An evolutionary shape optimization procedure for contact problems in mechanical designs

Abstract

The finite element method (FEM) has been extensively applied to explore contact stress distributions in multi-body mechanical systems. Uneven contact stresses are often one of the main concerns of mechanical design engineers. By adopting the evolutionary structural optimization (ESO) concepts, this paper presents a non-gradient procedure for gradual shape redesign of prescribed contact interfaces. In this method, interfacial gaps are considered as design variables and contact stress deviations over design interfaces are set as the objective function. To deal with multiple contact region problems, two different design objectives, namely an individual criteria and a unified criteria, are formulated respectively. Several practical examples show that this method is effective for design problems consisting of single- or multiple-contact regions in mechanical systems, in which a uniform contact stress pattern is the desired optimality criterion.

Keywords

shape optimization elastic contact evolutionary structural optimization mechanical design finite element analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Zhong

Z. H.

Finite Element Procedures for Contact-Impact Problems, 1993 (Oxford University Press, New York).

Hilding

Klarbring

Peterson

Optimization of structures in unilateral contact. Appl. Mech. Rev., 1999, 52, 139–160.

Conry

T. F.

Seireg

A. A.

Mathematical programming method for design of elastic bodies in contact. Trans. ASME, J. Appl. Mechanics, 1971, 387–392.

Haug

E. J.

Kwak

B. M.

Contact stress minimization by contour design. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 1978, 12, 917–930.

Belegundu

A. D.

Chandrupatla

T. R.

Shape optimization of valve geometry with contact analysis. In Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization with Numerical Methods (Eds Saigal

Mukherjee

), 1990, pp. 71–78 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).

Tada

Nishihara

Optimum shape design of contact surface with finite element method. Adv. Engng Software, 1993, 18, 75–85.

Park

Anderson

W. J.

Geometric optimization in presence of contact signularities. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 1995, 33, 1503–1509.

Fancello

E. A.

Feijoo

R. A.

Shape optimization in frictionless contact problems. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 1994, 37, 2311–2335.

Haslinger

Neittaanmaki

Finite Element Approximation for Optimal Shape, Material and Topology Design, 1996 (John Wiley, Chichester, West Sussex).

10.

Zabaras

Bao

Srikanth

Frazier

W. G.

A continuum Lagrangian sensitivity analysis for metal forming process with applications to die design problems. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 2000, 48, 679–720.

11.

Xie

Y. M.

Steven

G. P.

A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Computers Structs, 1993, 49, 885–896.

12.

Querin

O. M.

Steven

G. P.

Xie

Y. M.

Evolutionary structural optimization using a bidirectional algorithm. Engng Comput., 1998, 15, 1031–1048.

13.

Xie

Y. M.

Steven

G. P.

Evolutionary Structural Optimization, 1997 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).

14.

Steven

G. P.

Xie

Y. M.

Shape design for two-and three-dimensional contact problems using an evolutionary method. Int. J. Comput. Engng Sci., 2001, 2, 181–198.

15.

Kikuchi

Taylor

J. E.

Shape optimization for unilateral elastic contact problems. In Proceedings of International Conference on Numerical Methods in Coupled Problems, University College, Swansea, Wales, 1981, pp. 430–441.

16.

Hilding

Torstenfelt

Klarbring

A computational method for shape optimization of structures in frictionless contact. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engng, 2001, 190, 4043–4060.

17.

Strand6 Finite Element Analysis System Reference Manual and User Guide, 1996 (G + D Computing Pty Ltd.).

18.

Zboinski

Numerical research on 3D contact problems of turbomachinery blade attachments in the elastic range. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1993, 35, 141–165.

19.

Esping

Design optimization as an engineering tool. Structural Optimization, 1995, 10, 137–152.