke in women. JAMA 269(2), 232–236 (1993).

76.

Kawachi

Colditz

Stampfer

. Smoking cessation and time course of decreased risks of coronary heart disease in middle-aged women. Arch. Intern. Med. 154(2), 169–175 (1994).

77.

Mukamal

Ascherio

Mittleman

. Alcohol and risk for ischemic stroke in men: the role of drinking patterns and usual beverage. Ann. Intern. Med. 142(1), 11–19 (2005).

78.

Mukamal

Conigrave

Mittleman

. Roles of drinking pattern and type of alcohol consumed in coronary heart disease in men. N. Engl. J. Med. 348(2), 109–118 (2003).

79.

White

Altmann

Nanchahal

. Alcohol consumption and mortality: modelling risks for men and women at different ages. BMJ 325(7357), 191 (2002).

80.

White

Altmann

Nanchahal

. Mortality in England and Wales attributable to any drinking, drinking above sensible limits and drinking above lowest-risk level. Addiction 99(6), 749–756 (2004).

81.

Liao

Mcgee

Cao

Cooper

. Alcohol intake and mortality: findings from the National Health Interview Surveys (1988 and 1990). Am. J. Epidemiol. 151(7), 651–659 (2000).

82.

Kurth

Gaziano

Berger

. Body mass index and the risk of stroke in men. Arch. Intern. Med. 162(22), 2557–2562 (2002).

83.

Stampfer

Manson

Rimm

Willett

. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease in women through diet and lifestyle. N. Engl. J. Med. 343(1), 16–22 (2000).

84.

Knoops

De Groot

Kromhout

. Mediterranean diet, lifestyle factors, and 10-year mortality in elderly European men and women: the HALE project. JAMA 292(12), 1433–1439 (2004).

85.

Chiuve

Mccullough

Sacks

Rimm

. Healthy lifestyle factors in the primary prevention of coronary heart disease among men: benefits among users and nonusers of lipid-lowering and antihypertensive medications. Circulation 114(2), 160–167 (2006).

86.

Kurth

Moore

Gaziano

. Healthy lifestyle and the risk of stroke in women. Arch. Intern. Med. 166(13), 1403–1409 (2006).

87.

King

Mainous

3rd Geesey

. Adopting moderate alcohol consumption in middle age: subsequent cardiovascular events. Am. J. Med. 121(3), 201–206 (2008).

88.

Davis

Neuhaus

Moritz

Lein

Barclay

Murphy

. Health behaviors and survival among middle-aged and older men and women in the NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. Prev. Med. 23(3), 369–376 (1994).

89.

King

Mainous

3rd Geesey

. Turning back the clock: adopting a healthy lifestyle in middle age. Am. J. Med. 120(7), 598–603 (2007).

90.

Haveman-Nies

De Groot

Burema

Cruz

Osler

Van Staveren

. Dietary quality and lifestyle factors in relation to 10-year mortality in older Europeans: the SENECA study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 156(10), 962–968 (2002).

91.

Roter

Hall

Merisca

Nordstrom

Cretin

Svarstad

. Effectiveness of interventions to improve patient compliance: a meta-analysis. Med. Care 36(8), 1138–1161 (1998).

92.

Koelewijn-Van Loon

van der Weijden

van Steenkiste

. Involving patients in cardiovascular risk management with nurse-led clinics: a cluster randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 181(12), E267–E274 (2009).

93.

O'Connor

Legare

Stacey

. Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids. BMJ 327(7417), 736–740 (2003).

94.

Rosenstock

Strecher

Becker

. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ. Q. 15(2), 175–183 (1988).

95.

Bandura

. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ. Behav. 31(2), 143–164 (2004).

96.

Ashenden

Silagy

Weller

. A systematic review of the effectiveness of promoting lifestyle change in general practice. Fam. Pract. 14(2), 160–176 (1997).

97.

Lutfey

Wishner

. Beyond ‘compliance’ is ‘adherence’. Improving the prospect of diabetes care. Diabetes Care 22(4), 635–639 (1999).

98.

Burke

Dunbar-Jacob

Hill

. Compliance with cardiovascular disease prevention strategies: a review of the research. Ann. Behav. Med. 19(3), 239–263 (1997).

99.

Knowler

Barrett-Connor

Fowler

. Reduction in the incidence of Type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N. Engl. J. Med. 346(6), 393–403 (2002).

100.

Seidel

Powell

Zgibor

Siminerio

Piatt

. Translating the diabetes prevention program into an urban medically underserved community: a nonrandomized prospective intervention study. Diabetes Care 31(4), 684–689 (2008).

101.

Mosca

Mochari

Liao

. A novel family-based intervention trial to improve heart health. FIT heart: results of a randomized controlled trial. Circ. Cardiovasc. Qual. Outcomes 1(2), 98–106 (2008).

102.

Rigotti

Munafo

Stead

. Smoking cessation interventions for hospitalized smokers: a systematic review. Arch. Intern. Med. 168(18), 1950–1960 (2008).

103.

Fonarow

Gawlinski

Moughrabi

Tillisch

. Improved treatment of coronary heart disease by implementation of a Cardiac Hospitalization Atherosclerosis Management Program (CHAMP). Am. J. Cardiol. 87(7), 819–822 (2001).

104.

Rahiman

Saver

Porter

. In-hospital initiation of secondary prevention is associated with improved vascular outcomes at 3 months. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 17(1), 5–8 (2008).

105.

Eckel

Grundy

Zimmet

. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet 365(9468), 1415–1428 (2005).

106.

This article provides an overview of the underlying mechanisms of the metabolic syndrome, its management and its relationship with cardiovascular risk

107.

Brolin

. Bariatric surgery and long-term control of morbid obesity. JAMA 288(22), 2793–2796 (2002).

108.

Korner

Woods

Woodworth

. Regulation of energy homeostasis and health consequences in obesity. Am. J. Med. 122(4 Suppl. 1), S12–S18 (2009).

109.

Walley

Asher

Froguel

. The genetic contribution to non-syndromic human obesity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10(7), 431–442 (2009).

110.

Apovian

Bigornia

Mott

. Adipose macrophage infiltration is associated with insulin resistance and vascular endothelial dysfunction in obese subjects. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 28(9), 1654–1659 (2008).

111.

Kursawe

Eszlinger

Narayan

. Cellularity and adipogenic profile of the abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue from obese adolescents: association with insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis. Diabetes 59(9), 2288–2296 (2010).

112.

Mclaughlin

Deng

Gonzales

. Insulin resistance is associated with a modest increase in inflammation in subcutaneous adipose tissue of moderately obese women. Diabetologia 51(12), 2303–2308 (2008).

113.

Apovian

. The causes, prevalence, and treatment of obesity revisited in 2009: what have we learned so far? Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 91(1), S277–S279 (2010).

114.

Galimanis

Mono

Arnold

Nedeltchev

Mattle

. Lifestyle and stroke risk: a review. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 22(1), 60–68 (2009).

115.

Garfield

Heisler

. Pharmacological targeting of the serotonergic system for the treatment of obesity. J. Physiol. 587(1), 49–60 (2009).

116.

Zhang

Zhou

. AMPK: an emerging drug target for diabetes and the metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab. 9(5), 407–416 (2009).

117.

Goldstein

Mascitelli

Pezzetta

. On treating metabolic syndrome: emphasise lifestyle change. Lancet Oncol. 11(5), 415 (2010).

118.

Markus

. Unravelling the genetics of ischaemic stroke. PLoS Med. 7(3), e1000225 (2010).

119.

Assmann

Schulte

Seedorf

. The role of genetic predisposition and biomarkers in atherosclerosis. Int. Congress Series 1303, 95–102 (2007).

120.

Touzé

Rothwell

. Heritability of ischaemic stroke in women compared with men: a genetic epidemiological study. Lancet Neurol. 6(2), 125–133 (2007).

No Time to ‘Weight’: The Link between Obesity and Stroke in Women

Abstract

Keywords

BMI & stroke risk

Abdominal adiposity & stroke risk

Metabolic syndrome & stroke risk

Potential pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the impact of obesity on stroke

Lifestyle interventions & stroke

Conclusion

Future perspective

Footnotes

References