Based on a four-year ethnography (2019–2023) with 40 Turkish university students aged 18–23, this study traces sharing through social media as contributing to collective memory and belonging and, within terrains where mistrust runs deep, can be seen as a quiet form of resistance. While approaching memory not as a fixed archive but as something enacted—in fragments, silences—the study explores how digital and embodied acts fold together. Despite moments of withdrawal and the numbing rhythm of surveillance with its constant swell of information, social media emerges as both a tool and a symptom, showing how authoritarianism settles into pauses, jokes, and what remains nearly unsaid.
BourdieuP (1990) The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3.
BozdağÇKoçerS (2022) Skeptical inertia in the face of polarization: News consumption and misinformation in Turkey. Media and Communication10(2): 169–179.
HanB-C (2015) The transparency society (E. Butler, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
7.
HanB-C (2017) Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and new technologies of power. London: Verso.
8.
HanB-C (2022) Infocracy: Digitization and the crisis of democracy (D. Steuer, Trans.). Polity Press.
9.
McCoyJRahmanTSomerM (2018) Polarization and the global crisis of democracy: Common patterns, dynamics, and pernicious consequences. American Behavioral Scientist62(1): 16–42.
10.
PapacharissiZ (2019) Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
SomerM (2016) Understanding Turkey’s democratic breakdown: Old vs. new and indigenous vs. global authoritarianism. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies16(4): 481–503.
