Optimal selection of topologies for the minimum-weight design of continuum structures with stress constraints

Abstract

This paper presents a method for assisting the optimal selection of topologies for the minimum-weight design of continuum structures subject to stress constraints by using the performance index (PI). A performance index is developed for evaluating the efficiency of structural topologies based on the scaling design approach. This performance index is incorporated in the evolutionary structural optimization (ESO) method to monitor the optimization process when gradually removing inefficient material from the structure. The optimal topology can be identified from the performance index history. Various structures with stress and height constraints are investigated by using this performance index, which is also employed to compare the efficiency of structural topologies generated by different optimization methods. It is shown that the proposed performance index is capable of measuring the efficiency of structural topologies obtained by various structural optimization methods and is a valuable design tool for engineers in selecting optimal topologies in structural design.

Keywords

performance index topology stress constraint evolutionary structural optimization finite element analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kirsch

Fundamental properties of optimal topologies. In Proceedings of NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Topology Design of Structures (Eds Bendse

M. P.

Mota Soares

C. A.

), 1993, pp. 3–18 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht).

In Proceedings of NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Topology Design of Structures (Eds Bendse

M. P.

Mota Soares

C. A.

), 1993 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht).

In Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Structural Optimization (Eds Steven

G. P.

Querin

O. M.

Guan

Xie

Y. M.

), 1998 (Oxbridge Press, Melbourne).

Michell

A. G. M.

The limits of economy of material in frame-structures. Phil. Mag., 1904, 8, 589–597.

Hemp

W. S.

Optimum Structures, 1973 (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

Boiten

R. G.

Mechanics of instrumentation. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, 1963, 177, 269.

Ashby

M. F.

Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, 1992 (Pergamon Press, Oxford).

Weaver

P. M.

Ashby

M. F.

The optimal selection of material and section-shape. J. Engng Des., 1996, 7 (2), 129–150.

Burgess

S. C.

The ranking of efficiency of structural layouts using form factors. Part 1: Design for stiffness. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1998, 212 (C2), 117–128.

10.

Burgess

S. C.

The ranking of efficiency of structural layouts using form factors. Part 2: Design for strength. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1998, 212 (C2), 129–140.

11.

Querin

O. M.

Evolutionary structural optimization: Stress based formulation and implementation. PhD thesis, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, The University of Sydney, 1997.

12.

Xie

Y. M.

Steven

G. P.

Evolutionary Structural Optimization, 1997 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).

13.

Kirsch

Optimal design based on approximate scaling. J. Struct. Engng, 1982, 108 (ST4), 888–909.

14.

Bendse

M. P.

Optimization of Structural Topology, Shape, and Material, 1995 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).

15.

Xie

Y. M.

Steven

G. P.

A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Comput. and Struct., 1993, 49 (5), 885–896.

16.

Xie

Y. M.

Steven

G. P.

Evolutionary structural optimization for dynamic problems. Comput. and Struct., 1996, 58, 1067–1073.

17.

Mattheck

Design in Nature: Learning from Trees, 1998 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).