Does the amount of self-control consumers must exert to choose a goal-consistent action influence their perceptions of goal progress? For example, if you choose to go to the gym when one of your favorite TV shows is on (vs. when nothing interesting is on TV), do you perceive that you have made a differential amount of progress toward your goal, despite completing the exact same workout? In eight studies (N = 7,515), the authors demonstrate that consumers perceive that they have made more progress on their goals when more (vs. less) self-control is required to choose to complete an identical goal-consistent task. This is because when consumers exert more (vs. less) self-control to choose a goal-consistent task over the goal-inconsistent alternatives, they infer higher commitment to the goal. The higher inferred commitment, in turn, leads consumers to perceive that future goal pursuit will be easier. The authors demonstrate this effect across a variety of tasks and means of exerting self-control, as well as with both hypothetical scenarios and real-behavior studies.
ArielyDanWertenbrochKlaus (2002), “Procrastination, Deadlines, and Performance: Self-Control by Precommitment,” Psychological Science, 13 (3), 219–24.
2.
Baca-MotesKatieBrownAmberGneezyAyeletKeenanElizabeth A.NelsonLeif D. (2013), “Commitment and Behavior Change: Evidence from the Field,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (5), 1070–84.
3.
BagchiRajeshLiXingbo (2011), “Illusionary Progress in Loyalty Programs: Magnitudes, Reward Distances, and Step-Size Ambiguity,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (5), 888–901.
4.
BanduraAlbertLockeEdwin A. (2003), “Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (1), 87.
5.
BartelsDaniel M.UrminskyOleg (2011), “On Intertemporal Selfishness: How the Perceived Instability of Identity Underlies Impatient Consumption,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (1), 182–98.
6.
BaumeisterRoy F. (2002), “Yielding to Temptation: Self-Control Failure, Impulsive Purchasing, and Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (4), 670–66.
7.
BaumeisterRoy F.VohsKathleen D.TiceDianne M. (2007), “The Strength Model of Self-Control,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16 (6), 351–55.
8.
BazermanMax H.TenbrunselAnn E.Wade-BenzoniKimberly (1998), “Negotiating with Yourself and Losing: Making Decisions with Competing Internal Preferences,” Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 225–41.
9.
BertramsAlex (2020), “A Schema-Activation Approach to Failure and Success in Self-Control,” Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 2256.
10.
BettmanJames R.LuceMary FrancesPayneJohn W. (1998), “Constructive Consumer Choice Processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (3), 187–217.
11.
BisinAlbertoHyndmanKyle (2021), “Procrastination, Self-Imposed Deadlines and Other Commitment Devices,” Economic Theory, 74,871–97.
CampbellMargaret C.WarrenCaleb (2015), “The Progress Bias in Goal Pursuit: When One Step Forward Seems Larger Than One Step Back,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (5), 1316–31.
14.
CarverCharles S. (2004), Self-Regulation of Action and Affect. The Guilford Press.
15.
CarverCharles S.ScheierMichael F. (1998), On the Self-Regulation of Behavior. Cambridge University Press.
16.
CheemaAmarBagchiRajesh (2011), “The Effect of Goal Visualization on Goal Pursuit: Implications for Consumers and Managers,” Journal of Marketing, 75 (2), 109–23.
17.
CialdiniRobert B. (2007), Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Harper Collins.
18.
CochranWinonaTesserAbraham (1996), “The ‘What the Hell’ Effect: Some Effects of Goal Proximity and Goal Framing on Performance,” in Striving and Feeling: Interactions Among Goals, Affect, and Self-Regulation, MartinL.L.TesserA., eds. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 99–120.
19.
CutrightKeisha M.SamperAdriana (2014), “Doing It the Hard Way: How Low Control Drives Preferences for High-Effort Products and Services,” Journal of Consumer Research, 41 (3), 730–45.
20.
DharRaviHuberJoelKhanUzma (2007), “The Shopping Momentum Effect,” Journal of Marketing Research, 44 (3), 370–78.
21.
DharRaviWertenbrochKlaus (2012), “Self-Signaling and the Costs and Benefits of Temptation in Consumer Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (1), 15–25.
FishbachAyeletDharRavi (2005), “Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 370–77.
24.
FreedmanJonathan L.FraserScott C. (1966), “Compliance Without Pressure: The Foot-in-the-Door Technique,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 (2), 195–202.
25.
FudenbergDrewLevineDavid K. (2006), “A Dual-Self Model of Impulse Control,” American Economic Review, 96 (5), 1449–76.
26.
GollwitzerPeter M. (1990), “Action Phases and Mind-Sets,” in Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, Vol. 2, E.T. Higgins and R.M. Sorrentino, eds. Guilford Press, 53–92.
27.
HarkinBenjaminWebbThomas L.ChangBetty P.I.PrestwichAndrewConnerMarkKellarIan, et al. (2016), “Does Monitoring Goal Progress Promote Goal Attainment? A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence,” Psychological Bulletin, 142 (2), 198–229.
28.
HayesAndrew F. (2017), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
HochStephen J.LoewensteinGeorge F. (1991), “Time-Inconsistent Preferences and Consumer Self-Control,” Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (4), 492–507.
31.
HsiawAlice (2013), “Goal-Setting and Self-Control,” Journal of Economic Theory, 148 (2), 601–26.
32.
HuangSzu-ChiZhangYing (2011), “Motivational Consequences of Perceived Velocity in Consumer Goal Pursuit,” Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (6), 1045–56.
33.
HuangSzu-ChiZhangYingBroniarczykSusan M. (2012), “So Near and Yet So Far: The Mental Representation of Goal Progress,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103 (2), 225–41.
JinLiyinXuQianZhangYing (2015), “Climbing the Wrong Ladder: The Mismatch Between Consumers’ Preference for Subgoal Sequences and Actual Goal Performance,” Journal of Marketing Research, 52 (5), 616–28.
36.
KhanUzmaDharRavi (2006), “Licensing Effect in Consumer Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (2), 259–66.
37.
KivetzRanUrminskyOlegZhengYuhuang (2006), “The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis Resurrected: Purchase Acceleration, Illusionary Goal Progress, and Customer Retention,” Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (1), 39–58.
38.
KleinHoward J.MolloyJanice C.BrinsfieldChad T. (2012), “Reconceptualizing Workplace Commitment to Redress a Stretched Construct: Revisiting Assumptions and Removing Confounds,” Academy of Management Review, 37 (1), 130–51.
39.
KooMinjungFishbachAyelet (2012), “The Small-Area Hypothesis: Effects of Progress Monitoring on Goal Adherence,” Journal of Consumer Research, 39 (3), 493–509.
40.
KrugerJustinWirtzDerrickVan BovenLeafWilliam AltermattT. (2004), “The Effort Heuristic,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40 (1), 91–98.
41.
LockeEdwin A.LathamGary P.ErezMiriam (1988), “The Determinants of Goal Commitment,” Academy of Management Review, 13 (1), 23–39.
42.
LoewensteinGeorgeThalerRichard H. (1989), “Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3 (4), 181–93.
43.
LuceMary FrancesPayneJohn W.BettmanJames R. (1999), “Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (2), 143–59.
44.
MarkmanKeith D.GuentherCorey L. (2007), “Psychological Momentum: Intuitive Physics and Naive Beliefs,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33 (6), 800–812.
45.
MilkmanKatherine L.RogersToddBazermanMax H. (2008), “Harnessing Our Inner Angels and Demons: What We Have Learned About Want/Should Conflicts and How That Knowledge Can Help Us Reduce Short-Sighted Decision Making,” Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3 (4), 324–38.
46.
MukhopadhyayAnirbanJoharGita Venkataramani (2005), “Where There Is a Will, Is There a Way? Effects of Lay Theories of Self-Control on Setting and Keeping Resolutions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (4), 779–86.
47.
O’DonoghueTedRabinMatthew (1999), “Doing It Now or Later,” American Economic Review, 89 (1), 103–24.
48.
PayneJohn W.BettmanJames R.JohnsonEric J. (1993), “The Use of Multiple Strategies in Judgment and Choice,” in Individual and Group Decision Making: Current Issues, CastellanN.J.Jr., ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 19–39.
49.
PietersRik (2017), “Meaningful Mediation Analysis: Plausible Causal Inference and Informative Communication,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (3), 692–716.
50.
PrelecDraženBodnerRonit (2003), Self-Signaling and Self-Control. Russell Sage Foundation.
51.
RogersToddMilkmanKatherine L.VolppKevin G. (2014), “Commitment Devices: Using Initiatives to Change Behavior,” JaMa, 311 (20), 2065–66.
52.
SchriftRom Y.KivetzRanNetzerOded (2016), “Complicating Decisions: The Work Ethic Heuristic and the Construction of Effortful Decisions,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145 (7), 807–29.
53.
SharifMarissa A.ShuSuzanne B. (2021), “Nudging Persistence After Failure Through Emergency Reserves,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 163, 17–29.
54.
SharifMarissa. A.WoolleyKaitlin (2020), “The Effect of Categorization on Goal Progress Perceptions and Motivation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 47 (4), 608–30.
55.
SomanDilipAinslieGeorgeFrederickShaneLiXiupingLynchJohnMoreauPage, et al. (2005), “The Psychology of Intertemporal Discounting: Why Are Distant Events Valued Differently from Proximal Ones?” Marketing Letters, 16 (3/4), 347–60.
56.
UrminskyOleg (2017), “The Role of Psychological Connectedness to the Future Self in Decisions Over Time,” Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26 (1), 34–39.
57.
UrminskyOlegZaubermanGal (2015), “The Psychology of Intertemporal Preferences,” in The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 2, D. Koehler and N. Harvey, eds. John Wiley & Sons, 141–81.
58.
WallaceScott G.EtkinJordan (2017), “How Goal Specificity Shapes Motivation: A Reference Points Perspective,” Journal of Consumer Research, 44 (5), 1033–51.
59.
WangJingNovemskyNathanDharRaviBaumeisterRoy F. (2010), “Trade-Offs and Depletion in Choice,” Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (5), 910–19.
60.
ZhangYingFishbachAyeletDharRavi (2007), “When Thinking Beats Doing: The Role of Optimistic Expectations in Goal-Based Choice,” Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (4), 567–78.
61.
ZhangYingHuangSzu-Chi (2010), “How Endowed Versus Earned Progress Affects Consumer Goal Commitment and Motivation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (4), 641–54.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
