Prior research has demonstrated that negative online reviews have a greater impact than positive online reviews on tourists’ purchase decisions. However, building on the construal level theory, this study proposes a new perspective, suggesting that positive online reviews are more influential in distant-future trips, and negative online reviews are more influential in near-future trips. These effects (i) occur because tourists generate experiences of processing fluency from a construal fit between the construal level of reviews with different valence and the temporal distance of tourists’ trips, and (ii) are significant for tourists who are reading reviews on large screen devices, but not for those using small screen devices. This study demonstrates the importance of temporal distance in eliminating the robust negativity bias, offering novel insight into existing research on persuasion. These findings provide new references for tourism enterprises managing the detrimental effects of negative online reviews in multi-screen times.
AdlerS.SarstedtM. (2020). Mapping the jungle: A bibliometric analysis of research into construal level theory. Psychology & Marketing, 38(9), 1367–1383. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21537
3.
AlterA. L.OppenheimerD. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
4.
AmitE.AlgomD.TropeY. (2009). Distance-dependent processing of pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 400–415. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015835
5.
AvnetT.LauferD.HigginsE. T. (2013). Are all experiences of fit created equal? Two paths to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(3), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.011
6.
AyehJ. K.AuN.LawR. (2013). Predicting the intention to use consumer-generated media for travel planning. Tourism Management, 35, 132–143. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.06.010
7.
BasuroyS.ChatterjeeS.RavidS. A. (2003). How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.4.103.18692
8.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
9.
BergerJ.SorensenA. T.RasmussenS. J. (2010). Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Science, 29(5), 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1090.0557
BrunoS.YangC.TianW.XieZ.ShaoY. (2019). Exploring the characteristics of tourism industry by analyzing consumer review contents from social media: A case study of Bamako, Mali. Geo-spatial Information Science, 22(3), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2019.1649848
12.
CasalóL. V.FlaviánC.GuinalíuM.EkinciY. (2015). Avoiding the dark side of positive online consumer reviews: Enhancing reviews’ usefulness for high risk-averse travelers. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 68(9), 1829–1835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.010
13.
CesarioJ.GrantH.HigginsE. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “Feeling Right. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(3), 388–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388
14.
ChaeM.KimJ. (2004). Do size and structure matter to mobile users? An empirical study of the effects of screen size, information structure, and task complexity on user activities with standard web phones. Behaviour and Information Technology, 23(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290410001669923
15.
ChangH. H.Tuan PhamM. (2013). Affect as a decision-making system of the present. The Journal of Consumer Research, 40(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1086/668644
16.
ChenZ.LurieN. H. (2013). Temporal contiguity and negativity bias in the impact of online word of mouth. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0063
17.
ChevalierJ. A.MayzlinD. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
18.
ChristodoulidesG.MichaelidouN.ArgyriouE. (2012). Cross-national differences in e-WOM influence. European Journal of Marketing, 46(11/12), 1689–1707. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211260040
19.
ChungS.HairN. (2021). The adverse effects of mobile devices on willingness to donate and online fundraising outcomes. International Journal of Advertising, 40(8), 1343–1365.
DaughertyT.HoffmanE. (2014). eWOM and the importance of capturing consumer attention within social media. Journal of Marketing Communications, 20(1–2), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2013.797764
EyalT.SagristanoM. D.TropeY.LibermanN.ChaikenS. (2009). When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. Distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.023
24.
EysenckM. W.CalvoM. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition & Emotion, 6(6), 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696
25.
FangB.YeQ.KucukustaD.LawR. (2016). Analysis of the perceived value of online tourism reviews: Influence of readability and reviewer characteristics. Tourism Management, 52, 498–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.07.018
26.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
27.
FilieriR.RaguseoE.VitariC. (2019). What moderates the influence of extremely negative ratings? The role of review and reviewer characteristics. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77, 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.07.013
28.
FiskeS. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(6), 889–906. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.889
29.
FoleyP.KirschbaumC. (2010). Human hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to acute psychosocial stress in laboratory settings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.01.010
FujitaK.TropeY.LibermanN.Levin-SagiM. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351
32.
García-PablosA.CuadrosM.LinazaM. T. (2016). Automatic analysis of textual hotel reviews. Information Technology & Tourism, 16(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40558-015-0047-7
33.
GhoseA.GoldfarbA.HanS. P. (2013). How is the mobile Internet different? Search costs and local activities. Information Systems Research, 24(3), 613–631. http://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0453
34.
GruenT. W.OsmonbekovT.CzaplewskiA. J. (2006). eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business research, 59(4), 449–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.10.004
35.
HansenJ.DechêneA.WänkeM. (2008). Discrepant fluency increases subjective truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 687–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.005
36.
HaoY.YeQ.LiY.ChengZ.Ieee. (2010). How does the valence of online consumer reviews matter in consumer decision making? Differences between search goods and experience goods [Conference session]. 43rd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (HICSS 2010)
37.
HasherL.GoldsteinD.ToppinoT. (1977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80012-1
38.
HayesA. F. (2009). Beyond baron and kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
39.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
40.
HernandezJ. M. D. C.WrightS. A.Ferminiano RodriguesF. (2015). Attributes versus benefits: The role of construal levels and appeal type on the persuasiveness of marketing messages. Journal of Advertising, 44(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2014.967425
41.
HerrP. M.KardesF. R.KimJ. (1991). Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.2307/2626839
42.
HerzogS. M.HansenJ.WänkeM. (2007). Temporal distance and ease of retrieval. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.008
HigginsE. T.Chen IdsonL.FreitasA. L.SpiegelS.MoldenD. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1140–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1140
45.
HongS.ParkH. S. (2012). Computer-mediated persuasion in online reviews: Statistical versus narrative evidence. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 906–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.011
46.
HuangL.TanC.-H.KeW.WeiK.; Zhejiang University. National University of Singapore.Clarkson University, & National University of Singapore. (2018). Helpfulness of online review content: The moderating effects of temporal and social cues. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(06), 503–522. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00499
47.
JeongH. J.KooD. M. (2015). Combined effects of valence and attributes of e-WOM on consumer judgment for message and product. Internet Research, 25(1), 2–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-09-2013-0199
48.
JiménezF. R.MendozaN. A. (2013). Too popular to ignore: The influence of online reviews on purchase intentions of search and experience products. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 27(3), 226–235. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.04.004
49.
JinL.HuB.HeY. (2014). The recent versus the out-dated: An experimental examination of the time-variant effects of online consumer reviews. Journal of Retailing, 90(4), 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2014.05.002
50.
KimH.RaoA. R.LeeA. Y. (2009). It’s time to vote: The effect of matching message orientation and temporal frame on political persuasion. The Journal of Consumer Research, 35(6), 877–889. https://doi.org/10.1086/593700
51.
KimK. J.SundarS. S. (2014). Does screen size matter for smartphones? Utilitarian and hedonic effects of screen size on smartphone adoption. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(7), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0492
52.
KimK. J.SundarS. S. (2016). Mobile persuasion: Can screen size and presentation mode make a difference to trust?Human Communication Research, 42(1), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12064
53.
KoenigA. M.CesarioJ.MoldenD. C.KosloffS.HigginsE. T. (2009). Incidental experiences of regulatory fit and the processing of persuasive appeals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(10), 1342–1355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209339076
LangB. (2011). How word of mouth communication varies across service encounters. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 21(6), 583–598. https://doi.org/10.1108/09604521111185592
56.
LeeA. Y.HigginsE. T. (2009). Thepersuasive power of regulatory fit. In WänkeM. (Ed.), Social psychology of consumer behavior (pp. 319–333). Routledge.
57.
LeeA. Y.KellerP. A.SternthalB. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735–747. https://doi.org/10.1086/605591
58.
LeeA. Y.LabrooA. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 41(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.2.151.28665
59.
LeeH.DengX.UnnavaH. R.FujitaK. (2014). Monochrome forests and colorful trees: The effect of black-and-white versus color imagery on construal level. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1015–1032. https://doi.org/10.1086/678392
60.
LeeJ.ParkD.-H.HanI. (2008). The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(3), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2007.05.004
61.
LeeM.YounS. (2009). Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) How eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgement. International Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 473–499. https://doi.org/10.2501/s0265048709200709
62.
LeeS.OhH. (2014). Effective communication strategies for hotel guests’ green behavior. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965513504029.
63.
LeeY. J.HosanagarK.TanY. (2015). Do I follow my friends or the crowd? Information cascades in online movie ratings. Management Science, 61(9), 2241–2258. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2082
64.
LibermanN.EyalT.TropeY.WaltherE. (2004). The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.781
LibermanN.SagristanoM. D.TropeY. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00535-8
LiH.MengF.JeongM.ZhangZ. (2020). To follow others or be yourself? Social influence in online restaurant reviews. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(3), 1067–1087. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-03-2019-0263
70.
LiH.MengF.PanB. (2020). How does review disconfirmation influence customer online review behavior? A mixed-method investigation. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(11), 3685–3703. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-03-2020-0234
71.
LiH.QiR.LiuH.MengF.ZhangZ. (2021). Can time soften your opinion? The influence of consumer experience valence and review device type on restaurant evaluation. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, 102729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102729
72.
LiH.ZhangZ.MengF.ZhangZ. (2019). When you write review” matters: The interactive effect of prior online reviews and review temporal distance on consumers’ restaurant evaluation. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(3), 1273–1291. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2018-0058
73.
LiuY.ZhaoX.LiuY. (2018). Stress and unethical consumer attitudes: The mediating role of construal level and materialism. Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.044
NazlanN. H.TanfordS.MontgomeryR. (2018). The effect of availability heuristics in online consumer reviews. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 17(5), 449–460. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1731
78.
NorrisC. J. (2021). The negativity bias, revisited: Evidence from neuroscience measures and an individual differences approach. Social Neuroscience, 16(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2019.1696225
PanL. Y.ChiouJ. S. (2011). How much can you trust online information? Cues for perceived trustworthiness of consumer-generated online information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 25(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2011.01.002
81.
ParkC.LeeT. M. (2009). Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.11.017
82.
PhillipsP.BarnesS.ZiganK.ScheggR. (2017). Understanding the impact of online reviews on hotel performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 56(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287516636481
83.
PiccoliG.OttM. (2014). Impact of mobility and timing on user-generated content. MIS Quarterly Executive, 13(3), 147–157.
84.
PietriE. S.FazioR. H.ShookN. J. (2013). Weighting positive versus negative: The fundamental nature of valence asymmetry. Journal of Personality, 81(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00800.x
85.
RansbothamS.LurieN. H.LiuH. (2019). Creation and consumption of mobile word of mouth: How are mobile reviews different?Marketing Science, 38(5), 773–792. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2018.1115
86.
ReberR.WinkielmanP.SchwarzN. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008
87.
RozinP.RoyzmanE. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0504_2
88.
SchollS. G.GreifenederR.BlessH. (2014). When fluency signals truth: Prior successful reliance on fluency moderates the impact of fluency on truth judgments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 27(3), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1805
89.
SchwartzM. (1982). Repetition and rated truth value of statements. The American Journal of Psychology, 95(3), 393. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422132
90.
SchwarzN. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_2
91.
ShinS. H.ChungN.KangD. (2017). A test of the psychological distance effect for online travel reviews based on construal-level theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Information System, 27(4), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.14329/apjis.2017.27.4.216
92.
SohnS.SeegebarthB.MoritzM. (2017). The impact of perceived visual complexity of mobile online shops on user’s satisfaction. Psychology & Marketing, 34(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20983
93.
SonnierG. P.McAlisterL.RutzO. J. (2011). A dynamic model of the effect of online communications on firm sales. Marketing Science, 30(4), 702–716. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0642
94.
SparksB. A.BrowningV. (2011). The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. Tourism Management, 32(6), 1310–1323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2010.12.011
95.
SuL.YangX.HuangY. (2022). Tourists’ goal-directed behaviors: The influences of goal disclosure, goal commitment, and temporal distance. Journal of Travel Research, 61(4), 940–960. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211000446
96.
SzetoG. P.LeeR. (2002). An ergonomic evaluation comparing desktop, notebook, and subnotebook computers. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.30627
97.
TaibM. F.BahnS.YunM. H. (2016). The effect of psychosocial stress on muscle activity during computer work: Comparative study between desktop computer and mobile computing products. Work, 54(3), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162334
98.
ThomasM.ChandranS.TropeY. (2006). The effects of temporal distance on purchase construal [Unpublished manuscript]. Cornell University.
99.
TillyR.FischbachK.SchoderD. (2015). Mineable or messy? Assessing the quality of macro-level tourism information derived from social media. Electronic Markets, 25, 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0181-2
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
102.
TropeY.LibermanN.WakslakC. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X
103.
TsaurS. H.HuangC. C.LuohH. F. (2014). Do travel product types matter? Online review direction and persuasiveness. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 31(7), 884–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2014.890156
104.
UnkelbachC. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.219
105.
WakslakC.TropeY. (2009). The effect of construal level on subjective probability estimates. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society/APS, 20(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02250.x
106.
WakslakC. J.TropeY.LibermanN.AlonyR. (2006). Seeing the forest when entry is unlikely: Probability and the mental representation of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 135(4), 641–653. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.641
107.
WanE. W.AgrawalN. (2011). Carryover effects of self-control on decision making: A construal-level perspective. The Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1086/658471
108.
WangS.LehtoX. (2020). The interplay of travelers’ psychological distance, language abstraction, and message appeal type in social media advertising. Journal of Travel Research, 59(8), 1430–1446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519880000
109.
WeiW.MiaoL.HuangZ. (. (2013). Customer engagement behaviors and hotel responses. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.10.002
110.
WilliamsL. E.SteinR.GalgueraL. (2014). The distinct affective consequences of psychological distance and construal level. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1123–1138. https://doi.org/10.1086/674212
111.
WuP. F. (2013). In search of negativity bias: An empirical study of perceived helpfulness of online reviews. Psychology & Marketing, 30(11), 971–984. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20660
112.
WuR.WuH. H.WangC. L. (2021). Why is a picture ‘worth a thousand words’? Pictures as information in perceived helpfulness of online reviews. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(3), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12627
113.
XueF.ZhouP. (2010). The effects of product involvement and prior experience on Chinese consumers’ responses to online word of mouth. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2011.524576
114.
YangJ.MaiE. (. (2010). Experiential goods with network externalities effects: An empirical study of online rating system. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 63(9-10), 1050–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.029
115.
YangY.WuL.YangW. (2018). Does time dull the pain? The impact of temporal contiguity on review extremity in the hotel context. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 75, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.02.015
116.
YanJ.HouS.UngerA. (2014). High construal level reduces overoptimistic performance prediction. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(8), 1303–1313. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.8.1303
117.
YinD.MitraS.ZhangH. (2016). Research note—when do consumers value positive vs. Negative reviews? An empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Information Systems Research, 27(1), 131–144. http://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0617
118.
YanD.SenguptaJ. (2011). Effects of construal level on the price-quality relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 376–389. https://doi.org/10.1086/659755
119.
ZhangL.WuL.MattilaA. S. (2016). Online reviews: The role of information load and peripheral factors. Journal of Travel Research, 55(3), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287514559032
120.
ZhangJ. Q.CraciunG.ShinD. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 63(12), 1336–1341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.12.011
121.
ZhaoM.XieJ. (2011). Effects of social and temporal distance on consumer’ responses to peer recommendations. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.3.486
122.
ZhouY.TianB.MoT.FeiZ. (2020). Consumers complain more fiercely through small-screen devices: The role of spatial crowding perception. Journal of Service Research, 23(3), 353–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520904408
