Four studies examine how consumers’ prior knowledge of a product category and the way they process product information affect evaluation. Consumers with extensive prior knowledge of a category evaluate the brand more favorably when the presentation of the product information prompts a sense of progress rather than facilitating a detailed assessment (Studies 1 and 2), as well as when the information presentation involves a high level of construal rather than a low level (Studies 3 and 4). Consumers with limited domain knowledge exhibit opposite outcomes. The subjective experience of processing fluency mediates these effects. The findings suggest that evaluations are more favorable when there is a fit between prior knowledge and message processing than when fit is absent.
AlbaJoseph W., and Wesley HutchinsonJ., (1987), “Dimensions of Expertise,”Journal of Consumer Research, 13(March), 411–54.
2.
AlbaJoseph W., and Wesley HutchinsonJ., (2000), “Knowledge Calibration,”Journal of Consumer Research, 27(September), 123–56.
3.
AvnetTamar, and Tory HigginsE., (2003), “Locomotion, Assessment and Regulatory Fit: Value Transfer from ‘How’ to ‘What,'”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(September), 525–30.
4.
BaronReuben M., and KennyDavid A., (1986), “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(December), 1173–82.
5.
BettmanJames R., and Whan ParkC., (1980), “Effects of Prior Knowledge and Experience and Phase of the Choice Process on Consumer Decision Processes: A Protocol Analysis,”Journal of Consumer Research, 7(December), 234–48.
6.
BettmanJames R., and SujanMita, (1987), “Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice Consumers,”Journal of Consumer Research, 14(September), 141–54.
7.
BrucksMerrie, (1985), “The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12(June), 1–16.
8.
CamachoChristopher J., Tory HigginsE., and LugerLindsey, (2003), “Moral Value Transfer from Regulatory Fit: What Feels Right Is Right and What Feels Wrong Is Wrong,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(March), 498–510.
9.
CesarioJoseph, GrantHeidi, and Tory HigginsE., (2004), “Regulatory Fit and Persuasion: Transfer from ‘Feeling Right’,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(March), 388–404.
10.
ChiMichelene T.H., GlaserRobert, and ReesErnest, (1982), “Expertise in Problem Solving,” in Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, Vol. 1, SternbergRobert J., ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 11–76.
11.
ChiMichelene T.H., and SimonHayes A., (1973), “Perception in Chess,”Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.
12.
FerrariMichel, PinardAdrien, ReidLuc, and Bouffard-BouchardTherese, (1991), “The Relationship Between Expertise and Self-Regulation in Movement Performance: Some Theoretical Issues,”Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72(1), 139–50.
13.
HigginsE. Tory, (2000), “Making a Good Decision: Value from Fit,”American Psychologist, 55(November), 1217–30.
14.
HindsPamela J., PattersonMichael, and PfefferJeffery, (2001), “Bothered by Abstraction: The Effect of Expertise on Knowledge Transfer and Subsequent Novice Performance,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(December), 1232–43.
15.
HoneckRichard P., FirmentMichael, and CaseTammy J., (1987), “Expertise and Categorization,”Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 25(November), 431–34.
16.
JohnsonEric, and Edward RussoJ., (1984), “Product Familiarity and Learning New Information,”Journal of Consumer Research, 11(June), 542–51.
17.
KruglanskiArie W., ThompsonErik P., Tory HigginsE., Nadir AtashM., PierroAntonio, ShahJames Y., and SpiegelScott, (2000), “To ‘Do the Right Thing’ or to ‘Just Do It’: Locomotion and Assessment as Distinct Self-Regulatory Imperatives,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(November), 793–815.
18.
LangerEllen J., and ImberLois G., (1979), “When Practice Makes Imperfect: Debilitating Effects of Overlearning,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(November), 2014–2024.
19.
LeeAngela Y., and AakerJennifer L., (2004), “Bringing the Frame into Focus: The Influence of Regulatory Fit on Processing Fluency and Persuasion,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(February), 205–218.
20.
LewandowskyStephan, and KirsnerKim, (2000), “Knowledge Partitioning: Context-Dependent Use of Expertise,”Memory and Cognition, 28(March), 295–305.
21.
LibermanNira, and TropeYaacov, (1998), “The Role of Feasibility and Desirability Considerations in Near and Distant Future Decisions: A Test of Temporal Construal Theory,”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(July), 5–18.
22.
MaheswaranDurairaj, and SternthalBrian, (1990), “The Effects of Knowledge, Motivation, and Type of Message on Ad Processing and Product Judgments,”Journal of Consumer Research, 17(June), 66–73.
23.
MalkocSelin A., ZaubermanGal, and UluCanan, (2005), “Consuming Now or Later? The Interactive Effect of Timing and Attribute Alignability,”Psychological Science, 16(5), 411–17.
24.
MandelNaomi, and JohnsonEric J., (2002), “When Web Pages Influence Choice: Effects of Visual Primes on Experts and Novices,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29(September), 235–45.
25.
MenonGeeta, and RaghubirPriya, (2003), “Ease of Retrieval as an Automatic Input in Judgments: A Mere-Accessibility Framework?”Journal of Consumer Research, 30(September), 230–43.
26.
MitchellAndrew A., and DacinPeter A., (1996), “The Assessment of Alternative Measures of Consumer Expertise,”Journal of Consumer Research, 23(December), 219–39.
27.
NovemskyNathan, DharRavi, SchwarzNorbert, and SimonsonItamar, (2007), “Preference Fluency in Choice,”Journal of Marketing Research, 44(August), 347–56.
28.
RadeckiCarmen M., and JaccardJames, (1995), “Perceptions of Knowledge, Actual Knowledge, and Information Search Behavior,”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(March), 107–138.
29.
RoehmMichelle, and SternthalBrian, (2001), “The Moderating Effect of Knowledge and Resources on the Persuasive Impact of Analogies,”Journal of Consumer Research, 28(September), 257–72.
30.
SchoenfeldAlan H., and HerrmannDouglas J., (1982), “Problem Perception and Knowledge Structure in Expert and Novice Mathematical Problem Solvers,”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(September), 484–94.
31.
SchraagenJan Maarten, and LeijenhorstHenk, (2001), “Searching for Evidence: Knowledge and Search Strategies Used by Forensic Scientists,” in Linking Expertise and Naturalistic Decision Making, SalasEduardo, and KleinGary, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 263–74.
32.
SchwarzNorbert, (2004), “Meta-Cognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(3), 332–48.
33.
ShanteauJames, (1992), “Competence in Experts: The Role of Task Characteristics,”Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53(November), 252–66.
34.
SobelMichael, E., (1982), “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models,” in Sociological Methodology, LeinhardtSamuel, ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 290–312.
35.
SpenceMark T., and BrucksMerrie, (1997), “The Moderating Characteristics of Experts’ and Novices’ Judgments,”Journal of Marketing Research, 34(May), 233–47.
36.
SujanMita, (1985), “Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments,”Journal of Consumer Research, 12(June), 31–46.
37.
ThunholmPeter, (2005), “Planning Under Time Pressure: An Attempt Toward a Prescriptive Model of Military Tactical Decision Making,” in How Experts Make Decisions, MontgomeryHenry, LipshitzRaanan, and BrehmerBerndt, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 43–56.
38.
TropeYaacov, and LibermanNira, (2003), “Temporal Construal,”Psychological Review, 110(July), 403–421.
39.
TropeYaacov, LibermanNira, and WakslakCheryl, (2007), “Construal Level Theory and Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113–17.
40.
TyboutAlice M., SternthalBrian, MalaviyaPrashant, BakamitsosGeorgios A., and ParkSe-Bum, (2005), “Information Accessibility as a Moderator of Judgments,”Journal of Consumer Research, 32(June), 76–85.
41.
VallacherRobin R., and WegnerDaniel M., (1987), “What Do People Think They Are Doing? Action Identification and Human Behavior,”Psychological Review, 94(January), 3–15.
42.
WileyJennifer, (1998), “Expertise as Mental Set: The Effects of Domain Knowledge in Creative Problem Solving,”Memory & Cognition, 26(July), 716–30.
43.
WoodStacy L., and LynchJohn G.Jr., (2002), “Prior Knowledge and Complacency in New Product Learning,”Journal of Consumer Research, 29(December), 416–26.
44.
WrisbergCraig A., and PeinRichard L., (1990), “Past Running Experience as a Mediator of the Attentional Focus of Male and Female Recreational Runners,”Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70(April), 427–32.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
