An overview is provided of the didactic design and evaluation of a blended-learning environment of an advanced training course for the C-Trainer license in table tennis. The focus lies on new online applications (Web 2.0) that serve the didactical function of cognitive tools. These actively support the learner-centered construction of trainer-specific knowledge. The evaluation in the praxis of sports associations consists of a formative and a summative part and is mainly based on questioning of the participants and instructors (qualitative study). The results show that the blended-learning structure is highly accepted by the participants. Furthermore, the findings show that the combination of the implemented online tools in the form of a time-stamp based video player, concept mapping and Weblogs can support competency-oriented learning.
JonesR.L., The Sports Coach as Educator: Re-Conceptualising Sports Coaching, Routledge, London, 2006.
4.
AndersonL.KrathwohlD., A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objects, Longman, Munich, 2001.
5.
SeilerTh. B., Wissen Zwischen Sprache, Information, Bewusstsein: Probleme mit dem Wissensbegriff, MV-Wissenschaft, Münster, 2008.
6.
ReinmannG., Blended Leraning in der Lehrerbildung, Grundlagen für die Konzeption Innovativer Lernumgebungen, Pabst, Lengerich, 2005.
7.
RauterbergM., Partizipative Konzepte, Methoden und Techniken zur Optimierung der Softwareentwicklung, Softwaretechnik-Trends, 1991, 11(3), 104–126.
8.
KrammerK.HugenerI., Netzbasierte Reflexion von Unterrichtsvideos in der Ausbildung von Lehrpersonen eine Explorationsstudie, Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 2005, 23, 51–61.
9.
ReusserK., Situiertes Lernen mit Unterrichtsvideos, Journal für LehrerInnenbildung, 2005, 5 (2), 8–18.
10.
AlbyT., Web 2.0. Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologien, Hanser, Munich, 2007.
11.
JonassenD. H.ReevesT. C., Learning with Technology: Using Computers as Cognitive Tools, in: JonassenD.H. ed., Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 1st edn., Macmillan, New York, 1996, 693–719.
12.
ReinmannG.MandlH, Unterrichten und Lernumgebungen Gestalten, in: KrappA.WeidenmannB. eds., Pädagogische Psychologie: Ein Lehrbuch, Belz, Weinheim, 2006, 613–658.
13.
SalomonG.PerkinsD.GlobersonT., Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies, Educational Researcher, 1991, 20(4), 2–9.
14.
ZimmermanB.KitsantasA., The Hidden Dimension of Personal Competence: Self-Regulation Learning and Practice, in: ElliotA.J.DweckC.S. eds., Handbook of Competence and Motivation, Guilford Press, New York, 2005, 509–526.
15.
PintrichP., The Role of Goal Orientation in Self-Regulation, in: BoekaertsM.PintrichP.ZeidnerM. eds., Handbook of Self-Regulation, Academic Press, New York, 2000, 452–502.
16.
OmmundsenY.LemyreP.N., Self-Regulation and Strategic Learning: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and the Learning Environment in Physical Education, in: LiukkonenJ.VereijkenB.AlfermannD.TheodorakisY. eds., Psychology for Physical Education, Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, 2007, 141–179.
17.
ZimmermanB., Attaining Self-Regulation: A Social-Cognitive Perspective, in: BoekaertsMPintrichP.ZeidnerM. ed., Handbook of Self-Regulation, Academic Press, New York, 2000, 13–39.
18.
NeuwegG., Könnerschaft und Implizites Wissen. Zur lehr-lerntheoretischen Bedeutung der Erkenntnis- und Wissenstheorie Michael Polanys, Waxmann, Münster, 2001.
19.
CarsonF., Utilizing Video to Facilitate Reflective Practice: Developing Sport Coaches, International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 2008, 3(3), 381–390.
20.
NovakJ. D.CañasA., The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them, Technical Report IHMC CmapTools, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, 2006.
21.
DweckC. S., Self-Theories and Goals: Their Role in Motivation, Personality and Developement, in: DienstbierR. ed., Perspectives on Motivation, Vol. 38, University of Nebraska Press, London, 1991, 200–235.
22.
ReinmannG.VohleF.ZangeCh., Onlinebarometer. Ein Beitrag zur Qualitätsentwicklung beim E-Learning, in: SchiedE. SeilerKälinS.SengstagCh. eds., E-Learning – Alltagstaugliche Innovation?Waxmann, Münster, 2006, 129–139.
23.
HatscherM., Joy of Use – Determinanten der Freude bei der Softwarenutzung, Unpublished Diploma thesis, Department of Psychology and Health Sciences, University of Osnabrück, Germany, 2000, http://www.incthings.de/download/Diplom_HiRes.pdf, 20.07.2008.
24.
KellyE.LeshR.BaekJ., Handbook of Design Research Methods in Education: Innovations in Science, Technology, Engeneering, and Mathematics Learning and Teaching, Routledge, London, 2008.
25.
EmersonRFretzF.ShawL., Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995.
SchierzM.ThieleJ.FischerB., Fallarbeit in der Trainerausbildung: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer pädagogischen Professionalisierung, Strauß, Köln, 2007.
