When pursuing goals that involve subgoals of varying levels of difficulty, consumers prefer to follow a difficult-to-easy sequence when completing the subgoals because they believe that such a sequence renders the overall goal easier to achieve. However, consumers are actually more successful when they follow an easy-to-difficult sequence when completing subgoals. In seven studies, the authors present consistent evidence for this mismatch and explore the value of subgoals as an important boundary condition.
AmirAmir and ArielyDan (2008), “Resting on Laurels: The Effects of Discrete Progress Markers as Subgoals on Task Performance and Preferences,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34 (5), 1158–71.
2.
BanduraAndrew (1997), Self-Efficacy: The Experience of Control.New York: Freeman.
3.
BaumeisterRoy F.BratslavskyEllenMuravenMark and TiceDianne M. (1998), “Ego Depletion: Is the Active Self a Limited Resource?”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74 (5), 1252–65.
4.
BuehlerBuehler and GriffinDale (2003), “Planning, Personality, and Prediction: The Role of Future Focus in Optimistic Time Predictions,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92 (1/2), 80–90.
5.
BuehlerRoger and RossMichael (1994), “Exploring the ‘Planning Fallacy’: Why People Underestimate Their Task Completion Times,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67 (3), 366–81.
6.
BurgerJerry M. and BurnsLinda (1988), “The Illusion of Unique Invulnerability and the Use of Effective Contraception,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14 (2), 264–70.
7.
CarverCharles S. and ScheierMichael F. (1990), “Origins and Functions of Positive and Negative Affect: A Control-Process View,”Psychological Review, 97 (1), 19–35.
8.
CarverCharles S. and ScheierMichael F. (1998), On the Self-Regulation of Behavior.New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ChambersJohn R.WindschitlPaul D. and SulsJerry (2003), “Egocentrism, Event Frequency, and Comparative Optimism: When What Happens Frequently Is ‘More Likely to Happen to Me,'”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (11), 1343–56.
10.
CochranCochran and TesserAbraham (1996), “The ‘What the Hell' Effect: Some Effects of Goal Proximity and Goal Framing on Performance,” in Striving and Feeling: Interactions Among Goals, Affect, and Self-Regulation, MartinLeonard L. and TesserAbraham, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 99–120.
11.
DweckCarol S. (1999), Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Development.Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
12.
DweckCarol S. (2006), Mindset: The New Psychology of Success.New York: Random House.
13.
EmmonsRobert A. (1992), “Abstract Versus Concrete Goals: Personal Striving Level, Physical Illness, and Psychological Well-Being,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62 (2), 292–300.
14.
FishbachAyeletDharRavi and ZhangYing (2006), “Subgoals as Substitutes or Complements: The Role of Goal Accessibility,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (2), 232–42.
15.
GalGal and McShaneB. Blakeley (2012), “Can Small Victories Help Win the War? Evidence from Consumer Debt Management,”Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (August), 487–501.
16.
GollwitzerPeter M. (1999), “Implementation Intentions: Strong Effects of Simple Plans,”American Psychologist, 54 (7), 493–503.
17.
HeathChipLarrickRichard P. and WuGeorge (1999), “Goals as Reference Points,”Cognitive Psychology, 38 (1), 79–109.
18.
HoffmanHoffman and SpitzerMatthew L. (1993), “Willingness to Pay vs. Willingness to Accept: Legal and Economic Implications,”Washington University Law Quarterly, 71 (1), 59–114.
19.
InnesAndrew (1999), “Handgrip Strength Testing: A Review of the Literature,”Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 46 (3), 120–40.
20.
KahnemanDanielKnetschJack L. and ThalerRichard H. (1991), “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias,”Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1), 193–206.
21.
KooKoo and FishbachAyelet (2008), “Dynamics of Self-Regulation: How (Un)Accomplished Goal Actions Affect Motivation,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94 (2), 183–95.
22.
LevavJonathanHeitmannMarkHerrmannAndreas and IyengarSheena S. (2010), “Order in Product Customization Decisions: Evidence from Field Experiments,”Journal of Political Economy, 118 (2), 274–99.
23.
LockeEdwin A. and LathamGary P. (1990), A Theory of Goal Setting & Task Performance.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
24.
LoewensteinGeorge F.O'DonoghueTed, and RabinMatthew (2003), “Projection Bias in Predicting Future Utility,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (4), 1209–1248.
25.
LoewensteinGeorge F.O'DonoghueTed, and PrelecDrazen (1993), “Preferences for Sequences of Outcomes,”Psychological Review, 100 (1), 91–108.
26.
OettingenOettingen and MayerDoris (2002), “The Motivating Function of Thinking About the Future: Expectations Versus Fantasies,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (5), 1198–1212.
27.
RatnerRebecca K.KahnBarbara E. and KahnemanDaniel (1999), “Choosing Less-Preferred Experiences for the Sake of Variety,”Journal of Consumer Research, 26 (1), 1–15.
28.
ReadRead and LoewensteinGeorge (1995), “Diversification Bias: Explaining the Discrepancy in Variety Seeking Between Combined and Separated Choices,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 1 (1), 34–49.
29.
RossWilliam T.Jr., and SimonsonItamar (1991), “Evaluations of Pairs of Experiences: A Preference for Happy Endings,”Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 4 (4), 155–61.
30.
ShahJames Y. and HigginsTory E. (1997), “Expectancy × Value Effects: Regulatory Focus as Determinant of Magnitude and Direction,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73 (3), 447–58.
31.
ShahJames Y. and KruglanskiArie W. (2003), “When Opportunity Knocks: Bottom-Up Priming of Goals by Means and Its Effects on Self-Regulation,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (6), 1109–1122.
32.
SimonsonAndrew (1990), “The Effect of Purchase Quantity and Timing on Variety-Seeking Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, 27 (May), 150–62.
33.
SomanSoman and CheemaAmar (2004), “When Goals Are Counterproductive: The Effects of Violation of a Behavioral Goal on Subsequent Performance,”Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 52–62.
34.
TaylorShelley E. and BrownJonathon D. (1994), “Positive Illusions and Well-Being Revisited: Separating Fact from Fiction,”Psychological Bulletin, 116 (1), 21–27.
35.
ThalerAndrew (1980), “Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice,”Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1 (1), 39–60.
36.
VallacherRobin R. and WegnerDaniel M. (1987), “What Do People Think They're Doing? Action Identification and Human Behavior,”Psychological Review, 94 (1), 3–15.
37.
VohsKathleen D. and FaberRonald J. (2007), “Spent Resources: Self-Regulatory Resource Availability Affects Impulse Buying,”Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (4), 537–47.
38.
VroomVictor H. (1964), Work and Motivation.Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
39.
WeinsteinNeil D. and KleinWilliam M. (1995), “Resistance of Personal Risk Perceptions to Debiasing Interventions,”Health Psychology, 14 (2), 132–40.
40.
WhitleyBernard E. and HernAndrea L. (1991), “Perceptions of Vulnerability to Pregnancy and the Use of Effective Contraception,”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17 (1), 104–110.
41.
ZhaoMinLeeLeonard and SomanDilip (2012), “Crossing the Virtual Boundary: The Effect of Task-Irrelevant Environmental Cues on Task Implementation,”Psychological Science, 23 (10), 1200–1207.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
