Danger-Associated Molecular Patterns Derived From the Extracellular Matrix Provide Temporal Control of Innate Immunity

Abstract

It is evident that components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) act as danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) through direct interactions with pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) including Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and inflammasomes. Through these interactions, ECM-derived DAMPs autonomously trigger sterile inflammation or prolong pathogen-induced responses through the production of proinflammatory mediators and the recruitment of leukocytes to sites of injury and infection. Recent research, however, suggests that ECM-derived DAMPs are additionally involved in the resolution and fine-tuning of inflammation by orchestrating the production of anti-inflammatory mediators that are required for the resolution of tissue inflammation and the transition to acquired immunity. Thus, in this review, we discuss the current knowledge of the interplay between ECM-derived DAMPs and the innate immune signaling pathways that are activated to provide temporal control of innate immunity.

Keywords

biglycan decorin extracellular matrix hyaluronan inflammasome inflammation innate immunity Toll-like receptors (TLRs)versican

Introduction

There is growing evidence that components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) are crucial regulators of tissue inflammation and innate immunity.^1–4 Inflammation is an essential mechanism through which the innate immune system initiates a protective response to pathogen invasion and tissue injury.^5,6 The activation of innate immunity results from the recognition of specific molecules by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that are present in both immune and non-immune cells.⁷ Activation of PRRs initiates an inflammatory cascade consisting of cytokine transcription and secretion, recruitment of leukocytes into the site of infection or injury and, in the case of tissue infection, the transition to adaptive immune response which is often required for the clearance of a pathogen.⁸ Activation of PRRs involves the engagement of various co-receptors and promotes specific intracellular signaling cascades upstream of the secretion of proinflammatory mediators.⁹ Fine-control of the innate immune system is critical because this response must switch from the production of proinflammatory mediators to those mediators required for the resolution of tissue inflammation and the transition to an adaptive immune response. The inability to make this switch will result in increased tissue injury, chronic inflammation, and fibrosis.

PRRs recognize two classes of specific molecules resulting either from the presence of pathogens, via pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or from danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which are released from damaged tissue.⁹ While PAMPs are external agents derived from viruses or bacteria, DAMPs represent endogenous sterile stimuli, which are released either from the ECM (e.g., proteolytically digested ECM fragments) or from dying cells (e.g., calcium-binding proteins, ATP, chromatin, DNA, nuclear proteins).^10,11

A broad spectrum of DAMPs has now been extensively described to promote a host of diverse biological processes involving either homeostasis and regeneration or development of pathological conditions, such as chronic inflammation and fibrogenesis.^1,5,11–15 Intracellular DAMPs refer to immunogenic molecules that are released from the breakdown of necrotic and apoptotic cells or cells that undergo autophagy.⁵ Such molecules are mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and ATP that originate from mitochondria,¹⁶ calcium-binding protein S-100,¹⁷ myosin fragments,¹⁸ actin,¹⁹ heat shock proteins,²⁰ uric acid²¹ from cytosol, high-mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) from the nucleus or autophagosome,²² and histone from the nucleus²³ (Table 1). A number of thorough review articles cover our understanding of the inflammatory signaling pathways triggered by these ligands.^5,14,24,25

Table 1.

The Nature and Source of Intra- and Extracellular DAMPs.

	Origins	Release Mechanism	PRRs	References
Intracellular
ATP	Mitochondria	Injury	P2X₇	²⁶
Heat shock proteins	Cytosol	Apoptosis, necrosis	TLR2, TLR4, CD91	^27–29
Histone	Nucleus	Apoptosis, necrosis	TLR2, TLR4, NLRP3	^30,31
HMGB1	Nucleus, autophagosome	Apoptosis, necrosis, injury	TLR2, TLR4, TLR9, RAGE	^22,32,33
mtDNA	Mitochondria	Trauma, injury	TLR9	¹⁶
S-100	Cytosol	Neutrophilic inflammation	TLR4, RAGE	^17,34,35
Myosin	Cytosol, endosome	Myocardial infarction	TLR2, TLR4, RAGE	¹⁸
Actin	Cytosol	Injury	Dendritic cell NK lectin group receptor-1	¹⁹
Uric acid	Cytosol	Ultraviolet irradiation	NLRP3	³⁶
Extracellular
Aggrecan	Proteoglycan	MMP, ADAMTS cleavage	TLR2	³⁷
Biglycan	Proteoglycan	MMP cleavage, de novo synthesis	TLR2, TLR4, NLRP3	^38–40
Decorin	Proteoglycan	MMP cleavage, de novo synthesis	TLR2, TLR4	⁴¹
LMW-HA	GAG	Hyaluronidase cleavage	CD44, TLR2, TLR4, NLRP3	^42–45
Versican	Proteoglycan	Secretion	TLR2, TLR6, CD14	⁴⁶
HS	GAG	Heparanase cleavage	TLR4, RAGE	^47,48
Tenascin-C	ECM glycoprotein	De novo synthesis	TLR4	⁴⁹
Fibrinogen	ECM glycoprotein	Extravasation	TLR4	⁵⁰
Fibronectin	ECM glycoprotein	MMP, splicing, unfolding	TLR2, TLR4	^51–57

Abbreviations: ADAMTS, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs; PRRs, pattern recognition receptors; TLRs, Toll-like receptors; CD, cluster of differentiation; NLRP3, NOD-like receptor pyrin domain–containing 3; HMGB1, high-mobility group protein B1; mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; RAGE, receptor for advanced glycation end products; MMP, metalloproteinase; LMW-HA, low-molecular-weight hyaluronan; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; HS, heparan sulfate; ECM, extracellular matrix.

The ECM components discovered to be capable of acting as DAMPs are glycoproteins (e.g., fibrinogen, fibronectin [FN] domains, tenascin-C),^{50–52,58,59} proteoglycans (PGs; for example, small leucine-rich proteoglycans [SLRPs], versican),^{38,41–43,60,61} or glycosaminoglycans (GAGs; for example, low-molecular-weight hyaluronan [LMW-HA] and HS).^47,62,63 In addition the matrix-derived protein matrilin-2 in its soluble form promotes inflammation and axonal damage⁶⁴ (Table 1).

The ECM-derived DAMPs are autonomous triggers of the inflammatory process through direct interaction with the specific PRRs. They are also capable of ramping-up and prolonging pathogen-induced inflammatory responses.⁶⁵ At later stages, depending on the pathology and signaling pathway involved, DAMPs can act to maintain or reduce the inflammatory response. To this end, DAMPs indirectly influence the innate immune response by modulating the production or activity of other sterile stimuli such as transforming growth factor (TGF)-β and interleukin (IL)-1β, which in turn will regulate the immune response.^5,7,66

In this context, the present review aims to focus on the current knowledge regarding the direct and indirect interplay between ECM-derived DAMPs and the innate immune signaling pathways.

ECM-Derived DAMP/Receptor Interactions and Signaling

Several innate immune receptors have been shown to represent the first line of defense following direct interaction with danger molecules.⁶⁷ These innate immune responses are initiated by the activation of PRRs following ligand recognition and further promotion of signaling cascades.⁶⁸ DAMPs are typically released from inside the cell (e.g., heat shock proteins) or the ECM network (e.g., biglycan, decorin). Upon tissue injury, they can be released in the extracellular milieu and further trigger the innate response via PRRs either aggravating inflammation or promoting the regeneration of injured tissue.^1,5,69 ECM-derived DAMPs can be generated as a consequence of enzymatic cleavage, de novo synthesis by macrophages and/or stromal cells^60,70–72 as well as splicing mechanisms⁵³ and unfolding due to mechanical contractility.⁵⁴

To a large extent, the outcome depends on the nature of the respective DAMP, the signaling receptor, and the signaling pathway involved.⁷³ Common receptors for DAMPs include Toll-like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs), NOD-like receptors (NLRs), receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE; as well as scavenger receptors),⁷⁴ integrins,⁷⁵ and cluster of differentiation 44 (CD44).⁴⁴ Given the large number and diversity of immune receptors, in this section, we will only address those receptors, which directly interact with ECM-derived DAMPs in relation to their consequent signaling pathway. The common structural and functional features of these immune receptors are covered by a number of reviews in great detail.^{10,67,76–83}

TLR-Dependent ECM-Derived DAMP Signaling

TLRs are the most well-characterized PRRs, which consist of 10 distinct proteins in humans (TLR1-10) and 12 in mice (TLR1–TLR9, TLR11–TLR13; TLR10 is a pseudogene).^84–87 Structurally, TLRs have a highly glycosylated N-terminal ectodomain with leucine-rich repeats (LRRs), responsible for ligand recognition,⁸⁸ and a cytoplasmic region with a Toll/IL-1 receptor (TIR) domain for signaling.⁸⁹ TLR1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 are located at the cell surface, and they sense various extracellular danger molecules, such as soluble ECM-derived ligands and pathogens,² while TLR3, 7, 8, and 9 are present at the endolysosomal membrane.⁹⁰ The latter category of receptors recognizes nucleic acids and PAMPs that undergo endocytosis to allow degradation by endosomes or lysosomes.⁹⁰ TLR10, the only TLR without identified ligand specificity, was initially described as an anti-inflammatory PRR, which is capable of attenuating the TLR2 response.⁹¹ More recent studies, however, showed involvement of TLR10 in the signaling of ligands such as FSL-1, LPS, and flagellin. Thus, the TLR10 knockdown in monocytic cell lines diminished the production of IL-8, IL-1β, and chemokine (C–C motif) ligand (CCL) 20 in response to these ligands.⁹²

TLRs require co-receptors or accessory molecules for ligand recognition and further signaling activation.⁹³ Moreover, TLR signaling interacts with a variety of other signaling pathways making the design of new specific therapeutic agents increasingly difficult.^65,94 Specific downstream effects depend on the specific DAMP, type of TLR, involvement of accessory molecules, cell/tissue type, and the overall biological context. For example, TLR4 engages cluster of differentiation 14 (CD14) and lymphocyte antigen 96 (MD2) to generate the LPS-induced inflammatory signal.^95,96 On the contrary, TLR2 is capable of associating with TLR1, TLR6, CD14, and CD36; binding to integrins; and recognizing peptidoglycans and lipopeptides derived from gram-positive bacteria or mycoplasma.^97,98 In addition, endosomal TLRs co-localize with CD14, which appears to be pivotal for TLR7 and TLR9 signaling.⁹⁹

The complexity of the TLR signaling requires the development of more specific therapeutic strategies to target certain ligand/receptor interactions and adaptor molecules rather than the simple neutralization of a receptor.

ECM-Derived DAMPs

ECM-derived DAMPs are primarily created by fragments of the ECM that are cleaved off during tissue injury and engage with multiple PRRs to initiate the proinflammatory response. This interaction is summarized in Table 1 and Fig. 1. In addition to this mode of generation, ECM-derived DAMPs can also be synthesized de novo by cytokine-activated macrophages and resident cells to bind PRRs and sustain their proinflammatory status.¹⁰⁰ Even though there are many distinct TLRs, it is of note that to date only TLR2 and TLR4 have been observed to recognize ECM-generated DAMPs.

Figure 1.

ECM-derived DAMP signaling through the innate immunity receptors. Upon injury, the ECM components HS-binding proteoglycans and SLRPs are cleaved by proteinases and the resulting soluble molecules act as DAMPs. They activate specific receptors on the surface of macrophages or intracellularly and promote inflammation. The soluble SLRPs biglycan and decorin bind to TLR2 and TLR4, aggrecan fragments signal through TLR2, and versican via the TLR2/TLR6/CD14 complex. LMW-HA signals through CD44 and further promotes the TLR4-dependent inflammatory response. These interactions promote downstream signaling, which involves the engagement of MyD88 or TRIF; the activation of NF-kB and p38, ERK MAPKs; and the expression of the proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Consequently, these mediators attract neutrophils, macrophages, B cells, and T cells to the site of injury. In addition, soluble biglycan clusters TLR2/4 with P2X₇ and modulates the NLRP3 inflammasome. On the contrary, LMW-HA activates the NLPR3 inflammasome via CD44. Thus, biglycan and LMW-HA activate caspase-1, which cleaves pro-IL-1β into mature IL-1β. Abbreviations: ECM, extracellular matrix; DAMPs, danger-associated molecular patterns; HS, heparan sulfate; SLRP, small leucine-rich proteoglycan; TLR, Toll-like receptor; CD, cluster of differentiation; LMW-HA, low-molecular-weight hyaluronan; MyD88, myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88; TRIF, TIR-domain–containing adaptor-inducing interferon-β; NF-kB, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; ERK, extracellular signal–regulated kinase; MAPKs, mitogen-activated protein kinases; NLRP3, NOD-like receptor pyrin domain–containing 3; IL, interleukin; HA, hyaluronan; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; CCL, chemokine (C–C motif) ligand; CXCL, chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand.

Biglycan and decorin, two members of the SLRPs family, generate a sterile proinflammatory response in macrophages following direct interaction with TLR2 and TLR4.^38,41 Through TLR signaling and engagement of different adaptor molecules, biglycan promotes inflammatory, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and sphingolipid pathways to regulate various cytokines and chemokines.⁶⁵ Thus, biglycan promotes the production of chemokine (C–X–C motif) ligand (CXCL) 1 and CCL2 via TLR2/4/myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88) to recruit neutrophils and macrophages, whereas the expression of CCL5 via TLR4/TIR-domain-containing adaptor-inducing interferon-β (TRIF) attracts T cells and macrophages.⁷⁰ At earlier times, these pathways also involve the activation of sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1), an enzyme that catalyzes the phosphorylation of sphingosine to sphingosine 1-phosphate.¹⁰¹ Moreover, biglycan induces the release of mature IL-1β which is modulated in a ROS-dependent fashion.^39,102 However, biglycan also plays a limiting role regarding IL-1β production. Biglycan promotes the synthesis and activation of NADPH oxidase (NOX) 2 in macrophages, which inhibits the synthesis of IL-1β. However, the anti-inflammatory effect of biglycan-induced NOX2 activation is counteracted by biglycan signaling through TLR2 and heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) induction.¹⁰²

Similar to biglycan, decorin binds directly to both TLR2 and TLR4 receptors, thereby orchestrating pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and recruiting macrophages.^40,41 Furthermore, decorin suppresses the activity of TGF-β1 and reduces the abundance of oncogenic microRNA-21, thus enhancing the protein level of programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4), which in turn will inhibit the transcription of anti-inflammatory IL-10.⁴¹ Consequently, this proinflammatory state provided by soluble decorin limits the expansion of established tumors.⁴¹ The direct interaction between these two SLRPs and TLRs is thought to be due to the presence within their protein structure of LRR motifs, while the signaling requires the presence of GAG moieties.³⁸ Interestingly, some PGs may also interact with PAMPs and PRRs. For example, lumican being structurally very similar to decorin and biglycan has up to now not been described as an independent trigger of TLRs but rather as an enhancer of LPS. Therefore, lumican core protein binds LPS and enhances the LPS/TLR4/CD14-dependent proinflammatory response.¹⁰³

In addition to intact PGs, proteolytic degradation of two chondroitin sulfate PGs, aggrecan and versican, results in the generation of fragments that are important in cancer progression and are DAMPs.¹⁰⁴ The aggrecan 32-mer fragment, which is generated upon proteolytic degradation of the aggrecan core protein, activates chondrocytes, synovial fibroblasts, and macrophages in a TLR2/MyD88/NF-kB-dependent manner.³⁷ Activation of TLR2-dependent signaling by the aggrecan 32-mer stimulates the expression of inducible nitric oxide synthases (iNOS), CCL2, IL-1α, IL-6, MMP12, MMP13, and ADAMTS5 in chondrocytes, synovial fibroblasts, and peritoneal macrophages. Similarly, versikine, the 70-kDa N-terminal fragment of versican, activates macrophages resulting in the increase of type I IFN–stimulated genes and macrophage production of IL-6, IL-1β, IL-12, and CCL2.¹⁰⁵ The work of Tang et al. shows that intact versican is recognized by macrophages in a TLR2-dependent manner.⁷² When macrophages deficient in TLR2 were exposed to versikine, there was a significant but only partial decrease in IL-6, suggesting that TLR2 along with other PRRs are responsible for macrophage recognition of versikine.⁷²

Hyaluronic acid (HA), a non-sulfated GAG without a protein core, is capable of regulating the innate immune response via TLRs through different mechanisms which are dependent on its molecular weight.^2,63 LMW-HA has been shown to act as an endogenous activator of a TLR2-promoted immune response, whereas high-molecular-weight hyaluronan (HMW-HA) inhibits TLR2 signaling.⁴² Moreover, the LMW-HA fragments released upon tissue injury engage TLR2/4/MyD88 and CD44, and activate the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) pathway.^42,106,107 Consequently, these signaling pathways potentiate the expression of various cytokines and enzymes that modulate ECM homeostasis (e.g., metalloproteinase [MMP] 12, inducible nitric oxide synthase, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1). Moreover, HS fragments released by heparanases¹⁰⁸ from perlecan (basement membrane),¹⁰⁹ syndecans,¹¹⁰ and glypicans¹¹¹ (cell surface) act as direct TLR4 agonists.^47,62,112 It appears that HS binds also to other TLRs containing the HS-binding motif, such as TLR1, TLR2, or TLR6. More details are addressed in a recently published comprehensive review.¹¹² On the contrary, HS chains, while still attached within heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), modulate the innate immune response by facilitating the LPS-induced CD14/TLR4 activation.¹¹³ In this context, studying the effects of HS biomimetics, synthetic compounds, or regulation of heparanases might bring us closer to the identification of specific drug targets to limit the untoward effects of excessive inflammation.^108,114

Other potent activators of TLR4 are the endogenous soluble ECM glycoproteins such as tenascin-C,^49,58,115 fibrinogen extravascular deposits,⁵⁰ and FN-derived domains^51,52,55 (Table 1). FN-derived domains are generated as a consequence of unfolding due to cellular contractility⁵⁴ or alternative splicing mechanisms.⁵³ FN III 13-14,⁵⁵ FN extradomain A,^51,56,57 the partially unfolded III-1 domain, and FnIII-1c⁵² are FN-derived domains revealed to signal through TLRs. For more insights on the structure of FN, please refer to more thematic reviews.^116,117

The non-collagenous matrix protein matrilin-2 released during axonal injury has been shown to signal through TLR4 in the central nervous system.⁶⁴ Even though the ECM-derived DAMPs share similar TLRs (mainly TLR2 or TLR4), the signaling outcomes differ widely from one DAMP to the other.^{41,65,118,119}

Inflammasomes and ECM-Derived DAMPs Signaling

Another class of PRRs is represented by inflammasomes, which are intracellular innate immune receptors activated by specific ligands to form molecular scaffolds that recruit and activate the cysteine protease caspase-1.¹²⁰ Caspase-1 in turn cleaves and matures IL-1β and IL-18 cytokines and is capable of induction of pyroptosis, the inflammatory form of cell death, which is thought to be a mechanism to remove compromised cells.^120,121 However, there are a number of molecules that arrest pyroptosis in infected cells to maintain their survival.^122,123 Some inflammasomes such as NLR family caspase activation and recruitment domains–containing protein 4 (NLRC4); NACHT, LRR, and PYD domains–containing protein (NLRP) 1; and absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) are known to be activated by direct interaction with viral or bacterial ligands delivered in the cytosol.¹²⁰ NLRP3, NLRP6, and pyrin have been shown to be more sensitive to different cellular biochemical changes or signaling like membrane potential modification, potassium efflux, ROS formation, or metabolic changes.^{120,121,124–126} Two other human inflammatory caspases, caspase-4 and -5, were shown to be also involved in the innate immune response¹²⁷; however, their regulation by ECM-derived ligands is not well understood.

At this time, biglycan and LMW-HA are the main ECM-derived DAMPs shown to activate the inflammasome and subsequently caspase-1.⁵ To promote the formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome complex, caspase-1 activation, and IL-1β maturation in macrophages, soluble biglycan must first interact with TLR2/4 and the purinergic receptor P2X₇³⁹ (Table 1). However, the exact biochemical mechanism of biglycan-mediated NLRP3 activation is not yet fully clarified. It is conceivable that biglycan alters membrane potential by binding to the ligand-gated ion channel P2X₇.³⁹ Another possible mechanism might be the induction of ROS by biglycan, which is known to be involved in the formation of the inflammasome scaffold.¹²¹ Based on recent study regarding the dual role of biglycan in IL-1β regulation,¹⁰² it appears that while biglycan induces the inflammasome scaffold formation through the NOX1- and NOX4-generated ROS, biglycan might exert anti-inflammatory signaling via NOX2-produced ROS.

Even if soluble biglycan induces the synthesis and the activation of SphK1, thereby enhancing the CCL2 and CCL5 inflammatory cytokines,¹⁰¹ nothing is known about the biglycan/SphK1 axis in terms of activation of the inflammasome. Nevertheless, studies show that SphK1 activation has an inhibitory effect on inflammasome activation by decreasing the levels of sphingosine, a DAMP that promotes NLRP3-inflammasome-dependent secretion of IL-1β.^128–130 However, the hypotheses regarding the direct mechanisms of biglycan-induced inflammasome activation require further studies to be well established.

On the contrary, LMW-HA activates the NLRP3/cryopyrin inflammasome, thereby promoting the maturation of IL-1β through a different mechanism. LMW-HA is internalized by macrophages and subjected to lysosomal digestion into fragments, which in turn activate the inflammasome.⁴⁵

HS has not been studied in relation to the inflammasome pathways, even though inflammasomes such as NLRP3, NLRC4, or AIM2 contain HS-binding motifs¹¹² that should be recognized when HSPGs become engulfed intracellularly. Tenascin-C together with ATP-P2X7R signaling can also activate the inflammasome through TLR4 in epicardium-derived cells following myocardial infarction.¹³¹

HS and RAGE Signaling

RAGE has been initially revealed as the receptor for advanced glycation end products (AGEs) formed after rearrangement of the non-enzymatic glycosylated products.^132–134 RAGE is one of the most studied receptors for DAMPs known to recognize ligands like HMGB1,³² S-100 calcium-binding proteins,³⁴ myosin fragments,¹⁸ and amyloid-β.¹³⁵ Structurally, RAGE possesses an extracellular domain formed by three immunoglobulin domains (V-C1-C2), a single transmembrane domain and cytosolic portions. The V and C1 domains are decisive for the ligand–receptor interaction, whereas intracellular domain is crucial for signal transduction.^48,132,136

RAGE expression is augmented during embryonic development; it remains in a basal level in healthy tissues but is reactivated in adults under conditions such as inflammation.¹³⁷ Due to natural alternative splicing and cleavage by membrane-associated protease, RAGE has three variants: N-truncated (V-type domain absent), dominant-negative (cytosolic domain absent), and soluble RAGE (transmembrane domain absent).¹³⁸ RAGE-dependent signal transduction requires the oligomerization of RAGE on the cell surface,⁴⁸ and inhibition of this process reduces mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and NF-kB activation.¹³⁹ Out of all matrix-derived DAMPs, HS chains bind to RAGE with a receptor: HS stoichiometry of 2:1 and trigger the formation of a hexamer.⁴⁸ The binding of HS to RAGE is essential for the receptor activation and downstream Erk1/2 phosphorylation following stimulation with known RAGE ligands like HMGB1, S100A8/A9, S100A12, S100b, or AGE-BSA.^48,140,141 Besides HS, RAGE was shown to bind CS chains and promote the pulmonary metastasis of Lewis lung carcinoma and B16 melanoma cells.¹⁴² Based on the potential for RAGE to be involved in chronic inflammation and metastasis, it is considered a therapeutic target. Soluble RAGE is a potential therapeutic tool to limit tissue inflammation and tumor metastasis because it competes with ligands, including AGEs, that bind to RAGE localized on endothelial cells, and inhibits RAGE signaling.^33,143–145

Indirect Modulation of Innate Immunity by ECM-Derived DAMPs

TGF-β in Innate Immunity

TGF-β is an extensively characterized cytokine with roles in diverse biological processes such as regeneration, angiogenesis, immune responses, and homeostasis.^66,146–148 The origins of TGF-β dysregulation have been of great interest because this has the potential to play a pivotal role in the development of fibrosis.⁶⁶ TGF-β pathway activation initially requires release of TGF-β from large latent complexes (LLCs) formed by the latent-associated protein (LAP), TGF-β, and the latent transforming growth factor β binding protein (LTBP).¹⁴⁹ Once released, TGF-β binds to its receptor, which is a tetramer and promotes kinase activity and the downstream Smad-dependent or -independent signaling pathways.^66,150 The Smad-independent pathways include the activation of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K), Rho GTPases, and various MAPKs.^66,150

In addition to its profibrotic effects, TGF-β has been shown to modify the innate and adaptive immune systems with effects on almost every immune cell, including dendritic cells, B cells, NK cells, innate lymphoid cells, and granulocytes.⁶⁶ For example, TGF-β promotes the differentiation of macrophages to an M2 or anti-inflammatory phenotype.¹⁵¹ Thus, TGF-β decreases the NF-kB- and TNF-α production in macrophages by interfering with the TLR2, TLR4, and TLR5 receptors as well as the MyD88 pathway, while TRIF-related adaptor molecule (TRAM)/TRIF signaling remains unaffected.¹⁵² This is mainly due to TGF-β-dependent ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of MyD88 and the subsequent decrease of its cellular levels.¹⁵² Moreover, the inflammatory anergy of intestinal macrophages is attributable to the action of intestinal stromal TGF-β, which is able to induce IkBα expression, thus inhibiting NF-κB activation in a Smad-dependent manner.¹⁵³ However, TGF-β also promotes proinflammatory responses because inhibition of TGF-ß signaling decreases LPS-induced TNF-α production in macrophages.¹⁵⁴

ECM-Derived DAMPs and TGF-β Signaling Crosstalk in Inflammation

Among the ECM-derived DAMPs, decorin is the most extensively studied TGF-β-binding partner, and their interaction results in various biological effects. The proinflammatory response triggered by decorin can be attributed to three different mechanisms such as direct interaction between soluble decorin and the TLR2 and TLR4 receptors, inhibition of the TGF-β signaling, and sequestration of TGF-β by matrix-bound decorin. The direct signaling of soluble decorin through TLR2 and TLR4 is described above and schematized in Fig. 1.

Heparin and HS also bind TGF-β1, suggesting the potential for these GAGs to control the biological activity of this molecule.¹⁵⁵ Heparin and highly sulfated HS were shown to bind TGF-β1 and TGF-β2 but not TGF-β3.¹⁵⁶ The ability of heparin and HS to modulate the biological activity of TGF-β is summarized in a new comprehensive review.¹⁵⁷ However, that ability of GAGs to modulate TGF-β activity in the innate immune response to PAMPs and DAMPs was not addressed in this article.

Highly sulfated hyaluronan molecules have been shown to interact with TGF-β, thereby impairing its bioactivity by blocking the binding of TGF-β1 to its receptors-I and –II and consequently decreasing Smad2 phosphorylation.¹⁵⁸ In addition, the fifth FN type III–like domain of tenascin-C, called TNCIII5, has been shown to bind TGF-β family members with high affinity.¹⁵⁹

ECM-Derived DAMPs Promote an Anti-Inflammatory Response

There is growing evidence that many of the same ECM-derived DAMPs that bind to PRRs and activate a proinflammatory response are also capable of binding to PRRs to promote an anti-inflammatory response.^160–162 HA can activate both pro- and anti-inflammatory pathways depending on size with LMW-HA (<250 kDa) promoting the proinflammatory effects of HA, which are described in detail earlier in this review. In contrast to the LMW-HA, studies show that HMW-HA (>1 million Da) interactions with TLRs provide signals of tissue integrity and are important in suppressing the inflammatory response. In one study, HMW-HA interactions with TLR4 in type 2 alveolar epithelial cells (AEC2) promoted an anti-inflammatory response that leads to proliferation of AEC2 cells and repair of lung injury and decreased the pulmonary fibrosis in a mouse model of bleomycin-induced lung injury.¹⁶³ In a second study, HMW-HA was found to specifically inhibit the TLR2-dependent signaling of LMW-HA in MH-S cells, an alveolar macrophage cell line.⁴²

As previously discussed, biglycan promotes a proinflammatory response through activation of TLRs and inflammasomes.² In addition to activation of MyD88 signaling pathways after engaging TLR4, biglycan activates the TLR4 co-adaptor molecule, TRIF, activating type I interferon signaling pathways.^70,102 Signaling through TRIF is considered to be important in the resolution of inflammation via the expression of type I interferon–stimulated genes.¹⁶⁴ Recent work from the cancer literature shows that intact versican binds TLR2 and differentiates dendritic cells to an anti-inflammatory/immunosuppresive phenotype with increased production of IL-6 and IL-10 and increased expression of IL-6 and IL-10 receptors on the cell surface of these immune cells.⁷² The polarization of dendritic cells to an immunosuppressive phenotype—a well-recognized consequence of inflammation associated with cancer—is now considered to be a mechanism contributing to immune evasion by tumor cells.^72,165

In contrast to other ECM-DAMPs that activate TLRs causing either a pro- or anti-inflammatory response, proteoglycan-4 (PRG4), also known as lubricin, has been shown to only promote an anti-inflammatory response. Abundant in normal joints, PRG4 decreases in the presence of inflammatory arthropathies, such as osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).¹⁶⁶ The binding of PRG4 to CD44, TLR2, and TLR4 on synovial fibroblasts suppresses the production of a number of proinflammatory mediators including cytokines and proteases and decreases the proliferation of synovial fibroblasts when these fibroblasts are treated with TLR agonists or synovial fluid obtained from patients with OA and RA.^167–169

Future studies will need to better define the mechanisms whereby ECM-derived DAMPs shape the innate immune response during the resolution of tissue inflammation and the progression from innate to acquired immunity. This will include better characterization of the signaling pathways and transcription factors by which HMW-HA, biglycan, and versican promote an anti-inflammatory response. More research is also needed to better define the role of ECM-DAMPs such as HMW-HA and PRG4 in maintaining tissue homeostasis. Understanding the mechanisms whereby ECM-DAMPs promote an anti-inflammatory response may lead to new treatment strategies to minimize the untoward effects of excessive inflammation.

Over the past two decades, studies have provided mounting evidence of the importance of the ECM in shaping the innate immune response. This is a paradigm shift from the initial concept where the ECM was considered a static network involved in the structural integrity of tissues to a new paradigm where the ECM is dynamic and is able to shape the immune responses to tissue inflammation and injury.^170,171 A prime example is the release of ECM components, the so-called DAMPs that bind PRRs and activate select signaling pathways of the innate immune system. The study of the biglycan and decorin has attracted a considerable amount of attention and more importantly resulted in the identification of specific PRRs including TLR2, TLR4, and TLR6, and the NLRP3 inflammasome that are activated resulting in the production of proinflammatory mediators and the acute inflammatory response (Fig. 1).^5,40 More recently, studies provide evidence that these same molecules activate PRRs such as TLR2 and TLR4 and play a critical role in promoting an anti-inflammatory response that is critical for resolution of tissue inflammation and the transition to acquired immunity.^102,163,165

Despite these advances, there is much that still needs to be addressed. For example, structural modifications of HS and CS side chains of ECM-PGs occur in response to tissue inflammation and injury. However, very little is known about how these modifications alter the ability of ECM-PGs to bind and activate PRRs. It is also interesting that only a limited number of ECM-derived DAMPs have been discovered, raising the question as to whether additional ECM-DAMPs exist. Another potential avenue that needs to be pursued is the use of these molecules as biomarkers that might have diagnostic relevance in certain pathological conditions.^40,172–174 Finally, increased knowledge of how the ECM-derived DAMPs trigger the innate response will enable the development of novel therapeutic strategies to limit the deleterious effects of excessive tissue inflammation.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We apologize to those researchers whose work could not be cited due to space limitation.

Competing Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author Contributions

All of the authors contributed to writing the manuscript. CFW, JF, MW, and LS designed the concept of the article (the order and content of the review sections). LS and MVN designed the figure and table. All of the authors provided final approval of the submitted and published versions.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Original research on ECM signaling in the authors’ laboratories was supported by the German Research Council (SFB 815, project A5, SFB 1039, project B02, SFB 1177, project C2, and SCHA 1082/6-1), LOEWE program Ub-Net (all to LS), German Research Council (WY119/1-3), and German Center for Lung Research (to MW).

References

Anders

Schaefer

Beyond tissue injury-damage-associated molecular patterns, toll-like receptors, and inflammasomes also drive regeneration and fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(7):1387–400.

Frey

Schroeder

Manon-Jensen

Iozzo

Schaefer

Biological interplay between proteoglycans and their innate immune receptors in inflammation. FEBS J. 2013;280(10):2165–79.

Sorokin

The impact of the extracellular matrix on inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(10):712–23.

Iozzo

Schaefer

Proteoglycan form and function: a comprehensive nomenclature of proteoglycans. Matrix Biol. 2015;42:11–55.

Schaefer

Complexity of danger: the diverse nature of damage-associated molecular patterns. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(51):35237–45.

Fullerton

Gilroy

DW.

Resolution of inflammation: a new therapeutic frontier. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2016;15(8):551–67.

Liu

Cao

Cellular and molecular regulation of innate inflammatory responses. Cell Mol Immunol. 2016;13(6):711–21.

Hato

Dagher

PC.

How the innate immune system senses trouble and causes trouble. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(8):1459–69.

Mogensen

TH.

Pathogen recognition and inflammatory signaling in innate immune defenses. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009;22(2):240–73.

10.

Newton

Dixit

VM.

Signaling in innate immunity and inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(3). pii: a006049; doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006049.

11.

Rosin

Okusa

MD.

Dangers within: DAMP responses to damage and cell death in kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(3):416–25.

12.

Seong

Matzinger

Hydrophobicity: an ancient damage-associated molecular pattern that initiates innate immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(6):469–78.

13.

Matzinger

Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12:991–1045.

14.

Venereau

Ceriotti

Bianchi

ME.

DAMPs from cell death to new life. Front Immunol. 2015;6:422.

15.

Goligorsky

MS.

Immune system in renal injury and repair: burning the candle from both ends?

Pharmacol Res. 2008;58(2):122–8.

16.

Zhang

Raoof

Chen

Sumi

Sursal

Junger

Brohi

Itagaki

Hauser

CJ.

Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464(7285):104–7.

17.

Foell

Roth

Proinflammatory S100 proteins in arthritis and autoimmune disease. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(12):3762–71.

18.

Lipps

Nguyen

Pyttel

Lynch

4th Liebetrau

Aleshcheva

Voss

Dörr

Nef

Möllmann

Hamm

Sadayappan

Troidl

N-terminal fragment of cardiac myosin binding protein-C triggers pro-inflammatory responses in vitro. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016;99:47–56.

19.

Srinivasan

Gordon

Ahrens

Franz

Deddouche

Chakravarty

Phillips

Yunus

Rosen

Valente

Teixeira

Barry Thompson

Dionne

Wood

e Sousa

CR.

Actin is an evolutionarily-conserved damage-associated molecular pattern that signals tissue injury in Drosophila melanogaster. Elife. 2016;5. pii: e19662; doi: 10.7554/eLife.19662.

20.

Pockley

Shepherd

Corton

JM.

Detection of heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and anti-Hsp70 antibodies in the serum of normal individuals. Immunol Invest. 1998;27(6):367–77.

21.

Shi

Evans

Rock

KL.

Molecular identification of a danger signal that alerts the immune system to dying cells. Nature. 2003;425(6957):516–21.

22.

Scaffidi

Misteli

Bianchi

ME.

Release of chromatin protein HMGB1 by necrotic cells triggers inflammation. Nature. 2002;418(6894):191–5.

23.

Zhang

Pelayo

Monestier

Ammollo

Semeraro

Taylor

Esmon

Lupu

Esmon

CT.

Extracellular histones are major mediators of death in sepsis. Nat Med. 2009;15(11):1318–21.

24.

Khandia

Munjal

Iqbal

Dhama

Heat shock proteins: therapeutic perspectives in inflammatory disorders. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2017;10(2):94–104.

25.

Turner

NA.

Inflammatory and fibrotic responses of cardiac fibroblasts to myocardial damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016;94:189–200.

26.

Mariathasan

Weiss

Newton

McBride

O’Rourke

Roose-Girma

Lee

Weinrauch

Monack

Dixit

VM.

Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature. 2006;440(7081):228–32.

27.

Basu

Binder

Ramalingam

Srivastava

PK.

CD91 is a common receptor for heat shock proteins gp96, hsp90, hsp70, and calreticulin. Immunity. 2001;14(3):303–13.

28.

Lehnardt

Schott

Trimbuch

Laubisch

Krueger

Wulczyn

Nitsch

Weber

JR.

A vicious cycle involving release of heat shock protein 60 from injured cells and activation of toll-like receptor 4 mediates neurodegeneration in the CNS. J Neurosci. 2008;28(10):2320–31.

29.

Wheeler

Chase

Senft

Poynter

Wong

Page

Extracellular Hsp72, an endogenous DAMP, is released by virally infected airway epithelial cells and activates neutrophils via Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4. Respir Res. 2009;10:31.

30.

Huang

Chen

Evankovich

Yan

Rosborough

Nace

Ding

Loughran

Beer-Stolz

Billiar

Esmon

Tsung

Histones activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in Kupffer cells during sterile inflammatory liver injury. J Immunol. 2013;191(5):2665–79.

31.

Zhang

Monestier

Esmon

CT.

Extracellular histones are mediators of death through TLR2 and TLR4 in mouse fatal liver injury. J Immunol. 2011;187(5):2626–31.

32.

Rovere-Querini

Capobianco

Scaffidi

Valentinis

Catalanotti

Giazzon

Dumitriu

Müller

Iannacone

Traversari

Bianchi

Manfredi

AA.

HMGB1 is an endogenous immune adjuvant released by necrotic cells. EMBO Rep. 2004;5(8):825–30.

33.

Lee

Park

JH.

Receptor for advanced glycation endproducts (RAGE), its ligands, and soluble RAGE: potential biomarkers for diagnosis and therapeutic targets for human renal diseases. Genomics Inform. 2013;11(4):224–9.

34.

Heizmann

Ackermann

Galichet

Pathologies involving the S100 proteins and RAGE. Subcell Biochem. 2007;45:93–138.

35.

Lee

Jang

Park

Kim

Choi

Shin

Park

Choi

Kim

Chung

Jeong

Park

CS.

Elevation of S100 calcium binding protein A9 in sputum of neutrophilic inflammation in severe uncontrolled asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013;111(4):268–75.e1.

36.

Martinon

Petrilli

Mayor

Tardivel

Tschopp

Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2006;440(7081):237–41.

37.

Lees

Golub

Last

Zeng

Jackson

Sutton

Fosang

AJ.

Bioactivity in an aggrecan 32-mer fragment is mediated via toll-like receptor 2. Arthritis Rheum. 2015;67(5):1240–9.

38.

Schaefer

Babelova

Kiss

Hausser

Baliova

Krzyzankova

Marsche

Young

Mihalik

Götte

Malle

Schaefer

Gröne

HJ.

The matrix component biglycan is proinflammatory and signals through Toll-like receptors 4 and 2 in macrophages. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(8):2223–33.

39.

Babelova

Moreth

Tsalastra-Greul

Zeng-Brouwers

Eickelberg

Young

Bruckner

Pfeilschifter

Schaefer

Gröne

Schaefer

Biglycan, a danger signal that activates the NLRP3 inflammasome via toll-like and P2X receptors. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(36):24035–48.

40.

Hsieh

Nastase

Zeng-Brouwers

Iozzo

Schaefer

Soluble biglycan as a biomarker of inflammatory renal diseases. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2014;54:223–35.

41.

Merline

Moreth

Beckmann

Nastase

Zeng-Brouwers

Tralhao

Lemarchand

Pfeilschifter

Schaefer

Iozzo

Schaefer

Signaling by the matrix proteoglycan decorin controls inflammation and cancer through PDCD4 and MicroRNA-21. Sci Signal. 2011;4(199):ra75.

42.

Scheibner

Lutz

Boodoo

Fenton

Powell

Horton

MR.

Hyaluronan fragments act as an endogenous danger signal by engaging TLR2. J Immunol. 2006;177(2):1272–81.

43.

Taylor

Yamasaki

Radek

Di Nardo

Goodarzi

Golenbock

Beutler

Gallo

RL.

Recognition of hyaluronan released in sterile injury involves a unique receptor complex dependent on Toll-like receptor 4, CD44, and MD-2. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(25):18265–75.

44.

Lesley

Hascall

Tammi

Hyman

Hyaluronan binding by cell surface CD44. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(35):26967–75.

45.

Yamasaki

Muto

Taylor

Cogen

Audish

Bertin

Grant

Coyle

Misaghi

Hoffman

Gallo

RL.

NLRP3/cryopyrin is necessary for interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) release in response to hyaluronan, an endogenous trigger of inflammation in response to injury. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(19):12762–71.

46.

Wang

Jia

Ren

Liu

WB.

Ligation of TLR2 by versican: a link between inflammation and metastasis. Arch Med Res. 2009;40(4):321–3.

47.

Goodall

Poon

Phipps

Hulett

MD.

Soluble heparan sulfate fragments generated by heparanase trigger the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines through TLR-4. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(10):e109596.

48.

Young

Krahn

Song

Corbett

Chazin

Pedersen

Esko

JD.

Stable RAGE-heparan sulfate complexes are essential for signal transduction. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8(7):1611–20.

49.

Piccinini

Midwood

KS.

Endogenous control of immunity against infection: tenascin-C regulates TLR4-mediated inflammation via microRNA-155. Cell Rep. 2012;2(4):914–26.

50.

Smiley

King

Hancock

WW.

Fibrinogen stimulates macrophage chemokine secretion through toll-like receptor 4. J Immunol. 2001;167(5):2887–94.

51.

Lefebvre

Levesque

Picard

Pare

Gravel

Flamand

Borgeat

Extra domain A of fibronectin primes leukotriene biosynthesis and stimulates neutrophil migration through activation of Toll-like receptor 4. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(6):1527–33.

52.

Kelsh

You

Horzempa

Zheng

McKeown-Longo

PJ.

Regulation of the innate immune response by fibronectin: synergism between the III-1 and EDA domains. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(7):e102974.

53.

Muro

Iaconcig

Baralle

FE.

Regulation of the fibronectin EDA exon alternative splicing. Cooperative role of the exonic enhancer element and the 5’ splicing site. FEBS Lett. 1998;437(1–2):137–41.

54.

Smith

Gourdon

Little

Kubow

Eguiluz

Luna-Morris

Vogel

Force-induced unfolding of fibronectin in the extracellular matrix of living cells. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(10):e268.

55.

Sofat

Robertson

Wait

Fibronectin III 13-14 domains induce joint damage via Toll-like receptor 4 activation and synergize with interleukin-1 and tumour necrosis factor. J Innate Immun. 2012;4(1):69–79.

56.

Gondokaryono

Ushio

Niyonsaba

Hara

Takenaka

Jayawardana

Ikeda

Okumura

Ogawa

The extra domain A of fibronectin stimulates murine mast cells via toll-like receptor 4. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;82(3):657–65.

57.

Doddapattar

Gandhi

Prakash

Dhanesha

Grumbach

Dailey

Lentz

Chauhan

AK.

Fibronectin splicing variants containing extra domain A promote atherosclerosis in mice through toll-like receptor 4. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(11):2391–400.

58.

Midwood

Sacre

Piccinini

Inglis

Trebaul

Chan

Drexler

Sofat

Kashiwagi

Orend

Brennan

Foxwell

Tenascin-C is an endogenous activator of Toll-like receptor 4 that is essential for maintaining inflammation in arthritic joint disease. Nat Med. 2009;15(7):774–80.

59.

Piccinini

Zuliani-Alvarez

Lim

Midwood

KS.

Distinct microenvironmental cues stimulate divergent TLR4-mediated signaling pathways in macrophages. Sci Signal. 2016;9(443):ra86.

60.

Kim

Takahashi

Lin

Descargues

Grivennikov

Kim

Luo

Karin

Carcinoma-produced factors activate myeloid cells through TLR2 to stimulate metastasis. Nature. 2009;457(7225):102–6.

61.

Teder

Vandivier

Jiang

Liang

Cohn

Pure

Henson

Noble

PW.

Resolution of lung inflammation by CD44. Science. 2002;296(5565):155–8.

62.

Johnson

Brunn

Kodaira

Platt

JL.

Receptor-mediated monitoring of tissue well-being via detection of soluble heparan sulfate by Toll-like receptor 4. J Immunol. 2002;168(10):5233–9.

63.

Termeer

Benedix

Sleeman

Fieber

Voith

Ahrens

Miyake

Freudenberg

Galanos

Simon

JC.

Oligosaccharides of hyaluronan activate dendritic cells via toll-like receptor 4. J Exp Med. 2002;195(1):99–111.

64.

Jonas

Thiem

Kuhlmann

Wagener

Aszodi

Nowell

Hagemeier

Laverick

Perreau

Jokubaitis

Emery

Kilpatrick

Butzkueven

Gresle

Axonally derived matrilin-2 induces proinflammatory responses that exacerbate autoimmune neuroinflammation. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(11):5042–56.

65.

Nastase

Janicova

Wygrecka

Schaefer

Signaling at the crossroads: matrix-derived proteoglycan and reactive oxygen species signaling. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2017;27(12):855–73.

66.

Kelly

Houston

Sherwood

Casulli

Travis

MA.

Regulation of innate and adaptive immunity by TGFbeta. Adv Immunol. 2017;134:137–233.

67.

Brubaker

Bonham

Zanoni

Kagan

JC.

Innate immune pattern recognition: a cell biological perspective. Annu Rev Immunol. 2015;33:257–90.

68.

Kieser

Kagan

JC.

Multi-receptor detection of individual bacterial products by the innate immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2017;17(6):376–90.

69.

Moreth

Frey

Hubo

Zeng-Brouwers

Nastase

Hsieh

Haceni

Pfeilschifter

Iozzo

Schaefer

Biglycan-triggered TLR-2- and TLR-4-signaling exacerbates the pathophysiology of ischemic acute kidney injury. Matrix Biol. 2014;35:143–51.

70.

Zeng-Brouwers

Beckmann

Nastase

Iozzo

Schaefer

De novo expression of circulating biglycan evokes an innate inflammatory tissue response via MyD88/TRIF pathways. Matrix Biol. 2014;35:132–42.

71.

Chang

Tanino

Vidova

Kinsella

Chan

Johnson

Wight

Frevert

CW.

A rapid increase in macrophage-derived versican and hyaluronan in infectious lung disease. Matrix Biol. 2014;34:1–12.

72.

Tang

Diao

Khatri

Zhao

Cattral

MS.

Toll-like receptor 2 activation promotes tumor dendritic cell dysfunction by regulating IL-6 and IL-10 receptor signaling. Cell Rep. 2015;13(12):2851–64.

73.

Cao

Self-regulation and cross-regulation of pattern-recognition receptor signalling in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(1):35–50.

74.

Murphy

Tedbury

Homer-Vanniasinkam

Walker

Ponnambalam

Biochemistry and cell biology of mammalian scavenger receptors. Atherosclerosis. 2005;182(1):1–15.

75.

Gianni

Leoni

Chesnokova

Hutt-Fletcher

Campadelli-Fiume

αvβ3-integrin is a major sensor and activator of innate immunity to herpes simplex virus-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(48):19792–7.

76.

Medzhitov

Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2001;1(2):135–45.

77.

Iwasaki

Medzhitov

Control of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(4):343–53.

78.

Broz

Dixit

VM.

Inflammasomes: mechanism of assembly, regulation and signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(7):407–20.

79.

Ponta

Sherman

Herrlich

PA.

CD44: from adhesion molecules to signalling regulators. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4(1):33–45.

80.

Canton

Neculai

Grinstein

Scavenger receptors in homeostasis and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(9):621–34.

81.

Chuah

Basir

Talib

Tie

Nordin

Receptor for advanced glycation end products and its involvement in inflammatory diseases. Int J Inflam. 2013;2013:403460.

82.

Ibrahim

Armour

Phipps

Sukkar

MB.

RAGE and TLRs: relatives, friends or neighbours?

Mol Immunol. 2013;56(4):739–44.

83.

Gasiorowski

Brokos

Echeverria

Barreto

Leszek

RAGE-TLR crosstalk sustains chronic inflammation in neurodegeneration. Mol Neurobiol. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s12035-017-0419-4.

84.

Hashimoto

Hudson

Anderson

KV.

The Toll gene of Drosophila, required for dorsal-ventral embryonic polarity, appears to encode a transmembrane protein. Cell. 1988;52(2):269–79.

85.

Medzhitov

Preston-Hurlburt

Janeway

Jr.

A human homologue of the Drosophila Toll protein signals activation of adaptive immunity. Nature. 1997;388(6640):394–7.

86.

Hasan

Chaffois

Gaillard

Saulnier

Merck

Tancredi

Guiet

Brière

Vlach

Lebecque

Trinchieri

Bates

EEM

. Human TLR10 is a functional receptor, expressed by B cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells, which activates gene transcription through MyD88. J Immunol. 2005;174(5):2942–50.

87.

Lee

Avalos

Ploegh

HL.

Accessory molecules for Toll-like receptors and their function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12(3):168–79.

88.

Bell

Mullen

Leifer

Mazzoni

Davies

Segal

DM.

Leucine-rich repeats and pathogen recognition in Toll-like receptors. Trends Immunol. 2003;24(10):528–33.

89.

O’Neill

Bowie

AG.

The family of five: TIR-domain-containing adaptors in Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(5):353–64.

90.

Barton

Kagan

JC.

A cell biological view of Toll-like receptor function: regulation through compartmentalization. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(8):535–42.

91.

Oosting

Cheng

Bolscher

Vestering-Stenger

Plantinga

Verschueren

Arts

Garritsen

van Eenennaam

Sturm

Kullberg

Hoischen

Adema

van der Meer

Netea

Joosten

LA.

Human TLR10 is an anti-inflammatory pattern-recognition receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(42):E4478–84.

92.

Kim

JY.

Stable Toll-like receptor 10 knockdown in THP-1 cells reduces TLR-ligand-induced proinflammatory cytokine expression. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(6). pii: E859; doi: 10.3390/ijms17060859.

93.

Goulopoulou

McCarthy

Webb

RC.

Toll-like receptors in the vascular system: sensing the dangers within. Pharmacol Rev. 2016;68(1):142–67.

94.

Zinngrebe

Walczak

TLRs go linear—on the ubiquitin edge. Trends Mol Med. 2017;23(4):296–309.

95.

Zanoni

Ostuni

Marek

Barresi

Barbalat

Barton

Granucci

Kagan

JC.

CD14 controls the LPS-induced endocytosis of Toll-like receptor 4. Cell. 2011;147(4):868–80.

96.

Ryu

Kim

Rah

Kang

Jung

Lee

Park

Yoon

Kim

HM.

Reconstruction of LPS transfer cascade reveals structural determinants within LBP, CD14, and TLR4-MD2 for efficient LPS recognition and transfer. Immunity. 2017;46(1):38–50.

97.

Raby

Holst

Le Bouder

Diaz

Ferran

Conraux

Guillemot

Coles

Kift-Morgan

Colmont

Szakmany

Ferrara

Hall

Topley

Labéta

MO.

Targeting the TLR co-receptor CD14 with TLR2-derived peptides modulates immune responses to pathogens. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(185):185ra64.

98.

Triantafilou

Gamper

Haston

Mouratis

Morath

Hartung

Triantafilou

Membrane sorting of toll-like receptor (TLR)-2/6 and TLR2/1 heterodimers at the cell surface determines heterotypic associations with CD36 and intracellular targeting. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(41):31002–11.

99.

Baumann

Aspalter

Sharif

Pichlmair

Bluml

Grebien

Bruckner

Pasierbek

Aumayr

Planyavsky

Bennett

Colinge

Knapp

Superti-Furga

CD14 is a coreceptor of Toll-like receptors 7 and 9. J Exp Med. 2010;207(12):2689–701.

100.

Schaefer

RM.

Proteoglycans: from structural compounds to signaling molecules. Cell Tissue Res. 2010;339(1):237–46.

101.

Hsieh

Nastase

Roedig

Zeng-Brouwers

Poluzzi

Schwalm

Fork

Tredup

Brandes

Wygrecka

Huwiler

Pfeilschifter

Schaefer

Biglycan- and sphingosine kinase-1 signaling crosstalk regulates the synthesis of macrophage chemoattractants. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(3). pii: E595; doi: 10.3390/ijms18030595.

102.

Hsieh

Frey

Nastase

Tredup

Hoffmann

Poluzzi

Zeng-Brouwers

Manon-Jensen

Schröder

Brandes

Iozzo

Schaefer

Bimodal role of NADPH oxidases in the regulation of biglycan-triggered IL-1beta synthesis. Matrix Biol. 2016;49:61–81.

103.

Vij

Roberts

Lopez-Briones

Joyce

Chakravarti

A novel role of the lumican core protein in bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced innate immune response. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(36):26409–17.

104.

Binder

McCoombe

Williams

McCulloch

Ward

AC.

The extracellular matrix in cancer progression: role of hyalectan proteoglycans and ADAMTS enzymes. Cancer Lett. 2017;385:55–64.

105.

Hope

Foulcer

Jagodinsky

Chen

Jensen

Patel

Leith

Maroulakou

Callander

Miyamoto

Hematti

Apte

Asimakopoulos

Immunoregulatory roles of versican proteolysis in the myeloma microenvironment. Blood. 2016;128(5):680–5.

106.

Noble

McKee

Cowman

Shin

HS.

Hyaluronan fragments activate an NF-kappa B/I-kappa B alpha autoregulatory loop in murine macrophages. J Exp Med. 1996;183(5):2373–8.

107.

Day

de la Motte

CA.

Hyaluronan cross-linking: a protective mechanism in inflammation?

Trends Immunol. 2005;26(12):637–43.

108.

Goldberg

Meirovitz

Hirshoren

Bulvik

Binder

Rubinstein

Elkin

Versatile role of heparanase in inflammation. Matrix Biol. 2013;32(5):234–40.

109.

Patel

Knox

Likar

Lathrop

Hossain

Eftekhari

Whitelock

Elkin

Vlodavsky

Hoffman

MP.

Heparanase cleavage of perlecan heparan sulfate modulates FGF10 activity during ex vivo submandibular gland branching morphogenesis. Development. 2007;134(23):4177–86.

110.

Gotte

Syndecans in inflammation. FASEB J. 2003;17(6):575–91.

111.

Ding

Sandgren

Mani

Belting

Fransson

LA.

Modulations of glypican-1 heparan sulfate structure by inhibition of endogenous polyamine synthesis. Mapping of spermine-binding sites and heparanase, heparin lyase, and nitric oxide/nitrite cleavage sites. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(50):46779–91.

112.

Simon Davis

Parish

CR.

Heparan sulfate: a ubiquitous glycosaminoglycan with multiple roles in immunity. Front Immunol. 2013;4:470.

113.

O’Callaghan

Lannfelt

Lindahl

Zhang

Microglial heparan sulfate proteoglycans facilitate the cluster-of-differentiation 14 (CD14)/Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-dependent inflammatory response. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(24):14904–14.

114.

Farrugia

Lord

Melrose

Whitelock

JM.

Can we produce heparin/heparan sulfate biomimetics using “mother-nature” as the gold standard?

Molecules. 2015;20(3):4254–76.

115.

Bhattacharyya

Wang

Morales-Nebreda

Feng

Zhou

Lafyatis

Lee

Hinchcliff

Feghali-Bostwick

Lakota

Budinger

Raparia

Tamaki

Varga

Tenascin-C drives persistence of organ fibrosis. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11703.

116.

Henderson

Nair

Pallas

Williams

MA.

Fibronectin: a multidomain host adhesin targeted by bacterial fibronectin-binding proteins. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011;35(1):147–200.

117.

Maurer

Mosher

DF.

Dynamic structure of plasma fibronectin. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2015;51(4):213–27.

118.

Moreth

Iozzo

Schaefer

Small leucine-rich proteoglycans orchestrate receptor crosstalk during inflammation. Cell Cycle. 2012;11(11):2084–91.

119.

Nastase

Iozzo

Schaefer

Key roles for the small leucine-rich proteoglycans in renal and pulmonary pathophysiology. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840(8):2460–70.

120.

Prochnicki

Latz

Inflammasomes on the crossroads of innate immune recognition and metabolic control. Cell Metab. 2017;26(1):71–93.

121.

Schroder

Tschopp

The inflammasomes. Cell. 2010;140(6):821–32.

122.

LaRock

Cookson

BT.

The Yersinia virulence effector YopM binds caspase-1 to arrest inflammasome assembly and processing. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12(6):799–805.

123.

Johnston

Barrett

Nazarian

Goodwin

Ricciuto

Wang

McFadden

A poxvirus-encoded pyrin domain protein interacts with ASC-1 to inhibit host inflammatory and apoptotic responses to infection. Immunity. 2005;23(6):587–98.

124.

Guo

Callaway

Ting

JP.

Inflammasomes: mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics. Nat Med. 2015;21(7):677–87.

125.

Martinon

Burns

Tschopp

The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-beta. Mol Cell. 2002;10(2):417–26.

126.

Franchi

Kanneganti

Dubyak

Nunez

Differential requirement of P2X7 receptor and intracellular K+ for caspase-1 activation induced by intracellular and extracellular bacteria. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(26):18810–8.

127.

Jorgensen

Miao

EA.

Pyroptotic cell death defends against intracellular pathogens. Immunol Rev. 2015;265(1):130–42.

128.

Maceyka

Spiegel

Sphingolipid metabolites in inflammatory disease. Nature. 2014;510(7503):58–67.

129.

Luheshi

Giles

Lopez-Castejon

Brough

Sphingosine regulates the NLRP3-inflammasome and IL-1beta release from macrophages. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42(3):716–25.

130.

Pyne

McNaughton

Boomkamp

MacRitchie

Evangelisti

Martelli

Jiang

Ubhi

Pyne

Role of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors, sphingosine kinases and sphingosine in cancer and inflammation. Adv Biol Regul. 2016;60:151–9.

131.

Hesse

Leberling

Boden

Friebe

Schmidt

Ding

Dieterich

Deussen

Roderigo

Rose

Floss

Scheller

Schrader

CD73-derived adenosine and tenascin-C control cytokine production by epicardium-derived cells formed after myocardial infarction. FASEB J. 2017;31(7):3040–53.

132.

Neeper

Schmidt

Brett

Yan

Wang

Pan

Elliston

Stern

Shaw

Cloning and expression of a cell surface receptor for advanced glycosylation end products of proteins. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(21):14998–5004.

133.

Ramasamy

Yan

Schmidt

AM.

The diverse ligand repertoire of the receptor for advanced glycation endproducts and pathways to the complications of diabetes. Vascul Pharmacol. 2012;57(5–6):160–7.

134.

Brownlee

Cerami

Vlassara

Advanced glycosylation end products in tissue and the biochemical basis of diabetic complications. N Engl J Med. 1988;318(20):1315–21.

135.

Chaney

Stine

Kokjohn

Kuo

Esh

Rahman

Luehrs

Schmidt

Stern

Yan

Roher

AE.

RAGE and amyloid beta interactions: atomic force microscopy and molecular modeling. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1741(1–2):199–205.

136.

Xie

Reverdatto

Frolov

Hoffmann

Burz

Shekhtman

Structural basis for pattern recognition by the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). J Biol Chem. 2008;283(40):27255–69.

137.

Brett

Schmidt

Yan

Zou

Weidman

Pinsky

Nowygrod

Neeper

Przysiecki

Shaw

Survey of the distribution of a newly characterized receptor for advanced glycation end products in tissues. Am J Pathol. 1993;143(6):1699–712.

138.

Hudson

Carter

Harja

Kalea

Arriero

Yang

Grant

Schmidt

AM.

Identification, classification, and expression of RAGE gene splice variants. FASEB J. 2008;22(5):1572–80.

139.

Zong

Madden

Ward

Mooney

Elliott

Stitt

AW.

Homodimerization is essential for the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE)-mediated signal transduction. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(30):23137–46.

140.

Young

Song

Esko

JD.

Heparan sulfate is essential for high mobility group protein 1 (HMGB1) signaling by the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). J Biol Chem. 2011;286(48):41736–44.

141.

Rosenberg

Rai

Dilisio

Agrawal

DK.

Damage-associated molecular patterns in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis: potentially novel therapeutic targets. Mol Cell Biochem. 2017;434(1–2):171–79.

142.

Mizumoto

Takahashi

Sugahara

Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) functions as receptor for specific sulfated glycosaminoglycans, and anti-RAGE antibody or sulfated glycosaminoglycans delivered in vivo inhibit pulmonary metastasis of tumor cells. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(23):18985–94.

143.

Juranek

Daffu

Geddis

Rosario

Kaplan

Kelly

Schmidt

AM.

Soluble RAGE treatment delays progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in SOD1 mice. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016;10:117.

144.

Koyama

Yamamoto

Nishizawa

RAGE and soluble RAGE: potential therapeutic targets for cardiovascular diseases. Mol Med. 2007;13(11–12): 625–35.

145.

Yan

Ramasamy

Schmidt

AM.

Soluble RAGE: therapy and biomarker in unraveling the RAGE axis in chronic disease and aging. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010;79(10):1379–86.

146.

Zhao

Jin

Zhang

Cao

Zhai

Wei

Shou

Cai

Liu

Yang

G-T

Yang

Corry

Liu

Yang

Interleukin 37 promotes angiogenesis through TGF-beta signaling. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):6113.

147.

Vega

Alarcon

San Martin

The cellular and signalling alterations conducted by TGF-beta contributing to renal fibrosis. Cytokine. 2016;88:115–25.

148.

Massague

TGFbeta signalling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2012;13(10):616–30.

149.

Robertson

Horiguchi

Zilberberg

Dabovic

Hadjiolova

Rifkin

DB.

Latent TGF-beta-binding proteins. Matrix Biol. 2015;47:44–53.

150.

Derynck

Zhang

YE.

Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways in TGF-beta family signalling. Nature. 2003;425(6958):577–84.

151.

Hao

Fan

Cao

Zhang

Yang

SM.

Macrophages in tumor microenvironments and the progression of tumors. Clin Dev Immunol. 2012;2012:948098.

152.

Naiki

Michelsen

Zhang

Chen

Doherty

Arditi

Transforming growth factor-beta differentially inhibits MyD88-dependent, but not TRAM- and TRIF-dependent, lipopolysaccharide-induced TLR4 signaling. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(7):5491–5.

153.

Smythies

Shen

Bimczok

Novak

Clements

Eckhoff

Bouchard

George

Dandekar

Smith

PD.

Inflammation anergy in human intestinal macrophages is due to Smad-induced IkappaBalpha expression and NF-kappaB inactivation. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(25):19593–604.

154.

Chen

Kam

Liu

Lui

Lamb

Tam

PK.

LPS-induced up-regulation of TGF-beta receptor 1 is associated with TNF-alpha expression in human monocyte-derived macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2008;83(5):1165–73.

155.

McCaffrey

Falcone

Transforming growth factor-beta 1 is a heparin-binding protein: identification of putative heparin-binding regions and isolation of heparins with varying affinity for TGF-beta 1. J Cell Physiol. 1992;152(2):430–40.

156.

Lyon

Rushton

Gallagher

JT.

The interaction of the transforming growth factor-betas with heparin/heparan sulfate is isoform-specific. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(29):18000–6.

157.

Rider

Mulloy

Heparin, heparan sulphate and the TGF-beta cytokine superfamily. Molecules. 2017;22(5). pii: E713; doi:10.3390/molecules22050713.

158.

Koehler

Samsonov

Rother

Vogel

Kohling

Moeller

Schnabelrauch

Rademann

Hempel

Pisabarro

Scharnweber

Hintze

Sulfated hyaluronan derivatives modulate TGF-beta1: receptor complex formation: possible consequences for TGF-beta1 signaling. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1210.

159.

De Laporte

Rice

Tortelli

Hubbell

JA.

Tenascin C promiscuously binds growth factors via its fifth fibronectin type III-like domain. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(4):e62076.

160.

Asimakopoulos

Hope

Johnson

Pagenkopf

Gromek

Nagel

Extracellular matrix and the myeloid-in-myeloma compartment: balancing tolerogenic and immunogenic inflammation in the myeloma niche. J Leukoc Biol. 2017;102(2):265–75.

161.

Petrey

de la Motte

CA.

Hyaluronan, a crucial regulator of inflammation. Front Immunol. 2014;5:101.

162.

Stern

Asari

Sugahara

KN.

Hyaluronan fragments: an information-rich system. Eur J Cell Biol. 2006;85(8):699–715.

163.

Liang

Zhang

Xie

Liu

Chen

Geng

Kurkciyan

Mena

Stripp

Jiang

Noble

PW.

Hyaluronan and TLR4 promote surfactant-protein-C-positive alveolar progenitor cell renewal and prevent severe pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Nat Med. 2016;22(11):1285–93.

164.

Guarda

Braun

Staehli

Tardivel

Mattmann

Forster

Farlik

Decker

Du Pasquier

Romero

Tschopp

Type I interferon inhibits interleukin-1 production and inflammasome activation. Immunity. 2011;34(2):213–23.

165.

Tang

Diao

Cattral

MS.

Molecular mechanisms involved in dendritic cell dysfunction in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2017;74(5):761–76.

166.

Kosinska

Ludwig

Liebisch

Zhang

Siebert

Wilhelm

Kaesser

Dettmeyer

Klein

Ishaque

Rickert

Schmitz

Schmidt

Steinmeyer

Articular joint lubricants during osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis display altered levels and molecular species. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(5):e0125192.

167.

Al-Sharif

Jamal

Zhang

Larson

Schmidt

Jay

Elsaid

KA.

Lubricin/proteoglycan 4 binding to CD44 receptor: a mechanism of the suppression of proinflammatory cytokine-induced synoviocyte proliferation by lubricin. Arthritis Rheum. 2015;67(6):1503–13.

168.

Alquraini

Garguilo

D’Souza

Zhang

Schmidt

Jay

Elsaid

KA.

The interaction of lubricin/proteoglycan 4 (PRG4) with toll-like receptors 2 and 4: an anti-inflammatory role of PRG4 in synovial fluid. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015;17:353.

169.

Alquraini

Jamal

Zhang

Schmidt

Jay

Elsaid

KA.

The autocrine role of proteoglycan-4 (PRG4) in modulating osteoarthritic synoviocyte proliferation and expression of matrix degrading enzymes. Arthritis Res Ther. 2017;19(1):89.

170.

Hynes

Naba

Overview of the matrisome—an inventory of extracellular matrix constituents and functions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4(1):a004903.

171.

Bonnans

Chou

Werb

Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15(12):786–801.

172.

Genovese

Barascuk

Larsen

Nawrocki

Zheng

Wang

Veidal

Leeming

Karsdal

MA.

Biglycan fragmentation in pathologies associated with extracellular matrix remodeling by matrix metalloproteinases. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2013;6(1):9.

173.

Genovese

Manresa

Leeming

Karsdal

Boor

The extracellular matrix in the kidney: a source of novel non-invasive biomarkers of kidney fibrosis?

Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair. 2014;7(1):4.

174.

Inokoshi

Tanino

Wang

Sato

Fukuhara

Nikaido

Fukuhara

Saito

Frevert

Munakata

Clinical significance of serum hyaluronan in chronic fibrotic interstitial pneumonia. Respirology. 2013;18(8):1236–43.