This article analyses research trials on noteworthy features and technological impact of the polystyrene/graphene nanoplatelet nanocomposites. In polystyrene matrix, graphene nanoplatelets have been used as remarkable nanofiller. Substantial improvements in polystyrene physical properties occurs by adding low nanofiller content. Simple in situ, emulsion, solution, or melt synthesis strategies have been used to develop polystyrene/graphene nanoplatelet nanocomposite. The polystyrene/graphene nanoplatelet nanocomposites possess enhanced structural features, morphology, glass transition temperature, thermal stability, mechanical strength, electrical characteristics, sensing, capacitance, and other physical properties. The performance of the polystyrene/graphene nanoplatelet nanocomposites have been explored for the practical applications in the fields of sensing, electromagnetic interference shielding, and flame retardant materials.
KausarAMeerSIqbalT.Structure, morphology, thermal, and electro-magnetic shielding properties of polystyrene microsphere/polyaniline/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposite. J Plast Film Sheet2017; 33: 262–289.
2.
AhmedNKausarAMuhammadB.Shape memory properties of electrically conductive multi-walled carbon nanotube-filled polyurethane/modified polystyrene blends. J Plast Film Sheet2016; 32: 272–292.
3.
Van MelickHGovaertLMeijerH.Prediction of brittle-to-ductile transitions in polystyrene. Polymer2003; 44: 457–465.
4.
KausarA.A review of fundamental principles and applications of polymer nanocomposites filled with both nanoclay and nano-sized carbon allotropes–graphene and carbon nanotubes. J Plast Film Sheet2020; 36: 209–228.
5.
KausarA.Shape memory polyurethane/graphene nanocomposites: structures, properties, and applications. J Plast Film Sheet2020; 36: 151–166.
6.
GuanYMeyersKPMendonSK, et al. Ecofriendly fabrication of modified graphene oxide latex nanocomposites with high oxygen barrier performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2016; 8: 33210–33220.
7.
KishoreMAmritaMKameshB. Experimental investigation of milling on basalt-jute hybrid composites with graphene as nanofiller. Mater Today Proceed2021; 43: 726–730.
8.
ShenJHuYLiC, et al. Synthesis of amphiphilic graphene nanoplatelets. Small2009; 5: 82–85.
9.
KausarA. Graphene nanoplatelet reinforced polyacrylonitrile/poly (vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) nanocomposite foams: physical properties and ion detoxification. Mater Res Innov 2020; 24: 28–38.
10.
BakerJDeganelloDGethinD, et al. Flexographic printing of graphene nanoplatelet ink to replace platinum as counter electrode catalyst in flexible dye sensitised solar cell. Mater Res Innov2014; 18: 86–90.
11.
RSulongNHMustapaSAS, ARashidMK.Application of expanded polystyrene (EPS) in buildings and constructions: a review. J Appl Polym Sci2019; 136: 47529.
QiX-YYanDJiangZ, et al. Enhanced electrical conductivity in polystyrene nanocomposites at ultra-low graphene content. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2011; 3: 3130–3133.
14.
KaseemMHamadKKoYG.Fabrication and materials properties of polystyrene/carbon nanotube (PS/CNT) composites: a review. Eur Polym J2016; 79: 36–62.
15.
KausarA.Applications of polymer/graphene nanocomposite membranes: a review. Mater Res Innov2019; 23: 276–287.
16.
ZamiriGBagheriSShahnazarS, et al. Progress on synthesis, functionalisation and applications of graphene nanoplatelets. Mater Res Innov2016; 20: 365–374.
17.
AjorlooMFasihiMOhshimaM, et al. How are the thermal properties of polypropylene/graphene nanoplatelet composites affected by polymer chain configuration and size of nanofiller?Mater Des2019; 181: 108068.
18.
ChoJJeonIKimSY, et al. Improving dispersion and barrier properties of polyketone/graphene nanoplatelet composites via noncovalent functionalization using aminopyrene. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2017; 9: 27984–27994.
19.
KaratasEGulOKarsliNG, et al. Synergetic effect of graphene nanoplatelet, carbon fiber and coupling agent addition on the tribological, mechanical and thermal properties of polyamide 6, 6 composites. Compos B Engineer2019; 163: 730–739.
20.
CataldiPBayerISNanniG, et al. Effect of graphene nano-platelet morphology on the elastic modulus of soft and hard biopolymers. Carbon2016; 109: 331–339.
21.
KausarA.Up-to-date notions of polystyrene nanocomposite nanofibers. Mater Res Innov2021; 1–13.
22.
HorvathJ.Expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam: an introduction to material behavior. Geotext Geomembr1994; 13: 263–280.
23.
CuiLChenMChenC, et al. Systematic studies on (co) polymerization of polar styrene monomers with palladium catalysts. Macromolecules2019; 52: 7197–7206.
24.
KotaniYKamigaitoMSawamotoM.Living radical polymerization of Para-substituted styrenes and synthesis of styrene-based copolymers with rhenium and iron complex catalysts. Macromolecules2000; 33: 6746–6751.
25.
ZambelliAPellecchiaCOlivaL, et al. Catalysts for syndiotactic‐specific polymerization of styrene: a tentative interpretation of some experimental data. Makromol Chem1991; 192: 223–231.
26.
GiussiJMBlaszczyk-LezakICortizoMS, et al. In-situ polymerization of styrene in AAO nanocavities. Polymer2013; 54: 6886–6893.
27.
SrivastavaNMehraR.Study of structural, electrical, and dielectric properties of polystyrene/foliated graphite nanocomposite developed via in situ polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci2008; 109: 3991–3999.
28.
DingXZhaoJLiuY, et al. Silica nanoparticles encapsulated by polystyrene via surface grafting and in situ emulsion polymerization. Mater Lett2004; 58: 3126–3130.
29.
KotelyanskiiMWagnerNPaulaitisME.Building large amorphous polymer structures: Atomistic simulation of glassy polystyrene. Macromolecules1996; 29: 8497–8506.
30.
MaHTianZ.Effects of polymer chain confinement on thermal conductivity of ultrathin amorphous polystyrene films. Appl Phys Lett2015; 107: 073111.
31.
LiuJLinPChengS, et al. Polystyrene glasses under compression: ductile and brittle responses. ACS Macro Lett2015; 4: 1072–1076.
32.
MohanAJSekharVCBhaskarT, et al. Microbial assisted high impact polystyrene (HIPS) degradation. Bioresour Technol2016; 213: 204–207.
33.
ZengCLeeLJ.Poly (methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene/clay nanocomposites prepared by in-situ polymerization. Macromolecules2001; 34: 4098–4103.
34.
ErmeydanMACabaneEGierlingerN, et al. Improvement of wood material properties via in situ polymerization of styrene into tosylated cell walls. Rsc Adv2014; 4: 12981–12988.
35.
ZhangZZhangJChenP, et al. Enhanced interactions between multi-walled carbon nanotubes and polystyrene induced by melt mixing. Carbon2006; 44: 692–698.
36.
ChaeDWKimBC.Characterization on polystyrene/zinc oxide nanocomposites prepared from solution mixing. Polym Adv Technol2005; 16: 846–850.
37.
ZhaoFZhangGZhaoS, et al. Fabrication of pristine graphene-based conductive polystyrene composites towards high performance and light-weight. Compos Sci Technol2018; 159: 232–239.
38.
HuangPGuoYQuirkRP, et al. Comparison of poly (ethylene oxide) crystal orientations and crystallization behaviors in nano-confined cylinders constructed by a poly (ethylene oxide)-b-polystyrene diblock copolymer and a blend of poly (ethylene oxide)-b-polystyrene and polystyrene. Polymer2006; 47: 5457–5466.
39.
HuangPZhuLChengSZ, et al. Crystal orientation changes in two-dimensionally confined nanocylinders in a poly(ethylene oxide)-b-polystyrene/polystyrene blend. Macromolecules2001; 34: 6649–6657.
GeimAK.Graphene: status and prospects. Science2009; 324: 1530–1534.
42.
RaoCBiswasKSubrahmanyamK, et al. Graphene, the new nanocarbon. J Mater Chem2009; 19: 2457–2469.
43.
AhmadIIslamMSubhaniT, et al. Toughness enhancement in graphene nanoplatelet/SiC reinforced Al2O3 ceramic hybrid nanocomposites. Nanotechnology2016; 27: 425704.
44.
MehraliMSadeghinezhadERosenMA, et al. Effect of specific surface area on convective heat transfer of graphene nanoplatelet aqueous nanofluids. Experimen Therm Fluid Sci2015; 68: 100–108.
45.
Cruz-SilvaEJiaXTerronesH, et al. Edge–edge interactions in stacked graphene nanoplatelets. ACS Nano2013; 7: 2834–2841.
46.
ShenJHuYLiC, et al. Layer-by-layer self-assembly of graphene nanoplatelets. Langmuir2009; 25: 6122–6128.
47.
ShenJHuYShiM, et al. Fast and facile preparation of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide nanoplatelets. Chem Mater2009; 21: 3514–3520.
48.
LongoAVerucchiRAversaL, et al. Graphene oxide prepared by graphene nanoplatelets and reduced by laser treatment. Nanotechnology2017; 28: 224002.
49.
FanXChangDWChenX, et al. Functionalized graphene nanoplatelets from ball milling for energy applications. Curr Opin Chem Engineer2016; 11: 52–58.
50.
RashadMPanFZhangJ, et al. Use of high energy ball milling to study the role of graphene nanoplatelets and carbon nanotubes reinforced magnesium alloy. J Alloys Comp2015; 646: 223–232.
51.
AnJ-CKimHJHongI.Preparation of kish graphite-based graphene nanoplatelets by GIC (graphite intercalation compound) via process. J Indus Engineer Chem2015; 26: 55–60.
52.
AnJ-CLeeEJHongI.Preparation of the spheroidized graphite-derived multi-layered graphene via GIC (graphite intercalation compound) method. J Indus Engineer Chem2017; 47: 56–61.
53.
OngTYangH.Effect of atmosphere on the mechanical milling of natural graphite. Carbon2000; 38: 2077–2085.
54.
RashadMPanFLiuY, et al. High temperature formability of graphene nanoplatelets-AZ31 composites fabricated by stir-casting method. J Magnes Alloy2016; 4: 270–277.
55.
BaigZMamatOMustaphaM, et al. Investigation of tip sonication effects on structural quality of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) for superior solvent dispersion. Ultrason Sonochem2018; 45: 133–149.
56.
SadriRHosseiniMKaziS, et al. Study of environmentally friendly and facile functionalization of graphene nanoplatelet and its application in convective heat transfer. Ener Convers Manag2017; 150: 26–36.
57.
VallejoJPMercatelliLMartinaMR, et al. Comparative study of different functionalized graphene-nanoplatelet aqueous nanofluids for solar energy applications. Renew Ener2019; 141: 791–801.
58.
YoungRJLiuMKinlochIA, et al. The mechanics of reinforcement of polymers by graphene nanoplatelets. Compos Sci Technol2018; 154: 110–116.
59.
KashiSGuptaRKKaoN, et al. Influence of graphene nanoplatelet incorporation and dispersion state on thermal, mechanical and electrical properties of biodegradable matrices. J Mater Sci Technol2018; 34: 1026–1034.
60.
MoricheRProlongoSSánchezM, et al. Morphological changes on graphene nanoplatelets induced during dispersion into an epoxy resin by different methods. Compos B Engineer2015; 72: 199–205.
61.
ZhangYParkS-J.Imidazolium-optimized conductive interfaces in multilayer graphene nanoplatelet/epoxy composites for thermal management applications and electroactive devices. Polymer2019; 168: 53–60.
DuJChengHM.The fabrication, properties, and uses of graphene/polymer composites. Macromol Chem Phys2012; 213: 1060–1077.
67.
KuvardinaENovokshonovaLLomakinS, et al. Effect of the graphite nanoplatelet size on the mechanical, thermal, and electrical properties of polypropylene/exfoliated graphite nanocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci2013; 128: 1417–1424.
68.
LiWDichiaraABaiJ.Carbon nanotube–graphene nanoplatelet hybrids as high-performance multifunctional reinforcements in epoxy composites. Compos Sci Technol2013; 74: 221–227.
69.
RanSGuoZHanL, et al. Effect of friedel–crafts reaction on the thermal stability and flammability of high‐density polyethylene/brominated polystyrene/graphene nanoplatelet composites. Polym Int2014; 63: 1835–1841.
70.
ChakrabortyIShuklaABoseA.Core–shell rubbery fillers for massive electrical conductivity enhancement and toughening of polystyrene–graphene nanoplatelet composites. J Mater Sci2016; 51: 10555–10560.
71.
MergenÖBUmutEArdaE, et al. A comparative study on the AC/DC conductivity, dielectric and optical properties of polystyrene/graphene nanoplatelets (PS/GNP) and multi-walled carbon nanotube (PS/MWCNT) nanocomposites. Polym Test2020; 90: 106682.
72.
BaiQ-qWeiXYangJ-h, et al. Dispersion and network formation of graphene platelets in polystyrene composites and the resultant conductive properties. Compos A: Appl Sci Manufact2017; 96: 89–98.
73.
HuHWangXWangJ, et al. Preparation and properties of graphene nanosheets–polystyrene nanocomposites via in situ emulsion polymerization. Chem Phys Lett2010; 484: 247–253.
74.
Roghani-MamaqaniHHaddadi-AslVKhezriK, et al. Confinement effect of graphene nanoplatelets on atom transfer radical polymerization of styrene: grafting through hydroxyl groups. Iran Polym J2015; 24: 51–62.
75.
KangYAKim Mh NohH-JBaekJ-B, et al. Reinforcement of Polystyrene using Edge-Styrene Graphitic Nanoplatelets. J Mater Res Technol 2021; 10: 662–670.
76.
LiJHanMMuhammadY, et al. Comparative analysis, road performance and mechanism of modification of polystyrene graphene nanoplatelets (PS-GNPs) and octadecyl amine graphene nanoplatelets (ODA-GNPs) modified SBS incorporated asphalt binders. Construct Build Mater2018; 193: 501–517.
77.
FanBLiuYHeD, et al. Influences of thermal treatment on the dielectric performances of polystyrene composites reinforced by graphene nanoplatelets. Materials2017; 10: 838.
78.
ArdaEMergenÖBEvingürGA.Electrical, optical and mechanical properties of PS/GNP composite films. Phase Trans2018; 91: 887–900.
79.
HBMZMDMSII, et al. Effect of nanoparticles composition on tensile and thermal properties of polystyrene reinforced with graphene nanoplatelets. IJET2018; 7: 347–349.
80.
WeiYLiuYMuhammadY, et al. Study on the properties of GNPs/PS and GNPs/ODA composites incorporated SBS modified asphalt after short-term and long-term aging. Construct Build Mater2020; 261: 119682.
81.
HoffmannBDietrichCThomannR, et al. Morphology and rheology of polystyrene nanocomposites based upon organoclay. Macromol Rapid Commun2000; 21: 57–61.
82.
LiYPorwalHHuangZ, et al. Enhanced thermal and electrical properties of polystyrene-graphene nanofibers via electrospinning. J Nanomater2016; 2016: 1–8.
83.
RuanKGuoYTangY, et al. Improved thermal conductivities in polystyrene nanocomposites by incorporating thermal reduced graphene oxide via electrospinning-hot press technique. Compos Communicat2018; 10: 68–72.
84.
YuY-HLinY-YLinC-H, et al. High-performance polystyrene/graphene-based nanocomposites with excellent anti-corrosion properties. Polym Chem2014; 5: 535–550.
85.
AhmedLZhangBHawkinsS, et al. Study of thermal and mechanical behaviors of flame retardant polystyrene-based nanocomposites prepared via in-situ polymerization method. J Loss Prevent Proc Indus2017; 49: 228–239.
86.
AhmedLZhangBShenR, et al. Fire reaction properties of polystyrene-based nanocomposites using nanosilica and nanoclay as additives in cone calorimeter test. J Therm Anal Calorim2018; 132: 1853–1865.
87.
ChenYWangYZhangH-B, et al. Enhanced electromagnetic interference shielding efficiency of polystyrene/graphene composites with magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Carbon2015; 82: 67–76.
88.
SaghatforoushLHasanzadehMShadjouN.Polystyrene–graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode as a new class of polymeric nanosensors for electrochemical determination of histamine. Chinese Chem Lett2014; 25: 655–658.
89.
LiuWXiaoJWangC, et al. Synthesis of polystyrene-grafted-graphene hybrid and its application in electrochemical sensor of dopamine. Mater Lett2013; 100: 70–73.
90.
ChenJLiuYLiW, et al. Nanostructured polystyrene/polyaniline/graphene hybrid materials for electrochemical supercapacitor and Na-ion battery applications. J Mater Sci2015; 50: 5466–5474.
91.
Al-SalehMHJawadSA.Graphene nanoplatelet–polystyrene nanocomposite: dielectric and charge storage behaviors. Journal of Elec Materi2016; 45: 3532–3539.
92.
KhasimS.Polyaniline-graphene nanoplatelet composite films with improved conductivity for high performance X-band microwave shielding applications. Resul Phys2019; 12: 1073–1081.
93.
SethyDMakireddiSVargheseF, et al. Piezoresistive behaviour of graphene nanoplatelet (GNP)/PMMA spray coated sensors on a polymer matrix composite beam. Express Polym Lett2019; 13: 1018–1025.
94.
RanSChenCGuoZ, et al. Char barrier effect of graphene nanoplatelets on the flame retardancy and thermal stability of high‐density polyethylene flame‐retarded by brominated polystyrene. J Appl Polym Sci2014; 131: 40520.
95.
HanMLiJMuhammadY, et al. Effect of polystyrene grafted graphene nanoplatelets on the physical and chemical properties of asphalt binder. Construct Build Mater2018; 174: 108–119.
