The current paper proposes an integrating framework to present the essential elements of global engineering networks (GENs) from the perspectives of the context, capability, and configuration (3C). Using the 3C framework, three key patterns (efficient GEN, flexible GEN, and innovative GEN) of the leading practice have been identified. The research updates the concept of global engineering management for current business environments and aims to help researchers and practitioners to understand and manage dispersed engineering operations in dynamic environments. The framework is based on a literature review and refined by the empirical studies of a small number of companies in the aerospace, automotive, electrics, and fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector. More in-depth studies across a wider range of industries would improve the validity and reliability.
National Academy of Engineering (NAE)Visions of engineering in the new century, 2004 (The National Academies Press, Washington, DC).
4.
EppingerS. D.ChitkaraA. R.The new practice of global product development. Sloan Mgmt Rev., 2006, 47(4), 22–30.
5.
KarandikarH.NidamarthiS. A.Model for managing the transition to a global engineering network spanning industrialized and emerging economies. J. Mfg Technol. Mgmt, 2006, 17(8), 1042–1057.
6.
ShawW. H.Engineering management in our modern age. In IEEE International Engineering management conference, Cambridge University, UK, 2002.
7.
ZhangY.GregoryM.ShiY.Foundations of global engineering networks: Essential features of effective engineering networks. In IEEE International Conference on Management of innovation and technology, Singapore, 2006.
8.
PayneA. C.ChelsomJ. V.ReavillR. P.Management for engineering, 1996 (John Wiley, New York).
9.
ThamhainH. J.Engineering management: Managing effectively in technology-based organizations, 1992 (John Wiley, New York).
10.
ArmstrongS. C.Engineering and product development management: The holistic approach, 2001 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
11.
SubrahmanianE.RachuriS.FenvesS.FoufouS.SriramR.Product lifecycle management support: A challenge in supporting product design and manufacturing in a networked economy. Int. J. Product Lifecycle Mgmt, 2005, 1(1), 4–25.
12.
ShiY.GregoryM.International manufacturing networks: To develop global competitive capabilities. J. Ops Mgmt, 1998, 16, 195–214.
13.
Von ZedtwitzM.GassmannO.Market versus technology driven in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of managing research and development. Res. Policy, 2002, 31, 569–588.
14.
LeendersR. T. A. J.Van EngelenJ. M. L.KratzerJ.Virtuality, communication, and new product team creativity: A social network perspective. J. Engng Technol. Mgmt, 2003, 20, 69–92.
15.
FineC. H.Clockspeed: Winning industry control in the age of temporary advantage, 1995 (Harper Collines Publishers, New York).
16.
KuemmerleW.The drivers of foreign direct investment into research and development: An empirical investigation. J. Int. Bus. Studies, 1999, 30, 1–24.
17.
Von ZedtwitzM.GassmannO.BoutellierR.Organising global R&D: Challenges and dilemmas. J. Int. Mgmt, 2004, 10, 21–49.
18.
WulfW. A.Out-sourcing/off-shoring of engineering jobs. National Academy of Engineering Public Discussion, 2004.
19.
Parametric Technology Corporation (PTC)Gaining competitive advantage through global product development, 2005 (White Paper, PTC).
ZhangY.GregoryM.ShiY.Global engineering networks: Drivers, evolution, performance and key patterns. In European conference of the international association for management of technology, Birmingham, 2006.
22.
FombrunC. J.Strategies for network research in organizations. Acad. Mgmt Rev., 1982, 7, 280–291.
23.
PodolnyJ. M.PageK. L.Network forms of organization. Annual Rev. Sociol., 1998, 24, 57–76.
24.
NohriaN.EcclesR.Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action, 1992 (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
25.
PowellW. W.Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Res. Orgnl Behavior, 1990, 12, 295–336.
26.
WilliamsonO. E.Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Q., 1991, 36, 269–296.
27.
BaronD. P.BesankoD.Matrix organization, 1996 (Working Paper, North-western University and Stanford University).
28.
PowellA.PiccoliG.IvesB.Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM SIGMIS Database, 2004, 35(1), 6–36.
29.
RegerG.Coordinating globally dispersed research centres of excellence-the case of Philips Electronics. J. Int. Mgmt, 2004, 10, 51–76.
30.
BirkinshawJ.HagstrmP.The flexible firm: Capability management in network organizations, 2000 (Oxford University Press, New York).
WillaeltS. S. A.de GraafR.MinderhoudS.Collaborative engineering: A case study of concurrent engineering in a wider context. J. Engng Technol. Mgmt, 1998, 15, 87–109.
33.
BusinessWeek Research Services. Global engineering development (GPD) - moving from strategy to execution, 2006, Report (BusinessWeek Research).
34.
EisenhardtK. M.Building theories from case study research. Acad. Mgmt Rev., 1989, 14(4), 532–550.
35.
YinR. K.Case study research: Design and methods, 1994 (Sage Publication: Beverly Hills, CA).
36.
BartlettC. A.GhoshalS.Managing across borders: The transnational solution, 1989 (Harvard Business School Press, Boston).
37.
PrahaladC. K.DozY.The multinational mission: Balancing local demands and global vision, 1987 (Free Press, NY).
38.
YipG. S.Total global strategy: Managing for worldwide competitive advantage, 1992 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
FerdowsK.Making the most of foreign factories. HBR, 1997, March-April, 73–88.
41.
SweeneyM. T.SzwejczewskiM.Strategic global manufacturing management: A study of the process and current practice, 2002 (Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University).
42.
De MeyerA.Management of an international network of industrial R&D laboratories. R&D Mgmt, 1993, 23(2), 109–120.
43.
GassmannO.von ZedtwitzM.Organisation of industrial R&D on a global scale. R&D Mgmt, 1998, 28(3), 147–161.
44.
MillerW.MorrisL.4th generation R&D: Managing knowledge, technology, and innovation, 1999 (John Wiley, New York).
RubenstainA. H.Managing technology in the decentralized firm, 1989 (John Wiley, New York).
50.
HkanssonH.SnehotaI.Developing relationships in business networks, 1995 (International Thomson Business Press, London).
51.
Thuriaux-AlembnB.BernhartW.HarrisonR.GemuendenH. G.Assessing the fit between the organisation of engineering/project development functions and strategy. In European conference of the international association for management of technology, Birmingham, 2006.
52.
WulfW. A.Changing nature of engineering. The Bridge, 1997, 27(2), 3–5.
53.
O'SullivanA.Dispersed collaboration in a multi-firm, multi-team product-development project. J. Engng Technol. Mgmt, 2003, 20, 93–116.
54.
RogersG. F. C.The nature of engineering, 1983 (Macmillan Press, Helsinki).
55.
FraserP.FarrukhC.GregoryM.Managing product development collaborations - a process maturity approach. J. Engng Mf, 2003, 217, 1499–1519.
PaulkM.CurtisB.ChrissisM.WeberC.Capability maturity model for software, version 1.1, 1993 (Technical Report, CMU/SEI-93-TR-024 ESC-TR-93-177, February).
60.
MintzbergH.The structuring of organisations, 1979 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
61.
MillerD.Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis. Strategic Mgmt J., 1986, 7(3), 233–249.
62.
RegerG.Internationalization and coordination of research and development at large corporations. J. Int. Mgmt, 1999, 3, 13–32.
