Small-strain damping profiles developed from geotechnical laboratory testing have been observed to be smaller than the damping inferred from the observed site amplification from downhole array recordings. This study investigates the high-frequency spectral decay parameter (κ0) of earthquake motions from soil sites and evaluates the use of κ0 to constrain the small-strain damping profile for one-dimensional site response analysis. Using data from 51 sites from the Kiban-Kyoshin strong motion network (KiK-net) array in Japan and six sites from California, a relationship was developed between κ0 at the surface and both the 30-m time-averaged shear wave velocity (Vs30) and the depth to the 2.5 km/s shear wave velocity horizon (Z2.5). This relationship demonstrates that κ0 increases with decreasing Vs30 and increasing Z2.5. An approach is developed that uses this relationship to establish a target κ0 from which to constrain the small-strain damping profile used in one-dimensional site response analysis. This approach to develop κ0-consistent damping profiles for site response analysis is demonstrated through a recent site amplification study of Central and Eastern North America for the NGA-East project.
AnchetaTDDarraghRBStewartJP, et al. (2014) NGA-West2 database. Earthquake Spectra30: 989–1005.
2.
AndersonJGHoughSE (1984) A model for the shape of the Fourier amplitude spectrum of acceleration at high frequencies. Bulletin Seismological Society of America74: 1969–1993.
3.
AoiSKunugiTFujiwaraH (2004) Strong-motion seismograph network operated by NIED: K-NET and KiK-net. Journal of Japan Association for Earthquake Engineering4(3): 65–74.
4.
BooreDMThompsonEMCadetH (2011) Regional correlations of Vs30 and velocities averaged over depths less than and greater than 30 m. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America101: 3046–3059.
5.
BoraSSCottonFScherbaumF (2018) NGA-West2 empirical Fourier and duration models to generate adjustable response spectra. Earthquake Spectra35: 61–93.
6.
BoraSSScherbaumFKuehnN, et al. (2015) Development of a response spectral ground-motion prediction equation (GMPE) for seismic-hazard analysis from empirical Fourier spectral and duration models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America105(4): 2192–2218.
7.
CabasARodriguez-MarekABonillaLF (2017) Estimation of site-specific kappa (κ0)-consistent damping values at KiK-net sites to assess the discrepancy between laboratory-based damping models and observed attenuation (of seismic waves) in the field. Bulletin Seismological Society of America107(5): 2258–2271.
8.
CampbellKW (2009) Estimates of shear-wave Q and K0 for unconsolidated and semiconsolidated sediments in Eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America99: 2365–2932.
9.
CampbellKWHashashYMAKimB, et al. (2014) Reference rock site conditions for central and eastern North America: Part II—Attenuation (kappa) definition. PEER report 2014-12. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley.
10.
ChandlerAMLambNTKTsangHH (2006) Near-surface attenuation modelling based on rock shear-wave velocity profile. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering26: 1004–1014.
11.
DarendeliMB (2001) Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
12.
DawoodHMRodriguez-MarekABaylessJ, et al. (2016) A Flatfile for the Kik-net database processed using an automated protocol. Earthquake Spectra32: 1281–1302.
13.
DouglasJGehlPBonillaLF, et al. (2010) A κ model for mainland France. Pure and Applied Geophysics167: 1303–1315.
14.
DrouetSCottonFGueguenP (2010) Vs30, κ, regional attenuation and Mw from accelerograms: Application to magnitude 3–5 French earthquakes. Geophysical Journal International182: 880–898.
15.
EdwardsBKtenidouO-JCottonF, et al. (2015) Epistemic uncertainty and limitations of the κ0 model for near-surface attenuation at hard rock sites. Geophysical Journal International202: 1627–1645.
16.
EdwardsBFaehDGiardiniD (2011) Attenuation of seismic shear wave energy in Switzerland. Geophysical Journal International185: 967–984.
17.
ElgamalALaiTYangZ, et al. (2001) Dynamic soil properties, seismic downhole arrays and applications in practice. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics (ed PrakashS), San Diego, CA, 26–31March.
18.
FujiwaraHAoiSKunugiT, et al. (2004) Strong-motion observation networks of NIED: K-NET and KiK-net. Technical report, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention, Tsukuba, Japan.
19.
FuttermanWI (1962) Dispersive body waves. Journal of Geophysical Research67: 5279–5291.
20.
GoodmanLE (1988) Chapter 36: Material damping and slip damping. In: HarrisCM (ed.) Shock and Vibration Handbook. 3rd ed.New York: McGraw Hill. p. 36.1-36.30.
21.
HarmonJHashashYMStewartJP, et al. (2019a) Site amplification functions for central and eastern North America—Part I: Simulation dataset development. Earthquake Spectra35: 787–814.
22.
HarmonJHashashYMStewartJP, et al. (2019b) Site amplification functions for central and eastern North America—Part II: Simulation-based model development and evaluation. Earthquake Spectra35: 815–847.
23.
HashashYMAKottkeARStewartJP, et al. (2014) Reference rock site condition for central and eastern North America. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America104(2): 684–701.
24.
HoughSEAndersonJG (1988) High-frequency spectra observed at Anza, California: Implications of Q structure. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America78: 692–707.
25.
HoughSEAndersonJGBruneJ, et al. (1988) Attenuation near Anza, California. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America78: 672–691.
26.
IdrissI (2011) Use of Vs30 to represent local site conditions. In: Proceedings of the 4th IASPEI / IAEE international symposium effects of surface geology on strong ground motion, Santa Barbara, CA, 26 August.
27.
KnopoffL (1964). “Q.”Reviews of Geophysics2(4): 625–660.
28.
KtenidouO-JVan HoutteC (2012) Empirical estimation of kappa from rock velocity profiles at the Swiss NPP sites. Report TP2-TB-1090. Olten: PEGASOS Refinement Project.
29.
KtenidouO-JCottonFAbrahamsonNA, et al. (2014) Taxonomy of κ (kappa): A review of definitions and estimation methods targeted to applications. Seismological Research Letters85(1): 135–146.
30.
KtenidouO-JAbrahamsonNADrouetS, et al. (2015) Understanding the physics of kappa (k) insights from a downhole array. Geophysical Journal International203: 678–691.
31.
KtenidouO-JGélisCBonillaL-F (2013) A study on the variability of kappa (κ) in a borehole: Implications of the computation process. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America103: 1048–1068.
32.
ParolaiSBindiD (2004) Influence of soil-layer properties on κ evaluation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America94(1): 349–356.
33.
PoggiVEdwardsBFähD (2013) Reference S-wave velocity profile and attenuation models for ground-motion prediction equations: Application to Japan. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America103(5): 2645–2656.
34.
SeyhanEJPStewartTDAnchetaRB, et al. (2014) NGA-West 2 site database. Earthquake Spectra30: 1007–1024.
35.
SilvaWDarraghRGregorN, et al. (1998) Reassessment of site coefficients and near-fault factors for building code provisions. Technical report program element II: 98-HQGR-1010. El Cerrito, CA: Pacific Engineering and Analysis.
36.
StewartJPAfshariKHashashYMA (2014) Guidelines for performing hazard-consistent one-dimensional ground response analysis for ground motion prediction. PEER report 2014-16. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley.
37.
SykoraDWStokoeKH (1983) Correlations of in situ measurements in sands of shear wave velocity, soil characteristics, and site conditions. Geotechnical engineering report, GR83-33. Austin, TX: Geotechnical Engineering Center, The University of Texas at Austin.
38.
ThompsonEMBaiseLGTanakaY, et al. (2012) A taxonomy of site response complexity. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering41: 32–43.
39.
TsaiCCHashashYMA (2009) Learning of dynamic soil behavior from downhole arrays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering135(6): 745–757.
40.
Van HoutteCKtenidouO-JLarkinT, et al. (2014) Hard-site κ0 (kappa) calculations for Christchurch, New Zealand, and comparison with local ground motion prediction models. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America104: 1899–1913.
41.
Van HoutteCDrouetSCottonF (2011) Analysis of the origins of κ (kappa) to compute hard rock to rock adjustment factors for GMPEs. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America101: 2926–2941.
42.
YeeEStewartJPTokimatsuK (2013) Elastic and large-strain nonlinear seismic site response from analysis of vertical array recordings. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering139(10): 1789–1801.
43.
ZalachorisGRathjeEM (2015) Evaluation of one-dimensional site response techniques using borehole arrays. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering141(12): 04015053.
44.
ZandiehACampbellKWPezeshkS (2016) Estimation of K0 implied by the high-frequency shape of the NGA-West2 ground-motion prediction equations. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America106: 1342–1356.
