This study is based on persuasion models (Elaboration Likelihood Model; Heuristic Model of Persuasion) and Goffman's dialogic communication approach. It focuses on the means coaches use to influence referees' decision-making during games, and seeks to identify the contextual factors (game period, opposing team, coach yellow cards) that impact the influence processing used. Influence processing is examined through an analysis of the content of the verbal and behavioral communication of professional male coaches (n = 3) recorded during 14 games through deductive then inductive approaches. The results show that: 1) contextual factors have an effect on influencing decision-making and communicating disagreements about game situations; 2) coaches use technical skills more than any other means to influence referees; and 3) during the halftime break, the coaches make argued criticisms of referees' interpretation of play, while during play, coaches can influence referees' interpretation through direct speech not requiring arguments.
GilbertW.TrudelP., Analysis of Coaching Science Research Published From 1970–2001, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 2004, 75, 388–399.
2.
HortonS.BakerJ.DeakinJ., Experts in Action: A Systematic Observation of 5 National Team Coaches, International Journal of Sport Psychology, 2005, 36, 299–319.
3.
ButeraF.PérezJ.-A., Les Modèles Explicatifs de l'Influence Sociale, in: MugnyG.OberléD.BeauvoisJ.-L. eds., La Psychologie Sociale, 1. Relations Humaines, Groupes et Influence Sociale, P.U.G., Grenoble, 1995, 203–224.
4.
DebanneT.FontayneP., A Study of a Successful Experienced Elite Handball Coach's Cognitive Processes in Competition Situations, International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 2009, 4, 1–15.
5.
HagemannN.StraussB.BüschD., The Complex Problem-Solving Competence of Team Coaches, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2008, 9, 301–317.
6.
FrimanM.NybergC.NorlanderT., Threats and Aggression Directed at Soccer Referees: An Empirical Psychological Study, The Qualitative Report, 2004, 9(4), 652–672.
7.
Rix-LièvreG.GenebrierV., Interactions Players-Referee During a Soccer Match: Understanding How Altercations Appear or Not, Science & Movement, 2011, 72, 27–33.
8.
CôtéJ.TrudelP.BernardD.BoileauR.MarcotteG., Observation of Coach Behaviors During Different Game Score Differentials, in: CastaldiC. R.BishopP. J.HoeroerE. eds., Safety in Ice Hockey Second Volume American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1993, 78–87.
9.
TrudelP.CôtéJ.BernardD., Systematic Observation of Youth Ice Hockey Coaches During Games, Journal of Sport Behaviors, 1996, 19, 160–175.
10.
LyleJ., Modelling the Complexity of the Coaching Process: A Commentary, International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 2007, 4, 407–409.
11.
LyleJ., Sports Coaching Concepts: A Framework for Coaches' Behaviour, Routledge, London, 2002.
12.
MacquetA. C., Recognition within the Decision-Making Process: A Case Study of Expert Volleyball Players, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2009, 21, 64–79.
13.
MascarenhasD.O'HareD.PlessnerH., The Psychological and Performance Demands of Association Football Refereeing, International Journal of Sport Psychology, 2006, 37, 99–120.
14.
PlessnerH., Positive and Negative Effects of Prior Knowledge on Referee Decisions in Sports, in: BetschT.HaberstrohS. eds., The Routines of Decision Making, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 2005, 311–324.
15.
Ste-MarieD. M., Expertise in Sport Judges and Referees: Circumventing Information-Processing Limitations, in: StarkesJ.L.EricssonA. eds., Expert Performance in Sport: Advances in Research on Sport Expertise, Human Kinetics, Champaign, 2003, 169–190.
16.
PlessnerH.BetschT., Sequential Effects in Important Referee Decisions: The Case of Penalties in Soccer, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2001, 23, 254–259.
17.
PlessnerH.HaarT., Sports Performance Judgments from a Social Cognitive Perspective, Pyschology of Sport and Exercise, 2006, 7, 555–575.
18.
NevillA. M.BalmerN. J.WilliamsA. M., The Influence of Crowd Noise and Experience Upon Refereeing Decisions in Football, Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2002, 3, 261–272.
19.
SouchonN.CabagnoG.TracletA.TrouilloudD.MaïoG., Referees' Use of Heuristics: The Moderating Impact of Level of Competition, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2009, 27, 695–700.
20.
TverskyA.KahnemanD., Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Science, 1974, 185, 1124–1131.
21.
TverskyA.KahnemanD., Evidential Impact of Base Rates, in: KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA. eds., Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge University Press, 1982, 153–160.
22.
JonesM.V.PaullG.C.ErskineJ., The Impact of a Team's Agressive Reputation on the Decisions of Association Football Referees, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2002, 20, 991–1000.
23.
SouchonN.Coulomb-CabagnoG.RascleO.TracletA., Referees' Decision-Making in Handball and Transgressive Behaviors: Influence of Their Stereotypes About Gender of Players, Sex Roles, 2004, 51, 143–150.
24.
SouchonN.CabagnoG.TracletA.DossevilleF., Referees' Decision-Making and Player Gender: The Moderating Role of the Type of Situation, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2010, 22, 1–16.
25.
FrankM.G.GilovitchT., The Dark Side of Self and Social Perception: Black Uniforms and Aggression in Professional Sports, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988, 54, 74–85.
26.
DownwardP.JonesM. V., Effects of Crowd Size on Referee Decisions: Analysis of the FA Cup, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2007, 25, 1541–1545.
27.
UnkelbachC.MemmertD., Game Management, Context Effects, and Calibration: The Case of Yellow Cards in Soccer, Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 2008, 30, 95–109.
28.
SouchonN.FontayneP.LivingstoneA.MaïoG. R.MellacN.GenoliniC., External Influences on Referees' Decisions in Judo: The Effects of Coaches' Exclamations During Throw Situations, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2013, 25(2), 223–233.
29.
PlessnerH., Expectancies-biases in Gymnastic Judging, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1999, 21, 131–144.
30.
PettyR.E.CacioppoJ.T., Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, Springer, New York, 1986.
31.
ChaikenS., Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Messages Cues in Persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980, 39, 752–766.
32.
EaglyA.H.ChaikenS., The Psychology of Attitudes, Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich, Fort Worth, TX, 1993.
33.
CacioppoJ.T.PettyR.E.KaoC.F.RodriguezR., Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: An Individual Difference Perspective, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51, 1032–1043.
34.
PettyR.E.BrinolP., Mécanismes Psychologiques de la Persuasion, Diogène, 2007, 217, 58–78.
35.
PriesterJ.M.PettyR.E., Source Attributions and Persuasion: Perceived Honesty as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1995, 21, 637–654.
36.
PettyR.E.CacioppoJ.T.GoldmanR., Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-based Persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 41, 847–855.
37.
RixG., Typology of Experienced Rugby Referee's Judgement Acts, Movement & Sport Sciences, 2005, 56, 109–124.
38.
RusselJ.S., Are Rules All an Umpire Has to Work With?, Journal of Philosophy of Sport, 1999, 26, 27–49.
39.
SilvaJ.M., Normative Compliance and Rule Violating Behavior in Sport, International Journal of Sport Psychology, 1981, 12, 10–18.
40.
RaineyD.W.LarsenJ.D.StephensonA.OlsonT., Normative Rules among Umpires: The “Phantom Tag” at Second Base, Journal of Sport Behavior, 1993, 16, 147–155.
41.
RaineyD.W.LarsenJ.D.WillardM.J., A Computer Simulation of Sport Officiating Behavior, Journal of Sport Behavior, 1987, 10, 183–191.
42.
GilbertW.TrudelP.BloomG., Intramural Ice Hockey Officiating: A Case Study, Avante, 1995, 1, 63–76.
43.
TrudelP.A.DionneJ-P.BernardD., Differences between Assessments of Penalities in Ice Hockey by Referees, Coaches, Players and Parents, in: AshareA.B. Ed., Safety in Ice Hockey: Third Volume, ASTM STP 1341, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, 2000, 274–290.
44.
DossevilleF.GarncarzykC., L'Arbitrage des Pratiques Sportives: Jugement et Décision, Bulletin de Psychologie, 2007, 489, 225–237.
45.
GarncarzykC., Représentations de l'arbitrage: Consensus ou Divergences?, Movement & Sport Sciences, 1995, 26, 9–20.
46.
GoffmanE., Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates, Doubleday Anchor, New York, 1961.
47.
BosW.TarnaiC., Content Analysis in Empirical Social Research, International Journal of Education Research, 1999, 31, 659–671.
48.
GubaE.G., The Alternative Paradigm Dialogue, in: GubaE.G. Ed., The Paradigm Dialogue, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990, 17–27.
49.
MilesM. B.HubermannA. M., Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1994.
50.
SchwandtT.A., Qualitative Inquiry, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1997.
51.
WatkinsM. W., MacKappa [Computer Software], Pennsylvania State University, PA, 1998.
52.
FleissJ.L., Measuring Nominal Scale Agreement Among Many Raters, Psychological Bulletin, 1971, 76, 378–382.
53.
FrenchJ.R.P.RavenB.H., The Bases of Social Power, in: CartwrightD. Ed., Studies in Social Power, Ann Arbor, Institute of Social Research, 1959, 150–168.
