The question of how people should structure goal-directed activity to maximize the likelihood of goal attainment is one of theoretical and practical significance. In particular, should people begin by attempting relatively easy tasks or more difficult ones? How might these differing strategies affect the likelihood of completing the overarching goal? The authors examine this question in the context of an important goal for a large number of consumers—getting out of debt. Using a data set obtained from a debt settlement firm, they find that (1) closing debt accounts is predictive of debt elimination regardless of the dollar balance of the closed accounts, whereas (2) the dollar balance of closed accounts is not predictive of debt elimination when controlling for the fraction of accounts closed. These findings suggest that completing discrete subtasks might motivate consumers to persist in pursuit of a goal. The authors discuss implications for goal pursuit generally and for consumer debt management specifically.
AmarMoty, ArielyDan, AyalShahar, CryderCynthia, and RickScott (2011), “Winning the Battle but Losing the War: The Psychology of Debt Management,”Journal of Marketing Research, 48 (Special Issue), S38–S50.
2.
AmirOn, and ArielyDan (2008), “Resting on Laurels: The Effects of Discrete Progress Markers as Subgoals on Task Performance and Preferences,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34 (5), 1158–71.
3.
AnzaiYuichiro, and HerbertA. Simon (1979), “The Theory of Learning by Doing,”Psychological Review, 86 (2), 124–140.
4.
BanduraAlbert (1997), Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control.New York: W.H. Freeman.
5.
BrownJudson S. (1948), “Gradients of Approach and Avoidance Responses and Their Relation to Level of Motivation,”Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 41 (6), 450–65.
6.
CamererColin, BabcockLinda, LoewensteinGeorge, and ThalerRichard (1997), “Labor Supply of New York City Taxi Drivers: One Day at a Time,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (May), 407–441.
7.
CarverCharles S., and MichaelF. Scheier (1998), On the Self-Regulation of Behavior.New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CatramboneRichard (1998), “The Subgoal Learning Model: Creating Better Examples so That Students Can Solve Novel Problems,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127 (4), 355–76.
9.
CheemaAmar, and BagchiRajesh (2011), “The Effect of Goal Visualization on Goal Pursuit: Implications for Consumers and Managers,”Journal of Marketing, 75 (March), 109–123.
10.
De BoorCarl (1978), A Practical Guide to Splines.New York: Springer-Verlag.
Federal Citizen Information Center (2011), Consumer Action Handbook.Pueblo, CO: Federal Citizen Information Center.
13.
FishbachAyelet, and DharRavi (2005), “Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 370–77.
14.
FishbachAyelet, DharRavi, and ZhangYing (2006), “Subgoals as Substitutes or Complements: The Role of Goal Accessibility,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (2), 232–42.
15.
GourvilleJohn T., and JonathanJ. Koehler (2004), “Downsizing Prices Increases: A Greater Sensitivity to Price than to Quantity in Consumer Markets,” HBS Marketing Research Paper Series, Harvard University.
16.
HastieTrevor, TibshiraniRobert, and FriedmanJerome (2009), The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2d ed.New York: Springer.
17.
HeathChip, RichardP. Larrick, and WuGeorge (1999), “Goals as Reference Points,”Cognitive Psychology, 38 (1), 79–109.
18.
HullClark L. (1932), “The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis and Maze Learning,”Psychological Review, 39 (1), 25–43.
19.
HullClark L. (1934), “The Rats' Speed of Locomotion Gradient in the Approach to Food,”Journal of Comparative Psychology, 17 (3), 393–422.
20.
KahnemanDaniel, and TverskyAmos (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica, 47 (2), 263–92.
21.
KhanUzma, and DharRavi (2006), “Licensing Effect in Consumer Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (May), 259–66.
22.
KivetzRan, UrminskyOleg, and ZhengYuhuang (2006), “The Goal-Gradient Hypothesis Resurrected: Purchase Acceleration, Illusionary Goal Progress, and Customer Retention,”Journal of Marketing Research, 43 (February), 39–58.
23.
KruglanskiArie W., JamesY. Shah, FishbachAyelet, FriedmanRon, ChunWoo Young, and Sleeth-KepplerDavid (2002), “A Theory of Goal Systems,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 34, ZannaM.P., ed. San Diego: Academic Press, 331–76.
24.
LibermanNira, and TropeYaacov (1998), “The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75 (1), 5–18.
25.
LockeEdwin A., GaryP. Latham, KenJ. Smith, and RobertE. Wood (1990), A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
MillerNeal E. (1944), “Experimental Studies of Conflict,” in Personality and the Behavior Disorders, Vol. 1. Oxford: Ronald Press, 431–465.
27.
NewellAllen, and HerbertA. Simon (1972), Human Problem Solving.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
NunesJoseph C., and DrèzeXavier (2006), “The Endowed Progress Effect: How Artificial Advancement Increases Effort,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (4), 504–512.
29.
RaghubirPriya, and SrivastavaJoydeep (2002), “Effect of Face Value on Product Valuation in Foreign Currencies,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29 (3), 335–47.
RamseyDave (2009b), The Total Money Makeover: A Proven Plan for Financial Fitness.Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
32.
ReadDaniel, LoewensteinGeorge, RabinMatthew (1999), “Choice Bracketing,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19 (1), 171–97.
33.
ShafirEldar, DiamondPeter, and TverskyAmos (1997), “Money Illusion,”Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (2), 341–74.
34.
ShahJames Y., and ArieW. Kruglanski (2002), “Priming Against Your Will: How Goal Pursuit Is Affected by Accessible Alternatives,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38 (4), 362–82.
35.
SingleyMark K., and JohnR. Anderson (1989), The Transfer of Cognitive Skill.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
SomanDilip, and ShiMengzhi (2003), “Virtual Progress: The Effect of Path Characteristics on Perceptions of Progress and Choice,”Management Science, 49 (9), 1229–50.
37.
StawBarry M. (1981), “The Escalation of Commitment to a Course of Action,”Academy of Management Review, 6 (4), 577–87.
38.
SuttonRobert I. (2010a), Good Boss, Bad Boss: How to Be the Best … and Learn from the Worst.New York: Business Plus.
ThorndikeEdward Lee (1898), Animal Intelligence: An Experimental Study of the Associative Processes in Animals.New York: Macmillan.
41.
TropeYaacov, and LibermanNira (2003), “Temporal Construal,”Psychological Review, 110 (3), 403–421.
42.
Van BurenMark E., and SafferstoneTodd (2009), “The Quick Wins Paradox,”Harvard Business Review, 116 (January), 54–61.
43.
WeickKarl E. (1984), “Small Wins: Redefining the Scale of Social Problems,”American Psychologist, 39 (1), 40–49.
44.
WertenbrochKlaus, SomanDilip, and ChattopadhyayAmitava (2007), “On the Perceived Value of Money: The Reference Dependence of Currency Numerosity Effects,”Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (June), 1–10.
